- 17 12月, 2018 22 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Btrfs has not allowed swap files since commit 35054394 ("Btrfs: stop providing a bmap operation to avoid swapfile corruptions"). However, now that the proper restrictions are in place, Btrfs can support swap files through the swap file a_ops, similar to iomap in commit 67482129 ("iomap: add a swapfile activation function"). For Btrfs, activation needs to make sure that the file can be used as a swap file, which currently means that it must be fully allocated as NOCOW with no compression on one device. It must also do the proper tracking so that ioctls will not interfere with the swap file. Deactivation clears this tracking. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
The Btrfs swap code is going to need it, so give it a btrfs_ prefix and make it non-static. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
A later patch will implement swap file support for Btrfs, but before we do that, we need to make sure that the various Btrfs ioctls cannot change a swap file. When a swap file is active, we must make sure that the extents of the file are not moved and that they don't become shared. That means that the following are not safe: - chattr +c (enable compression) - reflink - dedupe - snapshot - defrag Don't allow those to happen on an active swap file. Additionally, balance, resize, device remove, and device replace are also unsafe if they affect an active swapfile. Add a red-black tree of block groups and devices which contain an active swapfile. Relocation checks each block group against this tree and skips it or errors out for balance or resize, respectively. Device remove and device replace check the tree for the device they will operate on. Note that we don't have to worry about chattr -C (disable nocow), which we ignore for non-empty files, because an active swapfile must be non-empty and can't be truncated. We also don't have to worry about autodefrag because it's only done on COW files. Truncate and fallocate are already taken care of by the generic code. Device add doesn't do relocation so it's not an issue, either. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This is the counterpart to merge_extent_hook, similarly, it's used only for data/freespace inodes so let's remove it, rename it and call it directly where necessary. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This callback is used only for data and free space inodes. Such inodes are guaranteed to have their extent_io_tree::private_data set to the inode struct. Exploit this fact to directly call the function. Also give it a more descriptive name. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This is the counterpart to ex-set_bit_hook (now btrfs_set_delalloc_extent), similar to what was done before remove clear_bit_hook and rename the function. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This callback is used to properly account delalloc extents for data inodes (ordinary file inodes and freespace v1 inodes). Those can be easily identified since they have their extent_io trees ->private_data member point to the inode. Let's exploit this fact to remove the needless indirection through extent_io_hooks and directly call the function. Also give the function a name which reflects its purpose - btrfs_set_delalloc_extent. This patch also modified test_find_delalloc so that the extent_io_tree used for testing doesn't have its ->private_data set which would have caused a crash in btrfs_set_delalloc_extent due to the btrfs_inode->root member not being initialised. The old version of the code also didn't call set_bit_hook since the extent_io ops weren't set for the inode. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This callback was only used in debug builds by btrfs_leak_debug_check. A better approach is to move its implementation in btrfs_leak_debug_check and ensure the latter is only executed for extent tree which have ->private_data set i.e. relate to a data node and not the btree one. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This callback is ony ever called for data page writeout so there is no need to actually abstract it via extent_io_ops. Lets just export it, remove the definition of the callback and call it directly in the functions that invoke the callback. Also rename the function to btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered since what it really does is account finished io in the ordered extent data structures. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This hook is called only from __extent_writepage_io which is already called only from the data page writeout path. So there is no need to make an indirect call via extent_io_ops. This patch just removes the callback definition, exports the callback function and calls it directly at the only call site. Also give the function a more descriptive name. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This callback is called only from writepage_delalloc which in turn is guaranteed to be called from the data page writeout path. In the end there is no reason to have the call to this function to be indrected via the extent_io_ops structure. This patch removes the callback definition, exports the function and calls it directly. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ rename to btrfs_run_delalloc_range ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This will be used in future patches that remove the optional extent_io_ops callbacks. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Add extra dev extent end check against device boundary. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Enhance btrfs_verify_dev_extents() to remember previous checked dev extents, so it can verify no dev extents can overlap. Analysis from Hans: "Imagine allocating a DATA|DUP chunk. In the chunk allocator, we first set... max_stripe_size = SZ_1G; max_chunk_size = BTRFS_MAX_DATA_CHUNK_SIZE ... which is 10GiB. Then... /* we don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writeable space */ max_chunk_size = min(div_factor(fs_devices->total_rw_bytes, 1), max_chunk_size); Imagine we only have one 7880MiB block device in this filesystem. Now max_chunk_size is down to 788MiB. The next step in the code is to search for max_stripe_size * dev_stripes amount of free space on the device, which is in our example 1GiB * 2 = 2GiB. Imagine the device has exactly 1578MiB free in one contiguous piece. This amount of bytes will be put in devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail Next we recalculate the stripe_size (which is actually the device extent length), based on the actual maximum amount of available raw disk space: stripe_size = div_u64(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, dev_stripes); stripe_size