pfn_range_valid_contig() bails out when it finds an in-use page or a
hugetlb page, among other things.  We can drop the in-use page check since
__alloc_contig_pages can migrate away those pages, and the hugetlb page
check can go too since isolate_migratepages_range is now capable of
dealing with hugetlb pages.  Either way, those checks are racy so let the
end function handle it when the time comes.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-8-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Suggested-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

alloc_contig_range() will fail if it finds a HugeTLB page within the
range, without a chance to handle them.  Since HugeTLB pages can be
migrated as any LRU or Movable page, it does not make sense to bail out
without trying.  Enable the interface to recognize in-use HugeTLB pages so
we can migrate them, and have much better chances to succeed the call.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-7-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

alloc_contig_range will fail if it ever sees a HugeTLB page within the
range we are trying to allocate, even when that page is free and can be
easily reallocated.

This has proved to be problematic for some users of alloc_contic_range,
e.g: CMA and virtio-mem, where those would fail the call even when those
pages lay in ZONE_MOVABLE and are free.

We can do better by trying to replace such page.

Free hugepages are tricky to handle so as to no userspace application
notices disruption, we need to replace the current free hugepage with a
new one.

In order to do that, a new function called alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page is
introduced.  This function will first try to get a new fresh hugepage, and
if it succeeds, it will replace the old one in the free hugepage pool.

The free page replacement is done under hugetlb_lock, so no external users
of hugetlb will notice the change.  To allocate the new huge page, we use
alloc_buddy_huge_page(), so we do not have to deal with any counters, and
prep_new_huge_page() is not called.  This is valulable because in case we
need to free the new page, we only need to call __free_pages().

Once we know that the page to be replaced is a genuine 0-refcounted huge
page, we remove the old page from the freelist by remove_hugetlb_page().
Then, we can call __prep_new_huge_page() and
__prep_account_new_huge_page() for the new huge page to properly
initialize it and increment the hstate->nr_huge_pages counter (previously
decremented by remove_hugetlb_page()).  Once done, the page is enqueued by
enqueue_huge_page() and it is ready to be used.

There is one tricky case when page's refcount is 0 because it is in the
process of being released.  A missing PageHugeFreed bit will tell us that
freeing is in flight so we retry after dropping the hugetlb_lock.  The
race window should be small and the next retry should make a forward
progress.

E.g:

CPU0				CPU1
free_huge_page()		isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page
				  PageHuge() == T
				  alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page
				    alloc_buddy_huge_page()
				    spin_lock_irq(hugetlb_lock)
				    // PageHuge() && !PageHugeFreed &&
				    // !PageCount()
				    spin_unlock_irq(hugetlb_lock)
  spin_lock_irq(hugetlb_lock)
  1) update_and_free_page
       PageHuge() == F
       __free_pages()
  2) enqueue_huge_page
       SetPageHugeFreed()
  spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock)
				  spin_lock_irq(hugetlb_lock)
                                   1) PageHuge() == F (freed by case#1 from CPU0)
				   2) PageHuge() == T
                                       PageHugeFreed() == T
                                       - proceed with replacing the page

In the case above we retry as the window race is quite small and we have
high chances to succeed next time.

With regard to the allocation, we restrict it to the node the page belongs
to with __GFP_THISNODE, meaning we do not fallback on other node's zones.

Note that gigantic hugetlb pages are fenced off since there is a cyclic
dependency between them and alloc_contig_range.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-6-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Currently, prep_new_huge_page() performs two functions.  It sets the
right state for a new hugetlb, and increases the hstate's counters to
account for the new page.

Let us split its functionality into two separate functions, decoupling
the handling of the counters from initializing a hugepage.  The outcome
is having __prep_new_huge_page(), which only initializes the page , and
__prep_account_new_huge_page(), which adds the new page to the hstate's
counters.

This allows us to be able to set a hugetlb without having to worry about
the counter/locking.  It will prove useful in the next patch.
prep_new_huge_page() still calls both functions.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-5-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pages allocated via the page allocator or CMA get its private field
cleared by means of post_alloc_hook().

Pages allocated during boot, that is directly from the memblock
allocator, get cleared by paging_init()-> ..  ->memmap_init_zone-> ..
->__init_single_page() before any memblock allocation.

