Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 5月, 2017 35 次提交
  3. 17 5月, 2017 5 次提交
    • C
      liquidio: use pcie_flr instead of duplicating it · 9ad09803
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: NFelix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9ad09803
    • A
      net: phy: Remove residual magic from PHY drivers · 1b86f702
      由 Andrew Lunn 提交于 
      commit fa8cddaf ("net phylib: Remove unnecessary condition check in phy")
removed the only place where the PHY flag PHY_HAS_MAGICANEG was
checked. But it left the flag being set in the drivers. Remove the flag.
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1b86f702
    • L
      bnx2x: Remove open coded carrier check · 3fdd34c1
      由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于 
      There is inline function to test if carrier present,
so it makes open-coded solution redundant.
Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: NYuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3fdd34c1
    • E
      tcp: internal implementation for pacing · 218af599
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      BBR congestion control depends on pacing, and pacing is
currently handled by sch_fq packet scheduler for performance reasons,
and also because implemening pacing with FQ was convenient to truly
avoid bursts.

However there are many cases where this packet scheduler constraint
is not practical.
- Many linux hosts are not focusing on handling thousands of TCP
  flows in the most efficient way.
- Some routers use fq_codel or other AQM, but still would like
  to use BBR for the few TCP flows they initiate/terminate.

This patch implements an automatic fallback to internal pacing.

Pacing is requested either by BBR or use of SO_MAX_PACING_RATE option.

If sch_fq happens to be in the egress path, pacing is delegated to
the qdisc, otherwise pacing is done by TCP itself.

One advantage of pacing from TCP stack is to get more precise rtt
estimations, and less work done from TX completion, since TCP Small
queue limits are not generally hit. Setups with single TX queue but
many cpus might even benefit from this.

Note that unlike sch_fq, we do not take into account header sizes.
Taking care of these headers would add additional complexity for
no practical differences in behavior.

Some performance numbers using 800 TCP_STREAM flows rate limited to
~48 Mbit per second on 40Gbit NIC.

If MQ+pfifo_fast is used on the NIC :

$ sar -n DEV 1 5 | grep eth
14:48:44         eth0 725743.00 2932134.00  46776.76 4335184.68      0.00      0.00      1.00
14:48:45         eth0 725349.00 2932112.00  46751.86 4335158.90      0.00      0.00      0.00
14:48:46         eth0 725101.00 2931153.00  46735.07 4333748.63      0.00      0.00      0.00
14:48:47         eth0 725099.00 2931161.00  46735.11 4333760.44      0.00      0.00      1.00
14:48:48         eth0 725160.00 2931731.00  46738.88 4334606.07      0.00      0.00      0.00
Average:         eth0 725290.40 2931658.20  46747.54 4334491.74      0.00      0.00      0.40
$ vmstat 1 5
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ------cpu-----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa st
 4  0      0 259825920  45644 2708324    0    0    21     2  247   98  0  0 100  0  0
 4  0      0 259823744  45644 2708356    0    0     0     0 2400825 159843  0 19 81  0  0
 0  0      0 259824208  45644 2708072    0    0     0     0 2407351 159929  0 19 81  0  0
 1  0      0 259824592  45644 2708128    0    0     0     0 2405183 160386  0 19 80  0  0
 1  0      0 259824272  45644 2707868    0    0     0    32 2396361 158037  0 19 81  0  0

Now use MQ+FQ :

lpaa23:~# echo fq >/proc/sys/net/core/default_qdisc
lpaa23:~# tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root mq

$ sar -n DEV 1 5 | grep eth
14:49:57         eth0 678614.00 2727930.00  43739.13 4033279.14      0.00      0.00      0.00
14:49:58         eth0 677620.00 2723971.00  43674.69 4027429.62      0.00      0.00      1.00
14:49:59         eth0 676396.00 2719050.00  43596.83 4020125.02      0.00      0.00      0.00
14:50:00         eth0 675197.00 2714173.00  43518.62 4012938.90      0.00      0.00      1.00
14:50:01         eth0 676388.00 2719063.00  43595.47 4020171.64      0.00      0.00      0.00
Average:         eth0 676843.00 2720837.40  43624.95 4022788.86      0.00      0.00      0.40
$ vmstat 1 5
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ------cpu-----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa st
 2  0      0 259832240  46008 2710912    0    0    21     2  223  192  0  1 99  0  0
 1  0      0 259832896  46008 2710744    0    0     0     0 1702206 198078  0 17 82  0  0
 0  0      0 259830272  46008 2710596    0    0     0     0 1696340 197756  1 17 83  0  0
 4  0      0 259829168  46024 2710584    0    0    16     0 1688472 197158  1 17 82  0  0
 3  0      0 259830224  46024 2710408    0    0     0     0 1692450 197212  0 18 82  0  0

As expected, number of interrupts per second is very different.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: NSoheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: Van Jacobson <vanj@google.com>
Cc: Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      218af599
    • D
      Merge branch 'udp-scalability-improvements' · 8dfedc53
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      Paolo Abeni says:

====================
udp: scalability improvements

This patch series implement an idea suggested by Eric Dumazet to
reduce the contention of the udp sk_receive_queue lock when the socket is
under flood.

An ancillary queue is added to the udp socket, and the socket always
tries first to read packets from such queue. If it's empty, we splice
the content from sk_receive_queue into the ancillary queue.

The first patch introduces some helpers to keep the udp code small, and the
following two implement the ancillary queue strategy. The code is split
to hopefully help the reviewing process.

The measured overall gain under udp flood is up to the 30% depending on
the numa layout and the number of ingress queue used by the relevant nic.

The performance numbers have been gathered using pktgen as sender, with 64
bytes packets, random src port on a host b2b connected via a 10Gbs link
with the dut.

The receiver used the udp_sink program by Jesper [1] and an h/w l4 rx hash on
the ingress nic, so that the number of ingress nic rx queues hit by the udp
traffic could be controlled via ethtool -L.

The udp_sink program was bound to the first idle cpu, to get more
stable numbers.

On a single numa node receiver:

nic rx queues           vanilla                 patched kernel
1                       1820 kpps               1900 kpps
2                       1950 kpps               2500 kpps
16                      1670 kpps               2120 kpps

When using a single nic rx queue, busy polling was also enabled,
elsewhere, in the above scenario, the bh processing becomes the bottle-neck
and this produces large artifacts in the measured performances (e.g.
improving the udp sink run time, decreases the overall tput, since more
action from the scheduler comes into play).

[1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/network-testing/blob/master/src/udp_sink.c

v1 -> v2:
  Patches 1/3 and 2/3 are unchanged, in patch 3/3 the rx_queue_lock_held param
  of udp_rmem_release() is now a bool.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8dfedc53