This is only used locally in scrub.c, move it out of ctree.h into
scrub.c.
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If we're doing device replace on a zoned filesystem and discover in
scrub_enumerate_chunks() that we don't have to copy the block group it is
unlocked before it gets skipped.

But as the block group hasn't yet been locked before it leads to a locking
imbalance. To fix this simply remove the unlock.

This was uncovered by fstests' testcase btrfs/163.

Fixes: 9283b9e0 ("btrfs: remove lock protection for BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_TO_COPY")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This reverts commit 786672e9.

[BUG]
Since commit 786672e9 ("btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data
extent scrub"), btrfs scrub no longer reports errors if the corruption
is not in the first sector of a STRIPE_LEN.

The following script can expose the problem:

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
  mount $dev $mnt
  xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xff 0 8k" $mnt/foobar
  umount $mnt

  # 13631488 is the logical bytenr of above 8K extent
  btrfs-map-logical -l 13631488 -b 4096 $dev
  mirror 1 logical 13631488 physical 13631488 device /dev/test/scratch1

  # Corrupt the 2nd sector of that extent
  xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x00 13635584 4k" $dev

  mount $dev $mnt
  btrfs scrub start -B $mnt
  scrub done for 54e63f9f-0c30-4c84-a33b-5c56014629b7
  Scrub started:    Mon Nov  7 07:18:27 2022
  Status:           finished
  Duration:         0:00:00
  Total to scrub:   536.00MiB
  Rate:             0.00B/s
  Error summary:    no errors found <<<

[CAUSE]
That offending commit enlarges the data extent scrub size from sector
size to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, to avoid extra scrub_block to be allocated.

But unfortunately the data extent scrub is still heavily relying on the
fact that there is only one scrub_sector per scrub_block.

Thus it will only check the first sector, and ignoring the remaining
sectors.

Furthermore the error reporting is not able to handle multiple sectors
either.

[FIX]
For now just revert the offending commit.

The consequence is just extra memory usage during scrub.
We will need a proper change to make the remaining data scrub path to
handle multiple sectors before we enlarging the data scrub size.
Reported-by: NLi Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If we have NOWAIT specified on our IOCB and we're writing into a
PREALLOC or NOCOW extent then we need to be able to tell
can_nocow_extent that we don't want to wait on any locks or metadata IO.
Fix can_nocow_extent to allow for NOWAIT.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NStefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The parity raid write/recover functionality is currently not very well
abstracted from the bio submission and completion handling in volumes.c:

 - the raid56 code directly completes the original btrfs_bio fed into
   btrfs_submit_bio instead of dispatching back to volumes.c
 - the raid56 code consumes the bioc and bio_counter references taken
   by volumes.c, which also leads to special casing of the calls from
   the scrub code into the raid56 code

To fix this up supply a bi_end_io handler that calls back into the
volumes.c machinery, which then puts the bioc, decrements the bio_counter
and completes the original bio, and updates the scrub code to also
take ownership of the bioc and bio_counter in all cases.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[PROBLEM]
The existing scrub code for data extents always limit the block size to
sectorsize.

This causes quite some extra scrub_block being allocated:
(there is a data extent at logical bytenr 298844160, length 64KiB)

  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 mirror=1
  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 mirror=1
  ...
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 len=4096 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 len=4096 mirror=1

This behavior will waste a lot of memory, especially after we have moved
quite some members from scrub_sector to scrub_block.

[FIX]
To reduce the allocation of scrub_block, and to reduce memory usage, use
BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN instead of sectorsize as the block size to scrub data
extents.

This results only one scrub_block to be allocated for above data extent:

  alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1
  scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=65536 mirror=1

This would greatly reduce the memory usage (even it's just transient)
for larger data extents scrub.

