Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 3月, 2021 6 次提交
  3. 24 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 06 10月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 05 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 13 8月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 01 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  13. 10 6月, 2020 2 次提交
  15. 04 6月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 03 6月, 2020 1 次提交
    • L
      gup: document and work around "COW can break either way" issue · 17839856
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Doing a "get_user_pages()" on a copy-on-write page for reading can be
ambiguous: the page can be COW'ed at any time afterwards, and the
direction of a COW event isn't defined.

Yes, whoever writes to it will generally do the COW, but if the thread
that did the get_user_pages() unmapped the page before the write (and
that could happen due to memory pressure in addition to any outright
action), the writer could also just take over the old page instead.

End result: the get_user_pages() call might result in a page pointer
that is no longer associated with the original VM, and is associated
with - and controlled by - another VM having taken it over instead.

So when doing a get_user_pages() on a COW mapping, the only really safe
thing to do would be to break the COW when getting the page, even when
only getting it for reading.

At the same time, some users simply don't even care.

For example, the perf code wants to look up the page not because it
cares about the page, but because the code simply wants to look up the
physical address of the access for informational purposes, and doesn't
really care about races when a page might be unmapped and remapped
elsewhere.

This adds logic to force a COW event by setting FOLL_WRITE on any
copy-on-write mapping when FOLL_GET (or FOLL_PIN) is used to get a page
pointer as a result.

The current semantics end up being:

 - __get_user_pages_fast(): no change. If you don't ask for a write,
   you won't break COW. You'd better know what you're doing.

 - get_user_pages_fast(): the fast-case "look it up in the page tables
   without anything getting mmap_sem" now refuses to follow a read-only
   page, since it might need COW breaking.  Which happens in the slow
   path - the fast path doesn't know if the memory might be COW or not.

 - get_user_pages() (including the slow-path fallback for gup_fast()):
   for a COW mapping, turn on FOLL_WRITE for FOLL_GET/FOLL_PIN, with
   very similar semantics to FOLL_FORCE.

If it turns out that we want finer granularity (ie "only break COW when
it might actually matter" - things like the zero page are special and
don't need to be broken) we might need to push these semantics deeper
into the lookup fault path.  So if people care enough, it's possible
that we might end up adding a new internal FOLL_BREAK_COW flag to go
with the internal FOLL_COW flag we already have for tracking "I had a
COW".

Alternatively, if it turns out that different callers might want to
explicitly control the forced COW break behavior, we might even want to
make such a flag visible to the users of get_user_pages() instead of
using the above default semantics.

But for now, this is mostly commentary on the issue (this commit message
being a lot bigger than the patch, and that patch in turn is almost all
comments), with that minimal "enable COW breaking early" logic using the
existing FOLL_WRITE behavior.

[ It might be worth noting that we've always had this ambiguity, and it
  could arguably be seen as a user-space issue.

  You only get private COW mappings that could break either way in
  situations where user space is doing cooperative things (ie fork()
  before an execve() etc), but it _is_ surprising and very subtle, and
  fork() is supposed to give you independent address spaces.

  So let's treat this as a kernel issue and make the semantics of
  get_user_pages() easier to understand. Note that obviously a true
  shared mapping will still get a page that can change under us, so this
  does _not_ mean that get_user_pages() somehow returns any "stable"
  page ]
Reported-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Tested-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NKirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      17839856
  19. 30 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 25 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 19 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  25. 27 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 08 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  29. 21 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  31. 18 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  33. 22 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 11 12月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/gem: Wait on unbind barriers when invalidating userptr · 93e89ac8
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      When we are told we have to drop all references to userptr, wait for any
barriers required for unbinding.