is now 789MiB Next we do... data_stripes = num_stripes / ncopies ...where data_stripes ends up as 1, because num_stripes is 2 (the amount of device extents we're going to have), and DUP has ncopies 2. Next there's a check... if (stripe_size * data_stripes > max_chunk_size) ...which matches because 789MiB * 1 > 788MiB. We go into the if code, and next is... stripe_size = div_u64(max_chunk_size, data_stripes); ...which resets stripe_size to max_chunk_size: 788MiB Next is a fun one... /* bump the answer up to a 16MB boundary */ stripe_size = round_up(stripe_size, SZ_16M); ...which changes stripe_size from 788MiB to 800MiB. We're not done changing stripe_size yet... /* But don't go higher than the limits we found while searching * for free extents */ stripe_size = min(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, stripe_size); This is bad. max_avail is twice the stripe_size (we need to fit 2 device extents on the same device for DUP). The result here is that 800MiB < 1578MiB, so it's unchanged. However, the resulting DUP chunk will need 1600MiB disk space, which isn't there, and the second dev_extent might extend into the next thing (next dev_extent? end of device?) for 22MiB. The last shown line of code relies on a situation where there's twice the value of stripe_size present as value for the variable stripe_size when it's DUP. This was actually the case before commit 92e222df "btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling", from which I quote: "[...] in the meantime there's a check to see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size." In the previous version of the code, the 16MiB alignment (why is this done, by the way?) would result in a 50% chance that it would actually do an 8MiB alignment for the individual dev_extents, since it was operating on double the size. Does this matter? Does it matter that stripe_size can be set to anything which is not 16MiB aligned because of the amount of remaining available disk space which is just taken? What is the main purpose of this round_up? The most straightforward thing to do seems something like... stripe_size = min( div_u64(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, dev_stripes), stripe_size ) ..just putting half of the max_avail into stripe_size." Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/b3461a38-e5f8-f41d-c67c-2efac8129054@mendix.com/Reported-by: NHans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> [ add analysis from report ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
We have a complex loop design for find_free_extent(), that has different behavior for each loop, some even includes new chunk allocation. Instead of putting such a long code into find_free_extent() and makes it harder to read, just extract them into find_free_extent_update_loop(). With all the cleanups, the main find_free_extent() should be pretty barebone: find_free_extent() |- Iterate through all block groups | |- Get a valid block group | |- Try to do clustered allocation in that block group | |- Try to do unclustered allocation in that block group | |- Check if the result is valid | | |- If valid, then exit | |- Jump to next block group | |- Push harder to find free extents |- If not found, re-iterate all block groups Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> [ copy callchain from changelog to function comment ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This patch will extract unclsutered extent allocation code into find_free_extent_unclustered(). And this helper function will use return value to indicate what to do next. This should make find_free_extent() a little easier to read. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> [Update merge conflict with fb5c39d7 ("btrfs: don't use ctl->free_space for max_extent_size")] Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
We have two main methods to find free extents inside a block group: 1) clustered allocation 2) unclustered allocation This patch will extract the clustered allocation into find_free_extent_clustered() to make it a little easier to read. Instead of jumping between different labels in find_free_extent(), the helper function will use return value to indicate different behavior. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Instead of tons of different local variables in find_free_extent(), extract them into find_free_extent_ctl structure, and add better explanation for them. Some modification may looks redundant, but will later greatly simplify function parameter list during find_free_extent() refactor. Also add two comments to co-operate with fb5c39d7 ("btrfs: don't use ctl->free_space for max_extent_size"), to make ffe_ctl->max_extent_size update more reader-friendly. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
Introduce a new wrapper update_bytes_pinned to replace open coded bytes_pinned modifiers. Now the underflows of space_info::bytes_pinned get detected and reported. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Although we have space_info::bytes_may_use underflow detection in btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota(), we have more callers who are subtracting number from space_info::bytes_may_use. So instead of doing underflow detection for every caller, introduce a new wrapper update_bytes_may_use() to replace open coded bytes_may_use modifiers. This also introduce a macro to declare more wrappers, but currently space_info::bytes_may_use is the mostly interesting one. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Tracking pending ordered extents per transaction was introduced in commit 50d9aa99 ("Btrfs: make sure logged extents complete in the current transaction V3") and later updated in commit 161c3549 ("Btrfs: change how we wait for pending ordered extents"). However now that on fsync we always wait for ordered extents to complete before logging, done in commit 5636cf7d ("btrfs: remove the logged extents infrastructure"), we no longer need the stuff to track for pending ordered extents, which was not completely removed in the mentioned commit. So remove the remaining of the pending ordered extents infrastructure. Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
The logged_start and logged_end variables, at btrfs_log_changed_extents, were added in commit 8c6c5928 ("btrfs: log csums for all modified extents"). However since the recent simplification for fsync, which makes us wait for all ordered extents to complete before logging extents, we no longer need those variables. Commit a2120a47 ("btrfs: clean up the left over logged_list usage") forgot to remove them. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