For above example, the memory usage would be:

Old: num_sectors * (sizeof(scrub_block) + sizeof(scrub_sector))
     16          * (408                 + 96) = 8065

New: sizeof(scrub_block) + num_sectors * sizeof(scrub_sector)
     408                 + 16          * 96 = 1944

A good reduction of 75.9%.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently we store the following members in scrub_sector:

- logical
- physical
- physical_for_dev_replace
- dev
- mirror_num

However the current scrub code has ensured that scrub_blocks never cross
stripe boundary.
This is caused by the entry functions (scrub_simple_mirror,
scrub_simple_stripe), thus every scrub_block will not cross stripe
boundary.

Thus this makes it possible to move those members into scrub_block other
than putting them into scrub_sector.

This should save quite some memory, as a scrub_block can be as large as 64
sectors, even for metadata it's 16 sectors byte default.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Although scrub currently works for subpage (PAGE_SIZE > sectorsize) cases,
it will allocate one page for each scrub_sector, which can cause extra
unnecessary memory usage.

Utilize scrub_block::pages[] instead of allocating page for each
scrub_sector, this allows us to integrate larger extents while using
less memory.

For example, if our page size is 64K, sectorsize is 4K, and we got an
32K sized extent.
We will only allocate one page for scrub_block, and all 8 scrub sectors
will point to that page.

To do that properly, here we introduce several small helpers:

- scrub_page_get_logical()
  Get the logical bytenr of a page.
  We store the logical bytenr of the page range into page::private.
  But for 32bit systems, their (void *) is not large enough to contain
  a u64, so in that case we will need to allocate extra memory for it.

  For 64bit systems, we can use page::private directly.

- scrub_block_get_logical()
  Just get the logical bytenr of the first page.

- scrub_sector_get_page()
  Return the page which the scrub_sector points to.

- scrub_sector_get_page_offset()
  Return the offset inside the page which the scrub_sector points to.

- scrub_sector_get_kaddr()
  Return the address which the scrub_sector points to.
  Just a wrapper using scrub_sector_get_page() and
  scrub_sector_get_page_offset()

- bio_add_scrub_sector()

Please note that, even with this patch, we're still allocating one page
for one sector for data extents.

This is because in scrub_extent() we split the data extent using
sectorsize.

The memory usage reduction will need extra work to make scrub to work
like data read to only use the correct sector(s).
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[BACKGROUND]
Currently for scrub, we allocate one page for one sector, this is fine
for PAGE_SIZE == sectorsize support, but can waste extra memory for
subpage support.

[CODE CHANGE]
Make scrub_block contain all the pages, so if we're scrubbing an extent
sized 64K, and our page size is also 64K, we only need to allocate one
page.

[LIFESPAN CHANGE]
Since now scrub_sector no longer holds a page, but is using
scrub_block::pages[] instead, we have to ensure scrub_block has a longer
lifespan for write bio. The lifespan for read bio is already large
enough.

Now scrub_block will only be released after the write bio finished.

[COMING NEXT]
Currently we only added scrub_block::pages[] for this purpose, but
scrub_sector is still utilizing the old scrub_sector::page.

The switch will happen in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The allocation and initialization is shared by 3 call sites, and we're
going to change the initialization of some members in the upcoming
patches.

So factor out the allocation and initialization of scrub_sector into a
helper, alloc_scrub_sector(), which will do the following work:

- Allocate the memory for scrub_sector

- Allocate a page for scrub_sector::page

- Initialize scrub_sector::refs to 1

- Attach the allocated scrub_sector to scrub_block
  The attachment is bidirectional, which means scrub_block::sectorv[]
  will be updated and scrub_sector::sblock will also be updated.

- Update scrub_block::sector_count and do extra sanity check on it
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Although there are only two callers, we are going to add some members
for scrub_block in the incoming patches.  Factoring out the
initialization code will make later expansion easier.

One thing to note is, even scrub_handle_errored_block() doesn't utilize
scrub_block::refs, we still use alloc_scrub_block() to initialize
sblock::ref, allowing us to use scrub_block_put() to do cleanup.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

In function scrub_handle_errored_block(), we use @sblocks_for_recheck
pointer to hold one scrub_block for each mirror, and uses kcalloc() to
allocate an array.

