1. 20 4月, 2009 8 次提交
  2. 18 4月, 2009 8 次提交
  3. 17 4月, 2009 16 次提交
  4. 16 4月, 2009 8 次提交
    • J
      ar9170: fix struct layout on arm · 1269fa73
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      arm will pad even between u8's, so mark the structs/unions
      packed. Fixes a build bug on arm due to BUILD_BUG_ON tests
      in the code.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
      Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      1269fa73
    • P
      orinoco: correct timeout logic in __orinoco_hw_set_tkip_key() · 91fe9ca7
      Pavel Roskin 提交于
      If the value read from HERMES_RID_TXQUEUEEMPTY becomes 0 after exactly
      100 readings, we wrongly consider it a timeout.  Rewrite the clever
      while loop as a for loop that does the right thing and looks simpler.
      
      Reported by Juha Leppanen <juha_motorsportcom@luukku.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      91fe9ca7
    • G
      mac80211: Fragmentation threshold (typo) · 23a99840
      Gerrit Renker 提交于
      mac80211: Fragmentation threshold (typo)
      
      ieee80211_ioctl_siwfrag() sets the fragmentation_threshold to 2352
      when frame fragmentation is to be disabled, yet the corresponding
      'get' function tests for 2353 bytes instead.
      
      This causes user-space tools to display a fragmentation threshold
      of 2352 bytes even if fragmentation has been disabled.
      Signed-off-by: NGerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      23a99840
    • H
      rt2x00: prevent double kfree when failing to register hardware · f05faa31
      Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski 提交于
      In a scenario where there isn't any firmware available, we will have a
      double kfree of rt2x00dev->spec.channels_info when ieee80211_register_hw
      returns an error status inside rt2x00lib_probe_hw.
      
      The problem is that if ieee80211_register_hw fails, we call
      rt2x00lib_remove_hw twice:
      * first inside rt2x00lib_probe_hw upon failure of ieee80211_register_hw
      * error status is returned to rt2x00lib_probe_dev, which then sees it and
        calls in this case rt2x00lib_remove_dev that will again run
        rt2x00lib_remove_hw
      
      Prevent this avoiding calling rt2x00lib_remove_hw inside
      rt2x00lib_probe_hw
      
      Problem was detected with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y, CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y,
      CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y, that dumps this with no firmware available:
      
      rt61pci 0000:00:07.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
      wmaster0 (rt61pci): not using net_device_ops yet
      phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'pid'
      phy0: Failed to initialize wep: -2
      phy0 -> rt2x00lib_probe_dev: Error - Failed to initialize hw.
      =============================================================================
      BUG kmalloc-128: Object already free
      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      INFO: Allocated in rt61pci_probe_hw+0x3e5/0x6e0 [rt61pci] age=340 cpu=0 pid=21
      INFO: Freed in rt2x00lib_remove_hw+0x59/0x70 [rt2x00lib] age=0 cpu=0 pid=21
      INFO: Slab 0xc13ac3e0 objects=23 used=10 fp=0xdd59f6e0 flags=0x400000c3
      INFO: Object 0xdd59f6e0 @offset=1760 fp=0xdd59f790
      
