It's causing lockdep warnings and why should
we access the memory that is freed up?
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Won't work anyway, instead WARN_ON if the VA list isn't
empty when we free the BO.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

So we know how large an allocation we can allow.

v2: incorporate Michel's comments
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>

v2: fix rebase onto drm-fixes
Signed-off-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

And also domain to prefered_domains. That matches better
what those values represent.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Marek Olšák <maraeo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NMichele Curti <michele.curti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Some buffers (UVD/VM page tables) must be placed in VRAM,
but the byte restriction for moving buffers didn't took this
into account.

v2: keep closer to the original code
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>

Placing them exclusively into VRAM might not work all the time.

Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78297Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

This decreases eviction by up to 20%, by improving the fragmentation
quality. No harm in normal cases that fit VRAM fully (PTS gaming suite).

In some cases, even the VRAM-fitting cases improved slightly (openarena, urban terror).

512kb was measured as the most optimal threshold for 3d workloads common to radeon.
Other drivers may need different thresholds according to their workloads.

v2: Nicer formatting
Signed-off-by: NLauri Kasanen <cand@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

With dev->anon_inode we have a global address_space ready for operation
right from the beginning. Therefore, there is no need to do a delayed
setup with TTM. Instead, set dev_mapping during initialization in
ttm_bo_device_init() and remove any "if (dev_mapping)" conditions.

Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>

DRM drivers share a common address_space across all character-devices of a
single DRM device. This allows simple buffer eviction and mapping-control.
However, DRM core currently waits for the first ->open() on any char-dev
to mark the underlying inode as backing inode of the device. This delayed
initialization causes ugly conditions all over the place:
  if (dev->dev_mapping)
    do_sth();

To avoid delayed initialization and to stop reusing the inode of the
char-dev, we allocate an anonymous inode for each DRM device and reset
filp->f_mapping to it on ->open().
Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>

Just move all fields into radeon_cs_reloc, removing unused/duplicated fields.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Userspace should set the first 4 bits of drm_radeon_cs_reloc::flags to
a number from 0 to 15. The higher the number, the higher the priority,
which means a buffer with a higher number will be validated sooner.

The old behavior is preserved: Buffers used for write are prioritized over
read-only buffers if the userspace doesn't set the number.

v2: add buffers to buckets directly, then concatenate them
v3: use a stable sort
Signed-off-by: NMarek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

The statistics are:
- VRAM usage in bytes
- GTT usage in bytes
- number of bytes moved by TTM

The last one is actually a counter, so you need to sample it before and after
command submission and take the difference.

This is useful for finding performance bottlenecks. Userspace queries are
also added.

v2: use atomic64_t
Signed-off-by: NMarek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

When passing buffers between processes, the receiving process needs to know
the original buffer domain, so that it doesn't accidentally move the buffer.

v2: reserve the buffer
Signed-off-by: NMarek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Mark function radeon_bo_clear_va() as static in
drm/radeon/radeon_object.c because it is not used outside this file.

This eliminates the following warning in drm/radeon/radeon_object.c:
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c:49:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘radeon_bo_clear_va’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: NRashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This field is never read. No need to set it in radeon. Besides, DRM gem
core clears it during setup, anyway.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Op 10-07-13 12:03, Markus Trippelsdorf schreef:
> On 2013.07.10 at 11:56 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 10-07-13 11:46, Markus Trippelsdorf schreef:
>>> On 2013.07.10 at 11:29 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>>> Op 10-07-13 11:22, Markus Trippelsdorf schreef:
>>>>> By simply copy/pasting a big document under LibreOffice my system hangs
>>>>> itself up. Only a hard reset gets it working again.
>>>>> see also: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66551
>>>>>
>>>>> I've bisected the issue to:
>>>>>
>>>>> commit ecff665f
>>>>> Author: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date:   Thu Jun 27 13:48:17 2013 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>>     drm/ttm: make ttm reservation calls behave like reservation calls
>>>>>
>>>>>     This commit converts the source of the val_seq counter to
>>>>>     the ww_mutex api. The reservation objects are converted later,
>>>>>     because there is still a lockdep splat in nouveau that has to
>>>>>     resolved first.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
>>>>>     Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>>>>>     Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> Can you try current head with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING set and post the
>>>> lockdep splat from dmesg, if any? If there is any locking issue
>>>> lockdep should warn about it.  Lockdep will turn itself off after the
>>>> first splat, so if the lockdep splat happens before running the
>>>> affected parts those will have to be fixed first.
>>> There was an unrelated EDAC lockdep splat, so I simply disabled it.

