Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 30 4月, 2013 4 次提交
  3. 24 2月, 2013 5 次提交
    • T
      memory-hotplug: remove memmap of sparse-vmemmap · 0197518c
      由 Tang Chen 提交于 
      Introduce a new API vmemmap_free() to free and remove vmemmap
pagetables.  Since pagetable implements are different, each architecture
has to provide its own version of vmemmap_free(), just like
vmemmap_populate().

Note: vmemmap_free() is not implemented for ia64, ppc, s390, and sparc.

[mhocko@suse.cz: fix implicit declaration of remove_pagetable]
Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wu Jianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      0197518c
    • T
      memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture · bbcab878
      由 Tang Chen 提交于 
      Search a page table about the removed memory, and clear page table for
x86_64 architecture.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make kernel_physical_mapping_remove() static]
Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wu Jianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      bbcab878
    • W
      memory-hotplug: common APIs to support page tables hot-remove · ae9aae9e
      由 Wen Congyang 提交于 
      When memory is removed, the corresponding pagetables should alse be
removed.  This patch introduces some common APIs to support vmemmap
pagetable and x86_64 architecture direct mapping pagetable removing.

All pages of virtual mapping in removed memory cannot be freed if some
pages used as PGD/PUD include not only removed memory but also other
memory.  So this patch uses the following way to check whether a page
can be freed or not.

1) When removing memory, the page structs of the removed memory are
   filled with 0FD.

2) All page structs are filled with 0xFD on PT/PMD, PT/PMD can be
   cleared.  In this case, the page used as PT/PMD can be freed.

For direct mapping pages, update direct_pages_count[level] when we freed
their pagetables.  And do not free the pages again because they were
freed when offlining.

For vmemmap pages, free the pages and their pagetables.

For larger pages, do not split them into smaller ones because there is
no way to know if the larger page has been split.  As a result, there is
no way to decide when to split.  We deal the larger pages in the
following way:

1) For direct mapped pages, all the pages were freed when they were
   offlined.  And since menmory offline is done section by section, all
   the memory ranges being removed are aligned to PAGE_SIZE.  So only need
   to deal with unaligned pages when freeing vmemmap pages.

2) For vmemmap pages being used to store page_struct, if part of the
   larger page is still in use, just fill the unused part with 0xFD.  And
   when the whole page is fulfilled with 0xFD, then free the larger page.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo in comment]
[tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com: do not calculate direct mapping pages when freeing vmemmap pagetables]
[tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com: do not free direct mapping pages twice]
[tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com: do not free page split from hugepage one by one]
[tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com: do not split pages when freeing pagetable pages]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: use pmd_page_vaddr()]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix used-uninitialised bug]
Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wu Jianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ae9aae9e
    • Y
      memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap · 46723bfa
      由 Yasuaki Ishimatsu 提交于 
      For removing memmap region of sparse-vmemmap which is allocated bootmem,
memmap region of sparse-vmemmap needs to be registered by
get_page_bootmem().  So the patch searches pages of virtual mapping and
registers the pages by get_page_bootmem().

NOTE: register_page_bootmem_memmap() is not implemented for ia64,
      ppc, s390, and sparc.  So introduce CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE
      and revert register_page_bootmem_info_node() when platform doesn't
      support it.

      It's implemented by adding a new Kconfig option named
      CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE, which will be automatically selected
      by memory-hotplug feature fully supported archs(currently only on
      x86_64).

      Since we have 2 config options called MEMORY_HOTPLUG and
      MEMORY_HOTREMOVE used for memory hot-add and hot-remove separately,
      and codes in function register_page_bootmem_info_node() are only
      used for collecting infomation for hot-remove, so reside it under
      MEMORY_HOTREMOVE.

      Besides page_isolation.c selected by MEMORY_ISOLATION under
      MEMORY_HOTPLUG is also such case, move it too.

[mhocko@suse.cz: put register_page_bootmem_memmap inside CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE]
[linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com: introduce CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE and revert register_page_bootmem_info_node()]
[mhocko@suse.cz: remove the arch specific functions without any implementation]
[linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com: mm/Kconfig: move auto selects from MEMORY_HOTPLUG to MEMORY_HOTREMOVE as needed]
[rientjes@google.com: fix defined but not used warning]
Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NWu Jianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLin Feng <linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      46723bfa
    • W
      memory-hotplug: introduce new arch_remove_memory() for removing page table · 24d335ca
      由 Wen Congyang 提交于 
      For removing memory, we need to remove page tables.  But it depends on
architecture.  So the patch introduce arch_remove_memory() for removing
page table.  Now it only calls __remove_pages().

