1. 03 7月, 2014 4 次提交
    • A
      btrfs: fix null pointer dereference in clone_fs_devices when name is null · e755f780
      Anand Jain 提交于
      when one of the device path is missing btrfs_device name is null. So this
      patch will check for that.
      
      stack:
      BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
      IP: [<ffffffff812e18c0>] strlen+0x0/0x30
      [<ffffffffa01cd92a>] ? clone_fs_devices+0xaa/0x160 [btrfs]
      [<ffffffffa01cdcf7>] btrfs_init_new_device+0x317/0xca0 [btrfs]
      [<ffffffff81155bca>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x15a/0x1a0
      [<ffffffffa01d6473>] btrfs_ioctl+0xaa3/0x2860 [btrfs]
      [<ffffffff81132a6c>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x48c/0x9c0
      [<ffffffff81192a61>] ? __blkdev_put+0x171/0x180
      [<ffffffff817a784c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x4ac/0x590
      [<ffffffff81193426>] ? blkdev_put+0x106/0x110
      [<ffffffff81179175>] ? mntput+0x35/0x40
      [<ffffffff8116d4b0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x460/0x4a0
      [<ffffffff8115c72e>] ? ____fput+0xe/0x10
      [<ffffffff81068033>] ? task_work_run+0xb3/0xd0
      [<ffffffff8116d547>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x90
      [<ffffffff817a793e>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
      [<ffffffff817abe52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      reproducer:
      mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdg1 /dev/sdg2
      btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdg1
      modprobe -r btrfs && modprobe btrfs
      mount -o degraded /dev/sdg1 /btrfs
      btrfs dev add /dev/sdg3 /btrfs
      Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e755f780
    • E
      btrfs: fix nossd and ssd_spread mount option regression · 2aa06a35
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      The commit
      
      07802534 btrfs: Cleanup the btrfs_parse_options for remount.
      
      broke ssd options quite badly; it stopped making ssd_spread
      imply ssd, and it made "nossd" unsettable.
      
      Put things back at least as well as they were before
      (though ssd mount option handling is still pretty odd:
      # mount -o "nossd,ssd_spread" works?)
      Reported-by: NRoman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      2aa06a35
    • W
      Btrfs: fix race between balance recovery and root deletion · 5f316481
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      Balance recovery is called when RW mounting or remounting from
      RO to RW, it is called to finish roots merging.
      
      When doing balance recovery, relocation root's corresponding
      fs root(whose root refs is 0) might be destroyed by cleaner
      thread, this will make btrfs fail to mount.
      
      Fix this problem by holding @cleaner_mutex when doing balance
      recovery.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5f316481
    • F
      Btrfs: atomically set inode->i_flags in btrfs_update_iflags · 3cc79392
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      This change is based on the corresponding recent change for ext4:
      
        ext4: atomically set inode->i_flags in ext4_set_inode_flags()
      
      That has the following commit message that applies to btrfs as well:
      
        "Use cmpxchg() to atomically set i_flags instead of clearing out the
         S_IMMUTABLE, S_APPEND, etc. flags and then setting them from the
         EXT4_IMMUTABLE_FL, EXT4_APPEND_FL flags, since this opens up a race
         where an immutable file has the immutable flag cleared for a brief
         window of time."
      
      Replacing EXT4_IMMUTABLE_FL and EXT4_APPEND_FL with BTRFS_INODE_IMMUTABLE
      and BTRFS_INODE_APPEND, respectively.
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Reviewed-by: NSatoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      3cc79392
  2. 29 6月, 2014 9 次提交
  3. 20 6月, 2014 9 次提交
    • M
      Btrfs: fix wrong error handle when the device is missing or is not writeable · 8408c716
      Miao Xie 提交于
      The original bio might be submitted, so we shoud increase bi_remaining to
      account for it when we deal with the error that the device is missing or
      is not writeable, or we would skip the endio handle.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      8408c716
    • M
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when mounting a degraded fs · c55f1396
      Miao Xie 提交于
      The deadlock happened when we mount degraded filesystem, the reproduced
      steps are following:
       # mkfs.btrfs -f -m raid1 -d raid1 <dev0> <dev1>
       # echo 1 > /sys/block/`basename <dev0>`/device/delete
       # mount -o degraded <dev1> <mnt>
      
      The reason was that the counter -- bi_remaining was wrong. If the missing
      or unwriteable device was the last device in the mapping array, we would
      not submit the original bio, so we shouldn't increase bi_remaining of it
      in btrfs_end_bio(), or we would skip the final endio handle.
      