<4> [2055.808787] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6239 at mm/mmu_notifier.c:472 __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f2/0x250
<4> [2055.808792] Modules linked in: vgem mei_hdcp snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel r8169 lpc_ich realtek i915 snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core pinctrl_broxton snd_pcm pinctrl_intel mei_me intel_lpss_pci mei prime_numbers [last unloaded: vgem]
<4> [2055.808834] CPU: 3 PID: 6239 Comm: gem_userptr_bli Tainted: G     U            5.5.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_7522+ #1
<4> [2055.808839] Hardware name:  /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0049.2018.0508.1356 05/08/2018
<4> [2055.808847] RIP: 0010:__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f2/0x250
<4> [2055.808853] Code: c2 48 c7 c7 70 17 2e 82 44 89 45 d4 48 8b 70 28 e8 ec 01 ef ff 41 f6 46 20 01 44 8b 45 d4 75 0a 41 83 f8 f5 44 89 7d d4 74 89 <0f> 0b 44 89 45 d4 eb 81 0f 0b 49 8b 46 18 49 8b 76 10 4c 89 ff 48
<4> [2055.808858] RSP: 0018:ffffc90002937d40 EFLAGS: 00010202
<4> [2055.808865] RAX: 0000000000000061 RBX: ffff8882703a33e0 RCX: 0000000000000001
<4> [2055.808870] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff888277da8cb8 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
<4> [2055.808874] RBP: ffffc90002937d70 R08: 00000000fffffff5 R09: 0000000000000000
<4> [2055.808879] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
<4> [2055.808884] R13: ffffffff822e1716 R14: ffffc90002937d80 R15: 00000000fffffff5
<4> [2055.808890] FS:  00007fda75004e40(0000) GS:ffff888277d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [2055.808895] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4> [2055.808900] CR2: 000055ad72ec3000 CR3: 00000002697b2000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
<4> [2055.808904] Call Trace:
<4> [2055.808920]  unmap_vmas+0x13e/0x150
<4> [2055.808937]  unmap_region+0xa3/0x100
<4> [2055.808964]  __do_munmap+0x26d/0x490
<4> [2055.808980]  __vm_munmap+0x66/0xc0
<4> [2055.808994]  __x64_sys_munmap+0x12/0x20
<4> [2055.809001]  do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x220

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/771Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191210133719.3874455-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      93e89ac8
  37. 19 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  39. 12 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  41. 11 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  43. 07 11月, 2019 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Switch obj->mm.lock lockdep annotations on its head · f86dbacb
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      The trouble with having a plain nesting flag for locks which do not
naturally nest (unlike block devices and their partitions, which is
the original motivation for nesting levels) is that lockdep will
never spot a true deadlock if you screw up.

This patch is an attempt at trying better, by highlighting a bit more
of the actual nature of the nesting that's going on. Essentially we
have two kinds of objects:

- objects without pages allocated, which cannot be on any lru and are
  hence inaccessible to the shrinker.

- objects which have pages allocated, which are on an lru, and which
  the shrinker can decide to throw out.

For the former type of object, memory allocations while holding
obj->mm.lock are permissible. For the latter they are not. And
get/put_pages transitions between the two types of objects.

This is still not entirely fool-proof since the rules might change.
But as long as we run such a code ever at runtime lockdep should be
able to observe the inconsistency and complain (like with any other
lockdep class that we've split up in multiple classes). But there are
a few clear benefits:

- We can drop the nesting flag parameter from
  __i915_gem_object_put_pages, because that function by definition is
  never going allocate memory, and calling it on an object which
  doesn't have its pages allocated would be a bug.

- We strictly catch more bugs, since there's not only one place in the
  entire tree which is annotated with the special class. All the
  other places that had explicit lockdep nesting annotations we're now
  going to leave up to lockdep again.

- Specifically this catches stuff like calling get_pages from
  put_pages (which isn't really a good idea, if we can call get_pages
  so could the shrinker). I've seen patches do exactly that.

Of course I fully expect CI will show me for the fool I am with this
one here :-)

v2: There can only be one (lockdep only has a cache for the first
subclass, not for deeper ones, and we don't want to make these locks
even slower). Still separate enums for better documentation.