Based on this ground, let us remove the clearing of the flag from
prep_new_huge_page() as it is not needed.  This was a leftover from
commit 6c037149 ("hugetlb: convert PageHugeFreed to HPageFreed
flag").

Previously the explicit clearing was necessary because compound
allocations do not get this initialization (see prep_compound_page).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-4-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Currently, isolate_migratepages_{range,block} and their callers use a pfn
== 0 vs pfn != 0 scheme to let the caller know whether there was any error
during isolation.

This does not work as soon as we need to start reporting different error
codes and make sure we pass them down the chain, so they are properly
interpreted by functions like e.g: alloc_contig_range.

Let us rework isolate_migratepages_{range,block} so we can report error
codes.  Since isolate_migratepages_block will stop returning the next pfn
to be scanned, we reuse the cc->migrate_pfn field to keep track of that.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-3-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages", v10.

alloc_contig_range lacks the ability to handle HugeTLB pages.  This can
be problematic for some users, e.g: CMA and virtio-mem, where those
users will fail the call if alloc_contig_range ever sees a HugeTLB page,
even when those pages lay in ZONE_MOVABLE and are free.  That problem
can be easily solved by replacing the page in the free hugepage pool.

In-use HugeTLB are no exception though, as those can be isolated and
migrated as any other LRU or Movable page.

This aims to improve alloc_contig_range->isolate_migratepages_block, so
that HugeTLB pages can be recognized and handled.

Since we also need to start reporting errors down the chain (e.g:
-ENOMEM due to not be able to allocate a new hugetlb page),
isolate_migratepages_{range,block} interfaces need to change to start
reporting error codes instead of the pfn == 0 vs pfn != 0 scheme it is
using right now.  From now on, isolate_migratepages_block will not
return the next pfn to be scanned anymore, but -EINTR, -ENOMEM or 0, so
we the next pfn to be scanned will be recorded in cc->migrate_pfn field
(as it is already done in isolate_migratepages_range()).

Below is an insight from David (thanks), where the problem can clearly be
seen:

 "Start a VM with 4G. Hotplug 1G via virtio-mem and online it to
  ZONE_MOVABLE. Allocate 512 huge pages.

  [root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
  MemTotal:        5061512 kB
  MemFree:         3319396 kB
  MemAvailable:    3457144 kB
  ...
  HugePages_Total:     512
  HugePages_Free:      512
  HugePages_Rsvd:        0
  HugePages_Surp:        0
  Hugepagesize:       2048 kB

  The huge pages get partially allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE. Try unplugging
  1G via virtio-mem (remember, all ZONE_MOVABLE). Inside the guest:

  [  180.058992] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.060531] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.061972] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.063413] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.064838] alloc_contig_range: [1b8000, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.065848] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.066794] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.067738] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.068669] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy
  [  180.069598] alloc_contig_range: [1bfc00, 1c0000) PFNs busy"

And then with this patchset running:

 "Same experiment with ZONE_MOVABLE:

  a) Free huge pages: all memory can get unplugged again.

  b) Allocated/populated but idle huge pages: all memory can get unplugged
     again.

  c) Allocated/populated but all 512 huge pages are read/written in a
     loop: all memory can get unplugged again, but I get a single

     [  121.192345] alloc_contig_range: [180000, 188000) PFNs busy

     Most probably because it happened to try migrating a huge page
     while it was busy.  As virtio-mem retries on ZONE_MOVABLE a couple of
     times, it can deal with this temporary failure.

  Last but not least, I did something extreme:

  # cat /proc/meminfo
  MemTotal:        5061568 kB
  MemFree:          186560 kB
  MemAvailable:     354524 kB
  ...
  HugePages_Total:    2048
  HugePages_Free:     2048
  HugePages_Rsvd:        0
  HugePages_Surp:        0

  Triggering unplug would require to dissolve+alloc - which now fails
  when trying to allocate an additional ~512 huge pages (1G).

  As expected, I can properly see memory unplug not fully succeeding.  +
  I get a fairly continuous stream of

  [  226.611584] alloc_contig_range: [19f400, 19f800) PFNs busy
  ...

