- 10 8月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Because we don't mess with the offset into the extent for compressed we will properly find both extents for this case [extent a][extent b][rest of extent a] but because we already added a ref for the front half we won't add the inode information for the second half. This causes us to leak that memory and not print out the other offset when we do logical-resolve. So fix this by calling ulist_add_merge and then add our eie to the existing entry if there is one. With this patch we get both offsets out of logical-resolve. With this and the other 2 patches I've sent we now pass btrfs/276 on my vm with compress-force=lzo set. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If you do btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve on a compressed extent that has been partly overwritten it won't find anything. This is because we try and match the extent offset we've searched for based on the extent offset in the data extent entry. However this doesn't work for compressed extents because the offsets are for the uncompressed size, not the compressed size. So instead only do this check if we are not compressed, that way we can get an actual entry for the physical offset rather than nothing for compressed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I missed fixing the backref stuff when I introduced the skinny metadata. If you try and do things like snapshot aware defrag with skinny metadata you are going to see tons of warnings related to the backref count being less than 0. This is because the delayed refs will be found for stuff just fine, but it won't find the skinny metadata extent refs. With this patch I'm not seeing warnings anymore. Thanks, Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Looking into this backref problem I noticed we're using a macro to what turns out to essentially be a NULL check to see if we need to search the commit root. I'm killing this, let's just do what everybody else does and checks if trans == NULL. I've also made it so we pass in the path to __resolve_indirect_refs which will have the search_commit_root flag set properly already and that way we can avoid allocating another path when we have a perfectly good one to use. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
In the find_parent_nodes(), if read_tree_block() fails, we can not return directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise memory leak happens. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2013 8 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout. removed functions: btrfs_iref_to_path() __btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item() __btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item() __btrfs_search_delayed_deletion_item() find_eb_for_page() btrfs_find_block_group() range_straddles_pages() extent_range_uptodate() btrfs_file_extent_length() btrfs_scrub_cancel_devid() btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() btrfs_print_tree() is left because it is used for debugging. btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() and btrfs_reada_detach() are left for symmetry. ulist.c functions are left, another patch will take care of those. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We kept leaking extent buffers when mounting a broken file system and it turns out it's because not everybody uses read_tree_block properly. You need to check and make sure the extent_buffer is uptodate before you use it. This patch fixes everybody who calls read_tree_block directly to make sure they check that it is uptodate and free it and return an error if it is not. With this we no longer leak EB's when things go horribly wrong. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
If out of memory happens, we should return -ENOMEM directly to the caller rather than continue the work. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
__merge_refs() always return 0, it is unnecessary for the caller to check the return value. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
The only error return value of __add_prelim_ref() is -ENOMEM, just return errors rather than trigger BUG_ON(). Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
If btrfs_find_all_roots() fails, 'roots' has been freed or 'roots' fails to allocate. We don't need to free it outside btrfs_find_all_roots() again.Fix it. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
The reason that BUG_ON() happens in these places is just because of ENOMEM. We try ro return ENOMEM rather than trigger BUG_ON(), the caller will abort the transaction thus avoiding the kernel panic. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 27 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When a subvolume is removed, we remove the root item from the root tree, while the tree blocks and backrefs remain for a while. When backref walking comes across one of those orphan tree blocks, it can find a backref for a no longer existing root. This is all good, we only must tolerate __resolve_indirect_ref returning an error and continue with the good refs found. Reported-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
When __merge_refs merges two refs, it is also needed to merge the inode_list of both refs. Otherwise we have missed backrefs and memory leaks. This happens for example if two inodes share an extent and both lie in the same leaf and thus also have the same parent. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Just use WARN_ON rather than an if containing only WARN_ON(1). A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression e; @@ - if (e) WARN_ON(1); + WARN_ON(e); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 26 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
This adds support for the new extended inode refs to btrfs send. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Gabriel de Perthuis 提交于
To see the problem, create many hardlinks to the same file (120 should do it), then look up paths by inode with: ls -i btrfs inspect inode-resolve -v $ino /mnt/btrfs I noticed the memory layout of the fspath->val data had some irregularities (some unnecessary gaps that stop appearing about halfway), so I'm not sure there aren't any bugs left in it.