      Bytes b4 0xdd59f6d0:  15 00 00 00 b2 8a fb ff 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ....².ûÿZZZZZZZZ
        Object 0xdd59f6e0:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
        Object 0xdd59f6f0:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
        Object 0xdd59f700:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
        Object 0xdd59f710:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
        Object 0xdd59f720:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
        Object 0xdd59f730:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
        Object 0xdd59f740:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
        Object 0xdd59f750:  6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b a5 kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk¥
       Redzone 0xdd59f760:  bb bb bb bb                                     »»»»
       Padding 0xdd59f788:  5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a                         ZZZZZZZZ
      Pid: 21, comm: stage1 Not tainted 2.6.29.1-desktop-1.1mnb #1
      Call Trace:
       [<c01abbb3>] print_trailer+0xd3/0x120
       [<c01abd37>] object_err+0x37/0x50
       [<c01acf57>] __slab_free+0xe7/0x2f0
       [<c01ad1de>] kfree+0x7e/0xd0
       [<e0e4a239>] ? rt2x00lib_remove_hw+0x59/0x70 [rt2x00lib]
       [<e0e4a239>] ? rt2x00lib_remove_hw+0x59/0x70 [rt2x00lib]
       [<e0e4a239>] rt2x00lib_remove_hw+0x59/0x70 [rt2x00lib]
       [<e0e4acc7>] rt2x00lib_remove_dev+0x37/0x50 [rt2x00lib]
       [<e0e4b087>] rt2x00lib_probe_dev+0x1a7/0x3b0 [rt2x00lib]
       [<e0eb288f>] rt2x00pci_probe+0xdf/0x1ee [rt2x00pci]
       [<c026b9ee>] local_pci_probe+0xe/0x10
       [<c026c750>] pci_device_probe+0x60/0x80
       [<c02d5c2a>] driver_probe_device+0x9a/0x2e0
       [<c02d5ef9>] __driver_attach+0x89/0x90
       [<c02d541b>] bus_for_each_dev+0x4b/0x70
       [<c026c690>] ? pci_device_remove+0x0/0x40
       [<c02d59d9>] driver_attach+0x19/0x20
       [<c02d5e70>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x90
       [<c02d4cef>] bus_add_driver+0x1cf/0x2a0
       [<c026c690>] ? pci_device_remove+0x0/0x40
       [<c02d60c9>] driver_register+0x69/0x140
       [<c026c9b0>] __pci_register_driver+0x40/0x80
       [<e0ecc000>] ? rt61pci_init+0x0/0x19 [rt61pci]
       [<e0ecc017>] rt61pci_init+0x17/0x19 [rt61pci]
       [<c0101116>] do_one_initcall+0x26/0x1c0
       [<c01ab90c>] ? slab_pad_check+0x3c/0x120
       [<c01ab90c>] ? slab_pad_check+0x3c/0x120
       [<c01ac8da>] ? check_object+0xda/0x210
       [<c01b0026>] ? percpu_free+0x46/0x50
       [<c01ad09e>] ? __slab_free+0x22e/0x2f0
       [<c01b0026>] ? percpu_free+0x46/0x50
       [<c01b0026>] ? percpu_free+0x46/0x50
       [<c01b0026>] ? percpu_free+0x46/0x50
       [<c01687ec>] ? stop_machine_destroy+0x3c/0x40
       [<c015e515>] ? load_module+0xa5/0x1c50
       [<e0ec5000>] ? rt61pci_eepromregister_read+0x0/0x40 [rt61pci]
       [<e0eb2000>] ? rt2x00pci_write_tx_data+0x0/0x90 [rt2x00pci]
       [<c03ac2fb>] ? mutex_lock+0xb/0x20
       [<c03ac2fb>] ? mutex_lock+0xb/0x20
       [<c017ad16>] ? tracepoint_update_probe_range+0x76/0xa0
       [<c017ad6f>] ? tracepoint_module_notify+0x2f/0x40
       [<c03b02ed>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x70
       [<c014f0ed>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x60
       [<c014f11a>] ? blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
       [<c0160156>] sys_init_module+0x96/0x1d0
       [<c019dad6>] ? sys_munmap+0x46/0x60
       [<c0105546>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
      FIX kmalloc-128: Object at 0xdd59f6e0 not freed
      rt61pci 0000:00:07.0: PCI INT A disabled
      rt61pci: probe of 0000:00:07.0 failed with error -2
      Signed-off-by: NHerton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
      Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      f05faa31
    • J
      fix iwl3945 registration regression · d60cc91a
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      I forgot that iwl3945 registration is separate from iwlagn.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      d60cc91a
    • M
      mac80211: quiet beacon loss messages · a860402d
      Michael Buesch 提交于
      On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:29:38 Michael Buesch wrote:
      > On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:23:59 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
      > > With latest linus tree I am getting, .config file attached:
      > >
      > > [   22.895051] r8169: eth0: link down
      > > [   22.897564] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
      > > [   22.928047] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
      > > [   22.982292] libvirtd used greatest stack depth: 4200 bytes left
      > > [   63.709879] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6
      > > [   63.712096] wlan0: authenticated
      > > [   63.712127] wlan0: associate with AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6
      > > [   63.726831] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 (capab=0x471 status=0 aid=1)
      > > [   63.726855] wlan0: associated
      > > [   63.730093] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
      > > [   74.296087] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
      > > [   79.349044] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  119.358200] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  179.354292] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  259.366044] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  359.348292] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  361.953459] packagekitd used greatest stack depth: 4160 bytes left
      > > [  478.824258] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  598.813343] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  718.817292] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  838.824567] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [  958.815402] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1078.848434] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1198.822913] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1318.824931] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1438.814157] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1558.827336] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1678.823011] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1798.830589] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 1918.828044] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 2038.827224] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 2116.517152] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 2158.840243] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      > > [ 2278.827427] wlan0: beacon loss from AP 00:11:95:9e:df:f6 - sending probe request
      >
      >
      > I think this message should only show if CONFIG_MAC80211_VERBOSE_DEBUG is set.
      > It's kind of expected that we lose a beacon once in a while, so we shouldn't print
      > verbose messages to the kernel log (even if they are KERN_DEBUG).
      >
      > And besides that, I think one can easily remotely trigger this message and flood the logs.
      > So it should probably _also_ be ratelimited.
      
      Something like this:
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
      a860402d
    • M
      b43: Do radio lock assertion in software · 591f3dc2
      Michael Buesch 提交于
      The assertion of the lock-bit in the hardware register is unreliable,
      because there are devices with quirks that will randomly set the bit.
      
      Do the assertion in software, only.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      591f3dc2
    • I
      rt2x00: Add rt73usb USB IDs · 6aabd4c4
      Ivo van Doorn 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      6aabd4c4