  But more importantly, the hugepage count remains stable, as configured
  by the admin (me):

  HugePages_Total:    2048
  HugePages_Free:     2048
  HugePages_Rsvd:        0
  HugePages_Surp:        0"

This patch (of 7):

Currently, __alloc_contig_migrate_range can generate -EINTR, -ENOMEM or
-EBUSY, and report them down the chain.  The problem is that when
migrate_pages() reports -ENOMEM, we keep going till we exhaust all the
try-attempts (5 at the moment) instead of bailing out.

migrate_pages() bails out right away on -ENOMEM because it is considered a
fatal error.  Do the same here instead of keep going and retrying.  Note
that this is not fixing a real issue, just a cosmetic change.  Although we
can save some cycles by backing off ealier

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-1-osalvador@suse.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210419075413.1064-2-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

After making hugetlb lock irq safe and separating some functionality
done under the lock, add some lockdep_assert_held to help verify
locking.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-9-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit c77c0a8a ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in
non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being
called from irq context.  That commit hands off free_huge_page processing
to a workqueue if !in_task.  However, this doesn't cover all the cases as
pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1].

:  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
:
:        CPU0                    CPU1
:        ----                    ----
:   lock(hugetlb_lock);
:                                local_irq_disable();
:                                lock(slock-AF_INET);
:                                lock(hugetlb_lock);
:   <Interrupt>
:     lock(slock-AF_INET);

Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from
hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to
hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled.  Hugetlb freeing path doesn't
disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead
to a deadlock.

This commit addresses the issue by doing the following:
 - Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of
   changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls.
 - Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner.
 - Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

free_pool_huge_page was called with hugetlb_lock held.  It would remove
a hugetlb page, and then free the corresponding pages to the lower level
allocators such as buddy.  free_pool_huge_page was called in a loop to
remove hugetlb pages and these loops could hold the hugetlb_lock for a
considerable time.

Create new routine remove_pool_huge_page to replace free_pool_huge_page.
remove_pool_huge_page will remove the hugetlb page, and it must be
called with the hugetlb_lock held.  It will return the removed page and
it is the responsibility of the caller to free the page to the lower
level allocators.  The hugetlb_lock is dropped before freeing to these
allocators which results in shorter lock hold times.

Add new helper routine to call update_and_free_page for a list of pages.

Note: Some changes to the routine return_unused_surplus_pages are in
need of explanation.  Commit e5bbc8a6 ("mm/hugetlb.c: fix
reservation race when freeing surplus pages") modified this routine to
address a race which could occur when dropping the hugetlb_lock in the
loop that removes pool pages.  Accounting changes introduced in that
commit were subtle and took some thought to understand.  This commit
removes the cond_resched_lock() and the potential race.  Therefore,
remove the subtle code and restore the more straight forward accounting
effectively reverting the commit.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-7-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

With the introduction of remove_hugetlb_page(), there is no need for
update_and_free_page to hold the hugetlb lock.  Change all callers to
drop the lock before calling.

With additional code modifications, this will allow loops which decrease
the huge page pool to drop the hugetlb_lock with each page to reduce
long hold times.

The ugly unlock/lock cycle in free_pool_huge_page will be removed in a
subsequent patch which restructures free_pool_huge_page.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-6-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The new remove_hugetlb_page() routine is designed to remove a hugetlb
page from hugetlbfs processing.  It will remove the page from the active
or free list, update global counters and set the compound page
destructor to NULL so that PageHuge() will return false for the 'page'.
After this call, the 'page' can be treated as a normal compound page or
a collection of base size pages.

update_and_free_page no longer decrements h->nr_huge_pages{_node} as
this is performed in remove_hugetlb_page.  The only functionality
performed by update_and_free_page is to free the base pages to the lower
level allocators.

update_and_free_page is typically called after remove_hugetlb_page.

remove_hugetlb_page is to be called with the hugetlb_lock held.

Creating this routine and separating functionality is in preparation for
restructuring code to reduce lock hold times.  This commit should not
introduce any changes to functionality.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-5-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The helper routine hstate_next_node_to_alloc accesses and modifies the
hstate variable next_nid_to_alloc.  The helper is used by the routines
alloc_pool_huge_page and adjust_pool_surplus.  adjust_pool_surplus is
called with hugetlb_lock held.  However, alloc_pool_huge_page can not be
called with the hugetlb lock held as it will call the page allocator.
Two instances of alloc_pool_huge_page could be run in parallel or
alloc_pool_huge_page could run in parallel with adjust_pool_surplus
which may result in the variable next_nid_to_alloc becoming invalid for
the caller and pages being allocated on the wrong node.