Real fix: don't forget about phys objs and pin_map(), and fix the
shrinker to have the right annotations ... silly me.

v3: Forgot usertptr too ...

v4: Improve comment for pages_pin_count, drop the IMPORTANT comment
and instead prime lockdep (Chris).

v5: Appease checkpatch, no double empty lines (Chris)

v6: More rebasing over selftest changes. Also somehow I forgot to
push this patch :-/

Also format comments consistently while at it.

v7: Fix typo in commit message (Joonas)

Also drop the priming, with the lmem merge we now have allocations
while holding the lmem lock, which wreaks the generic priming I've
done in earlier patches. Should probably be resurrected when lmem is
fixed. See

commit 232a6eba
Author: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 8 17:01:14 2019 +0100

    drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region

I'm keeping the priming patch locally so it wont get lost.

Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Tang, CQ" <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v5)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v6)
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105090148.30269-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
[mlankhorst: Fix commit typos pointed out by Michael Ruhl]
      f86dbacb
  45. 22 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  47. 17 10月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/userptr: Never allow userptr into the mappable GGTT · 4f2a572e
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Daniel Vetter uncovered a nasty cycle in using the mmu-notifiers to
invalidate userptr objects which also happen to be pulled into GGTT
mmaps. That is when we unbind the userptr object (on mmu invalidation),
we revoke all CPU mmaps, which may then recurse into mmu invalidation.

We looked for ways of breaking the cycle, but the revocation on
invalidation is required and cannot be avoided. The only solution we
could see was to not allow such GGTT bindings of userptr objects in the
first place. In practice, no one really wants to use a GGTT mmapping of
a CPU pointer...

Just before Daniel's explosive lockdep patches land in v5.4-rc1, we got
a genuine blip from CI:

<4>[  246.793958] ======================================================
<4>[  246.793972] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4>[  246.793989] 5.3.0-gbd6c56f50d15-drmtip_372+ #1 Tainted: G     U
<4>[  246.794003] ------------------------------------------------------
<4>[  246.794017] kswapd0/145 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[  246.794030] 000000003f565be6 (&dev->struct_mutex/1){+.+.}, at: userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start+0x18f/0x220 [i915]
<4>[  246.794250]
                  but task is already holding lock:
<4>[  246.794263] 000000001799cef9 (&anon_vma->rwsem){++++}, at: page_lock_anon_vma_read+0xe6/0x2a0
<4>[  246.794291]
                  which lock already depends on the new lock.

<4>[  246.794307]
                  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[  246.794322]
                  -> #3 (&anon_vma->rwsem){++++}:
<4>[  246.794344]        down_write+0x33/0x70
<4>[  246.794357]        __vma_adjust+0x3d9/0x7b0
<4>[  246.794370]        __split_vma+0x16a/0x180
<4>[  246.794385]        mprotect_fixup+0x2a5/0x320
<4>[  246.794399]        do_mprotect_pkey+0x208/0x2e0
<4>[  246.794413]        __x64_sys_mprotect+0x16/0x20
<4>[  246.794429]        do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794443]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[  246.794456]
                  -> #2 (&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem){++++}:
<4>[  246.794478]        down_write+0x33/0x70
<4>[  246.794493]        unmap_mapping_pages+0x48/0x130
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_vma_revoke_mmap+0x81/0x1b0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_vma_unbind+0x11d/0x4a0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_vma_destroy+0x31/0x300 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        __i915_gem_free_objects+0xb8/0x4b0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        drm_file_free.part.0+0x1e6/0x290
<4>[  246.794519]        drm_release+0xa6/0xe0
<4>[  246.794519]        __fput+0xc2/0x250
<4>[  246.794519]        task_work_run+0x82/0xb0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_exit+0x35b/0xdb0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_group_exit+0x34/0xb0
<4>[  246.794519]        __x64_sys_exit_group+0xf/0x10
<4>[  246.794519]        do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794519]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[  246.794519]
                  -> #1 (&vm->mutex){+.+.}:
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex+0x6d/0xe0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_address_space_init+0x9f/0x160 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_ggtt_init_hw+0x55/0x170 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_driver_probe+0xc9f/0x1620 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1b0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120
<4>[  246.794519]        really_probe+0xea/0x3d0
<4>[  246.794519]        driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120
<4>[  246.794519]        device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50
<4>[  246.794519]        __driver_attach+0x97/0x130
<4>[  246.794519]        bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0
<4>[  246.794519]        bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210
<4>[  246.794519]        driver_register+0x56/0xe0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_one_initcall+0x58/0x300
<4>[  246.794519]        do_init_module+0x56/0x1f6
<4>[  246.794519]        load_module+0x25bd/0x2a40
<4>[  246.794519]        __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794519]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[  246.794519]
                  -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex/1){+.+.}:
<4>[  246.794519]        __lock_acquire+0x15d8/0x1e90
<4>[  246.794519]        lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794519]        __mutex_lock+0x9d/0x9b0
<4>[  246.794519]        userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start+0x18f/0x220 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x85/0x110
<4>[  246.794519]        try_to_unmap_one+0x76b/0x860
<4>[  246.794519]        rmap_walk_anon+0x104/0x280
<4>[  246.794519]        try_to_unmap+0xc0/0xf0
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_page_list+0x561/0xc10
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_inactive_list+0x220/0x440
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_node_memcg+0x36e/0x740
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_node+0xcb/0x490
<4>[  246.794519]        balance_pgdat+0x241/0x580
<4>[  246.794519]        kswapd+0x16c/0x530
<4>[  246.794519]        kthread+0x119/0x130
<4>[  246.794519]        ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4>[  246.794519]
                  other info that might help us debug this:

