- 03 2月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Add a helper to check that the fsid parts of two file handles match. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The pnfs code will need it too. Also remove the nfsd_ prefix to match the other filehandle helpers in that file. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
This (ab-)uses the file locking code to allow filesystems to recall outstanding pNFS layouts on a file. This new lease type is similar but not quite the same as FL_DELEG. A FL_LAYOUT lease can always be granted, an a per-filesystem lock (XFS iolock for the initial implementation) ensures not FL_LAYOUT leases granted when we would need to recall them. Also included are changes that allow multiple outstanding read leases of different types on the same file as long as they have a differnt owner. This wasn't a problem until now as nfsd never set FL_LEASE leases, and no one else used FL_DELEG leases, but given that nfsd will also issues FL_LAYOUT leases we will have to handle it now. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Just like for other lock types we should allow different owners to have a read lease on a file. Currently this can't happen, but with the addition of pNFS layout leases we'll need this feature. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 23 1月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The BKL is completely out of the picture in the lockd and sunrpc code these days. Update the antiquated comments that refer to it. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Someone with a weird time_t happened to notice this, it shouldn't really manifest till 2038. It may not be our ownly year-2038 problem. Reported-by: NAaron Pace <Aaron.Pace@alcatel-lucent.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2015 11 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We have each of the locks_remove_* variants doing this individually. Have the caller do it instead, and have locks_remove_flock and locks_remove_lease just assume that it's a valid pointer. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
This makes things a bit more efficient in the cifs and ceph lock pushing code. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Now that we use standard list_heads for tracking leases, we can have lm_change take a pointer to the lease to be modified instead of a double pointer. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
There is only a single call site for each of these functions, and the caller takes the i_lock prior to calling them and drops it just afterward. Move the spinlocking into the functions instead. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The current scheme of using the i_flock list is really difficult to manage. There is also a legitimate desire for a per-inode spinlock to manage these lists that isn't the i_lock. Start conversion to a new scheme to eventually replace the old i_flock list with a new "file_lock_context" object. We start by adding a new i_flctx to struct inode. For now, it lives in parallel with i_flock list, but will eventually replace it. The idea is to allocate a structure to sit in that pointer and act as a locus for all things file locking. We allocate a file_lock_context for an inode when the first lock is added to it, and it's only freed when the inode is freed. We use the i_lock to protect the assignment, but afterward it should mostly be accessed locklessly. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...instead of open-coding it and removing flock locks directly. This helps consolidate the flock lock removal logic into a single spot. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...that we can use to queue file_locks to per-ctx list_heads. Go ahead and convert locks_delete_lock and locks_dispose_list to use it instead of the fl_block list. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 16 1月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rickard Strandqvist 提交于
Remove the function renew_client() that is not used anywhere. This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by: NRickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Rickard Strandqvist 提交于
Remove the function nlm_encode_fh() that is not used anywhere. This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by: NRickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
commit 0efaa7e8 locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all moves the call to fl->fl_lmops->lm_change() to a place in the code where fl might be a non-lease lock. When that happens, fl_lmops is NULL and an Oops ensures. So add an extra test to restore correct functioning. Reported-by: NLinda Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912569 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v3.18) Fixes: 0efaa7e8Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
-
- 09 1月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
As per e23738a7 ("sched, inotify: Deal with nested sleeps"). fanotify_read is a wait loop with sleeps in. Wait loops rely on task_struct::state and sleeps do too, since that's the only means of actually sleeping. Therefore the nested sleeps destroy the wait loop state and the wait loop breaks the sleep functions that assume TASK_RUNNING (mutex_lock). Fix this by using the new woken_wake_function and wait_woken() stuff, which registers wakeups in wait and thereby allows shrinking the task_state::state changes to the actual sleep part. Reported-by: NYuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: NSedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141216152838.GZ3337@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 David Drysdale 提交于
Fix clashing values for O_PATH and FMODE_NONOTIFY on sparc. The clashing O_PATH value was added in commit 5229645b ("vfs: add nonconflicting values for O_PATH") but this can't be changed as it is user-visible. FMODE_NONOTIFY is only used internally in the kernel, but it is in the same numbering space as the other O_* flags, as indicated by the comment at the top of include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h (and its use in fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c). So renumber it to avoid the clash. All of this has happened before (commit 12ed2e36: "fanotify: FMODE_NONOTIFY and __O_SYNC in sparc conflict"), and all of this will happen again -- so update the uniqueness check in fcntl_init() to include __FMODE_NONOTIFY. Signed-off-by: NDavid Drysdale <drysdale@google.com> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