[BUG] A completely valid btrfs will refuse to mount, with error message like: BTRFS critical (device sdb2): corrupt leaf: root=2 block=239681536 slot=172 \ bg_start=12018974720 bg_len=10888413184, invalid block group size, \ have 10888413184 expect (0, 10737418240] This has been reported several times as the 4.19 kernel is now being used. The filesystem refuses to mount, but is otherwise ok and booting 4.18 is a workaround. Btrfs check returns no error, and all kernels used on this fs is later than 2011, which should all have the 10G size limit commit. [CAUSE] For a 12 devices btrfs, we could allocate a chunk larger than 10G due to stripe stripe bump up. __btrfs_alloc_chunk() |- max_stripe_size = 1G |- max_chunk_size = 10G |- data_stripe = 11 |- if (1G * 11 > 10G) { stripe_size = 976128930; stripe_size = round_up(976128930, SZ_16M) = 989855744 However the final stripe_size (989855744) * 11 = 10888413184, which is still larger than 10G. [FIX] For the comprehensive check, we need to do the full check at chunk read time, and rely on bg <-> chunk mapping to do the check. We could just skip the length check for now. Fixes: fce466ea ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+ Reported-by: NWang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Pan Bian 提交于
The function relocate_block_group calls btrfs_end_transaction to release trans when update_backref_cache returns 1, and then continues the loop body. If btrfs_block_rsv_refill fails this time, it will jump out the loop and the freed trans will be accessed. This may result in a use-after-free bug. The patch assigns NULL to trans after trans is released so that it will not be accessed. Fixes: 0647bf56 ("Btrfs: improve forever loop when doing balance relocation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We have a race between enabling quotas end subvolume creation that cause subvolume creation to fail with -EINVAL, and the following diagram shows how it happens: CPU 0 CPU 1 btrfs_ioctl() btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl() btrfs_quota_enable() mutex_lock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock) btrfs_ioctl() create_subvol() btrfs_qgroup_inherit() -> save fs_info->quota_root into quota_root -> stores a NULL value -> tries to lock the mutex qgroup_ioctl_lock -> blocks waiting for the task at CPU0 -> sets BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED in fs_info -> sets quota_root in fs_info->quota_root (non-NULL value) mutex_unlock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock) -> checks quota enabled flag is set -> returns -EINVAL because fs_info->quota_root was NULL before it acquired the mutex qgroup_ioctl_lock -> ioctl returns -EINVAL Returning -EINVAL to user space will be confusing if all the arguments passed to the subvolume creation ioctl were valid. Fix it by grabbing the value from fs_info->quota_root after acquiring the mutex. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robbie Ko 提交于
When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move (rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at apply_children_dir_moves(). An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes. Parent snapshot: . |--- 261/ |--- 271/ |--- 266/ |--- 259/ |--- 260/ | |--- 267 | |--- 264/ | |--- 258/ | |--- 257/ | |--- 265/ |--- 268/ |--- 269/ | |--- 262/ | |--- 270/ |--- 272/ | |--- 263/ | |--- 275/ | |--- 274/ |--- 273/ Send snapshot: . |-- 275/ |-- 274/ |-- 273/ |-- 262/ |-- 269/ |-- 258/ |-- 271/ |-- 268/ |-- 267/ |-- 270/ |-- 259/ | |-- 265/ | |-- 272/ |-- 257/ |-- 260/ |-- 264/ |-- 263/ |-- 261/ |-- 266/ When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved. When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in the following iterations: 1) We issue the move operation for inode 274; 2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the move operation for inode 262; 3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot); 4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262); 5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272); 6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272); 7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269); 8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257); 9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258); 10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264); 11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271); 12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is moved; 13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263); 14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12); 15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268); 16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14; 17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode 266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16. The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack (the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in an infinite loop. So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will not return anything for the current parent inode. A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon. Signed-off-by: NRobbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation] Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We were using the path name received from user space without checking that it is null terminated. While btrfs-progs is well behaved and does proper validation and null termination, someone could call the ioctl and pass a non-null terminated patch, leading to buffer overrun problems in the kernel. The ioctl is protected by CAP_SYS_ADMIN. So just set the last byte of the path to a null character, similar to what we do in other ioctls (add/remove/resize device, snapshot creation, etc). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 13 11月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