Note: __remove_pages() for some archtecuture is not implemented
      (I don't know how to implement it for s390).
Signed-off-by: NWen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wu Jianguo <wujianguo@huawei.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      24d335ca
  5. 13 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      x86/mm: Check if PUD is large when validating a kernel address · 0ee364eb
      由 Mel Gorman 提交于 
      A user reported the following oops when a backup process reads
/proc/kcore:

 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffbb00ff33b000
 IP: [<ffffffff8103157e>] kern_addr_valid+0xbe/0x110
 [...]

 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff811b8aaa>] read_kcore+0x17a/0x370
  [<ffffffff811ad847>] proc_reg_read+0x77/0xc0
  [<ffffffff81151687>] vfs_read+0xc7/0x130
  [<ffffffff811517f3>] sys_read+0x53/0xa0
  [<ffffffff81449692>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Investigation determined that the bug triggered when reading
system RAM at the 4G mark. On this system, that was the first
address using 1G pages for the virt->phys direct mapping so the
PUD is pointing to a physical address, not a PMD page.

The problem is that the page table walker in kern_addr_valid() is
not checking pud_large() and treats the physical address as if
it was a PMD.  If it happens to look like pmd_none then it'll
silently fail, probably returning zeros instead of real data. If
the data happens to look like a present PMD though, it will be
walked resulting in the oops above.

This patch adds the necessary pud_large() check.

Unfortunately the problem was not readily reproducible and now
they are running the backup program without accessing
/proc/kcore so the patch has not been validated but I think it
makes sense.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.coM>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130211145236.GX21389@suse.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      0ee364eb
  7. 30 1月, 2013 4 次提交
  9. 24 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 16 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 13 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 18 11月, 2012 8 次提交
  17. 17 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 30 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 24 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 18 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      x86-64: Fix accounting in kernel_physical_mapping_init() · 20167d34
      由 Jan Beulich 提交于 
      When finding a present and acceptable 2M/1G mapping, the number
of pages mapped this way shouldn't be incremented (as it was
already incremented when the earlier part of the mapping was
established). Instead, last_map_addr needs to be updated in this
case.

Further, address increments were wrong in one place each in both
phys_pmd_init() and phys_pud_init() (lacking the aligning down
to the respective page boundary).

As we're now doing the same calculation several times, fold it
into a single instance using a local variable (matching how
kernel_physical_mapping_init() itself does it at the PGD level).

Observed during code inspection, not because of an actual
problem.
Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4FB3C27202000078000841A0@nat28.tlf.novell.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      20167d34
  25. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 11 11月, 2011 5 次提交
  29. 15 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP · 0608f70c
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      From 5732e1247898d67cbf837585150fe9f68974671d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:16 +0200

Convert x86 to HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP.  The only difference in memory
handling is that allocations can't no longer cross node boundaries
whether they're node affine or not, which shouldn't matter at all.

This conversion will enable further simplification of boot memory
handling.

-v2: Fix build failure on !NUMA configurations discovered by hpa.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110714094423.GG3455@htj.dyndns.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      0608f70c
  31. 12 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  33. 17 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  35. 02 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling · 9688678a
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      The only special handling NUMA needs to do for hotadd memory is
determining the node for the hotadd memory given the address of it and
there's nothing specific to specific config method used.

srat_64.c does somewhat elaborate error checking on
ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE regions, remembers them and implements
memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() which determines the node for given
hotadd address.

This is almost completely redundant.  All the information is already
available to the generic NUMA code which already performs all the
sanity checking and merging.  All that's necessary is not using
__initdata from numa_meminfo and providing a function which uses it to
map address to node.

Drop the specific implementation from srat_64.c and add generic
memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() in numa_64.c, which is enabled if
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is set.  Other than dropping the code, srat_64.c
doesn't need any change as it already calls numa_add_memblk() for hot
pluggable regions which is enough.

While at it, change CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE in srat_64.c to
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG, for NUMA on x86-64, the two are always the
same.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      9688678a
  37. 24 3月, 2011 1 次提交