-
- 24 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
In btrfs_find_all_roots' termination condition, we compare the level of the old buffer we got from btrfs_search_old_slot to the level of the current root node. We'd better compare it to the level of the rewinded root node. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
The iterate_irefs in backref.c is used to build path components from inode refs. This patch adds code to iterate extended refs as well. I had modify the callback function signature to abstract out some of the differences between ref structures. iref_to_path() also needed similar changes. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
This patch adds basic support for extended inode refs. This includes support for link and unlink of the refs, which basically gets us support for rename as well. Inode creation does not need changing - extended refs are only added after the ref array is full. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
- 02 10月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This is the change of the kernel side. Translation of logical to inode used to have an upper limit 4k on inode container's size, but the limit is not large enough for a data with a great many of refs, so when resolving logical address, we can end up with "ioctl ret=0, bytes_left=0, bytes_missing=19944, cnt=510, missed=2493" This changes to regard 64k as the upper limit and use vmalloc instead of kmalloc to get memory more easily. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag. It is possible to lose our errors because (-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true. I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is. I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors. Acked-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
Btrfs send/receive uses the aux field to store inode numbers. On 32 bit machines this may become a problem. Also fix all users of ulist_add and ulist_add_merged. Reported-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
In iterate_inodes_from_logical() the error result from extent_from_logical() is patched by mistake. Typically ENOENT is patched to EINVAL because (-ENOENT & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) evaluates to true. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
- 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
Make iref_to_path non static (needed in send) and rename it to btrfs_iref_to_path Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
We've got two mechanisms both required for reliable backref resolving (tree mod log and holding back delayed refs). You cannot make use of one without the other. So instead of requiring the user of this mechanism to setup both correctly, we join them into a single interface. Additionally, we stop inserting non-blockers into fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list as we did before, which was of no value. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 27 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When delayed refs exist, btrfs_find_all_roots used to hold the delayed ref mutex way longer than actually required. We ought to drop it immediately after we're done collecting all the delayed refs. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
With the tree mod log, we can have a tree that's two levels high, but btrfs_search_old_slot may still return a path with the tree root at level one instead. __resolve_indirect_ref must care for this and accept parents in a lower level than expected. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 21 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
add_all_parents did assume that path is already at a correct extent data item, which may not be true in case of data extents that were partly rewritten and splitted. We need to check if we're on a matching extent for every item and only for the ones after the first. The loop is changed to do this now. This patch also fixes a bug introduced with commit 3b127fd8 "Btrfs: remove obsolete btrfs_next_leaf call from __resolve_indirect_ref". The removal of next_leaf did sometimes result in slot==nritems when the above described case happens, and thus resulting in invalid values (e.g. wanted_obejctid) in add_all_parents (leading to missed backrefs or even crashes). Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 15 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
To make sense of the tree mod log, the backref walker not only needs btrfs_search_old_slot, but it also called btrfs_next_leaf, which in turn was calling btrfs_search_slot. This obviously didn't give the correct result. This commit adds btrfs_next_old_leaf, a drop-in replacement for btrfs_next_leaf with a time_seq parameter. If it is zero, it behaves exactly like btrfs_next_leaf. If it is non-zero, it will use btrfs_search_old_slot with this time_seq parameter. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When resolving indirect refs, we used to call btrfs_next_leaf in case we didn't find an exact match. While we should find exact matches most of the time, in case we don't, we must continue searching. Treating those matches differently depending on the level we're searching doesn't make sense. Even worse, we might end up searching for a key larger than the largest, in which case there is no next_leaf and subsequent jobs would fail. This commit drops the bogous lines. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 01 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
We must build up the inode list with the extent lock held after following indirect refs. This also requires an extension to ulists, which allows to modify the stored aux value in case a key already exists in the list. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
This enables backref resolving on life trees while they are changing. This is a prerequisite for quota groups and just nice to have for everything else. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 26 5月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Before this patch we called find_all_leafs for a data extent, then called find_all_roots and then looked into the extent to grab the information we were seeking. This was done without holding the leaves locked to avoid deadlocks. However, this can obviouly race with concurrent tree modifications. Instead, we now look into the extent while we're holding the lock during find_all_leafs and store this information together with the leaf list. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The key we store with a tree block backref is only a hint. It is set when the ref is created and can remain correct for a long time. As the tree is rebalanced, however, eventually the key no longer points to the correct destination. With this patch, we change find_parent_nodes to no longer add keys unless it knows for sure they're correct (e.g. because they're for an extent data backref). Then when we later encounter a backref ref with no parent and no key set, we grab the block and take the first key from the block itself. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
That one has been around since the addition of backref.c. Due to the way we calculate our slot numbers, after adding inline refs we're missing one keyed ref unless it's located at the beginning of a new leaf. Reported-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
ulist_next gets the pointer to the previously returned element to find the next element from there. However, when we call ulist_add while iteration with ulist_next is in progress (ulist explicitly supports this), we can realloc the ulist internal memory, which makes the pointer to the previous element useless. Instead, we now use an iterator parameter that's independent from the internal pointers. Reported-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 19 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
iref_to_path and iterate_irefs both increment the eb's refcount to use it after releasing the path. Both depend on consistent data remaining in the extent buffer and need a read lock to protect it. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-