- 12 7月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We can't rely on kzalloc() always succeeding, so check its return value. Suppresses the following smatch error: mlxsw_sp_switchdev_event() error: potential null dereference 'switchdev_work->fdb_info.addr'. (kzalloc returns null) Fixes: af061378 ("mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Add support for learning FDB through notification") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Commit 10e23eb2 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Remove support for bypass bridge port attributes/vlan set") removed statements that used 'bridge_vlan', but didn't remove the variable itself resulting in the following warning with W=1: warning: variable ‘bridge_vlan’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Remove the variable and suppress the warning. Fixes: 10e23eb2 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Remove support for bypass bridge port attributes/vlan set") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
While working on IPv6 route replace I realized we can have a use-after-free in IPv4 in case the replaced route is offloaded and the only one using its FIB info. The problem is that fib_table_insert() drops the reference on the FIB info of the replaced routes which is eventually freed via call_rcu(). Since the driver doesn't hold a reference on this FIB info it can cause a use-after-free when it tries to clear the RTNH_F_OFFLOAD flag stored in fi->fib_flags. After running the following commands in a loop for enough time with a KASAN enabled kernel I finally got the below trace. $ ip route add 192.168.50.0/24 via 192.168.200.1 dev enp3s0np3 $ ip route replace 192.168.50.0/24 dev enp3s0np5 $ ip route del 192.168.50.0/24 dev enp3s0np5 BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8803717d9820 by task kworker/u4:2/55 [...] ? mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] ? mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] ? mlxsw_sp_router_neighs_update_work+0x1cd0/0x1ce0 [mlxsw_spectrum] ? mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] __asan_load4+0x61/0x80 mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_refresh+0xb6/0x370 [mlxsw_spectrum] mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event_work+0xd1c/0x2780 [mlxsw_spectrum] [...] Freed by task 5131: save_stack_trace+0x16/0x20 save_stack+0x46/0xd0 kasan_slab_free+0x70/0xc0 kfree+0x144/0x570 free_fib_info_rcu+0x2e7/0x410 rcu_process_callbacks+0x4f8/0xe30 __do_softirq+0x1d3/0x9e2 Fix this by taking a reference on the FIB info when creating the nexthop group it represents and drop it when the group is destroyed. Fixes: 599cf8f9 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for route replace") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
With this patch the error path of mlxsw_sp_nexthop_init() is symmetric with mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fini(). Noticed during code review. Fixes: a8c97014 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Refactor nexthop init routine") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In case a VLAN device is enslaved to a bridge we shouldn't create a router interface (RIF) for it when it's configured with an IP address. This is already handled by the driver for other types of netdevs, such as physical ports and LAG devices. If this IP address is then removed and the interface is subsequently unlinked from the bridge, a NULL pointer dereference can happen, as the original 802.1d FID was replaced with an rFID which was then deleted. To reproduce: $ ip link set dev enp3s0np9 up $ ip link add name enp3s0np9.111 link enp3s0np9 type vlan id 111 $ ip link set dev enp3s0np9.111 up $ ip link add name br0 type bridge $ ip link set dev br0 up $ ip link set enp3s0np9.111 master br0 $ ip address add dev enp3s0np9.111 192.168.0.1/24 $ ip address del dev enp3s0np9.111 192.168.0.1/24 $ ip link set dev enp3s0np9.111 nomaster Fixes: 99724c18 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce support for router interfaces") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add support for access cable info via ethtool. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
The MCIA register is used to access the SFP+ and QSFP connector's EPROM. It will be used to query the cable info. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 6月, 2017 10 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Previous patch made it unnecessary to map ports to modules before we allocate their struct. We can now therefore pass the port struct to these functions, thereby making them consistent with other functions that operate on ports. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In commit be94535f ("mlxsw: spectrum: Make split flow match firmware requirements") we had to modify the port split flow to overcome quirks in the device's firmware. This resulted in asymmetrical code with regards to port creation and removal. The problem in the firmware is long gone and since we can now enforce a minimal firmware version, we can simplify the code and make it symmetric again. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In new firmware versions (that we can now enforce via request_firmware()), only the first LPM tree is reserved and not the first two as in older versions. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
The FDB add/del are now done through the notification chain. The FDBs are synced with the bridge and there is no need for extra dumping. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add support for learning FDB through notification. The driver defers the hardware update via ordered work queue. Support for stacked devices is also provided. In case of a successful FDB add a notification is sent back to bridge. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
The current API for sending switchdev notifications implies only FDB add/del. In order to support notification about successful FDB offload the API is changed. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
The bridge port attributes/vlan for mlxsw devices should be set only from bridge code. The vlans are synced totally with the bridge so there is no need to special dump support. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add support for querying supported bridge flags. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Currently the mlxsw driver supports an option for disabling syncing the hardware learned FDBs with the software bridge. This behavior breaks the bridge offload model and thus it is removed. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Currently the bridge doesn't notify the underlying devices about new FDBs learned. The FDB sync is placed on the switchdev notifier chain because devices may potentially learn FDB that are not directly related to their ports, for example: 1. Mixed SW/HW bridge - FDBs that point to the ASICs external devices should be offloaded as CPU traps in order to perform forwarding in slow path. 2. EVPN - Externally learned FDBs for the vtep device. Notification is sent only about static FDB add/del. This is done due to fact that currently this is the only scenario supported by switch drivers. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: NIvan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
We need to push the chain index down to the drivers, so they have the information to which chain the rule belongs. For now, no driver supports multichain offload, so only chain 0 is supported. This is needed to prevent chain squashes during offload for now. Later this will be used to implement multichain offload. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 6月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Just use the previously prepared infrastructure and offload the gact trap action to ACL. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Use trap/discard flex action to implement trap. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Introduce an ACL trap and put it into ip2me trap group. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
