Since commit a5810f55 ("drm/i915: Allow more varied alternate
fixed modes for panels") intel_panel_add_edid_alt_fixed_modes()
no longer considers vrr vs. drrs separately. So no reason to
pass them as separate parameters either.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220927180615.25476-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Add a function to get the fixed_mode with the highest clock.
The plan is to use this for the link bw calculation on seamless
DRRS panels so that we alwasy end up with the same link params
regardless of the requested refresh rate. This will allow fastset
to do seamless refresh rate changes based on userspace request
instead of having to go for a full modeset.

TODO: the function name isn't great
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907091057.11572-15-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

On some systems the panel reports alternate modes with
different blanking periods. If the EDID reports them and VBT
doesn't tell us otherwise then I can't really see why they
should be rejected. So allow their use for the purposes of
static DRRS.

For seamless DRRS we still require a much more exact match
of course. But that logic only kicks in when selecting the
downclock mode (or in the future when determining whether
we can do a seamless refresh rate change due to a user
modeset).

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6374Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220830212436.2021-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Add intel_has_quirk() for checking if a display quirk is present. Avoid
accessing i915->quirks all over the place.

v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/74f954ca81a8068033141a15686dffd01ad9b0f9.1661779055.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Move display VBT related members under drm_i915_private display
sub-struct.

v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/db4b648b201ea0b79654fec2028120999a735db0.1661779055.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

It seem that when dealing with VRR capable eDP panels we need
to accept fixed modes with variable vblank length (which is what
VRR varies dynamically). Typically the preferred mode seems to be
a non-VRR more (lowish dotclock/refresh rate + short vblank).

We also have examples where it looks like even the hblank length
is a bit different between the preferred mode vs. VRR mode(s).
So let's just accept anything that has matching hdisp+vdisp+flags.

v2: Document that is_alt_drrs_mode() is a subset of is_alt_vrr_mode() (Jani)

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/125Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220531191844.11313-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

To help with debugging DRRS/VRR panel init let's dump out all
the fixed modes we rejected for whatever reason.
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220531191844.11313-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.

We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.

Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.

TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.

v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Make sure our choice of downclock mode respects the VBT
seameless DRRS min refresh rate limit.

v2: s/vrefesh/vrefresh/ (Jani)
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220504150440.13748-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

We shouldn't restrict ourselves to just downclock modes with
lower refresh rate than the preferred mode. Laptops these
days can offer higher refresh rate modes as well.

Remove the arbitrary limit and allow all modes that, apart
from the clock, match the preferred mode.

v2: s/add_edid_downclock_modes/add_edid_alt_fixed_modes/ (Jani)
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Remove the "two fixed modes only" limit and grab as many
downclock modes from the EDID as we can find.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Instead of duplicating the fixed/downclock modes we can just grab
the originals straight from the probed_modes list and keep them.
The next .get_modes() is going to repopulate the probed_modes list
anyway so whatever we leave there is just going to sit around until
that time wasting memory. In fact let's clear out the probed modes
list entirely to make sure we get 100% consistent behaviour starting
already from the very first real .get_modes().
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

The intel_panel_add_edid_fixed_mode() vs.
intel_panel_add_edid_downclock_mode() split is not really
helpful. Let's just roll those into a single function so
that the connector init code doesn't have to care too much
about this. All we need to know is whether DRRS should be
allowed or not.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

intel_drrs_init() is a mostly pointless wrapper around
intel_panel_add_edid_downclock_mode(), get rid of it.

The only really useful thing left in there is the debug
print regarding the DRRS type supported by the connector.
Let's just move that into intel_panel_init().
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

All the non-EDID fixed mode functions basically do the exact
same thing. Let's refactor the common bits into a shared
function.

There are minor differences on how the mode types are populated,
whether the display info physical size is updated, and the debug
print. The differences are purely accidental, so unifying them is
actually a good thing.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Rather than having the connector init get the fixed mode back from
intel_panel and then feed it straight back into intel_panel_init()
let's just make the fixed mode lookup put the mode directly onto
the panel's fixed_modes list. Avoids the pointless round trip and
opens the door for further enhancements to the fixed mode handling.

v2: Make the debug message correct by using intel_panel_drrs_type() (Jani)
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Apart from the EDID and VBT based mechanism we also sometimes
use the encoder's current mode as the panel fixed mode. We
currently have the same code for that duplicated in two places.
Let's unify.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

We have a function for duplicating the VBT LFP mode. Add the same
for the VBT SDVO mode.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Rename intel_panel_vbt_fixed_mode() to
intel_panel_vbt_lfp_fixed_mode() to be more descriptive.
We'll have another VBT fixed mode function soon and we
don't want to confuse the two.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Replace all drm_mode_debug_printmodeline() calls with
DRM_MODE_FMT+DRM_MODE_ARG(). Makes the debug output a bit more
terse in places where we previously had a newline in the precedeing
drm_dbg_kms(), and avoids anything else sneaking in between the two
printk()s in all cases.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

All the other intel_panel functions take struct intel_connector,
so might as well make init()/fini() take one as well.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220323182935.4701-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Store the fixed_mode and downclock_mode as a real list,
in preparation for exposing other supported modes as well.

v2: Init the list in intel_sdvo_connector_alloc() too
v3: Use list_first_entry_or_null() (Jani)
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220314152737.9125-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Let's start supporting static DRRS by trying to match the refresh
rate the user has requested, assuming the panel supports suitable
timings.