Both alloc_pool_huge_page and adjust_pool_surplus are only called from
the routine set_max_huge_pages after boot.  set_max_huge_pages is only
called as the reusult of a user writing to the proc/sysfs nr_hugepages,
or nr_hugepages_mempolicy file to adjust the number of hugetlb pages.

It makes little sense to allow multiple adjustment to the number of
hugetlb pages in parallel.  Add a mutex to the hstate and use it to only
allow one hugetlb page adjustment at a time.  This will synchronize
modifications to the next_nid_to_alloc variable.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Now that cma_release is non-blocking and irq safe, there is no need to
drop hugetlb_lock before calling.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts", v5.

This effort is the result a recent bug report [1].  Syzbot found a
potential deadlock in the hugetlb put_page/free_huge_page_path.  WARNING:
SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected Since the
free_huge_page_path already has code to 'hand off' page free requests to a
workqueue, a suggestion was proposed to make the in_irq() detection
accurate by always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT [2].  The outcome of that
discussion was that the hugetlb put_page path (free_huge_page) path should
be properly fixed and safe for all calling contexts.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311021321.127500-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com

This patch (of 8):

cma_release is currently a sleepable operatation because the bitmap
manipulation is protected by cma->lock mutex.  Hugetlb code which relies
on cma_release for CMA backed (giga) hugetlb pages, however, needs to be
irq safe.

The lock doesn't protect any sleepable operation so it can be changed to a
(irq aware) spin lock.  The bitmap processing should be quite fast in
typical case but if cma sizes grow to TB then we will likely need to
replace the lock by a more optimized bitmap implementation.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The local variable pseudo_vma is not used anymore.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-6-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

A rare out of memory error would prevent removal of the reserve map region
for a page.  hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() handles this rare case to avoid
dangling with incorrect counts.  Unfortunately, hugepage_subpool_get_pages
and hugetlb_acct_memory could possibly fail too.  We should correctly
handle these cases.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: b5cec28d ("hugetlbfs: truncate_hugepages() takes a range of pages")
Signed-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The resv_map could be NULL since this routine can be called in the evict
inode path for all hugetlbfs inodes and we will have chg = 0 in this case.
But (chg - freed) won't go negative as Mike pointed out:

 "If resv_map is NULL, then no hugetlb pages can be allocated/associated
  with the file.  As a result, remove_inode_hugepages will never find any
  huge pages associated with the inode and the passed value 'freed' will
  always be zero."

Add a comment clarifying this to make it clear and also avoid confusion.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

It's guaranteed that the vma is associated with a resv_map, i.e.  either
VM_MAYSHARE or HPAGE_RESV_OWNER, when the code reaches here or we would
have returned via !resv check above.  So it's unneeded to check whether
HPAGE_RESV_OWNER is set here.  Simplify the return code to make it more
clear.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "Cleanup and fixup for hugetlb", v2.

This series contains cleanups to remove redundant VM_BUG_ON() and simplify
the return code.  Also this handles the error case in
hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() correctly.  More details can be found in the
respective changelogs.

This patch (of 5):

The same VM_BUG_ON() check is already done in the callee.  Remove this
extra one to simplify the code slightly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210410072348.20437-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Further extend <debugfs>/split_huge_pages to accept
"<path>,<pgoff_start>,<pgoff_end>" for file-backed THP split tests since
tmpfs may have file backed by THP that mapped nowhere.

Update selftest program to test file-backed THP split too.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331235309.332292-2-zi.yan@sent.comSigned-off-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Suggested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NYang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mika Penttila <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We did not have a direct user interface of splitting the compound page
backing a THP and there is no need unless we want to expose the THP
implementation details to users.  Make <debugfs>/split_huge_pages accept a
new command to do that.

By writing "<pid>,<vaddr_start>,<vaddr_end>" to
<debugfs>/split_huge_pages, THPs within the given virtual address range
from the process with the given pid are split. It is used to test
split_huge_page function. In addition, a selftest program is added to
tools/testing/selftests/vm to utilize the interface by splitting
PMD THPs and PTE-mapped THPs.

