A tiny clean-up to allow better code separation between platforms.

v2: Fix comment placement (put in in i9xx_get_aux_clock_divider()) and
    nuke the outdated PCH eDP comment (Jani Nikula)
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For HSW+ platforms, enable the 5.4Ghz (HBR2) link rate for devices that support it. The
sink device must report that is supports Displayport 1.2 and the HBR2 bit rate in the
DPCD in order to use HBR2.
Signed-off-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Because we already do the wait in software: see
ironlake_wait_backlight_on and ironlake_edp_wait_backlight_off.

For the "backlight on" delay, even BSpec says we need to program 0x1
to PP_ON_DELAYS 12:0.

For the "backlight off" delay, if we don't do the same thing, when we
call ironlake_wait_panel_off we'll end up waiting for the it again.

On my machine the off delay is 200ms, so we save this amount of time
whenever we disable the panel (e.g, suspend).
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Function ironlake_wait_panel_off should just wait for the power off
delay, while function ironlake_wait_panel_power_cycle should wait for
the panel cycle (that's required after we turn the panel off, before
we enable it again).

The problem is that, currently, ironlake_wait_panel_off is waiting not
just for the panel to be off, but also for the power cycle delay and
the backlight off delay. This function relies on the PP_STATUS bits
3:0, which are not documented and not supposed to be used. A quick
analysis of the values we get while waiting quickly shows that power
off is reached while bits 3:0 are still 0x1, and the time it takes to
become 0x0 is the power cycle delay.

On my system with backlight off delay of 200ms, power down delay of
50ms and power cycle delay of 500ms, this is what I get:
 - Start waiting with value 0x80000008, timestamp 6.429364.
 - Jumps to 0xa0000003, timestamp 6.431360 (time waited: 0.001996)
 - Jumps to 0xa0000002, timestamp 6.631277 (time waited: 0.201913)
 - Jumps to 0x08000001, timestamp 6.681258 (time waited: 0.251894)
 - Jumps to 0x00000000, timestamp 7.192012 (time waited: 0.762648)

As you can see, ironlake_wait_panel_off is sleeping 760ms instead of
the expected 50ms: the first 200ms matches the backlight off delay
(which we should already have waited for!), then the 50ms for the real
panel off delay, then the 500ms for the panel power cycle.

This patch makes is look just at bits 31 and 29:28, which will ignore
the panel power cycle.

And just to be clear: this saves 500ms on my system every time we
disable the panel. But we can still save 200ms more (the backlight off
delay) on the next patches.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuougseek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I like how the macros are nicely column-aligned, so we can properly
compare what each macro waits for, but a column full of zeroes doesn't
really help anything: it just makes the lines bigger, and they're
already way past 80 columns. I imagine this column was used in the
past, but IMHO now we can get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

They now also work on vlv, which has the regs somewhere else. And
daring a glance into the looking glass it seems like this
functionality will continue to work the same for the next few hardware
platforms.

So it's better to just remove that misleading prefix and have a bit
shorter code for better readability.

The only exceptions are the panel/backlight functions shared with
intel_ddi.c, those get an intel_ prefix.

While at it make the vdd_on/off functions static.

And one straggler was missing the edp_ in the name, so make everything
neatly OCD.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have
to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver
action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we still use
msleep() calls directly. What this patch does is that we record the
timestamp of when action A happened, then, just before action B, we
look at how much time has passed and only sleep the remaining amount
needed.

With this change, I am able to save about 5-20ms (out of the total
200ms) of the backlight_off delay and completely skip the 1ms
backlight_on delay. The 600ms vdd_off delay doesn't happen during
normal usage anymore due to a previous patch.

v2: - Rename ironlake_wait_jiffies_delay to intel_wait_until_after and
      move it to intel_display.c
    - Fix the msleep call: diff is in jiffies
v3: - Use "tmp_jiffies" so we don't need to worry about the value of
      "jiffies" advancing while we're doing the math.
v4: - Rename function again.
    - Move function to i915_drv.h.
    - Store last_power_cycle at edp_panel_off too.
    - Use msecs_to_jiffies_timeout, then replace the msleep with an
      open-coded version that avoids the extra +1 jiffy.
    - Try to add units to every variable name so we don't confuse
      jiffies with milliseconds.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Our driver has two different ways of waiting for panel power
sequencing delays. One of these ways is through
ironlake_wait_panel_status, which implicitly uses the values written
to our registers. The other way is through the functions that call
intel_wait_until_after, and on this case we do direct msleep() calls
on the intel_dp->xxx_delay variables.

