- 15 6月, 2017 17 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
A read-from-write-only GICv3 access should UNDEF at EL1. But since we're in complete paranoia-land with broken CPUs, let's assume the worse and gracefully handle the case. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading/writing the guest's view of the ICC_PMR_EL1 register, which is located in the ICH_VMCR_EL2.VPMR field. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading/writing the guest's view of the ICV_CTLR_EL1 register. only EOIMode and CBPR are of interest here, as all the other bits directly come from ICH_VTR_EL2 and are Read-Only. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading the guest's view of the ICV_RPR_EL1 register, returning the highest active priority. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for writing the guest's view of the ICC_DIR_EL1 register, performing the deactivation of an interrupt if EOImode is set ot 1. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
A number of Group-0 registers can be handled by the same accessors as that of Group-1, so let's add the required system register encodings and catch them in the dispatching function. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading/writing the guest's view of the ICC_IGRPEN0_EL1 register, which is located in the ICH_VMCR_EL2.VENG0 field. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading/writing the guest's view of the ICC_BPR0_EL1 register, which is located in the ICH_VMCR_EL2.BPR0 field. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to be able to trap Group-1 GICv3 system registers, we need to set ICH_HCR_EL2.TALL1 before entering the guest. This is conditionally done after having restored the guest's state, and cleared on exit. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading the guest's view of the ICV_HPPIR1_EL1 register. This is a simple parsing of the available LRs, extracting the highest available interrupt. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading/writing the guest's view of the ICV_AP1Rn_EL1 registers. We just map them to the corresponding ICH_AP1Rn_EL2 registers. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for writing the guest's view of the ICC_EOIR1_EL1 register. This involves dropping the priority of the interrupt, and deactivating it if required (EOImode == 0). Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading the guest's view of the ICC_IAR1_EL1 register. This involves finding the highest priority Group-1 interrupt, checking against both PMR and the active group priority, activating the interrupt and setting the group priority as active. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading/writing the guest's view of the ICC_IGRPEN1_EL1 register, which is located in the ICH_VMCR_EL2.VENG1 field. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Add a handler for reading/writing the guest's view of the ICC_BPR1_EL1 register, which is located in the ICH_VMCR_EL2.BPR1 field. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to start handling guest access to GICv3 system registers, let's add a hook that will get called when we trap a system register access. This is gated by a new static key (vgic_v3_cpuif_trap). Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
As we're about to access the Active Priority registers a lot more, let's define accessors that take the register number as a parameter. Tested-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 06 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
We used to extract PRIbits from the ICH_VT_EL2 which was the upper field in the register word, so a mask wasn't necessary, but as we switched to looking at PREbits, which is bits 26 through 28 with the PRIbits field being potentially non-zero, we really need to mask off the field value, otherwise fun things may happen. Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The GICv3 documentation is extremely confusing, as it talks about the number of priorities represented by the ICH_APxRn_EL2 registers, while it should really talk about the number of preemption levels. This leads to a bug where we may access undefined ICH_APxRn_EL2 registers, since PREbits is allowed to be smaller than PRIbits. Thankfully, nobody seem to have taken this path so far... The fix is to use ICH_VTR_EL2.PREbits instead. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 19 4月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When iterating over the used LRs, be careful not to try to access an unused LR, or even an unimplemented one if you're unlucky... Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When emulating a GICv2-on-GICv3, special care must be taken to only save/restore VMCR_EL2 when ICC_SRE_EL1.SRE is cleared. Otherwise, all Group-0 interrupts end-up being delivered as FIQ, which is probably not what the guest expects, as demonstrated here with an unhappy EFI: FIQ Exception at 0x000000013BD21CC4 This means that we cannot perform the load/put trick when dealing with VMCR_EL2 (because the host has SRE set), and we have to deal with it in the world-switch. Fortunately, this is not the most common case (modern guests should be able to deal with GICv3 directly), and the performance is not worse than what it was before the VMCR optimization. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 09 4月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
We don't use these fields anymore so let's nuke them completely. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
Now when we don't look at the MISR and EISR values anymore, we can get rid of the logic to save them in the GIC save/restore code. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
There is no need to calculate and maintain live_lrs when we always populate the lowest numbered LRs first on every entry and clear all LRs on every exit. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