This does not change the old behavior, i.e., writing 1 to the interface
to split all THPs in the system.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210331235309.332292-1-zi.yan@sent.comSigned-off-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NYang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mika Penttila <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We know it must meet the !is_swap_pte() and !pte_none() condition if we
reach here.  Since !is_swap_pte() indicates pte_none() or pte_present()
is met, it's guaranteed that pte must be present here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The out label here is unneeded because it just goes to out_up_write label.
Remove it to make code more concise.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "Cleanup for khugepaged".

This series contains cleanups to remove unnecessary out label and
meaningless !pte_present() check.  Also use helper function to simplify
the code.  More details can be found in the respective changelogs.

This patch (of 3):

We could use helper function range_in_vma() to check whether the desired
range is inside the vma to simplify the code.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210325135647.64106-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

READ_ONCE() is more selective and lightweight.  It is more appropriate
that using a READ_ONCE() for the certain variable to prevent the
compiler from reordering.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210323092730.247583-1-yanfei.xu@windriver.comSigned-off-by: NYanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

It's more recommended to use helper function migration_entry_to_page()
to get the page via migration entry.  We can also enjoy the PageLocked()
check there.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-7-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrm (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: yuleixzhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit 4958e4d8 ("mm: thp: remove debug_cow switch") forgot to
remove TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEBUG_COW_FLAG macro.  Remove it here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-6-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrm (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: yuleixzhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The !PageCompound() check limits the page must be head or tail while
!PageHead() further limits it to page head only.  So !PageHead() check is
equivalent here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-5-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrm (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: yuleixzhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The current code that checks if migrating misplaced transhuge page is
needed is pretty hard to follow.  Rework it and add a comment to make
its logic more clear and improve readability.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrm (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: yuleixzhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

It's guaranteed that huge_zero_page will not be NULL if
huge_zero_refcount is increased successfully.

When READ_ONCE(huge_zero_page) is returned, there must be a
huge_zero_page and it can be replaced with returning
'true' when we do not care about the value of huge_zero_page.

We can thus make it return bool to save READ_ONCE cpu cycles as the
return value is just used to check if huge_zero_page exists.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrm (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: yuleixzhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "Some cleanups for huge_memory", v3.

This series contains cleanups to rework some function logics to make it
more readable, use helper function and so on.  More details can be found
in the respective changelogs.

This patch (of 6):

The current implementation of vma_adjust_trans_huge() contains some
duplicated codes.  Add helper function to get rid of these codes to make
it more succinct.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318122722.13135-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: yuleixzhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrm (Intel) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is no need to use a new local variable ret2 to get the return
value of handle_userfault().  Use ret directly to make code more
succinct.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210210072409.60587-1-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In writable and !referenced case, the result value should be
SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE for trace_mm_collapse_huge_page_isolate()
instead of default 0 (SCAN_FAIL) here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 7d2eba05 ("mm: add tracepoint for scanning pages")
Signed-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit 4d45e75a ("mm: remove the now-unnecessary mmget_still_valid()
hack") have made khugepaged_test_exit() suitable for check mm->mm_users
against 0.  Use this helper here.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

smp_wmb() is needed to avoid the copy_huge_page writes to become visible
after the set_pmd_at() write here.  But we can reuse the smp_wmb() inside
__SetPageUptodate() to remove this redundant one.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-3-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "Cleanup and fixup for khugepaged", v2.

This series contains cleanups to remove unneeded return value, use
helper function and so on.  And there is one fix to correct the wrong
result value for trace_mm_collapse_huge_page_isolate().

This patch (of 4):

The return value of khugepaged_collapse_pte_mapped_thps() is never checked
since it's introduced.  We should remove such unneeded return value.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210306032947.35921-2-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Ebru Akagunduz <ebru.akagunduz@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The fault_mutex hashing overhead can be avoided in truncate_op case
because page faults can not race with truncation in this routine.

So calculate hash for fault_mutex only in !truncate_op case to save some
cpu cycles.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-6-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Rework the error handling code when alloc_huge_page() failed to remove
some duplicated code and simplify the code slightly.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-5-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

!PageHuge(oldhpage) is implicitly checked in page_hstate() above, so we
remove this explicit one.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210308112809.26107-4-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>