Function intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer is responsible for
initializing the _delay variables and deciding which values we need to
write to the registers, but it does not write these values to the
registers. Only at intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers we
actually do this write.

Then problem is that when we call intel_dp_i2c_init, we will get some
I2C calls, which will trigger a VDD enable, which will make use of the
panel power sequencing registers and the _delay variables, so we need
to have both ready by this time. Today, when this happens, the _delay
variables are zero (because they were not computed) and the panel
power sequence registers contain whatever values were written by the
BIOS (which are usually correct).

What this patch does is to make sure that function
intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer is called earlier, so by the time
we call intel_dp_i2c_init, the _delay variables will already be
initialized. The actual registers won't contain their final values,
but at least they will contain the values set by the BIOS.

The good side is that we were reading the values, but were not using
them for anything (because we were just skipping the msleep(0) calls),
so this "fix" shouldn't fix any real existing bugs. I was only able to
identify the problem because I added some debug code to check how much
time time we were saving with my previous patch.

Regression introduced by:
    commit ed92f0b2
    Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
    Date:   Wed Jun 12 17:27:24 2013 -0300
        drm/i915: extract intel_edp_init_connector

v2: - Rewrite commit message.
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Add new definitions for hotplug live status bits for VLV2 since they're
in reverse order from the gen4x ones.

Changelog:
- Restored gen4 bit definitions
- Added new definitions for VLV2
- Added platform check for IS_VALLEYVIEW() in dp_detect to use the correct
  bit defintions
- Replaced a lost trailing brace for the added switch()
Signed-off-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73951
[danvet: Switch to _VLV postfix instead of prefix and regroupg
comments again so that the g4x warning is right next to those defines.
Also add a _G4X suffix for those special ones. Also cc stable.]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Atm after a failed link training we disable the DP port. This can happen
during a modeset-enable or a DP link re-establishment. The latter can be
a problem and we shouldn't disable the DP port, see the previous patch for
the reasoning. In the former case the right thing would be to disable
the DP port, but also the rest of the pipe.

As a stop-gap solution leave the DP port enabled in both cases. It is an
improvement on its own (avoiding HW lock ups) and the proper solution
for the first case requires a bigger change, so let's keep that on the
TODO list.

v2:
- fix explanation of change impact (Chris)
Suggested-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Currently if the DP link is lost (either because of a hot unplug, or
failed link status check) we disable the DP port, but leave the rest
of the pipe running. This is incompatible with the modeset disabling
sequence of some platforms/configurations. At least this is the case for
DP ports on the CPU as opposed to PCH.

Atm we'll also get a warning when we do a modeset disable after the
above link lost event, since we expect the DP port to be enabled at this
point (see the bugzilla ticket for the related dmesg).

Note that with this patch we'll still end up disabling the port, thanks
to the HPD uevent and subsequent modeset disable.

See also the next patch fixing the other half of this issue.

Solution suggested by Ville.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70570Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The current values seem to be defined in a format that's specific to the
i915, gma500 and radeon drivers. To make this more generally useful, use
the values as defined in the specification.

While at it, prefix the constants with DP_ for improved namespacing.
Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

If we're disabling the VDD override bit and the panel is enabled, we
don't need to wait for anything. If the panel is disabled, then we
need to actually wait for panel_power_cycle_delay, not
panel_power_down_delay, because the power down delay was already
respected when we disabled the panel.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I don't see a reason to touch VDD when we're disabling the panel:
since the panel is enabled, we don't need VDD. This saves a few sleep
calls from the vdd_on and vdd_off functions at every modeset.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69693Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: Fix the patch mangle wiggle has done ... Spotted by Paulo.
Also drop the runtime_pm_put call which now has to go due to different
patch ordering. Also from Paul.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

And put it when it's off. Otherwise, when you run pm_pc8 from
intel-gpu-tools, and the delayed function that disables VDD runs,
we'll get some messages saying we're touching registers while the HW
is suspended.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

These are needed when we cat the debugfs and sysfs files.