We don't have to save/restore the VMCR on every entry to/from the guest, since on GICv2 we can access the control interface from EL1 and on VHE systems with GICv3 we can access the control interface from KVM running in EL2. GICv3 systems without VHE becomes the rare case, which has to save/restore the register on each round trip. Note that userspace accesses may see out-of-date values if the VCPU is running while accessing the VGIC state via the KVM device API, but this is already the case and it is up to userspace to quiesce the CPUs before reading the CPU registers from the GIC for an up-to-date view. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Murzin 提交于
So we can reuse the code under arch/arm Signed-off-by: NVladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
由 Vladimir Murzin 提交于
Since we are going to share vgic-v3 save/restore code with ARM keep arch specific accessors separately. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
- 08 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
When rewriting the assembly code to C code, it was useful to have exported aliases or static functions so that we could keep the existing common C code unmodified and at the same time rewrite arm64 from assembly to C code, and later do the arm part. Now when both are done, we really don't need this level of indirection anymore, and it's time to save a few lines and brain cells. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
- 31 5月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The GICv3 backend of the vgic is quite barrier heavy, in order to ensure synchronization of the system registers and the memory mapped view for a potential GICv2 guest. But when the guest is using a GICv3 model, there is absolutely no need to execute all these heavy barriers, and it is actually beneficial to avoid them altogether. This patch makes the synchonization conditional, and ensures that we do not change the EL1 SRE settings if we do not need to. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Both our GIC emulations are "strict", in the sense that we either emulate a GICv2 or a GICv3, and not a GICv3 with GICv2 legacy support. But when running on a GICv3 host, we still allow the guest to tinker with the ICC_SRE_EL1 register during its time slice: it can switch SRE off, observe that it is off, and yet on the next world switch, find the SRE bit to be set again. Not very nice. An obvious solution is to always trap accesses to ICC_SRE_EL1 (by clearing ICC_SRE_EL2.Enable), and to let the handler return the programmed value on a read, or ignore the write. That way, the guest can always observe that our GICv3 is SRE==1 only. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
由 Christoffer Dall 提交于
When saving the state of the list registers, it is critical to reset them zero, as we could otherwise leave unexpected EOI interrupts pending for virtual level interrupts. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6+ Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 09 3月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
So far, we're always writing all possible LRs, setting the empty ones with a zero value. This is obvious doing a low of work for nothing, and we're better off clearing those we've actually dirtied on the exit path (it is very rare to inject more than one interrupt at a time anyway). Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to let the GICv3 code be more lazy in the way it accesses the LRs, it is necessary to start with a clean slate. Let's reset the LRs on each CPU when the vgic is probed (which includes a round trip to EL2...). Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
On exit, any empty LR will be signaled in ICH_ELRSR_EL2. Which means that we do not have to save it, and we can just clear its state in the in-memory copy. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Next on our list of useless accesses is the maintenance interrupt status registers (ICH_MISR_EL2, ICH_EISR_EL2). It is pointless to save them if we haven't asked for a maintenance interrupt the first place, which can only happen for two reasons: - Underflow: ICH_HCR_UIE will be set, - EOI: ICH_LR_EOI will be set. These conditions can be checked on the in-memory copies of the regs. Should any of these two condition be valid, we must read GICH_MISR. We can then check for ICH_MISR_EOI, and only when set read ICH_EISR_EL2. This means that in most case, we don't have to save them at all. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Just like on GICv2, we're a bit hammer-happy with GICv3, and access them more often than we should. Adopt a policy similar to what we do for GICv2, only save/restoring the minimal set of registers. As we don't access the registers linearly anymore (we may skip some), the convoluted accessors become slightly simpler, and we can drop the ugly indexing macro that tended to confuse the reviewers. Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to be able to move code outside of kvm/hyp, we need to make the global hyp.h file accessible from a standard location. include/asm/kvm_hyp.h seems good enough. Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 25 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The GICv3 architecture spec says: Writing to the active priority registers in any order other than the following order will result in UNPREDICTABLE behavior: - ICH_AP0R<n>_EL2. - ICH_AP1R<n>_EL2. So let's not pointlessly go against the rule... Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 14 12月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
As we've now switched to the new world switch implementation, remove the weak attributes, as nobody is supposed to override it anymore. Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
So far, we've implemented the new world switch with a completely different namespace, so that we could have both implementation compiled in. Let's take things one step further by adding weak aliases that have the same names as the original implementation. The weak attributes allows the new implementation to be overriden by the old one, and everything still work. At a later point, we'll be able to simply drop the old code, and everything will hopefully keep working, thanks to the aliases we have just added. This also saves us repainting all the callers. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-