Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 22 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 21 2月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Move the policy for placement of the GGTT vma into the caller · 5935485f
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Currently we make the unilateral decision inside
i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() where the VMA should resided (inside
the fence and mappable region or above?). This is not our decision to
make as it impacts on how the display engine can use the resulting
scanout object, and it would rather instruct us where to place the VMA so
that it can enable the features it wants. As such, make the pin flags an
argument to i915_gem_object_pin_to_display() and control them from
intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj()

Whilst taking control of the mapping for ourselves, start tracking how
we use it to avoid trying to free a fence we never claimed:

<3>[  227.151869] GEM_BUG_ON(vma->fence->pin_count <= 0)
<4>[  227.152064] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<2>[  227.152068] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h:391!
<4>[  227.152084] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
<0>[  227.152092] Dumping ftrace buffer:
<0>[  227.152099]    (ftrace buffer empty)
<4>[  227.152102] Modules linked in: i915 snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_codec_generic coretemp snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm lpc_ich e1000e mei_me mei prime_numbers
<4>[  227.152131] CPU: 1 PID: 1587 Comm: kworker/u16:49 Tainted: G     U           4.16.0-rc1-gbab67b2f6177-kasan_7+ #1
<4>[  227.152134] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 755                 /0PU052, BIOS A08 02/19/2008
<4>[  227.152236] Workqueue: events_unbound intel_atomic_commit_work [i915]
<4>[  227.152292] RIP: 0010:intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915]
<4>[  227.152295] RSP: 0018:ffff88005aad7b68 EFLAGS: 00010286
<4>[  227.152300] RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff88005c359580 RCX: 0000000000000000
<4>[  227.152304] RDX: 0000000000000026 RSI: ffffffff8707d840 RDI: ffffed000b55af63
<4>[  227.152307] RBP: ffff880056817e58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
<4>[  227.152311] R10: ffff88005aad7b88 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800568184d0
<4>[  227.152314] R13: ffff880065b5ab08 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000
<4>[  227.152318] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88006ac40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4>[  227.152322] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4>[  227.152325] CR2: 00007f5fb25550a8 CR3: 0000000068c78000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
<4>[  227.152328] Call Trace:
<4>[  227.152385]  intel_cleanup_plane_fb+0x6b/0xd0 [i915]
<4>[  227.152395]  drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x166/0x280
<4>[  227.152452]  intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x159d/0x3380 [i915]
<4>[  227.152463]  ? process_one_work+0x66e/0x1460
<4>[  227.152516]  ? skl_update_crtcs+0x9c0/0x9c0 [i915]
<4>[  227.152523]  ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390
<4>[  227.152527]  ? lock_acquire+0x13d/0x390
<4>[  227.152534]  process_one_work+0x71a/0x1460
<4>[  227.152540]  ? __schedule+0x815/0x1e20
<4>[  227.152547]  ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2b0/0x2b0
<4>[  227.152553]  ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0x40
<4>[  227.152559]  worker_thread+0xdf/0xf60
<4>[  227.152569]  ? process_one_work+0x1460/0x1460
<4>[  227.152573]  kthread+0x2cf/0x3c0
<4>[  227.152578]  ? _kthread_create_on_node+0xa0/0xa0
<4>[  227.152583]  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
<4>[  227.152591] Code: c6 00 11 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 bd 85 c0 e8 60 e7 a9 c4 0f ff e9 1f fe ff ff 48 c7 c6 40 10 86 c0 48 c7 c7 e0 ca 85 c0 e8 2b 95 bd c4 <0f> 0b 48 89 ef e8 4c 44 e8 c4 e9 ef fd ff ff e8 42 44 e8 c4 e9
<1>[  227.152720] RIP: intel_unpin_fb_vma+0x23a/0x2a0 [i915] RSP: ffff88005aad7b68

v2: i915_vma_pin_fence() is a no-op if a fence isn't required, so check
vma->fence as well.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180220134208.24988-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      5935485f
  5. 13 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 10 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 31 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 30 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 19 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 13 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  17. 01 12月, 2017 2 次提交
  19. 30 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 28 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  23. 25 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Use exponential backoff for wait_for() · a54b1873
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Instead of sleeping for a fixed 1ms (roughly, depending on timer slack),
start with a small sleep and exponentially increase the sleep on each
cycle.

A good example of a beneficiary is the guc mmio communication channel.
Typically we expect (and so spin) for 10us for a quick response, but this
doesn't cover everything and so sometimes we fallback to the millisecond+
sleep. This incurs a significant delay in time-critical operations like
preemption (igt/gem_exec_latency), which can be improved significantly by
using a small sleep after the spin fails.

We've made this suggestion many times, but had little experimental data
to support adding the complexity.

v2: Bump the minimum usleep to 10us on advice of
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt (Tvrko)
v3: Specify min, max range for usleep intervals -- some code may
crucially depend upon and so want to specify the sleep pattern.

References: 1758b90e ("drm/i915: Use a hybrid scheme for fast register waits")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171124130031.20761-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a54b1873
  25. 22 11月, 2017 4 次提交
  27. 17 11月, 2017 3 次提交
  29. 14 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  31. 12 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  33. 10 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • V
      drm/i915: Nuke intel_digital_port->port · 8f4f2797
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      Remove intel_digital_port->port and replace its users with
intel_encoder->port. intel_encoder->port is a superset of
intel_digital_port->port, and it works correctly even for
MST encoders.

v2: Eliminate a few dp_to_dig_port()->base.port cases too (DK)

Performed with cocci:
@@
@@
struct intel_digital_port {
       ...
-       enum port port;
       ...
}

@@
struct intel_digital_port *D;
expression E;
@@
- D->port = E;

@@
struct intel_digital_port *D;
@@
- D->port
+ D->base.port

@
expression E;
@@
(
- dp_to_dig_port(E)->port
+ dp_to_dig_port(E)->base.port
|
- enc_to_dig_port(E)->port
+ to_intel_encoder(E)->port
)

@@
expression E;
@@
- to_intel_encoder(&E->base)
+ E

@@
struct intel_digital_port *D;
identifier I, M;
@@
  I = &D->base
<...
(
- D->base.M
+ I->M
|
- &D->base
+ I
)
...>

@@
identifier D;
expression E;
identifier M;
@@
 D = enc_to_dig_port(&E->base)
<...
(
- D->base.M
+ E->M
|
- &D->base
+ E
)
...>

@@
identifier D, DP;
expression E;
identifier M;
@@
 DP = enc_to_intel_dp(&E->base)
<...
(
- dp_to_dig_port(DP)->base.M
+ E->M
|
- &dp_to_dig_port(DP)->base
+ E
)
...>

@@
expression E;
identifier M;
@@
(
- enc_to_dig_port(&E->base)->base.M
+ E->M
|
- enc_to_dig_port(&E->base)->base
+ E
|
- enc_to_mst(&E->base)->primary->base.port
+ E->port
)

@@
expression E;
identifier D;
@@
- struct intel_digital_port *D = E;
... when != D

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171109152434.32074-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
      8f4f2797
  35. 01 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  37. 31 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  39. 27 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  41. 25 10月, 2017 3 次提交
  43. 19 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  45. 18 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  47. 17 10月, 2017 2 次提交