<4>[  246.794519] Chain exists of:
                    &dev->struct_mutex/1 --> &mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> &anon_vma->rwsem

<4>[  246.794519]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

<4>[  246.794519]        CPU0                    CPU1
<4>[  246.794519]        ----                    ----
<4>[  246.794519]   lock(&anon_vma->rwsem);
<4>[  246.794519]                                lock(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
<4>[  246.794519]                                lock(&anon_vma->rwsem);
<4>[  246.794519]   lock(&dev->struct_mutex/1);
<4>[  246.794519]
                   *** DEADLOCK ***

v2: Say no to mmap_ioctl

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111744
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111870Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190928082546.3473-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit a4311745)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
      4f2a572e
  49. 04 10月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Move context management under GEM · a4e7ccda
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Keep track of the GEM contexts underneath i915->gem.contexts and assign
them their own lock for the purposes of list management.

v2: Focus on lock tracking; ctx->vm is protected by ctx->mutex
v3: Correct split with removal of logical HW ID
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a4e7ccda
    • C
      drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex · 2850748e
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot
allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate
workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we
reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes
with the GPU work and with later unbind).

In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to
avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is
the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not
to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma
does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM
fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping
the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by
a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we
do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate
and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv
itself.

Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the
destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex.
A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires
decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new
i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages.
However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm
discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with
trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called!

v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      2850748e
  51. 02 10月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/userptr: Never allow userptr into the mappable GGTT · a4311745
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Daniel Vetter uncovered a nasty cycle in using the mmu-notifiers to
invalidate userptr objects which also happen to be pulled into GGTT
mmaps. That is when we unbind the userptr object (on mmu invalidation),
we revoke all CPU mmaps, which may then recurse into mmu invalidation.

We looked for ways of breaking the cycle, but the revocation on
invalidation is required and cannot be avoided. The only solution we
could see was to not allow such GGTT bindings of userptr objects in the
first place. In practice, no one really wants to use a GGTT mmapping of
a CPU pointer...

Just before Daniel's explosive lockdep patches land in v5.4-rc1, we got
a genuine blip from CI:

<4>[  246.793958] ======================================================
<4>[  246.793972] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4>[  246.793989] 5.3.0-gbd6c56f50d15-drmtip_372+ #1 Tainted: G     U
<4>[  246.794003] ------------------------------------------------------
<4>[  246.794017] kswapd0/145 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[  246.794030] 000000003f565be6 (&dev->struct_mutex/1){+.+.}, at: userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start+0x18f/0x220 [i915]
<4>[  246.794250]
                  but task is already holding lock:
<4>[  246.794263] 000000001799cef9 (&anon_vma->rwsem){++++}, at: page_lock_anon_vma_read+0xe6/0x2a0
<4>[  246.794291]
                  which lock already depends on the new lock.