      Fix this problem by adding a flag into btrfs bio structure. If we submit
      the original bio, we will set the flag, and we increase bi_remaining counter,
      or we don't.
      
      Though there is another way to fix it -- decrease bi_remaining counter of the
      original bio when we make sure the original bio is not submitted, this method
      need add more check and is easy to make mistake.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c55f1396
    • M
      Btrfs: use bio_endio_nodec instead of open code · e990f167
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e990f167
    • W
      Btrfs: fix NULL pointer crash when running balance and scrub concurrently · 298a8f9c
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      While running balance, scrub, fsstress concurrently we hit the
      following kernel crash:
      
      [56561.448845] BTRFS info (device sde): relocating block group 11005853696 flags 132
      [56561.524077] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000078
      [56561.524237] IP: [<ffffffffa038956d>] scrub_chunk.isra.12+0xdd/0x130 [btrfs]
      [56561.524297] PGD 9be28067 PUD 7f3dd067 PMD 0
      [56561.524325] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
      [....]
      [56561.527237] Call Trace:
      [56561.527309]  [<ffffffffa038980e>] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x24e/0x490 [btrfs]
      [56561.527392]  [<ffffffff810abe00>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x50/0xb0
      [56561.527476]  [<ffffffffa038add4>] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x1a4/0x530 [btrfs]
      [56561.527561]  [<ffffffffa0368107>] btrfs_ioctl+0x13f7/0x2a90 [btrfs]
      [56561.527639]  [<ffffffff811c82f0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2e0/0x4c0
      [56561.527712]  [<ffffffff8109c384>] ? vtime_account_user+0x54/0x60
      [56561.527788]  [<ffffffff810f768c>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x9c/0xf0
      [56561.527870]  [<ffffffff811c8551>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
      [56561.527941]  [<ffffffff815707f7>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
      [...]
      [56561.528304] RIP  [<ffffffffa038956d>] scrub_chunk.isra.12+0xdd/0x130 [btrfs]
      [56561.528395]  RSP <ffff88004c0f5be8>
      [56561.528454] CR2: 0000000000000078
      
      This is because in btrfs_relocate_chunk(), we will free @bdev directly while
      scrub may still hold extent mapping, and may access freed memory.
      
      Fix this problem by wrapping freeing @bdev work into free_extent_map() which
      is based on reference count.
      Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      298a8f9c
    • Q
      btrfs: Skip scrubbing removed chunks to avoid -ENOENT. · ced96edc
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      When run scrub with balance, sometimes -ENOENT will be returned, since
      in scrub_enumerate_chunks() will search dev_extent in *COMMIT_ROOT*, but
      btrfs_lookup_block_group() will search block group in *MEMORY*, so if a
      chunk is removed but not committed, -ENOENT will be returned.
      
      However, there is no need to stop scrubbing since other chunks may be
      scrubbed without problem.
      
      So this patch changes the behavior to skip removed chunks and continue
      to scrub the rest.
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ced96edc
    • M
      Btrfs: fix broken free space cache after the system crashed · e570fd27
      Miao Xie 提交于
      When we mounted the filesystem after the crash, we got the following
      message:
        BTRFS error (device xxx): block group xxxx has wrong amount of free space
        BTRFS error (device xxx): failed to load free space cache for block group xxx
      
      It is because we didn't update the metadata of the allocated space (in extent
      tree) until the file data was written into the disk. During this time, there was
      no information about the allocated spaces in either the extent tree nor the
      free space cache. when we wrote out the free space cache at this time (commit
      transaction), those spaces were lost. In fact, only the free space that is
      used to store the file data had this problem, the others didn't because
      the metadata of them is updated in the same transaction context.
      
      There are many methods which can fix the above problem
      - track the allocated space, and write it out when we write out the free
        space cache
      - account the size of the allocated space that is used to store the file
        data, if the size is not zero, don't write out the free space cache.
      
