- 03 6月, 2010 6 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
This prevents us having common code depend on PCI or USB specific code. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Instead of parsing the EEPROM information, use the flag that was set during device initialization. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
There is no point on having them separated across 3 files. At the same time rename USB_CYC_CFG to its proper name US_CYC_CNT (as per the datasheet). Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
There is no evidence, either in adapters or in the Ralink code, that such a device actually exists. All so-call RT2870 adapter identify themselves as RT2860. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The beacon writing functions of rt2800pci and rt2800usb are now identical. Move them to rt2800lib to only have one central function. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Instead of fiddling with the skb->data pointer and thereby risking out of bounds accesses, properly reserve the space needed in an skb for descriptors. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
-
- 11 5月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
RXWI processing is exactly the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb, so make it common code. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
TXWI writing is exactly the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb, so make it common code. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
Update channel initialization for the RF3052 chipset. According to the Ralink drivers, the rt3x array must be used for this chipset, rather then the rt2x array. Furthermore RF3052 supports the 5GHz band, extend the rt3x array with the 5GHz channels, and use them for the RF3052 chip. Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
The SIFS value is a constant and doesn't need to be updated on erp changes. Furthermore the code used 10us for both, the OFDM SIFS and CCK SIFS time which broke CTS protected 11g connections (see patch "rt2x00: rt2800: update initial SIFS values" for details). Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Currently the CCK and OFDM SIFS value is set to 32us. This value is neither used by the Ralink driver nor specified in 802.11. Instead of using 10us for CCK SIFS (as defined in 802.11) use 16us like in the Ralink drivers. And indeed using a SIFS value of 10us breaks connectivity with 11g + CTS protected connections. Add a comment to the code why we don't use 10us for CCK SIFS value. The OFDM SIFS value is set to 16us (as defined in 802.11 and also used by the Ralink drivers). Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 05 5月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Inspection of the Ralink vendor driver shows that the TX_BAND_CFG register and BBP register 3 are about HT40- indication, not about HT40+ indication. Inverse the meaning of these fields in the code. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
PCI specific code has been remove quite some time ago. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 29 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Update the rfcsr and bbp init code for SoC devices to match with the latest Ralink driver. To have better control over which values are used for the register initialization create a new function rt2800_is_305x_soc which checks for SoC interface type, the correct RT chipset and the correct RF chipset. This is based on the assumption that all rt305x SoC devices use a rt2872 and rf3020/rf3021/rf3022. In case an unknown RF chipset is found on a SoC device with a rt2872 don't treat it as rt305x and just print a message. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 27 4月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Remove redundant check for RT2872. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Restore the rfcsr initialization for RT305x SoC devices which was removed by "rt2x00: Finish rt3070 support in rt2800 register initialization.". This fixes the rx path on SoC devices. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Get closer to what the ralink driver does by setting the rf register 13 to tx_power2 during channel switch. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
Disable HT40 support for now as it causes rx problems with HT40 capable 11n APs (when mac80211 enables HT40, rx is completely disfunctional). Once the rt2800 HT code is capable of using HT40 we should enable the flag again. I only tested this patch with a rt305x SoC device, nevertheless the patch disables HT40 also on PCI and USB rt2800 devices. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2010 9 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3390 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3390 vendor driver. Untested as I don't actually own an RT3390 based device, but given experiences on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work.. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3090 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3090 vendor driver. Untested as I don't actually own an RT3090 based device, but given experiences on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work.. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3070 vendor driver. With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was incomplete. Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink vendor driver. With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Align the rt2800 register initializations with the latest versions of the Ralink vendor driver. This patch is also preparation for the addition of support for RT3070 / RT3071 / RT3090 / RT3390 based devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't mean a lot of things anyway. Refactor the constants to have some more meaningful names, and introduce and use some new helpers to check these chipset revisions. At the same time rename to revision, as they are more revision numbers rather than version numbers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Only include definitions for RT chipsets that are also used inside the Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Definitions taken from the latest rt2860 / rt2870 / rt3070 / rt3090 Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
It seems that the distinction between RF channel switch method is solely based on the RF chipset that is used. Refactor the channel switch decision to just take the RF chipset into account, thereby greatly simplifying the check. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helmut Schaa 提交于
rt2872 needs the same rf register setup as rt3070 and rt3090, hence use rt2800_config_channel_rt3x instead of rt2800_config_channel_rt2x. This change allows me to actually switch channels and hence scan all configured channels on the RT305x SoC platform (which uses a rt2872) here. Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Tested-by: NLuis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 07 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
In all drivers ensure that auto wakeup is disabled before waking up the device. This is needed to prevent connection stability issues and problems in waking up the device. Based upon a patch from Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The recent rt2800 devices are no longer really identified by their PCI ID's, but rather by the contents of their CSR0 register. Also for the other chipsets is the contents of this CSR0 register important. Change the chipset determination logic to be more aligned with the rt2800 model. Preparation for the support of rt3070 / rt3090 based devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Don't set the RT chipset for a device from within the generic PCI/SOC code, but rather from the individual drivers, so that individual drivers have more control over what RT chipset is set. Preparation for chip handling updates for rt2800 devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Introduce the SoC interface type to detect SoC devices, instead of having them mimic being PCI devices. This allows for easier detection of SoC devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kalle Valo 提交于
get_tx_stats() will be removed from mac80211. Compile-tested only. Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi> Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
It is only used within the rt2800lib module itself. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The rt2800pci_wait_wpdma_ready and rt2800usb_wait_wpdma_ready functions are exactly the same, so unify them into rt200lib. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
The RF3052 chipset is now also being integrated onto USB devices, so allow the RF chipset and don't treat it as PCI/SOC only. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
rt2800_blink_set uses an illegal value to set the LED_CFG_G_LED_MODE field of the LED_CFG register. This field is only 2 bits large, so should be initialized with value that fits. Use default value from the vendor driver. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 29 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gertjan van Wingerde 提交于
Let each of them take a struct rt2x00_dev pointer as argument instead of a mixture of struct rt2x00_chip and struct rt2x00_dev pointers. Preparation for further clean ups in the rt2x00 chip handling, especially for rt2800 devices. Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-