For now we stick to just our current two timings:
- fixed_mode: the panel's preferred mode
- downclock_mode: the lowest refresh rate mode we found
Some panels may support more timings than that, but we'll
have to convert our fixed_mode/downclock_mode pointers
into a full list before we can handle that.

v2: Rebase due to intel_panel_get_modes()

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> #v1
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-16-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Add a helper to determine which type of DRRS the panel supports.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

There are a couple of cases where we essentially just want to
get/check the preferred fixed mode of the panel. Add a small
helper for that to abstract away the direct pointer lookup.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Several connectors want to return the fixed_mode from .get_modes(),
add a helper to do that (and hide the details inside intel_panel.c).
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Abstract away the details on where we store the fixed/downclock
modes, and also how we select them. Will be useful for static
DRRS (aka. allowing the user to select the refresh rate for the
panel).

We pass in the user requested mode to intel_panel_fixed_mode()
so that in the future it may try to match the refresh rate.
And intel_panel_downclock_mode() gets passed the adjusted_mode
we actually chose to use so that it may find a suitable lower
resresh rate variant.

v2: Hook it up for all encoders
    s/fixed_mode/adjusted_mode/ in intel_panel_downclock_mode() (Jani)
    Elaborate on the choice or arguments for the functions (Jani)
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311172428.14685-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Instead of just having the pipe_src_{w,h} let's use a full
drm_rect for it. This will be particularly useful to astract
away some bigjoiner details.

v2: No hweight() stuff yet
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223131315.18016-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

When using a panel with a fixed mode we don't change the refresh
rate of the display. Reject any user requested mode which doesn't
match that fixed refresh rate.

Unfortunately when Xorg sees the scaling_mode property on the
connecor it likes to automagically cook up modes whose refresh
rate is a fair bit off from the fixed refresh rate we use. So
we have to give it some extra latitude so that we don't start to
reject all of it.

v2: sDVO now uses intel_panel_compute_config() too
v3: Add a debug message to inform the user what happened

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2939
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3969Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210929184536.8332-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Let's introduce a compute_config() helper for fixed mode panels.
For now all it does is the fixed_mode->adjusted_mode copy.

Note that with sDVO we have to ask the external encoder chip
to spit out our actual display timings for us, so the fixed_mode
to adjusted_mode copy done by intel_panel_compute_config() is
redundant, but we still want to use it to do other checks for us
later. We'll be fine so long as we only call it before
intel_sdvo_get_preferred_input_mode() overwrites adjusted_mode
with the timings from the encoder.

v2: Use intel_panel_compute_config() with sDVO
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210927185207.13620-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

When using a fixed mode we won't change the refresh rate ever.
So filter out all modes that don't match the fixed_mode's refresh
rate.

I'm going to declare the "rounded to nearest Hz refresh
rates must match" approach good enough for now.

Note that we could start supporting multiple refresh rates
with panels that can do it, but that would mean replacing
the single fixed mode concept with a list of fixed modes.
Then we could look for the closest match to the user's
requested refresh rate and use that. But all of that would
be a fair bit of work so we'll leave it for later.

References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2939
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3969Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210923200109.4459-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Extract intel_panel_mode_valid() from the eDP code to a generic helper.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210923200109.4459-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Follow the usual naming conventions. Also pull HAS_GMCH() check to
intel_panel_fitting(). No functional changes.

Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/9ff6e42e377bdb0c9349f50d9ea79671059633c7.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Follow the usual naming conventions. As a drive-by cleanup, also pass
intel_connector instead of drm_connector to intel_backlight_setup(). No
functional changes.

Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ea1c22370210abdd4f5547af73c71b902061ea50.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

In a long overdue refactoring, split out backlight code to new
intel_backlight.[ch]. Simple code movement, leave renames for follow-up
work. No functional changes.

Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/97d310848f03061473b9b2328e2c5c4dcf263cfa.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

There's no performance reason to have it as static inline; move it out
of intel_display_types.h to reduce clutter and dependency on i915_drv.h.
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6f2c05005e4fa43a5572b02b3f41363725ffdb4f.1629281426.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.

This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)

@has_include@
@@
(
 #include "intel_de.h"
|
 #include "display/intel_de.h"
)

@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
  #include "intel_display_types.h"

@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
  #include "display/intel_display_types.h"

Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Registering multiple backlight devices with intel_backlight name will
obviously fail, regardless of whether they're two connectors in the same
drm device or two different drm devices.

It would be preferrable to switch to completely unique names, and sunset
the generic intel_backlight name. However, there are apparently users
out there that hardcode the name, so the change would break backward
compatibility.

As a compromise, register the first device with intel_backlight name. In
the common case, this is the only backlight device anyway. From the
second device on, use card%d-%s-backlight format, for example
card0-eDP-2-backlight, to make the name unique.

This approach does not preclude us from registering the first device
using the same naming scheme in the future.

v2: Keep using intel_backlight name for first backlight device

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2794Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7dc3f6974711ce44522189dc9db05d1e6e24e6d8.1619604743.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Add connector and backlight device name to logging, and propagate error
code from backlight_device_register() instead of flattening to
-ENODEV. Storing the name in an allocated buffer is unnecessary here,
but makes follow-up work on names much cleaner.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/271206461d9c0f42755792236330b588df3b532e.1619604743.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:

	1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
	macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
	like is done for >, >=, <=?

	2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
	brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
	could actually repurpose it for a range check

With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.

So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:

	@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
	- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
	+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1

	@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
	- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
	+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1

	@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
	- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
	+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com