      The first one is complex and may make the performance drop down.
      This patch chose the second method, we use a per-block-group variant to
      account the size of that allocated space. Besides that, we also introduce
      a per-block-group read-write semaphore to avoid the race between
      the allocation and the free space cache write out.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e570fd27
    • M
      Btrfs: make free space cache write out functions more readable · 5349d6c3
      Miao Xie 提交于
      This patch makes the free space cache write out functions more readable,
      and beisdes that, it also reduces the stack space that the function --
      __btrfs_write_out_cache uses from 194bytes to 144bytes.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5349d6c3
    • F
      Btrfs: remove unused wait queue in struct extent_buffer · 46fefe41
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      The lock_wq wait queue is not used anywhere, therefore just remove it.
      On a x86_64 system, this reduced sizeof(struct extent_buffer) from 320
      bytes down to 296 bytes, which means a 4Kb page can now be used for
      13 extent buffers instead of 12.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      46fefe41
    • C
      Btrfs: fix deadlocks with trylock on tree nodes · ea4ebde0
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The Btrfs tree trylock function is poorly named.  It always takes
      the spinlock and backs off if the blocking lock is held.  This
      can lead to surprising lockups because people expect it to really be a
      trylock.
      
      This commit makes it a pure trylock, both for the spinlock and the
      blocking lock.  It also reworks the nested lock handling slightly to
      avoid taking the read lock while a spinning write lock might be held.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ea4ebde0
  4. 14 6月, 2014 7 次提交
    • E
      btrfs: fix error handling in create_pending_snapshot · 47a306a7
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      fcebe456 cut and pasted some code to a later point
      in create_pending_snapshot(), but didn't switch
      to the appropriate error handling for this stage
      of the function.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      47a306a7
    • E
      btrfs: fix use of uninit "ret" in end_extent_writepage() · 3e2426bd
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      If this condition in end_extent_writepage() is false:
      
      	if (tree->ops && tree->ops->writepage_end_io_hook)
      
      we will then test an uninitialized "ret" at:
      
      	ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO;
      
      The test for ret is for the case where ->writepage_end_io_hook
      failed, and we'd choose that ret as the error; but if
      there is no ->writepage_end_io_hook, nothing sets ret.
      
      Initializing ret to 0 should be sufficient; if
      writepage_end_io_hook wasn't set, (!uptodate) means
      non-zero err was passed in, so we choose -EIO in that case.
      Signed-of-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      3e2426bd
    • E
      btrfs: free ulist in qgroup_shared_accounting() error path · d7372780
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      If tmp = ulist_alloc(GFP_NOFS) fails, we return without
      freeing the previously allocated qgroups = ulist_alloc(GFP_NOFS)
      and cause a memory leak.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      d7372780
    • F
      Btrfs: fix qgroups sanity test crash or hang · b050f9f6
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Often when running the qgroups sanity test, a crash or a hang happened.
      This is because the extent buffer the test uses for the root node doesn't
      have an header level explicitly set, making it have a random level value.
      This is a problem when it's not zero for the btrfs_search_slot() calls
      the test ends up doing, resulting in crashes or hangs such as the following:
      
