Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 14 9月, 2015 10 次提交
  3. 12 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      thermal: fix intel PCH thermal driver mismerge · dfb22fc5
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      I didn't notice this when merging the thermal code from Zhang, but his
merge (commit 5a924a07: "Merge branches 'thermal-core' and
'thermal-intel' of .git into next") of the thermal-core and
thermal-intel branches was wrong.

In thermal-core, commit 17e8351a ("thermal: consistently use int for
temperatures") converted the thermal layer to use "int" for
temperatures.

But in parallel, in the thermal-intel branch commit d0a12625
("thermal: Add Intel PCH thermal driver") added support for the intel
PCH thermal sensor using the old interfaces that used "unsigned long"
pointers.

This resulted in warnings like this:

  drivers/thermal/intel_pch_thermal.c:184:14: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
    .get_temp = pch_thermal_get_temp,
                ^
  drivers/thermal/intel_pch_thermal.c:184:14: note: (near initialization for ‘tzd_ops.get_temp’)
  drivers/thermal/intel_pch_thermal.c:186:19: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
    .get_trip_temp = pch_get_trip_temp,
                     ^
  drivers/thermal/intel_pch_thermal.c:186:19: note: (near initialization for ‘tzd_ops.get_trip_temp’)

This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      dfb22fc5
  5. 30 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 15 8月, 2015 7 次提交
    • V
      thermal/cpu_cooling: update policy limits if clipped_freq < policy->max · 1afb9c53
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      policy->max is the maximum allowed frequency defined by user and
clipped_freq is the maximum that thermal constraints allow.

If clipped_freq is lower than policy->max, then we need to readjust
policy->max.

But, if clipped_freq is greater than policy->max, we don't need to do
anything. We used to call cpufreq_verify_within_limits() in this case,
but it doesn't change anything in this case.

Lets skip this unnecessary call and write a comment that explains this.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
      1afb9c53
    • V
      thermal/cpu_cooling: rename max_freq as clipped_freq in notifier · abcbcc25
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      That's what it is for, lets name it properly.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
      abcbcc25
    • V
      thermal/cpu_cooling: rename cpufreq_val as clipped_freq · 59f0d218
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      That's what it is for, lets name it properly.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
      59f0d218
    • V
      thermal/cpu_cooling: convert 'switch' block to 'if' block in notifier · a24af233
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      We just need to take care of single event here and there is no need to
increase indentation level of most of the code (which causes lines
longer that 80 columns to break).

Kill the switch block.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
      a24af233
    • V
      thermal/cpu_cooling: quit early after updating policy · 166529c9
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      If a valid cpufreq_dev is found for policy->cpu, we should update the
policy and quit the for loop. There is no need to keep traversing the
list of cpufreq_dev's.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
      166529c9
    • V
      thermal/cpu_cooling: No need to initialize max_freq to 0 · 76fd38ce
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      Its always set before getting used, don't initialize it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
      76fd38ce
    • R
      thermal: cpu_cooling: fix lockdep problems in cpu_cooling · 02373d7c
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      A recent change to the cpu_cooling code introduced a AB-BA deadlock
scenario between the cpufreq_policy_notifier_list rwsem and the
cooling_cpufreq_lock.  This is caused by cooling_cpufreq_lock being held
before the registration/removal of the notifier block (an operation
which takes the rwsem), and the notifier code itself which takes the
locks in the reverse order:

======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.18.0+ #1453 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
rc.local/770 is trying to acquire lock:
 (cooling_cpufreq_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04abfc4>] cpufreq_thermal_notifier+0x34/0xfc

but task is already holding lock:
 ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<c0042f04>]  __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x68

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}:
       [<c06bc3b0>] down_write+0x44/0x9c
       [<c0043444>] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x28/0xd8
       [<c04ad610>] cpufreq_register_notifier+0x68/0x90
       [<c04abe4c>] __cpufreq_cooling_register.part.1+0x120/0x180
       [<c04abf44>] __cpufreq_cooling_register+0x98/0xa4
       [<c04abf8c>] cpufreq_cooling_register+0x18/0x1c
       [<bf0046f8>] imx_thermal_probe+0x1c0/0x470 [imx_thermal]
       [<c037cef8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xac
       [<c037b710>] driver_probe_device+0x114/0x234
       [<c037b8cc>] __driver_attach+0x9c/0xa0
       [<c0379d68>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0x90
       [<c037b204>] driver_attach+0x24/0x28
       [<c037ae7c>] bus_add_driver+0xe0/0x1d8
       [<c037c0cc>] driver_register+0x80/0xfc
       [<c037cd80>] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x64
       [<bf007018>] 0xbf007018
       [<c0008a5c>] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x1d8
       [<c0095da4>] load_module+0x1768/0x1ef8
       [<c0096614>] SyS_init_module+0xe0/0xf4
       [<c000ec00>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48