The "trap_id" is 9bits long. So far, this was not a problem since we used only traps with ids that fit into 8bits. But the ACL traps that are going to be introduced use the 9th bit. Fixes: eda6500a ("mlxsw: Add PCI bus implementation") Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 6月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The way we usually allocate an index is by letting the allocation function return an error instead of an invalid index. Do the same for RIF index. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Make it clear where functions are defined and move misplaced declaration to their correct place. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Change the firmware file name to be in "mellanox" directory. This commit is a followup to the linux-firmware commit a4c72696f5f4 ("Mellanox: Add firmware for mlxsw_spectrum") Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When BRIDGE is a loadable module, MLXSW_SPECTRUM mustn't be built-in: drivers/built-in.o: In function `mlxsw_sp_bridge_device_create': drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c:145: undefined reference to `br_vlan_enabled' drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c:158: undefined reference to `br_multicast_enabled' drivers/built-in.o: In function `mlxsw_sp_dev_rif_type': drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c:2972: undefined reference to `br_vlan_enabled' drivers/built-in.o: In function `mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_vlan_event': drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c:3310: undefined reference to `br_vlan_enabled' Add Kconfig dependency to enforce usable configurations. Fixes: c57529e1 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Replace vPorts with Port-VLAN") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Tested-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yotam Gigi 提交于
Add callback to the ethtool flash_device op. This callback uses the mlxfw module to flash the new firmware file to the device. As the firmware flash process takes about 20 seconds and ethtool takes the rtnl lock during the flash_device callback, release the rtnl lock at the beginning of the flash process and take it again before leaving the callback. This way, the rtnl is not held during the process. To make sure the device does not get deleted during the flash process, take a reference to it before releasing the rtnl lock. Signed-off-by: NYotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
Forgetting to disable preemption around tcf_action_stats_update() seems to be a common mistake. Add a helper function for updating stats on all actions of a filter. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 5月, 2017 11 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The mlxsw driver currently implements three types of RIFs. VLAN and FID RIFs for L3 interfaces on top of VLAN-aware and VLAN-unaware bridges (respectively) and Subport RIFs for all other L3 interfaces. All the RIF types follow a common configuration procedure, which only differs in the type-specific bits. The patch exploits this fact and consolidates the common code paths, thereby simplifying the code and making it more extensible. This work also prepares the driver for use with future ASICs, where the range of the Subport RIFs will be extended and their configuration modified accordingly. By merely implementing a new RIF operations and selecting it during initialization, the same driver could be re-used. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The device supports three types of FIDs. 802.1Q and 802.1D FIDs for VLAN-aware and VLAN-unaware bridges (respectively) and rFIDs to transport packets to the router block. The different users (e.g., bridge, router, ACLs) of the FIDs infrastructure need not know about the internal FIDs implementation and can therefore interact with it using a restricted set of exported functions. By encapsulating the entire FID logic and hiding it from the rest of the driver we get a code base that it much simpler and easier to work with and extend. For example, in the current Spectrum ASIC only 802.1D FIDs can be assigned a VNI, but future ASICs will also support 802.1Q FIDs. With this patch in place, support for future ASICs can be easily added by implementing a new FID operations according to their capabilities. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
All RIF types are associated with a virtual router (VR), so determine VR first when creating a RIF. That way, we can more easily integrate the common RIF core in the following patches. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
If a packet ingress the router but can't be assigned an ingress RIF, it's dropped. Therefore, in the case of RIF configured on top of a bridge, it makes sense to start flooding broadcast packets to the router only after the RIF was created. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that all the information to create a RIF is contained within the RIF struct itself, we can also simplify the destruction logic. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
All the information necessary for the configuration of RIFs can now be found in the RIF struct itself, so reduce the arguments list. This gets us one step closer to the common RIF core. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Currently, when a Subport RIF is configured, the LAG status and VLAN of the underlying port are read from the port itself. This is problematic, as we would like to have common code to configure all types of RIFs, which aren't necessarily bound to a port. Instead, embed the RIF in a struct specific to the Subport type, which contains all the necessary information. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In the following patches the RIF's configuration function is going to expect a RIF struct with all the necessary information. Therefore, allocate the RIF just before it's configured to the device. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The following patches are going to re-arrange the FID and RIF code, so that when the RIF is configured to the device based on the information present in the RIF struct (which points to a FID). For this reason, move the FID allocation to just before the RIF configuration. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
As explained in the cover letter, since the introduction of the bridge offload in the mlxsw driver, information related to the offloaded bridge and bridge ports was stored in the individual port struct, mlxsw_sp_port. This lead to a bloated struct storing both physical properties of the port (e.g., autoneg status) as well as logical properties of an upper bridge port (e.g., learning, mrouter indication). While this might work well for simple devices, it proved to be hard to extend when stacked devices were taken into account and more advanced use-cases (e.g., IGMP snooping) considered. This patch removes the excess information from the above struct and instead stores it in more appropriate structs that represent the bridge port, the bridge itself and a VLAN configured on the bridge port. The membership of a port in a bridge is denoted using the Port-VLAN struct, which points to the bridge port and also member in the bridge VLAN group of the VLAN it represents. This allows us to completely remove the vPort abstraction and consolidate many of the code paths relating to VLAN-aware and unaware bridges. Note that the FID / vFID code is currently duplicated, but this will soon go away when the common FID core will be introduced. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Up until now we used to create FIDs upon the creation of VLAN uppers on top of the VLAN-aware bridge. This was done so that in case a router interface (RIF) was configured on top of the bridge, the FID would already be there. Instead, simplify the code and only create the FID upon RIF creation. This is an intermediary step towards the introduction of the common FID core, in which this code would be completely removed. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-