- 26 1月, 2008 40 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This patch allows preemptible RCU to tolerate CPU-hotplug operations. It accomplishes this by maintaining a local copy of a map of online CPUs, which it accesses under its own lock. Signed-off-by: NGautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This patch implements a new version of RCU which allows its read-side critical sections to be preempted. It uses a set of counter pairs to keep track of the read-side critical sections and flips them when all tasks exit read-side critical section. The details of this implementation can be found in this paper - http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/OLSrtRCU.2006.08.11a.pdf and the article- http://lwn.net/Articles/253651/ This patch was developed as a part of the -rt kernel development and meant to provide better latencies when read-side critical sections of RCU don't disable preemption. As a consequence of keeping track of RCU readers, the readers have a slight overhead (optimizations in the paper). This implementation co-exists with the "classic" RCU implementations and can be switched to at compiler. Also includes RCU tracing summarized in debugfs. [ akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fixes on non-preempt architectures ] Signed-off-by: NGautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Fix rcu_barrier() to work properly in preemptive kernel environment. Also, the ordering of callback must be preserved while moving callbacks to another CPU during CPU hotplug. Signed-off-by: NGautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This patch re-organizes the RCU code to enable multiple implementations of RCU. Users of RCU continues to include rcupdate.h and the RCU interfaces remain the same. This is in preparation for subsequently merging the preemptible RCU implementation. Signed-off-by: NGautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Dipankar Sarma 提交于
This patch makes RCU use softirq instead of tasklets. It also adds a memory barrier after raising the softirq inorder to ensure that the cpu sees the most recently updated value of rcu->cur while processing callbacks. The discussion of the related theoretical race pointed out by James Huang can be found here --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/20/603Signed-off-by: NGautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NDipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
We had support for overlapping cpuset based rto logic in early prototypes that is no longer used, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
The overload set/clears were originally idempotent when this logic was first implemented. But that is no longer true due to the addition of the atomic counter and this logic was never updated to work properly with that change. So only adjust the overload state if it is actually changing to avoid getting out of sync. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
Dmitry Adamushko found that the current implementation of the RT balancing code left out changes to the sched_setscheduler and rt_mutex_setprio. This patch addresses this issue by adding methods to the schedule classes to handle being switched out of (switched_from) and being switched into (switched_to) a sched_class. Also a method for changing of priorities is also added (prio_changed). This patch also removes some duplicate logic between rt_mutex_setprio and sched_setscheduler. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
To make the main sched.c code more agnostic to the schedule classes. Instead of having specific hooks in the schedule code for the RT class balancing. They are replaced with a pre_schedule, post_schedule and task_wake_up methods. These methods may be used by any of the classes but currently, only the sched_rt class implements them. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Yanmin Zhang noticed a nice optimization: p = l * nr / nl, nl = l/g -> p = g * nr which eliminates a do_div() from __sched_period(). Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Dmitry Adamushko 提交于
Clean-up try_to_wake_up(). Get rid of the 'new_cpu' variable in try_to_wake_up() [ that's, one #ifdef section less ]. Also remove a few redundant blank lines. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Dmitry Adamushko 提交于
No need to do a check for 'affine wakeup and passive balancing possibilities' in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu. I guess, this part got missed upon introduction of per-sched_class select_task_rq() in try_to_wake_up(). Signed-off-by: NDmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
whitespace cleanups in topology.h. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
reactivate fork balancing. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
add credits for RT balancing improvements. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
style cleanup of various changes that were done recently. no code changed: text data bss dec hex filename 26399 2578 48 29025 7161 sched.o.before 26399 2578 48 29025 7161 sched.o.after Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
remove unused JIFFIES_TO_NS() macro. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
fix build bug in sched_rt.c:join/leave_domain and make them only be included on SMP builds. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
We move the rt-overload data as the first global to per-domain reclassification. This limits the scope of overload related cache-line bouncing to stay with a specified partition instead of affecting all cpus in the system. Finally, we limit the scope of find_lowest_cpu searches to the domain instead of the entire system. Note that we would always respect domain boundaries even without this patch, but we first would scan potentially all cpus before whittling the list down. Now we can avoid looking at RQs that are out of scope, again reducing cache-line hits. Note: In some cases, task->cpus_allowed will effectively reduce our search to within our domain. However, I believe there are cases where the cpus_allowed mask may be all ones and therefore we err on the side of caution. If it can be optimized later, so be it. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