      [ 6454.127192] Btrfs loaded, debug=on, assert=on, integrity-checker=on
      (...)
      [ 6454.127760] BTRFS: selftest: Running qgroup tests
      [ 6454.127964] BTRFS: selftest: Running test_test_no_shared_qgroup
      [ 6454.127966] BTRFS: selftest: Qgroup basic add
      [ 6480.152005] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [modprobe:5383]
      [ 6480.152005] Modules linked in: btrfs(+) xor raid6_pq binfmt_misc nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc i2c_piix4 i2c_core pcspkr evbug psmouse serio_raw e1000 [last unloaded: btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005] irq event stamp: 188448
      [ 6480.152005] hardirqs last  enabled at (188447): [<ffffffff8168ef5c>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
      [ 6480.152005] hardirqs last disabled at (188448): [<ffffffff81698e6a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x80
      [ 6480.152005] softirqs last  enabled at (188446): [<ffffffff810516cf>] __do_softirq+0x1cf/0x450
      [ 6480.152005] softirqs last disabled at (188441): [<ffffffff81051c25>] irq_exit+0xb5/0xc0
      [ 6480.152005] CPU: 0 PID: 5383 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.15.0-rc8-fdm-btrfs-next-33+ #4
      [ 6480.152005] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
      [ 6480.152005] task: ffff8802146125a0 ti: ffff8800d0d00000 task.ti: ffff8800d0d00000
      [ 6480.152005] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81349a63>]  [<ffffffff81349a63>] __write_lock_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 6480.152005] RSP: 0018:ffff8800d0d038e8  EFLAGS: 00000287
      [ 6480.152005] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8168ef5c RCX: 000005deb8525852
      [ 6480.152005] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000001d45 RDI: ffff8802105000b8
      [ 6480.152005] RBP: ffff8800d0d038e8 R08: fffffe12710f63db R09: ffffffffa03196fb
      [ 6480.152005] R10: ffff8802146125a0 R11: ffff880214612e28 R12: ffff8800d0d03858
      [ 6480.152005] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8800d0d00000 R15: ffff8802146125a0
      [ 6480.152005] FS:  00007f14ff804700(0000) GS:ffff880215e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [ 6480.152005] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
      [ 6480.152005] CR2: 00007fff4df0dac8 CR3: 00000000d1796000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
      [ 6480.152005] Stack:
      [ 6480.152005]  ffff8800d0d03908 ffffffff810ae967 0000000000000001 ffff8802105000b8
      [ 6480.152005]  ffff8800d0d03938 ffffffff8168e57e ffffffffa0319c16 0000000000000007
      [ 6480.152005]  ffff880210500000 ffff880210500100 ffff8800d0d039b8 ffffffffa0319c16
      [ 6480.152005] Call Trace:
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff810ae967>] do_raw_write_lock+0x47/0xa0
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff8168e57e>] _raw_write_lock+0x5e/0x80
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa0319c16>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0x116/0x270 [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa0319c16>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x116/0x270 [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa02b2acb>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x3b/0x50 [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa02b81a6>] btrfs_search_slot+0x916/0xa20 [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff811a727f>] ? create_object+0x23f/0x300
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa02b9958>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x78/0xd0 [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa036041a>] insert_normal_tree_ref.constprop.4+0xa2/0x19a [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa03605c3>] test_no_shared_qgroup+0xb1/0x1ca [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff8108cad6>] ? local_clock+0x16/0x30
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa035ef8e>] btrfs_test_qgroups+0x1ae/0x1d7 [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa03a69d2>] ? ftrace_define_fields_btrfs_space_reservation+0xfd/0xfd [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffffa03a6a86>] init_btrfs_fs+0xb4/0x153 [btrfs]
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff81000352>] do_one_initcall+0x102/0x150
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff8103d223>] ? set_memory_nx+0x43/0x50
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff81682668>] ? set_section_ro_nx+0x6d/0x74
      [ 6480.152005]  [<ffffffff810d91cc>] load_module+0x1cdc/0x2630
      (...)
      
      Therefore initialize the extent buffer as an empty leaf (level 0).
      
      Issue easy to reproduce when btrfs is built as a module via:
      
          $ for ((i = 1; i <= 1000000; i++)); do rmmod btrfs; modprobe btrfs; done
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b050f9f6
    • S
      btrfs: prevent RCU warning when dereferencing radix tree slot · f1e3c289
      Sasha Levin 提交于
      Mark the dereference as protected by lock. Not doing so triggers
      an RCU warning since the radix tree assumed that RCU is in use.
      Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f1e3c289
    • W
      Btrfs: fix unfinished readahead thread for raid5/6 degraded mounting · 5fbc7c59
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      Steps to reproduce:
      
       # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sd[b-f] -m raid5 -d raid5
       # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc --->corrupt one of btrfs device
       # mount /dev/sdb /mnt -o degraded
       # btrfs scrub start -BRd /mnt
      
      This is because readahead would skip missing device, this is not true
      for RAID5/6, because REQ_GET_READ_MIRRORS return 1 for RAID5/6 block
      mapping. If expected data locates in missing device, readahead thread
      would not call __readahead_hook() which makes event @rc->elems=0
      wait forever.
      
      Fix this problem by checking return value of btrfs_map_block(),we
      can only skip missing device safely if there are several mirrors.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5fbc7c59
    • G
      btrfs: new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2 · cc68a8a5
      Gerhard Heift 提交于
      This new ioctl call allows the user to supply a buffer of varying size in which
      a tree search can store its results. This is much more flexible if you want to
      receive items which are larger than the current fixed buffer of 3992 bytes or
      if you want to fetch more items at once. Items larger than this buffer are for
      example some of the type EXTENT_CSUM.
      Signed-off-by: NGerhard Heift <Gerhard@Heift.Name>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      cc68a8a5
  5. 13 6月, 2014 6 次提交
  6. 11 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 10 6月, 2014 4 次提交