-> #0 (cooling_cpufreq_lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<c00619f8>] lock_acquire+0xb0/0x124
       [<c06ba3b4>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5c/0x3d8
       [<c04abfc4>] cpufreq_thermal_notifier+0x34/0xfc
       [<c0042bf4>] notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x8c
       [<c0042f20>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x50/0x68
       [<c0042f58>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28
       [<c04ae62c>] cpufreq_set_policy+0x7c/0x1d0
       [<c04af3cc>] store_scaling_governor+0x74/0x9c
       [<c04ad418>] store+0x90/0xc0
       [<c0175384>] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x58
       [<c01746b4>] kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190
       [<c010dcc0>] vfs_write+0xac/0x1b4
       [<c010dfec>] SyS_write+0x44/0x90
       [<c000ec00>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem);
                               lock(cooling_cpufreq_lock);
                               lock((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem);
  lock(cooling_cpufreq_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

7 locks held by rc.local/770:
 #0:  (sb_writers#6){.+.+.+}, at: [<c010dda0>] vfs_write+0x18c/0x1b4
 #1:  (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0174678>] kernfs_fop_write+0xa0/0x190
 #2:  (s_active#52){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0174680>] kernfs_fop_write+0xa8/0x190
 #3:  (cpu_hotplug.lock){++++++}, at: [<c0026a60>] get_online_cpus+0x34/0x90
 #4:  (cpufreq_rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<c04ad3e0>] store+0x58/0xc0
 #5:  (&policy->rwsem){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04ad3f8>] store+0x70/0xc0
 #6:  ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<c0042f04>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x68

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 770 Comm: rc.local Not tainted 3.18.0+ #1453
Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
Backtrace:
[<c00121c8>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c0012360>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
 r6:c0b85a80 r5:c0b75630 r4:00000000 r3:00000000
[<c0012348>] (show_stack) from [<c06b6c48>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x98)
[<c06b6bcc>] (dump_stack) from [<c06b42a4>] (print_circular_bug+0x28c/0x2d8)
 r4:c0b85a80 r3:d0071d40
[<c06b4018>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c00613b0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1acc/0x1bb0)
 r10:c0b50660 r8:c09e6d80 r7:d0071d40 r6:c11d0f0c r5:00000007 r4:d0072240
[<c005f8e4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c00619f8>] (lock_acquire+0xb0/0x124)
 r10:00000000 r9:c04abfc4 r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:c0a06f0c
 r4:00000000
[<c0061948>] (lock_acquire) from [<c06ba3b4>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x5c/0x3d8)
 r10:ec853800 r9:c0a06ed4 r8:d0071d40 r7:c0a06ed4 r6:c11d0f0c r5:00000000
 r4:c04abfc4
[<c06ba358>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c04abfc4>] (cpufreq_thermal_notifier+0x34/0xfc)
 r10:ec853800 r9:ec85380c r8:d00d7d3c r7:c0a06ed4 r6:d00d7d3c r5:00000000
 r4:fffffffe
[<c04abf90>] (cpufreq_thermal_notifier) from [<c0042bf4>] (notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x8c)
 r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:00000000 r4:fffffffe
[<c0042ba8>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c0042f20>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x50/0x68)
 r8:c0a072a4 r7:00000000 r6:d00d7d3c r5:ffffffff r4:c0a06fc8 r3:ffffffff
[<c0042ed0>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain) from [<c0042f58>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28)
 r7:ec98b540 r6:c13ebc80 r5:ed76e600 r4:d00d7d3c
[<c0042f38>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain) from [<c04ae62c>] (cpufreq_set_policy+0x7c/0x1d0)
[<c04ae5b0>] (cpufreq_set_policy) from [<c04af3cc>] (store_scaling_governor+0x74/0x9c)
 r7:ec98b540 r6:0000000c r5:ec98b540 r4:ed76e600
[<c04af358>] (store_scaling_governor) from [<c04ad418>] (store+0x90/0xc0)
 r6:0000000c r5:ed76e6d4 r4:ed76e600
[<c04ad388>] (store) from [<c0175384>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x58)
 r8:0000000c r7:d00d7f78 r6:ec98b540 r5:0000000c r4:ec853800 r3:0000000c
[<c0175330>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c01746b4>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190)
 r6:ec98b540 r5:00000000 r4:00000000 r3:c0175330
[<c01745d8>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c010dcc0>] (vfs_write+0xac/0x1b4)
 r10:0162aa70 r9:d00d6000 r8:0000000c r7:d00d7f78 r6:0162aa70 r5:0000000c
 r4:eccde500
[<c010dc14>] (vfs_write) from [<c010dfec>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x90)
 r10:0162aa70 r8:0000000c r7:eccde500 r6:eccde500 r5:00000000 r4:00000000
[<c010dfa8>] (SyS_write) from [<c000ec00>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48)
 r10:00000000 r8:c000edc4 r7:00000004 r6:000216cc r5:0000000c r4:0162aa70

Solve this by moving to finer grained locking - use one mutex to protect
the cpufreq_dev_list as a whole, and a separate lock to ensure correct
ordering of cpufreq notifier registration and removal.

cooling_list_lock is taken within cooling_cpufreq_lock on
(un)registration to preserve the behavior of the code, i.e. to
atomically add/remove to the list and (un)register the notifier.

Fixes: 2dcd851f ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Update always cpufreq policy with
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
      02373d7c
  9. 14 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 07 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 04 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 03 8月, 2015 15 次提交
  17. 06 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  19. 04 6月, 2015 1 次提交