Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 04 2月, 2020 2 次提交
  5. 15 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 24 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 23 12月, 2019 2 次提交
  11. 20 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 15 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 25 10月, 2019 3 次提交
  17. 09 10月, 2019 1 次提交
    • N
      iwlwifi: mvm: fix race in sync rx queue notification · a2113cc4
      由 Naftali Goldstein 提交于 
      Consider the following flow:
 1. Driver starts to sync the rx queues due to a delba.
    mvm->queue_sync_cookie=1.
    This rx-queues-sync is synchronous, so it doesn't increment the
    cookie until all rx queues handle the notification from FW.
 2. During this time, driver starts to sync rx queues due to nssn sync
    required.
    The cookie's value is still 1, but it doesn't matter since this
    rx-queue-sync is non-synchronous so in the notification handler the
    cookie is ignored.
    What _does_ matter is that this flow increments the cookie to 2
    immediately.
    Remember though that the FW won't start servicing this command until
    it's done with the previous one.
 3. FW is still handling the first command, so it sends a notification
    with internal_notif->sync=1, and internal_notif->cookie=0, which
    triggers a WARN_ONCE.

The solution for this race is to only use the mvm->queue_sync_cookie in
case of a synchronous sync-rx-queues. This way in step 2 the cookie's
value won't change so we avoid the WARN.

The commit in the "fixes" field is the first commit to introduce
non-synchronous sending of this command to FW.

Fixes: 3c514bf8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add a loose synchronization of the NSSN across Rx queues")
Signed-off-by: NNaftali Goldstein <naftali.goldstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
      a2113cc4
  19. 06 9月, 2019 14 次提交
  21. 20 8月, 2019 1 次提交
    • I
      iwlwifi: mvm: Allow multicast data frames only when associated · 50f56044
      由 Ilan Peer 提交于 
      The MAC context configuration always allowed multicast data frames
to pass to the driver for all MAC context types, and in the
case of station MAC context both when associated and when not
associated.

One of the outcomes of this configuration is having the FW forward
encrypted multicast frames to the driver with Rx status indicating
that the frame was not decrypted (as expected, since no keys were
configured yet) which in turn results with unnecessary error
messages.

Change this behavior to allow multicast data frames only when they
are actually expected, e.g., station MAC context is associated etc.
Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
      50f56044
  23. 31 7月, 2019 3 次提交
    • J
      iwlwifi: fix locking in delayed GTK setting · 6569e7d3
      由 Johannes Berg 提交于 
      This code clearly never could have worked, since it locks
while already locked. Add an unlocked __iwl_mvm_mac_set_key()
variant that doesn't do locking to fix that.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      6569e7d3
    • E
      iwlwifi: mvm: add a loose synchronization of the NSSN across Rx queues · 3c514bf8
      由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于 
      In order to support MSI-X efficiently, we want to avoid
communication across Rx queues. Each Rx queue should have
all the data it needs to process a packet.

The reordering buffer is a challenge in the MSI-X world
since we can have a single BA session whose packets are
directed to different queues. This is why each queue has
its own reordering buffer. The hardware is able to hint
the driver whether we have a hole or not, which allows
the driver to know whether it can release a packet or not.
This indication is called NSSN. Roughly, if the packet's
SN is lower than the NSSN, we can release the packet to
the stack. The NSSN is the SN of the newest packet received
without any holes + 1.

This is working as long as we don't have packets that we
release because of a timeout. When that happens, we could
have taken the decision to release a packet after we have
been waiting for its predecessor for too long. If this
predecessor comes later, we have to drop it because we
can't release packets out of order. In that case, the
hardware will give us an indication that we can we release
the packet (SN < NSSN), but the packet still needs to be
dropped.
This is why we sometimes need to ignore the NSSN and we
track the head_sn in software.
Here is a specific example of this:

1) Rx queue 1 got packets: 480, 482, 483
2) We release 480 to to the stack and wait for 481
3) NSSN is now 481
4) The timeout expires
5) We release 482 and 483, NSSN is still 480
6) 481 arrives its NSSN is 484.

We need to drop 481 even if 481 < 484. This is why we'll
update the head_sn to 484 at step 2. The flow now is:

1) Rx queue 1 got packets: 480, 482, 483
2) We release 480 to to the stack and wait for 481
3) NSSN is now 481 / head_sn is 481
4) The timeout expires
5) We release 482 and 483, NSSN is still 480 but head_sn is 484.
6) 481 arrives its NSSN is 484, but head_sn is 484 and we drop it.

This code introduces another problem in case all the traffic
goes well (no hole, no timeout):

Rx queue 1: 0   -> 483   (head_sn = 484)
Rx queue 2: 501 -> 4095  (head_sn = 0)
Rx queue 2: 0   -> 480   (head_sn = 481)
Rx queue 1: 481 but head_sn = 484 and we drop it.

At this point, the SN of queue 1 is far behind: more than
4040 packets behind. Queue 1 will consider 481 "old"
because 481 is in [501-64:501] whereas it is a very new
packet.

In order to fix that, send an Rx notification from time to
time (twice across the full set of 4096 packets) to make
sure no Rx queue is lagging too far behind.