But this one pointer for an array is not readable due to the member
offsets done by addition and not [].

Change this pointer to struct scrub_block *[BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS], this
will slightly increase the stack memory usage.

Since function scrub_handle_errored_block() won't get iterative calls,
this extra cost would completely be acceptable.

And since we're here, also set sblock->refs and use scrub_block_put() to
clean them up, as later we will add extra members in scrub_block, which
needs scrub_block_put() to clean them up.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There are several sanity checks which are no longer possible to trigger
inside btrfs_scrub_dev().

Since we have mount time check against super block nodesize/sectorsize,
and our fixed macro is hardcoded to handle even the worst combination.

Thus those sanity checks are no longer needed, can be easily removed.

But this patch still uses some ASSERT()s as a safe net just in case we
change some features in the future to trigger those impossible
combinations.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We use this during device replace for zoned devices, we were simply
taking the lock because it was in a bit field and we needed the lock to
be safe with other modifications in the bitfield.  With the bit helpers
we no longer require that locking.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We use a bit field in the btrfs_block_group for different flags, however
this is awkward because we have to hold the block_group->lock for any
modification of any of these fields, and makes the code clunky for a few
of these flags.  Convert these to a properly flags setup so we can
utilize the bit helpers.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[BUG]
The following script shows that, although scrub can detect super block
errors, it never tries to fix it:

	mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 -m raid1 $dev1 $dev2
	xfs_io -c "pwrite 67108864 4k" $dev2

	mount $dev1 $mnt
	btrfs scrub start -B $dev2
	btrfs scrub start -Br $dev2
	umount $mnt

The first scrub reports the super error correctly:

  scrub done for f3289218-abd3-41ac-a630-202f766c0859
  Scrub started:    Tue Aug  2 14:44:11 2022
  Status:           finished
  Duration:         0:00:00
  Total to scrub:   1.26GiB
  Rate:             0.00B/s
  Error summary:    super=1
    Corrected:      0
    Uncorrectable:  0
    Unverified:     0

But the second read-only scrub still reports the same super error:

  Scrub started:    Tue Aug  2 14:44:11 2022
  Status:           finished
  Duration:         0:00:00
  Total to scrub:   1.26GiB
  Rate:             0.00B/s
  Error summary:    super=1
    Corrected:      0
    Uncorrectable:  0
    Unverified:     0

[CAUSE]
The comments already shows that super block can be easily fixed by
committing a transaction:

	/*
	 * If we find an error in a super block, we just report it.
	 * They will get written with the next transaction commit
	 * anyway
	 */

But the truth is, such assumption is not always true, and since scrub
should try to repair every error it found (except for read-only scrub),
we should really actively commit a transaction to fix this.

[FIX]
Just commit a transaction if we found any super block errors, after
everything else is done.

We cannot do this just after scrub_supers(), as
btrfs_commit_transaction() will try to pause and wait for the running
scrub, thus we can not call it with scrub_lock hold.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[PROBLEM]

Unlike data/metadata corruption, if scrub detected some error in the
super block, the only error message is from the updated device status:

  BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: started on devid 2
  BTRFS error (device dm-1): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch2 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 1, gen 0
  BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: finished on devid 2 with status: 0

This is not helpful at all.

[CAUSE]
Unlike data/metadata error reporting, there is no visible report in
kernel dmesg to report supper block errors.

In fact, return value of scrub_checksum_super() is intentionally
skipped, thus scrub_handle_errored_block() will never be called for
super blocks.

[FIX]
Make super block errors to output an error message, now the full
dmesg would looks like this:

  BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: started on devid 2
  BTRFS warning (device dm-1): super block error on device /dev/mapper/test-scratch2, physical 67108864
  BTRFS error (device dm-1): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch2 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 1, gen 0
  BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: finished on devid 2 with status: 0
  BTRFS info (device dm-1): scrub: started on devid 2

This fix involves:

- Move the super_errors reporting to scrub_handle_errored_block()
  This allows the device status message to show after the super block
  error message.
  But now we no longer distinguish super block corruption and generation
  mismatch, now all counted as corruption.