V2: - Rebase
V3: - Rebase
V4: - Rebase
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When inspecting reports that boot/suspend/resume times are unusual it
would be useful to clearly identify the time we must spend waiting for
the hardware to complete its task. In this case we have a notification
before we start waiting for the panel to change state, but none
afterwards - which would be useful.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Sweeping some dead code away.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We had some mode_valid() vfuncs returning an int, others the enum. Let's
use the latter everywhere.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Reduce the eDP detection to just checking if it's port A, or if
the VBT tells us that the port is eDP for the other ports.
Suggested-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

VLV can have eDP on either port B or C, or even both. Based on the
VBT spec, intel_dpd_is_edp() should work on VLV too, assuming we
check the correct ports.

So instead of hardcoding port D, rename the function to
intel_dp_is_edp() and pass the port as a parameter, and use it
on VLV ports B and C.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71051Tested-by: NRobert Hooker <robert.hooker@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: Wrestle the patch to apply and compile properly.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Now we have this everywhere. Next up would be to wire up the DP
hotplug pin to speed up panel power sequencing for eDP panels ...

I've decided to leave the has_aux_irq logic in the code, it should
come handy for hw bringup.

For testing/fail-safety the dp aux code already has a timeout when
waiting for interrupts to signal completion and screams rather loud if
they don't arrive in time. Given that we need a real piece of hw to
talk to anyway this is probably as good as it gets.

v2: Don't check the dp aux channel bits on i965 machines, they have a
different meaning there. Yay for reusing bits at will! Spotted by
Jani.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We used to put the local sink and any downstream sinks to power down
mode at disable or dpms off using the DPCD SET_POWER register, until
this was broken by

commit e8cb4558
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Sun Jul 1 13:05:48 2012 +0200

    drm/i915/dp: convert to encoder disable/enable

Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

vlv_dpio_read/write should be describe more in PHY centric instead of
display controller centric.
Create a enum dpio_channel for channel index and enum dpio_phy for PHY
index.  This should better to gather for upcoming platform.

v2: Rebase the code based on
drm/i915/vlv: Fix typo in the DPIO register define.

v3: Rename vlv_phy to dpio_phy_iosf_port and define additional macro
DPIO_PHY, and remove unrelated change. (Ville)
Suggested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Cc: Art Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Broadwell PSR support is a superset of Haswell. With this simple
register base calculation, everything that worked on HSW for eDP PSR
should work on BDW.

Note that Broadwell provides additional PSR support. This is not
addressed at this time.

v2: Make the HAS_PSR include BDW

v3: Use the correct offset (I had incorrectly used one from my faulty
brain) (Art!)

v4: It helps if you git add

v5: Be explicit about not setting min link entry time for BDW. This
should be no functional change over v4 (Jani)
Reviewed-by: NArt Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

They're not the same as the Haswell ones.
Reviewed-by: NArt Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Some VLV PHY/PLL DPIO registers have group/lane/channel access.  Current
DPIO register definition doesn't have a structure way to break them
down. As a result it is not easy to match the PHY/PLL registers with the
configdb document.  Rename those registers based on the configdb for easy
cross references, and without the need to check the offset in the header
file.

New format is as following.

<platform name>_<DPIO component><optional lane #>_DW<dword # in the
doc>_<optional channel #>

For example,

VLV_PCS_DW0 - Group access to PCS for lane 0 to 3 for PCS DWORD 0.
VLV_PCS01_DW0_CH0 - PCS access to lane 0/1, channel 0 for PCS DWORD 0.

Another example is

VLV_TX_DW0 - Group access to TX lane 0 to 3 for TX DWORD 0
VLV_TX0_DW0 - Refer to TX Lane 0 access only for TX DWORD 0.

There is no functional change on this patch.

v2: Rebase based on previous patch change.
v3: There may be configdb different version that document the start DW
differently. Add a comment to clarify.  Fix up some mismatch start DW
for second PLL block. (Ville)
Suggested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On VLV/BYT, backlight controls a per-pipe, so when adjusting the
backlight we need to pass the correct info.  So make the externally
visible backlight functions take a connector argument, which can be used
internally to figure out the pipe backlight to adjust.

v2: make connector pipe lookup check for NULL crtc (Jani)
    fixup connector check in ASLE code (Jani)
v3: make sure we take the mode config lock around lookups (Daniel)
v4: fix double unlock in panel_get_brightness (Daniel)
v5: push ASLE work into a work queue (Daniel)
v6: separate ASLE work to a prep patch, rebase (Jani)
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

All the bits in the VBT child device type have some speciifc meaning,
so looking for an exact match isn't always the right thing. On some
VLVs for example the device type for eDP panels is 0x1806.