In ocfs2_link(), the parent directory inode passed to function ocfs2_lookup_ino_from_name() is wrong. Parameter dir is the parent of new_dentry not old_dentry. We should get old_dir from old_dentry and lookup old_dentry in old_dir in case another node remove the old dentry. With this change, hard linking works again, when paths are relative with at least one subdirectory. This is how the problem was reproducable: # mkdir a # mkdir b # touch a/test # ln a/test b/test ln: failed to create hard link `b/test' => `a/test': No such file or directory However when creating links in the same dir, it worked well. Now the link gets created. Fixes: 0e048316 ("ocfs2: check existence of old dentry in ocfs2_link()") Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Reported-by: NSzabo Aron - UBIT <aron@ubit.hu> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Tested-by: NAron Szabo <aron@ubit.hu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
In dlm_process_recovery_data, only when dlm_new_lock failed the ret will be set to -ENOMEM. And in this case, newlock is definitely NULL. So test newlock is meaningless, remove it. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
len is size_t, should be printed with %zu. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@redhat.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
RFC 3530 14.2.24 says This value represents the length of the names of the directory entries and the cookie value for these entries. This length represents the XDR encoding of the data (names and cookies)... The "xdr encoding" of the name should probably include the 4 bytes for the length. But this is all just a hint so not worth e.g. backporting to stable. Also reshuffle some lines to more clearly group together the dircount-related code. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
fi_delegees is always handled under the fi_lock, so there's no need to use an atomic_t for this field. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Currently, nfs4_set_delegation takes a reference to an existing delegation and then checks to see if there is a conflict. If there is one, then it doesn't release that reference. Change the code to take the reference after the check and only if there is no conflict. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Theoretically we need to order setting of various fields in fc with fc->initialized. No known bug reports related to this yet. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Analysis from Marc: "Commit 7078187a ("fuse: introduce fuse_simple_request() helper") from the above pull request triggers some EIO errors for me in some tests that rely on fuse Looking at the code changes and a bit of debugging info I think there's a general problem here that fuse_get_req checks and possibly waits for fc->initialized, and this was always called first. But this commit changes the ordering and in many places fc->minor is now possibly used before fuse_get_req, and we can't be sure that fc has been initialized. In my case fuse_lookup_init sets req->out.args[0].size to the wrong size because fc->minor at that point is still 0, leading to the EIO error." Fix by moving the compat adjustments into fuse_simple_request() to after fuse_get_req(). This is also more readable than the original, since now compatibility is handled in a single function instead of cluttering each operation. Reported-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@gmail.com> Tested-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Fixes: 7078187a ("fuse: introduce fuse_simple_request() helper")
-
- 03 1月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Wilk 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This reverts commit 14516bb7. This was causing regression test failures with generic/285 with an ext3 filesystem using CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Commit 1d52c78a (Btrfs: try not to ENOSPC on log replay) added a check to skip delayed inode updates during log replay because it confuses the enospc code. But the delayed processing will end up ignoring delayed refs from log replay because the inode itself wasn't put through the delayed code. This can end up triggering a warning at commit time: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 778 at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1410 btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty+0x32/0x34() Which is repeated for each commit because we never process the delayed inode ref update. The fix used here is to change btrfs_delayed_delete_inode_ref to return an error if we're currently in log replay. The caller will do the ref deletion immediately and everything will work properly. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.18 and any stable series that picked 1d52c78a
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we are using skinny metadata, the block's tree level is in the offset of the key and not in a btrfs_tree_block_info structure following the extent item (it doesn't exist). Therefore fix it. Besides returning the correct level in the tree, this also prevents reading past the leaf's end in the case where the extent item is the last item in the leaf (eb) and it has only 1 inline reference - this is because sizeof(struct btrfs_tree_block_info) is greater than sizeof(struct btrfs_extent_inline_ref). Got it while running a scrub which produced the following warning: BTRFS: checksum error at logical 42123264 on dev /dev/sde, sector 15840: metadata node (level 24) in tree 5 Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSatoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
In btrfs_mkdir(), if it fails to create dir, we should clean up existed items, setting inode's link properly to make sure it could be cleaned up properly. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We shouldn't BUG_ON() if there is corruption. I hit this while testing my block group patch and the abort worked properly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-