What will happen then is:

Rx queue 1: 0    -> 483       (head_sn = 484)
Rx queue 2: 501  -> 2047      (head_sn = 2048)
Rx queue 1: Sync nofication   (head_sn = 2048)
Rx queue 2: 2048 -> 4095      (head_sn = 0)
Rx queue 1: Sync notification (head_sn = 0)
Rx queue 2: 1    -> 481       (head_sn = 482)
Rx queue 1: 481 and head_sn = 0.

In queue 1's data, head_sn is now 0, the packet coming in
is 481, it'll understand that the new packet is new and it
won't be dropped.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      3c514bf8
    • J
      iwlwifi: mvm: disable TX-AMSDU on older NICs · cfb21b11
      由 Johannes Berg 提交于 
      On older NICs, we occasionally see issues with A-MSDU support,
where the commands in the FIFO get confused and then we see an
assert EDC because the next command in the FIFO isn't TX.

We've tried to isolate this issue and understand where it comes
from, but haven't found any errors in building the A-MSDU in
software.

At least for now, disable A-MSDU support on older hardware so
that users can use it again without fearing the assert.

This fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203315.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      cfb21b11
  25. 26 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  27. 29 6月, 2019 3 次提交
  29. 01 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 28 4月, 2019 1 次提交
    • J
      netlink: make validation more configurable for future strictness · 8cb08174
      由 Johannes Berg 提交于 
      We currently have two levels of strict validation:

 1) liberal (default)
     - undefined (type >= max) & NLA_UNSPEC attributes accepted
     - attribute length >= expected accepted
     - garbage at end of message accepted
 2) strict (opt-in)
     - NLA_UNSPEC attributes accepted
     - attribute length >= expected accepted

Split out parsing strictness into four different options:
 * TRAILING     - check that there's no trailing data after parsing
                  attributes (in message or nested)
 * MAXTYPE      - reject attrs > max known type
 * UNSPEC       - reject attributes with NLA_UNSPEC policy entries
 * STRICT_ATTRS - strictly validate attribute size

The default for future things should be *everything*.
The current *_strict() is a combination of TRAILING and MAXTYPE,
and is renamed to _deprecated_strict().
The current regular parsing has none of this, and is renamed to
*_parse_deprecated().

Additionally it allows us to selectively set one of the new flags
even on old policies. Notably, the UNSPEC flag could be useful in
this case, since it can be arranged (by filling in the policy) to
not be an incompatible userspace ABI change, but would then going
forward prevent forgetting attribute entries. Similar can apply
to the POLICY flag.

We end up with the following renames:
 * nla_parse           -> nla_parse_deprecated
 * nla_parse_strict    -> nla_parse_deprecated_strict
 * nlmsg_parse         -> nlmsg_parse_deprecated
 * nlmsg_parse_strict  -> nlmsg_parse_deprecated_strict
 * nla_parse_nested    -> nla_parse_nested_deprecated
 * nla_validate_nested -> nla_validate_nested_deprecated

Using spatch, of course:
    @@
    expression TB, MAX, HEAD, LEN, POL, EXT;
    @@
    -nla_parse(TB, MAX, HEAD, LEN, POL, EXT)
    +nla_parse_deprecated(TB, MAX, HEAD, LEN, POL, EXT)

    @@
    expression NLH, HDRLEN, TB, MAX, POL, EXT;
    @@
    -nlmsg_parse(NLH, HDRLEN, TB, MAX, POL, EXT)
    +nlmsg_parse_deprecated(NLH, HDRLEN, TB, MAX, POL, EXT)

    @@
    expression NLH, HDRLEN, TB, MAX, POL, EXT;
    @@
    -nlmsg_parse_strict(NLH, HDRLEN, TB, MAX, POL, EXT)
    +nlmsg_parse_deprecated_strict(NLH, HDRLEN, TB, MAX, POL, EXT)

    @@
    expression TB, MAX, NLA, POL, EXT;
    @@
    -nla_parse_nested(TB, MAX, NLA, POL, EXT)
    +nla_parse_nested_deprecated(TB, MAX, NLA, POL, EXT)

    @@
    expression START, MAX, POL, EXT;
    @@
    -nla_validate_nested(START, MAX, POL, EXT)
    +nla_validate_nested_deprecated(START, MAX, POL, EXT)

    @@
    expression NLH, HDRLEN, MAX, POL, EXT;
    @@
    -nlmsg_validate(NLH, HDRLEN, MAX, POL, EXT)
    +nlmsg_validate_deprecated(NLH, HDRLEN, MAX, POL, EXT)

For this patch, don't actually add the strict, non-renamed versions
yet so that it breaks compile if I get it wrong.

Also, while at it, make nla_validate and nla_parse go down to a
common __nla_validate_parse() function to avoid code duplication.

Ultimately, this allows us to have very strict validation for every
new caller of nla_parse()/nlmsg_parse() etc as re-introduced in the
next patch, while existing things will continue to work as is.

In effect then, this adds fully strict validation for any new command.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8cb08174
  33. 03 4月, 2019 3 次提交