- Properly check the return value from scrub_checksum_super()
- Add extra super block error reporting for scrub_print_warning().
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Always consume the bio and call the end_io handler on error instead of
returning an error and letting the caller handle it.  This matches what
the block layer submission does and avoids any confusion on who
needs to handle errors.

Also use the proper bool type for the generic_io argument.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The raid56 code assumes a fixed stripe length BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN but there
are functions passing it as arguments, this is not necessary. The fixed
value has been used for a long time and though the stripe length should
be configurable by super block member stripesize, this hasn't been
implemented and would require more changes so we don't need to keep this
code around until then.

Partially based on a patch from Qu Wenruo.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
[ update changelog ]
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

For scrub_stripe() we can easily calculate the dev extent length as we
have the full info of the chunk.

Thus there is no need to pass @dev_extent_len from the caller, and we
introduce a helper, btrfs_calc_stripe_length(), to do the calculation
from extent_map structure.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Previously we use "unsigned long *" for those two bitmaps.

But since we only support fixed stripe length (64KiB, already checked in
tree-checker), "unsigned long *" is really a waste of memory, while we
can just use "unsigned long".

This saves us 8 bytes in total for scrub_parity.

To be extra safe, add an ASSERT() making sure calclulated @nsectors is
always smaller than BITS_PER_LONG.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[SUSPICIOUS CODE]
When refactoring scrub code, I noticed a very strange behavior around
scrub_remap_extent():

	if (sctx->is_dev_replace)
		scrub_remap_extent(fs_info, cur_logical, scrub_len,
				   &cur_physical, &target_dev, &cur_mirror);

As replace target is a 1:1 copy of the source device, thus physical
offset inside the target should be the same as physical inside source,
thus this remap call makes no sense to me.

[REAL FUNCTIONALITY]
After more investigation, the function name scrub_remap_extent()
doesn't tell anything of the truth, nor does its if () condition.

The real story behind this function is that, for scrub_pages() we never
expect missing device, even for replacing missing device.

What scrub_remap_extent() is really doing is to find a live mirror, and
make later scrub_pages() to read data from the good copy, other than
from the missing device and increase error counters unnecessarily.

[IMPROVEMENT]
We have no need to bother scrub_remap_extent() in scrub_simple_mirror()
at all, we only need to call it before we call scrub_pages().

And rename the function to scrub_find_live_copy(), add extra comments on
them.

By this we can remove one parameter from scrub_extent(), and reduce the
unnecessary calls to scrub_remap_extent() for regular replace.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Since we have find_first_extent_item() to iterate the extent items of a
certain range, there is no need to use the open-coded version.

Replace the final scrub call site with find_first_extent_item().
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently scrub_raid56_parity() has a large double loop, handling the
following things at the same time:

- Iterate each data stripe
- Iterate each extent item in one data stripe

Refactor this by:

- Introduce a new helper to handle data stripe iteration
  The new helper is scrub_raid56_data_stripe_for_parity(), which
  only has one while() loop handling the extent items inside the
  data stripe.

  The code is still mostly the same as the old code.

- Call cond_resched() for each extent
  Previously we only call cond_resched() under a complex if () check.
  I see no special reason to do that, and for other scrub functions,
  like scrub_simple_mirror() we're already doing the same cond_resched()
  after scrubbing one extent.

- Add more comments

Please note that, this patch is only to address the double loop, there
are incoming patches to do extra cleanup.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Although RAID56 has complex repair mechanism, which involves reading the
whole full stripe, but inside one data stripe, it's in fact no different
than SINGLE/RAID1.

The point here is, for data stripe we just check the csum for each
extent we hit.  Only for csum mismatch case, our repair paths divide.

So we can still reuse scrub_simple_mirror() for RAID56 data stripes,
which saves quite some code.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Since we have moved all other profiles handling into their own
functions, now the main body of scrub_stripe() is just handling RAID56
profiles.