After the simplification of the fast fsync patch done recently by commit b5e6c3e1 ("btrfs: always wait on ordered extents at fsync time") and commit e7175a69 ("btrfs: remove the wait ordered logic in the log_one_extent path"), we got a very short time window where we can get extents logged without writeback completing first or extents logged without logging the respective data checksums. Both issues can only happen when doing a non-full (fast) fsync. As soon as we enter btrfs_sync_file() we trigger writeback, then lock the inode and then wait for the writeback to complete before starting to log the inode. However before we acquire the inode's lock and after we started writeback, it's possible that more writes happened and dirtied more pages. If that happened and those pages get writeback triggered while we are logging the inode (for example, the VM subsystem triggering it due to memory pressure, or another concurrent fsync), we end up seeing the respective extent maps in the inode's list of modified extents and will log matching file extent items without waiting for the respective ordered extents to complete, meaning that either of the following will happen: 1) We log an extent after its writeback finishes but before its checksums are added to the csum tree, leading to -EIO errors when attempting to read the extent after a log replay. 2) We log an extent before its writeback finishes. Therefore after the log replay we will have a file extent item pointing to an unwritten extent (and without the respective data checksums as well). This could not happen before the fast fsync patch simplification, because for any extent we found in the list of modified extents, we would wait for its respective ordered extent to finish writeback or collect its checksums for logging if it did not complete yet. Fix this by triggering writeback again after acquiring the inode's lock and before waiting for ordered extents to complete. Fixes: e7175a69 ("btrfs: remove the wait ordered logic in the log_one_extent path") Fixes: b5e6c3e1 ("btrfs: always wait on ordered extents at fsync time") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
When a metadata read is served the endio routine btree_readpage_end_io_hook is called which eventually runs the tree-checker. If tree-checker fails to validate the read eb then it sets EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This leads to btree_read_extent_buffer_pages wrongly assuming that all available copies of this extent buffer are wrong and failing prematurely. Fix this modify btree_read_extent_buffer_pages to read all copies of the data. This failure was exhibitted in xfstests btrfs/124 which would spuriously fail its balance operations. The reason was that when balance was run following re-introduction of the missing raid1 disk __btrfs_map_block would map the read request to stripe 0, which corresponded to devid 2 (the disk which is being removed in the test): item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 3553624064) itemoff 15975 itemsize 112 length 1073741824 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|RAID1 io_align 65536 io_width 65536 sector_size 4096 num_stripes 2 sub_stripes 1 stripe 0 devid 2 offset 2156920832 dev_uuid 8466c350-ed0c-4c3b-b17d-6379b445d5c8 stripe 1 devid 1 offset 3553624064 dev_uuid 1265d8db-5596-477e-af03-df08eb38d2ca This caused read requests for a checksum item that to be routed to the stale disk which triggered the aforementioned logic involving EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This then triggered cascading failures of the balance operation. Fixes: a826d6dc ("Btrfs: check items for correctness as we search") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Suggested-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
There's a race between close_ctree() and cleaner_kthread(). close_ctree() sets btrfs_fs_closing(), and the cleaner stops when it sees it set, but this is racy; the cleaner might have already checked the bit and could be cleaning stuff. In particular, if it deletes unused block groups, it will create delayed iputs for the free space cache inodes. As of "btrfs: don't run delayed_iputs in commit", we're no longer running delayed iputs after a commit. Therefore, if the cleaner creates more delayed iputs after delayed iputs are run in btrfs_commit_super(), we will leak inodes on unmount and get a busy inode crash from the VFS. Fix it by parking the cleaner before we actually close anything. Then, any remaining delayed iputs will always be handled in btrfs_commit_super(). This also ensures that the commit in close_ctree() is really the last commit, so we can get rid of the commit in cleaner_kthread(). The fstest/generic/475 followed by 476 can trigger a crash that manifests as a slab corruption caused by accessing the freed kthread structure by a wake up function. Sample trace: [ 5657.077612] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000cc [ 5657.079432] PGD 1c57a067 P4D 1c57a067 PUD da10067 PMD 0 [ 5657.080661] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 5657.081592] CPU: 1 PID: 5157 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 4.19.0-rc8-default+ #323 [ 5657.083703] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626cc-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 5657.086577] RIP: 0010:shrink_page_list+0x2f9/0xe90 [ 5657.091937] RSP: 0018:ffffb5c745c8f728 EFLAGS: 00010287 [ 5657.092953] RAX: 0000000000000074 RBX: ffffb5c745c8f830 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 5657.094590] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff9a8747fdf3d0 [ 5657.095987] RBP: ffffb5c745c8f9e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 5657.097159] R10: ffff9a8747fdf5e8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffb5c745c8f788 [ 5657.098513] R13: ffff9a877f6ff2c0 R14: ffff9a877f6ff2c8 R15: dead000000000200 [ 5657.099689] FS: 00007f948d853b80(0000) GS:ffff9a877d600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 5657.101032] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 5657.101953] CR2: 00000000000000cc CR3: 00000000684bd000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 5657.103159] Call Trace: [ 5657.103776] shrink_inactive_list+0x194/0x410 [ 5657.104671] shrink_node_memcg.constprop.84+0x39a/0x6a0 [ 5657.105750] shrink_node+0x62/0x1c0 [ 5657.106529] try_to_free_pages+0x1a4/0x500 [ 5657.107408] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x2c9/0xb20 [ 5657.108418] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x268/0x2b0 [ 5657.109348] kmalloc_large_node+0x37/0x90 [ 5657.110205] __kmalloc_node+0x236/0x310 [ 5657.111014] kvmalloc_node+0x3e/0x70 Fixes: 30928e9b ("btrfs: don't run delayed_iputs in commit") Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add trace ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2018 8 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We currently allow cloning a range from a file which includes the last block of the file even if the file's size is not aligned to the block size. This is fine and useful when the destination file has the same size, but when it does not and the range ends somewhere in the middle of the destination file, it leads to corruption because the bytes between the EOF and the end of the block have undefined data (when there is support for discard/trimming they have a value of 0x00). Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ export foo_size=$((256 * 1024 + 100)) $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x3c 0 $foo_size" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb5 0 1M" /mnt/bar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/foo 0 512K $foo_size" /mnt/bar $ od -A d -t x1 /mnt/bar 0000000 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 * 0524288 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c * 0786528 3c 3c 3c 3c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0786544 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 * 0790528 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 * 1048576 The bytes in the range from 786532 (512Kb + 256Kb + 100 bytes) to 790527 (512Kb + 256Kb + 4Kb - 1) got corrupted, having now a value of 0x00 instead of 0xb5. This is similar to the problem we had for deduplication that got recently fixed by commit de02b9f6 ("Btrfs: fix data corruption when deduplicating between different files"). Fix this by not allowing such operations to be performed and return the errno -EINVAL to user space. This is what XFS is doing as well at the VFS level. This change however now makes us return -EINVAL instead of -EOPNOTSUPP for cases where the source range maps to an inline extent and the destination range's end is smaller then the destination file's size, since the detection of inline extents is done during the actual process of dropping file extent items (at __btrfs_drop_extents()). Returning the -EINVAL error is done early on and solely based on the input parameters (offsets and length) and destination file's size. This makes us consistent with XFS and anyone else supporting cloning since this case is now checked at a higher level in the VFS and is where the -EINVAL will be returned from starting with kernel 4.20 (the VFS changed was introduced in 4.20-rc1 by commit 07d19dc9 ("vfs: avoid problematic remapping requests into partial EOF block"). So this change is more geared towards stable kernels, as it's unlikely the new VFS checks get removed intentionally. A test case for fstests follows soon, as well as an update to filter existing tests that expect -EOPNOTSUPP to accept -EINVAL as well. CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we attempt to deduplicate the last block of a file A into the middle of a file B, and file A's size is not a multiple of the block size, we end rounding the deduplication length to 0 bytes, to avoid the data corruption issue fixed by commit de02b9f6 ("Btrfs: fix data corruption when deduplicating between different files"). However a length of zero will cause the insertion of an extent state with a start value greater (by 1) then the end value, leading to a corrupt extent state that will trigger a warning and cause chaos such as an infinite loop during inode eviction. Example trace: [96049.833585] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [96049.833714] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 24448 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:436 insert_state+0x101/0x120 [btrfs] [96049.833767] CPU: 0 PID: 24448 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 4.19.0-rc7-btrfs-next-39 #1 [96049.833768] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [96049.833780] RIP: 0010:insert_state+0x101/0x120 [btrfs] [96049.833783] RSP: 0018:ffffafd2c3707af0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [96049.833785] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000004dfff RCX: 0000000000000006 [96049.833786] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: ffff99045c143230 RDI: ffff99047b2168a0 [96049.833787] RBP: ffff990457851cd0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [96049.833787] R10: ffffafd2c3707ab8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9903b93b12c8 [96049.833788] R13: 000000000004e000 R14: ffffafd2c3707b80 R15: ffffafd2c3707b78 [96049.833790] FS: 00007f5c14e7d700(0000) GS:ffff99047b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [96049.833791] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [96049.833792] CR2: 00007f5c146abff8 CR3: 0000000115f4c004 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [96049.833795] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [96049.833796] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [96049.833796] Call Trace: [96049.833809] __set_extent_bit+0x46c/0x6a0 [btrfs] [96049.833823] lock_extent_bits+0x6b/0x210 [btrfs] [96049.833831] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x30 [96049.833841] ? test_range_bit+0xdf/0x130 [btrfs] [96049.833853] lock_extent_range+0x8e/0x150 [btrfs] [96049.833864] btrfs_double_extent_lock+0x78/0xb0 [btrfs] [96049.833875] btrfs_extent_same_range+0x14e/0x550 [btrfs] [96049.833885] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70 [96049.833890] ? __kmalloc_node+0x2b0/0x2f0 [96049.833899] ? btrfs_dedupe_file_range+0x19a/0x280 [btrfs] [96049.833909] btrfs_dedupe_file_range+0x270/0x280 [btrfs] [96049.833916] vfs_dedupe_file_range_one+0xd9/0xe0 [96049.833919] vfs_dedupe_file_range+0x131/0x1b0 [96049.833924] do_vfs_ioctl+0x272/0x6e0 [96049.833927] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [96049.833931] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [96049.833933] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [96049.833937] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [96049.833939] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [96049.833941] RIP: 0033:0x7f5c1478ddd7 [96049.833943] RSP: 002b:00007ffe15b196a8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [96049.833945] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5c1478ddd7 [96049.833946] RDX: 00005625ece322d0 RSI: 00000000c0189436 RDI: 0000000000000004 [96049.833947] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f5c14a46f48 R09: 0000000000000040 [96049.833948] R10: 0000000000000541 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 [96049.833949] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 00005625ece322d0 [96049.833954] irq event stamp: 6196 [96049.833956] hardirqs last enabled at (6195): [<ffffffff91b00663>] console_unlock+0x503/0x640 [96049.833958] hardirqs last disabled at (6196): [<ffffffff91a037dd>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [96049.833959] softirqs last enabled at (6114): [<ffffffff92600370>] __do_softirq+0x370/0x421 [96049.833964] softirqs last disabled at (6095): [<ffffffff91a8dd4d>] irq_exit+0xcd/0xe0 [96049.833965] ---[ end trace db7b05f01b7fa10c ]--- [96049.935816] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00005562e5259240 R15: 00007ffff092b910 [96049.935822] irq event stamp: 6584 [96049.935823] hardirqs last enabled at (6583): [<ffffffff91b00663>] console_unlock+0x503/0x640 [96049.935825] hardirqs last disabled at (6584): [<ffffffff91a037dd>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [96049.935827] softirqs last enabled at (6328): [<ffffffff92600370>] __do_softirq+0x370/0x421 [96049.935828] softirqs last disabled at (6313): [<ffffffff91a8dd4d>] irq_exit+0xcd/0xe0 [96049.935829] ---[ end trace db7b05f01b7fa123 ]--- [96049.935840] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [96049.936065] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 24463 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:436 insert_state+0x101/0x120 [btrfs] [96049.936107] CPU: 1 PID: 24463 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.19.0-rc7-btrfs-next-39 #1 [96049.936108] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [96049.936117] RIP: 0010:insert_state+0x101/0x120 [btrfs] [96049.936119] RSP: 0018:ffffafd2c3637bc0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [96049.936120] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000004dfff RCX: 0000000000000006 [96049.936121] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: ffff990445cf88e0 RDI: ffff99047b2968a0 [96049.936122] RBP: ffff990457851cd0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [96049.936123] R10: ffffafd2c3637b88 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9904574301e8 [96049.936124] R13: 000000000004e000 R14: ffffafd2c3637c50 R15: ffffafd2c3637c48 [96049.936125] FS: 00007fe4b87e72c0(0000) GS:ffff99047b280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [96049.936126] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [96049.936128] CR2: 00005562e52618d8 CR3: 00000001151c8005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [96049.936129] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [96049.936131] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [96049.936131] Call Trace: [96049.936141] __set_extent_bit+0x46c/0x6a0 [btrfs] [96049.936154] lock_extent_bits+0x6b/0x210 [btrfs] [96049.936167] btrfs_evict_inode+0x1e1/0x5a0 [btrfs] [96049.936172] evict+0xbf/0x1c0 [96049.936174] dispose_list+0x51/0x80 [96049.936176] evict_inodes+0x193/0x1c0 [96049.936180] generic_shutdown_super+0x3f/0x110 [96049.936182] kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 [96049.936189] btrfs_kill_super+0x13/0x100 [btrfs] [96049.936191] deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x70 [96049.936193] cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x80 [96049.936195] task_work_run+0x93/0xc0 [96049.936198] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xfa/0x100 [96049.936201] do_syscall_64+0x17f/0x1b0 [96049.936202] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [96049.936204] RIP: 0033:0x7fe4b80cfb37 [96049.936206] RSP: 002b:00007ffff092b688 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [96049.936207] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00005562e5259060 RCX: 00007fe4b80cfb37 [96049.936208] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00005562e525faa0 [96049.936209] RBP: 00005562e525faa0 R08: 00005562e525f770 R09: 0000000000000015 [96049.936210] R10: 00000000000006b4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fe4b85d1e64 [96049.936211] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00005562e5259240 R15: 00007ffff092b910 [96049.936211] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00005562e5259240 R15: 00007ffff092b910 [96049.936216] irq event stamp: 6616 [96049.936219] hardirqs last enabled at (6615): [<ffffffff91b00663>] console_unlock+0x503/0x640 [96049.936219] hardirqs last disabled at (6616): [<ffffffff91a037dd>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [96049.936222] softirqs last enabled at (6328): [<ffffffff92600370>] __do_softirq+0x370/0x421 [96049.936222] softirqs last disabled at (6313): [<ffffffff91a8dd4d>] irq_exit+0xcd/0xe0 [96049.936223] ---[ end trace db7b05f01b7fa124 ]--- The second stack trace, from inode eviction, is repeated forever due to the infinite loop during eviction. This is the same type of problem fixed way back in 2015 by commit 113e8283 ("Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after extent_same ioctl") and commit ccccf3d6 ("Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it"). So fix this by returning immediately if the deduplication range length gets rounded down to 0 bytes, as there is nothing that needs to be done in such case. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xe6 0 100" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xe6 0 1M" /mnt/bar # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again so that we start without any # extent state records when we ask for the deduplication. $ umount /mnt $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -c "dedupe /mnt/foo 0 500K 100" /mnt/bar # This unmount triggers the infinite loop. $ umount /mnt A test case for fstests will follow soon. Fixes: de02b9f6 ("Btrfs: fix data corruption when deduplicating between different files") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When we are writing out a free space cache, during the transaction commit phase, we can end up in a deadlock which results in a stack trace like the following: schedule+0x28/0x80 btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x8e/0x120 [btrfs] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x2f/0x40 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xf6/0x9f0 [btrfs] ? evict_refill_and_join+0xd0/0xd0 [btrfs] ? inode_insert5+0x119/0x190 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x166/0x1d0 btrfs_iget+0x113/0x690 [btrfs] __lookup_free_space_inode+0xd8/0x150 [btrfs] lookup_free_space_inode+0x5b/0xb0 [btrfs] load_free_space_cache+0x7c/0x170 [btrfs] ? cache_block_group+0x72/0x3b0 [btrfs] cache_block_group+0x1b3/0x3b0 [btrfs] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 find_free_extent+0x799/0x1010 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1b3/0x4f0 [btrfs] __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x500 [btrfs] btrfs_cow_block+0xdc/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x3bd/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x166/0x1d0 btrfs_update_inode_item+0x46/0x100 [btrfs] cache_save_setup+0xe4/0x3a0 [btrfs] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1be/0x480 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcb/0x8b0 [btrfs] At cache_save_setup() we need to update the inode item of a block group's cache which is located in the tree root (fs_info->tree_root), which means that it may result in COWing a leaf from that tree. If that happens we need to find a free metadata extent and while looking for one, if we find a block group which was not cached yet we attempt to load its cache by calling cache_block_group(). However this function will try to load the inode of the free space cache, which requires finding the matching inode item in the tree root - if that inode item is located in the same leaf as the inode item of the space cache we are updating at cache_save_setup(), we end up in a deadlock, since we try to obtain a read lock on the same extent buffer that we previously write locked. So fix this by using the tree root's commit root when searching for a block group's free space cache inode item when we are attempting to load a free space cache. This is safe since block groups once loaded stay in memory forever, as well as their caches, so after they are first loaded we will never need to read their inode items again. For new block groups, once they are created they get their ->cached field set to BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED meaning we will not need to read their inode item. Reported-by: NAndrew Nelson <andrew.s.nelson@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAPTELenq9x5KOWuQ+fa7h1r3nsJG8vyiTH8+ifjURc_duHh2Wg@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 9d66e233 ("Btrfs: load free space cache if it exists") Tested-by: NAndrew Nelson <andrew.s.nelson@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