If we mask out the bits that could concievably change between different
eDP panels, we are left with the set of bits that should still
tell us if the port is eDP or not.

v2: Use the named bits for VBT child device type

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71051Tested-by: NRobert Hooker <robert.hooker@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

That explains why I was seeing 2 consecutive "Turning eDP VDD off"
messages.

Regression introduced by:
    commit bf13e81b
    Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
    Date:   Fri Sep 6 07:40:05 2013 +0300
        drm/i915: add support for per-pipe power sequencing on vlv
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Now we only print messages when we actually enable VDD and when we
actually disable VDD.

The changes in the last commit triggered a big number of messages
while the driver was being initialized, and I thought we were toggling
things on/off too many times, but that was not really true: we were
just being too verbose.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If the eDP output is disabled, then we try to use /dev/i2c-X file to
do i2c transations, we get a WARN from intel_dp_check_edp() saying
we're trying to do AUX communication with the panel off. So this
commit reorganizes the code so we enable the VDD at
intel_dp_i2c_aux_ch() instead of just the callers inside i915.ko.

This fixes the i2c subtest from the pc8 test of intel-gpu-tools on
machines that have eDP panels.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This isn't a real fix to the problem, but rather a stopgap measure while
trying to find a proper solution.

There are several laptops out there that fail to light up the eDP panel
in UEFI boot mode. They seem to be mostly IVB machines, including but
apparently not limited to Dell XPS 13, Asus TX300, Asus UX31A, Asus
UX32VD, Acer Aspire S7. They seem to work in CSM or legacy boot.

The difference between UEFI and CSM is that the BIOS provides a
different VBT to the kernel. The UEFI VBT typically specifies 18 bpp and
1.62 GHz link for eDP, while CSM VBT has 24 bpp and 2.7 GHz link. We end
up clamping to 18 bpp in UEFI mode, which we can fit in the 1.62 Ghz
link, and for reasons yet unknown fail to light up the panel.

Dithering from 24 to 18 bpp itself seems to work; if we use 18 bpp with
2.7 GHz link, the eDP panel lights up. So essentially this is a link
speed issue, and *not* a bpp clamping issue.

The bug raised its head since
commit 657445fe
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Sat May 4 10:09:18 2013 +0200

    Revert "drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes"

which started clamping bpp *before* computing the link requirements, and
thus affecting the required bandwidth. Clamping after the computations
kept the link at 2.7 GHz.

Even though the BIOS tells us to use 18 bpp through the VBT, it happily
boots up at 24 bpp and 2.7 GHz itself! Use this information to
selectively ignore the VBT provided value.

We can't ignore the VBT eDP bpp altogether, as there are other laptops
that do require the clamping to be used due to EDID reporting higher bpp
than the panel can support.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59841
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67950Tested-by: NUlf Winkelvos <ulf@winkelvos.de>
Tested-by: Njkp <jkp@iki.fi>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

So drm was abusing device lifetimes, by having embedded device structures
in the minor and connector it meant that the lifetime of the internal drm
objects (drm_minor and drm_connector) were tied to the lifetime of the device
files in sysfs, so if something kept those files opened the current code
would kfree the objects and things would go downhill from there.

Now in reality there is no need for these lifetimes to be so intertwined,
especailly with hotplugging of devices where we wish to remove the sysfs
and userspace facing pieces before we can unwind the internal objects due
to open userspace files or mmaps, so split the objects out so the struct
device is no longer embedded and do what fbdev does and just allocate
and remove the sysfs inodes separately.
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This is useful with the follow-up patch that frobs
dev_priv->vbt.edp_bpp, and the value no longer comes directly from
VBT.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Follow-up to
commit 0aec2881
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 27 19:01:01 2013 +0300

    drm/dp: constify DP DPCD helpers
Requested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The DP spec allows this, and requires it when full link training is
started with non-minimum voltage swing and/or non-zero pre-emphasis.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If channel equalization succeeds, there's no indication something went
wrong in clock recovery (unless debug is enabled). We should shout about
the failures and fix them instead of hiding them under the carpet.

This has allowed bugs like [1] stay dormant for a long time.

[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70117Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>