There is no need to address other profiles in the main loop of
scrub_stripe(), so we can remove those dead branches.

Since we're here, also slightly change the timing of initialization of
variables like @offset, @increment and @logical.

Especially for @logical, we don't really need to initialize it for
btrfs_extent_root()/btrfs_csum_root(), we can use bg->start for that
purpose.

Now those variables are only initialize for RAID56 branches.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The new entrance will iterate through each data stripe which belongs to
the target device.

And since inside each data stripe, RAID0 is just SINGLE, while RAID10 is
just RAID1, we can reuse scrub_simple_mirror() to do the scrub properly.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The new helper, scrub_simple_mirror(), will scrub all extents inside a
range which only has simple mirror based duplication.

This covers every range of SINGLE/DUP/RAID1/RAID1C*, and inside each
data stripe for RAID0/RAID10.

Currently we will use this function to scrub SINGLE/DUP/RAID1/RAID1C*
profiles.  As one can see, the new entrance for those simple-mirror
based profiles can be small enough (with comments, just reach 100
lines).

This function will be the basis for the incoming scrub refactor.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The new helper, find_first_extent_item(), will locate an extent item
(either EXTENT_ITEM or METADATA_ITEM) which covers any byte of the
search range.

This helper will later be used to refactor scrub code.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The variable @physical_end is the exclusive stripe end, currently it's
calculated using @physical + @dev_extent_len / map->stripe_len *
 map->stripe_len.

And since at allocation time we ensured dev_extent_len is stripe_len
aligned, the result is the same as @physical + @dev_extent_len.

So this patch will just assign @physical and @physical_end early,
without using @nstripes.

This is especially helpful for any possible out: label user, as now we
only need to initialize @offset before going to out: label.

Since we're here, also make @physical_end constant.
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

All three scrub workqueues don't need ordered execution or thread
disabling threshold (as the thresh parameter is less than DFT_THRESHOLD).
Just switch to the normal workqueues that use a lot less resources,
especially in the work_struct vs btrfs_work structures.
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This requires one extra parameter @pgoff for the function.

In the current code base, scrub is still one page per sector, thus the
new parameter will always be 0.

It needs the extra subpage scrub optimization code to fully take
advantage.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

All the scrub bios go straight to the block device or the raid56 code,
none of which looks at the btrfs_bio.
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The I/O in repair_io_failue is synchronous and doesn't need a btrfs_bio,
so just use an on-stack bio.
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The I/O in repair_io_failue is synchronous and doesn't need a btrfs_bio,
so just use an on-stack bio.
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Require a separate call to the integrity checking helpers from the
actual bio submission.
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Explicit type casts are not necessary when it's void* to another pointer
type.
Signed-off-by: NYu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Since the subpage support for scrub, one page no longer always represents
one sector, thus scrub_bio::pagev and scrub_bio::sector_count are no
longer accurate.

Rename them to scrub_bio::sectors and scrub_bio::sector_count respectively.
This also involves scrub_ctx::pages_per_bio and other macros involved.

Now the renaming of pages involved in scrub is be finished.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Since the subpage support of scrub, scrub_sector is in fact just
representing one sector.

Thus the name scrub_page is no longer correct, rename it to
scrub_sector.

This also involves the following renames:

- spage -> sector
  Normally we would just replace "page" with "sector" and result
  something like "ssector".
  But the repeating 's' is not really eye friendly.

  So here we just simple use "sector", as there is nothing from MM layer
  called "sector" to cause any confusion.

- scrub_parity::spages -> sectors_list
  Normally we use plural to indicate an array, not a list.
  Rename it to @sectors_list to be more explicit on the list part.

- Also reformat and update comments that get changed
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The following will be renamed in this patch:

- scrub_block::pagev -> sectors

- scrub_block::page_count -> sector_count

- SCRUB_MAX_PAGES_PER_BLOCK -> SCRUB_MAX_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK

- page_num -> sector_num to iterate scrub_block::sectors

For now scrub_page is not yet renamed to keep the patch reasonable and
it will be updated in a followup.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>