Note: this patch fixes a problem in a feature outside of btrfs ("kernel hacking: add a config option to disable compiler auto-inlining") and is applied ahead of time due to cross-subsystem dependencies. On 32-bit ARM with gcc-8, I see a link error with the addition of the CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE option: fs/btrfs/super.o: In function `btrfs_statfs': super.c:(.text+0x67b8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod' super.c:(.text+0x67fc): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod' super.c:(.text+0x6858): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod' super.c:(.text+0x6920): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod' super.c:(.text+0x693c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod' fs/btrfs/super.o:super.c:(.text+0x6958): more undefined references to `__aeabi_uldivmod' follow So far this is the only file that shows the behavior, so I'd propose to just work around it by marking the functions as 'static inline' that normally get inlined here. The reference to __aeabi_uldivmod comes from a div_u64() which has an optimization for a constant division that uses a straight '/' operator when the result should be known to the compiler. My interpretation is that as we turn off inlining, gcc still expects the result to be constant but fails to use that constant value. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181103153941.1881966-1-arnd@arndb.deReviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NChangbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [ add the note ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Shaokun Zhang 提交于
block_group_err shows the group system as a decimal value with a '0x' prefix, which is somewhat misleading. Fix it to print hexadecimal, as was intended. Fixes: fce466ea ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Recently we got a massive simplification for fsync, where for the fast path we no longer log new extents while their respective ordered extents are still running. However that simplification introduced a subtle regression for the case where we use a ranged fsync (msync). Consider the following example: CPU 0 CPU 1 mmap write to range [2Mb, 4Mb[ mmap write to range [512Kb, 1Mb[ msync range [512K, 1Mb[ --> triggers fast fsync (BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC not set) --> creates extent map A for this range and adds it to list of modified extents --> starts ordered extent A for this range --> waits for it to complete writeback triggered for range [2Mb, 4Mb[ --> create extent map B and adds it to the list of modified extents --> creates ordered extent B --> start looking for and logging modified extents --> logs extent maps A and B --> finds checksums for extent A in the csum tree, but not for extent B fsync (msync) finishes --> ordered extent B finishes and its checksums are added to the csum tree <power cut> After replaying the log, we have the extent covering the range [2Mb, 4Mb[ but do not have the data checksum items covering that file range. This happens because at the very beginning of an fsync (btrfs_sync_file()) we start and wait for IO in the given range [512Kb, 1Mb[ and therefore wait for any ordered extents in that range to complete before we start logging the extents. However if right before we start logging the extent in our range [512Kb, 1Mb[, writeback is started for any other dirty range, such as the range [2Mb, 4Mb[ due to memory pressure or a concurrent fsync or msync (btrfs_sync_file() starts writeback before acquiring the inode's lock), an ordered extent is created for that other range and a new extent map is created to represent that range and added to the inode's list of modified extents. That means that we will see that other extent in that list when collecting extents for logging (done at btrfs_log_changed_extents()) and log the extent before the respective ordered extent finishes - namely before the checksum items are added to the checksums tree, which is where log_extent_csums() looks for the checksums, therefore making us log an extent without logging its checksums. Before that massive simplification of fsync, this wasn't a problem because besides looking for checkums in the checksums tree, we also looked for them in any ordered extent still running. The consequence of data checksums missing for a file range is that users attempting to read the affected file range will get -EIO errors and dmesg reports the following: [10188.358136] BTRFS info (device sdc): no csum found for inode 297 start 57344 [10188.359278] BTRFS warning (device sdc): csum failed root 5 ino 297 off 57344 csum 0x98f94189 expected csum 0x00000000 mirror 1 So fix this by skipping extents outside of our logging range at btrfs_log_changed_extents() and leaving them on the list of modified extents so that any subsequent ranged fsync may collect them if needed. Also, if we find a hole extent outside of the range still log it, just to prevent having gaps between extent items after replaying the log, otherwise fsck will complain when we are not using the NO_HOLES feature (fstest btrfs/056 triggers such case). Fixes: e7175a69 ("btrfs: remove the wait ordered logic in the log_one_extent path") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Lu Fengqi 提交于