<4>[  246.794307]
                  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[  246.794322]
                  -> #3 (&anon_vma->rwsem){++++}:
<4>[  246.794344]        down_write+0x33/0x70
<4>[  246.794357]        __vma_adjust+0x3d9/0x7b0
<4>[  246.794370]        __split_vma+0x16a/0x180
<4>[  246.794385]        mprotect_fixup+0x2a5/0x320
<4>[  246.794399]        do_mprotect_pkey+0x208/0x2e0
<4>[  246.794413]        __x64_sys_mprotect+0x16/0x20
<4>[  246.794429]        do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794443]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[  246.794456]
                  -> #2 (&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem){++++}:
<4>[  246.794478]        down_write+0x33/0x70
<4>[  246.794493]        unmap_mapping_pages+0x48/0x130
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_vma_revoke_mmap+0x81/0x1b0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_vma_unbind+0x11d/0x4a0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_vma_destroy+0x31/0x300 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        __i915_gem_free_objects+0xb8/0x4b0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        drm_file_free.part.0+0x1e6/0x290
<4>[  246.794519]        drm_release+0xa6/0xe0
<4>[  246.794519]        __fput+0xc2/0x250
<4>[  246.794519]        task_work_run+0x82/0xb0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_exit+0x35b/0xdb0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_group_exit+0x34/0xb0
<4>[  246.794519]        __x64_sys_exit_group+0xf/0x10
<4>[  246.794519]        do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794519]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[  246.794519]
                  -> #1 (&vm->mutex){+.+.}:
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex+0x6d/0xe0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_address_space_init+0x9f/0x160 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_ggtt_init_hw+0x55/0x170 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_driver_probe+0xc9f/0x1620 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1b0 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120
<4>[  246.794519]        really_probe+0xea/0x3d0
<4>[  246.794519]        driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120
<4>[  246.794519]        device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50
<4>[  246.794519]        __driver_attach+0x97/0x130
<4>[  246.794519]        bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0
<4>[  246.794519]        bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210
<4>[  246.794519]        driver_register+0x56/0xe0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_one_initcall+0x58/0x300
<4>[  246.794519]        do_init_module+0x56/0x1f6
<4>[  246.794519]        load_module+0x25bd/0x2a40
<4>[  246.794519]        __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0
<4>[  246.794519]        do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794519]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4>[  246.794519]
                  -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex/1){+.+.}:
<4>[  246.794519]        __lock_acquire+0x15d8/0x1e90
<4>[  246.794519]        lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0
<4>[  246.794519]        __mutex_lock+0x9d/0x9b0
<4>[  246.794519]        userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start+0x18f/0x220 [i915]
<4>[  246.794519]        __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x85/0x110
<4>[  246.794519]        try_to_unmap_one+0x76b/0x860
<4>[  246.794519]        rmap_walk_anon+0x104/0x280
<4>[  246.794519]        try_to_unmap+0xc0/0xf0
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_page_list+0x561/0xc10
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_inactive_list+0x220/0x440
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_node_memcg+0x36e/0x740
<4>[  246.794519]        shrink_node+0xcb/0x490
<4>[  246.794519]        balance_pgdat+0x241/0x580
<4>[  246.794519]        kswapd+0x16c/0x530
<4>[  246.794519]        kthread+0x119/0x130
<4>[  246.794519]        ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50
<4>[  246.794519]
                  other info that might help us debug this:

<4>[  246.794519] Chain exists of:
                    &dev->struct_mutex/1 --> &mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> &anon_vma->rwsem

<4>[  246.794519]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

<4>[  246.794519]        CPU0                    CPU1
<4>[  246.794519]        ----                    ----
<4>[  246.794519]   lock(&anon_vma->rwsem);
<4>[  246.794519]                                lock(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
<4>[  246.794519]                                lock(&anon_vma->rwsem);
<4>[  246.794519]   lock(&dev->struct_mutex/1);
<4>[  246.794519]
                   *** DEADLOCK ***

v2: Say no to mmap_ioctl

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111744
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111870Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190928082546.3473-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a4311745
  53. 12 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  55. 07 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  57. 29 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  59. 10 7月, 2019 1 次提交