> >>> This is what I get:

>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: ================================================
>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: 3.10.0-08587-g496322bc #35 Not tainted
>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: ------------------------------------------------
>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: X/211 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: 2 locks held by X/211:
>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: #0:  (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff813279f0>] radeon_bo_list_validate+0x20/0xd0
>>> Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: #1:  (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81309306>] ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x126/0x4b0
>>> Jul 10 11:40:52 x4 kernel: SysRq : Emergency Sync
>>> Jul 10 11:40:53 x4 kernel: Emergency Sync complete
>>>
>> Thanks, exactly what I thought. I missed a backoff somewhere..
>>
>> Does the below patch fix it?
> Yes. Thank you for your quick reply.

8<------
If radeon_cs_parser_relocs fails ttm_eu_backoff_reservation doesn't get called.
This left open a bug where ttm_eu_reserve_buffers succeeded but the bo's were
not unlocked afterwards:

Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: ================================================
Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: 3.10.0-08587-g496322bc #35 Not tainted
Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: ------------------------------------------------
Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: X/211 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: 2 locks held by X/211:
Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: #0:  (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff813279f0>] radeon_bo_list_validate+0x20/0xd0
Jul 10 11:40:44 x4 kernel: #1:  (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81309306>] ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x126/0x4b0
Jul 10 11:40:52 x4 kernel: SysRq : Emergency Sync
Jul 10 11:40:53 x4 kernel: Emergency Sync complete

This is a regression caused by commit ecff665f.
"drm/ttm: make ttm reservation calls behave like reservation calls"
Reported-by: NMarkus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Tested-by: NMarkus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Try to use lockdep_assert_held or other alternatives where possible.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This commit converts the source of the val_seq counter to
the ww_mutex api. The reservation objects are converted later,
because there is still a lockdep splat in nouveau that has to
resolved first.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Just everything needed to decode videos using UVD.

v6: just all the bugfixes and support for R7xx-SI merged in one patch
v7: UVD_CGC_GATE is a write only register, lockup detection fix
v8: split out VRAM fallback changes, remove support for RV770,
    add support for HEMLOCK, add buffer sizes checks
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Let the CS module decide if we can fall back to VRAM or not.

v2: remove unintended change
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This patch allows the CPU to map the stolen vram segment
directly rather than going through the PCI BAR.  This
significantly improves performance for certain workloads with
a properly patched ddx.

Use radeon.fastfb=1 to enable it (disabled by default).
Currently only supported on RS690, but support for RS780/880
and newer APUs may be added eventually.
Signed-off-by: NSamuel Li <samuel.li@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This reverts commit d025e9e2.

This causes corruption for a number of users and needs further
investigation in the next cycle.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52491
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58659
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-January/032961.htmlSigned-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Since 0d0b3e74
drm/radeon: use cached memory when evicting for vram on non agp

evicting from TTM would try and evict to TTM instead of system,
not so good.

This should fix:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58272Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The bo creation placement is where the bo will be. Instead of trying
to move bo at each command stream let this work to another worker
thread that will use more advance heuristic.

agd5f: remove leftover unused variable
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

All items on the lru list are always reservable, so this is a stupid
thing to keep. Not only that, it is used in a way which would
guarantee deadlocks if it were ever to be set to block on reserve.

This is a lot of churn, but mostly because of the removal of the
argument which can be nested arbitrarily deeply in many places.

No change of code in this patch except removal of the no_wait_reserve
argument, the previous patch removed the use of no_wait_reserve.

v2:
 - Warn if -EBUSY is returned on reservation, all objects on the list
   should be reservable. Adjusted patch slightly due to conflicts.
v3:
 - Focus on no_wait_reserve removal only.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

The few places that care should have those checks instead.
This allows destruction of bo backed memory without a reservation.
It's required for being able to rework the delayed destroy path,
as it is no longer guaranteed to hold a reservation before unlocking.

However any previous wait is still guaranteed to complete, and it's
one of the last things to be done before the buffer object is freed.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Force the use of cached memory when evicting from vram on non agp
hardware. Also force write combine on agp hw. This is to insure
the minimum cache type change when allocating memory and improving
memory eviction especialy on pci/pcie hw.
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

All drivers set it to 0 and nothing uses it.
Signed-off-by: NMarcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

When internal users want VRAM we shouldn't return GART memory instead.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Driver internal users shouldn't be limited in their allocation size.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Convert #include "..." to #include <path/...> in drivers/gpu/.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

Roughly based on how nouveau is handling it. Instead of
adding the bo_va when the address is set add the bo_va
when the handle is opened, but set the address to zero
until userspace tells us where to place it.

This fixes another bunch of problems with glamor.

v2: agd5f: fix build after dropping patch 7/8.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>

The no_wait param isn't used anywhere, and actually isn't
very usefull at all.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

It doesn't really belong into the object functions,
also rename it to avoid collisions with struct radeon_bo_va.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>