When running generic/475, we may get the following warning in dmesg: [ 6902.102154] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18013 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9776 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs] [ 6902.109160] CPU: 3 PID: 18013 Comm: umount Tainted: G W O 4.19.0-rc8+ #8 [ 6902.110971] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 6902.112857] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs] [ 6902.118921] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000459bdb0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 6902.120315] RAX: ffff880175050bb0 RBX: ffff8801124a8000 RCX: 0000000000170007 [ 6902.121969] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000170007 RDI: ffffffff8125fb74 [ 6902.123716] RBP: ffff880175055d10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 6902.125417] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880175055d88 [ 6902.127129] R13: ffff880175050bb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dead000000000100 [ 6902.129060] FS: 00007f4507223780(0000) GS:ffff88017ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6902.130996] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6902.132558] CR2: 00005623599cac78 CR3: 000000014b700001 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [ 6902.134270] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 6902.135981] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 6902.137836] Call Trace: [ 6902.138939] close_ctree+0x171/0x330 [btrfs] [ 6902.140181] ? kthread_stop+0x146/0x1f0 [ 6902.141277] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 [ 6902.142517] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [ 6902.143554] btrfs_kill_super+0x13/0x100 [btrfs] [ 6902.144790] deactivate_locked_super+0x2f/0x70 [ 6902.146014] cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x70 [ 6902.147020] task_work_run+0x9e/0xd0 [ 6902.148036] do_syscall_64+0x470/0x600 [ 6902.149142] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 6902.150375] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 6902.151640] RIP: 0033:0x7f45077a6a7b [ 6902.157324] RSP: 002b:00007ffd589f3e68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [ 6902.159187] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000055e8eec732b0 RCX: 00007f45077a6a7b [ 6902.160834] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055e8eec73490 [ 6902.162526] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000055e8eec734b0 R09: 00007ffd589f26c0 [ 6902.164141] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055e8eec73490 [ 6902.165815] R13: 00007f4507ac61a4 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd589f40d8 [ 6902.167553] irq event stamp: 0 [ 6902.168998] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] (null) [ 6902.170731] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00 [ 6902.172773] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00 [ 6902.174671] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] (null) [ 6902.176407] ---[ end trace 463138c2986b275c ]--- [ 6902.177636] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info 4 has 273465344 free, is not full [ 6902.179453] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info total=276824064, used=4685824, pinned=18446744073708158976, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=65536 In the above line there's "pinned=18446744073708158976" which is an unsigned u64 value of -1392640, an obvious underflow. When transaction_kthread is running cleanup_transaction(), another fsstress is running btrfs_commit_transaction(). The btrfs_finish_extent_commit() may get the same range as btrfs_destroy_pinned_extent() got, which causes the pinned underflow. Fixes: d4b450cd ("Btrfs: fix race between transaction commit and empty block group removal") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Robbie Ko 提交于
When the cow_file_range fails, the related resources are unlocked according to the range [start..end), so the unlock cannot be repeated in run_delalloc_nocow. In some cases (e.g. cur_offset <= end && cow_start != -1), cur_offset is not updated correctly, so move the cur_offset update before cow_file_range. kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2663! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 PID: 31525 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Tainted: P O Hardware name: Realtek_RTD1296 (DT) Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-1) task: ffffffc076db3380 ti: ffffffc02e9ac000 task.ti: ffffffc02e9ac000 PC is at clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1bc/0x1e8 LR is at clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x14/0x1e8 pc : [<ffffffc00033c91c>] lr : [<ffffffc00033c774>] pstate: 40000145 sp : ffffffc02e9af4f0 Process kworker/u8:7 (pid: 31525, stack limit = 0xffffffc02e9ac020) Call trace: [<ffffffc00033c91c>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1bc/0x1e8 [<ffffffbffc514674>] extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x1e4/0x210 [btrfs] [<ffffffbffc4fb168>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x3b8/0x948 [btrfs] [<ffffffbffc4fb948>] run_delalloc_range+0x250/0x3a8 [btrfs] [<ffffffbffc514c0c>] writepage_delalloc.isra.21+0xbc/0x1d8 [btrfs] [<ffffffbffc516048>] __extent_writepage+0xe8/0x248 [btrfs] [<ffffffbffc51630c>] extent_write_cache_pages.isra.17+0x164/0x378 [btrfs] [<ffffffbffc5185a8>] extent_writepages+0x48/0x68 [btrfs] [<ffffffbffc4f5828>] btrfs_writepages+0x20/0x30 [btrfs] [<ffffffc00033d758>] do_writepages+0x30/0x88 [<ffffffc0003ba0f4>] __writeback_single_inode+0x34/0x198 [<ffffffc0003ba6c4>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x184/0x3c0 [<ffffffc0003ba96c>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x6c/0xc0 [<ffffffc0003bac20>] wb_writeback+0x1b8/0x1c0 [<ffffffc0003bb0f0>] wb_workfn+0x150/0x250 [<ffffffc0002b0014>] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x388 [<ffffffc0002b02f0>] worker_thread+0x130/0x500 [<ffffffc0002b6344>] kthread+0x10c/0x110 [<ffffffc000284590>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40 Code: d503201f a9025bb5 a90363b7 f90023b9 (d4210000) CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NRobbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Change the remap_file_range functions to take a number of bytes to operate upon and return the number of bytes they operated on. This is a requirement for allowing fs implementations to return short clone/dedupe results to the user, which will enable us to obey resource limits in a graceful manner. A subsequent patch will enable copy_file_range to signal to the ->clone_file_range implementation that it can handle a short length, which will be returned in the function's return value. For now the short return is not implemented anywhere so the behavior won't change -- either copy_file_range manages to clone the entire range or it tries an alternative. Neither clone ioctl can take advantage of this, alas. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Combine the clone_file_range and dedupe_file_range operations into a single remap_file_range file operation dispatch since they're fundamentally the same operation. The differences between the two can be made in the prep functions. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-