We add the notion of a root-domain which will be used later to rescope global variables to per-domain variables. Each exclusive cpuset essentially defines an island domain by fully partitioning the member cpus from any other cpuset. However, we currently still maintain some policy/state as global variables which transcend all cpusets. Consider, for instance, rt-overload state. Whenever a new exclusive cpuset is created, we also create a new root-domain object and move each cpu member to the root-domain's span. By default the system creates a single root-domain with all cpus as members (mimicking the global state we have today). We add some plumbing for storing class specific data in our root-domain. Whenever a RQ is switching root-domains (because of repartitioning) we give each sched_class the opportunity to remove any state from its old domain and add state to the new one. This logic doesn't have any clients yet but it will later in the series. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> CC: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> CC: Simon Derr <simon.derr@bull.net> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
clean up schedule_balance_rt(). Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
clean up pull_rt_task(). Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
remove leftover debugging. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
remove rt_overload() - it's an unnecessary indirection. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
clean up whitespace damage and missing comments in kernel/sched_rt.c. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
clean up overlong line in kernel/sched_debug.c. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
clean up find_lock_lowest_rq(). Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
clean up pick_next_highest_task_rt(). Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
rt-balance when creating new tasks. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
This patch removes several cpumask operations by keeping track of the first of the CPUS that is of the lowest priority. When the search for the lowest priority runqueue is completed, all the bits up to the first CPU with the lowest priority runqueue is cleared. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
We can cheaply track the number of bits set in the cpumask for the lowest priority CPUs. Therefore, compute the mask's weight and use it to skip the optimal domain search logic when there is only one CPU available. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
We don't need to bother searching if the task cannot be migrated Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
This patch changes the searching for a run queue by a waking RT task to try to pick another runqueue if the currently running task is an RT task. The reason is that RT tasks behave different than normal tasks. Preempting a normal task to run a RT task to keep its cache hot is fine, because the preempted non-RT task may wait on that same runqueue to run again unless the migration thread comes along and pulls it off. RT tasks behave differently. If one is preempted, it makes an active effort to continue to run. So by having a high priority task preempt a lower priority RT task, that lower RT task will then quickly try to run on another runqueue. This will cause that lower RT task to replace its nice hot cache (and TLB) with a completely cold one. This is for the hope that the new high priority RT task will keep its cache hot. Remeber that this high priority RT task was just woken up. So it may likely have been sleeping for several milliseconds, and will end up with a cold cache anyway. RT tasks run till they voluntarily stop, or are preempted by a higher priority task. This means that it is unlikely that the woken RT task will have a hot cache to wake up to. So pushing off a lower RT task is just killing its cache for no good reason. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
We have logic to detect whether the system has migratable tasks, but we are not using it when deciding whether to push tasks away. So we add support for considering this new information. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
The current code base assumes a relatively flat CPU/core topology and will route RT tasks to any CPU fairly equally. In the real world, there are various toplogies and affinities that govern where a task is best suited to run with the smallest amount of overhead. NUMA and multi-core CPUs are prime examples of topologies that can impact cache performance. Fortunately, linux is already structured to represent these topologies via the sched_domains interface. So we change our RT router to consult a combination of topology and affinity policy to best place tasks during migration. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
In the original patch series that Steven Rostedt and I worked on together, we both took different approaches to low-priority wakeup path. I utilized "pre-routing" (push the task away to a less important RQ before activating) approach, while Steve utilized a "post-routing" approach. The advantage of my approach is that you avoid the overhead of a wasted activate/deactivate cycle and peripherally related burdens. The advantage of Steve's method is that it neatly solves an issue preventing a "pull" optimization from being deployed. In the end, we ended up deploying Steve's idea. But it later dawned on me that we could get the best of both worlds by deploying both ideas together, albeit slightly modified. The idea is simple: Use a "light-weight" lookup for pre-routing, since we only need to approximate a good home for the task. And we also retain the post-routing push logic to clean up any inaccuracies caused by a condition of "priority mistargeting" caused by the lightweight lookup. Most of the time, the pre-routing should work and yield lower overhead. In the cases where it doesnt, the post-router will bat cleanup. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
It doesn't hurt if we allow the current CPU to be included in the search. We will just simply skip it later if the current CPU turns out to be the lowest. We will use this later in the series Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
Isolate the search logic into a function so that it can be used later in places other than find_locked_lowest_rq(). Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
The current wake-up code path tries to determine if it can optimize the wake-up to "this_cpu" by computing load calculations. The problem is that these calculations are only relevant to SCHED_OTHER tasks where load is king. For RT tasks, priority is king. So the load calculation is completely wasted bandwidth. Therefore, we create a new sched_class interface to help with pre-wakeup routing decisions and move the load calculation as a function of CFS task's class. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
"this_rq" is normally used to denote the RQ on the current cpu (i.e. "cpu_rq(this_cpu)"). So clean up the usage of this_rq to be more consistent with the rest of the code. Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-