Since obj->frontbuffer is no longer protected by the struct_mutex, as we
are processing the execbuf, it may be removed. Mark the
intel_frontbuffer as rcu protected, and so acquire a reference to
the struct as we track activity upon it.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/827
Fixes: 8e7cb179 ("drm/i915: Extract intel_frontbuffer active tracking")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191218104043.3539458-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit da42104f)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

In order to keep the assert_bind_count() valid, we need to hold the vma
page reference until after we drop the bind count. However, we must also
keep the drm_mm_remove_node() as the last action of i915_vma_unbind() so
that it serialises with the unlocked check inside i915_vma_destroy(). So
we need to split up i915_vma_remove() so that we order the detach, drop
pages and remove as required during unbind.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112067Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191030192159.18404-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Currently even though i915_vma_parked() operates on a per-gt struct, it
is called from a global pm notify. This oddity was only because the long
term plan is to decouple the vma cache from the pm notification, but
right now the oddity stands out like a sore thumb!
Suggested-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021183236.21790-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We now do the page pin count upfront in vma_get_pages/vma_put_pages, so
that we do the allocations before we enter the vm->mutex. Our vma
page references we are tracked in vma->pages_count and the extra
obj->pages_pin_count being performed later in i915_vma_insert and
i915_vma_remove is redundant, and worse throws off the shrinker's logic
on when it can free an object by unbinding it.
Reported-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reported-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015100155.10376-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Before we attempt to set_pages on the vma, we claim a
obj.pages_pin_count for it. If we subsequently fail to set the pages on
the vma, we need to drop our pinning before returning the error.
Reported-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015093915.3995-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Forgo the struct_mutex serialisation for i915_active, and interpose its
own mutex handling for active/retire.

This is a multi-layered sleight-of-hand. First, we had to ensure that no
active/retire callbacks accidentally inverted the mutex ordering rules,
nor assumed that they were themselves serialised by struct_mutex. More
challenging though, is the rule over updating elements of the active
rbtree. Instead of the whole i915_active now being serialised by
struct_mutex, allocations/rotations of the tree are serialised by the
i915_active.mutex and individual nodes are serialised by the caller
using the i915_timeline.mutex (we need to use nested spinlocks to
interact with the dma_fence callback lists).

The pain point here is that instead of a single mutex around execbuf, we
now have to take a mutex for active tracker (one for each vma, context,
etc) and a couple of spinlocks for each fence update. The improvement in
fine grained locking allowing for multiple concurrent clients
(eventually!) should be worth it in typical loads.

v2: Add some comments that barely elucidate anything :(
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we need to use a mutex to serialise i915_active activation
(because we want to allow the callback to sleep), we need to push the
i915_active.retire into a worker callback in case we get need to retire
from an atomic context.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot
allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate
workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we
reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes
with the GPU work and with later unbind).

In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to
avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is
the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not
to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma
does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM
fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping
the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by
a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we
do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate
and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv
itself.

Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the
destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex.
A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires
decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new
i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages.
However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm
discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with
trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called!

v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The premise here is to simply avoiding having to acquire the vm->mutex
inside vma create/destroy to update the vm->unbound_lists, to avoid some
nasty lock recursions later.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

A subset of 71724f70 ("drm/mm: Use helpers for drm_mm_node booleans")
in order to prepare drm-intel-next-queued for subsequent patches before
we can backmerge 71724f70 itself.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004142226.13711-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In preparation for rearranging the booleans into a flags field, ensure
all the current users are using the inline helpers and not directly
accessing the members.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003210100.22250-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The request->timeline is only valid until the request is retired (i.e.
before it is completed). Upon retiring the request, the context may be
unpinned and freed, and along with it the timeline may be freed. We
therefore need to be very careful when chasing rq->timeline that the
pointer does not disappear beneath us. The vast majority of users are in
a protected context, either during request construction or retirement,
where the timeline->mutex is held and the timeline cannot disappear. It
is those few off the beaten path (where we access a second timeline) that
need extra scrutiny -- to be added in the next patch after first adding
the warnings about dangerous access.

One complication, where we cannot use the timeline->mutex itself, is
during request submission onto hardware (under spinlocks). Here, we want
to check on the timeline to finalize the breadcrumb, and so we need to
impose a second rule to ensure that the request->timeline is indeed
valid. As we are submitting the request, it's context and timeline must
be pinned, as it will be used by the hardware. Since it is pinned, we
know the request->timeline must still be valid, and we cannot submit the
idle barrier until after we release the engine->active.lock, ergo while
submitting and holding that spinlock, a second thread cannot release the
timeline.

v2: Don't be lazy inside selftests; hold the timeline->mutex for as long
as we need it, and tidy up acquiring the timeline with a bit of
refactoring (i915_active_add_request)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919111912.21631-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In preparation for reducing struct_mutex stranglehold around the vm,
make the vma.flags atomic so that we can acquire a pin on the vma
atomically before deciding if we need to take the mutex.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190911090243.16786-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Try to tidy up the cache-coloring such that we rid the code of any
mm.color_adjust assumptions, this should hopefully make it more obvious
in the code when we need to actually use the cache-level as the color,
and as a bonus should make adding a different color-scheme simpler.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190909124052.22900-3-matthew.auld@intel.com

Export color_differs so that we can use it elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190909124052.22900-1-matthew.auld@intel.com

Avoid calling i915_vma_put_fence() by using our alternate paths that
bind a secondary vma avoiding the original fenced vma. For the few
instances where we need to release the fence (i.e. on binding when the
GGTT range becomes invalid), replace the put_fence with a revoke_fence.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190822061557.18402-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we want to revoke the ggtt vma from only under the ggtt->mutex, we
need to move protection of the userfault tracking from the struct_mutex
to the ggtt->mutex.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190822060914.2671-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Before we acquire the vma for GPU activity, ensure that the underlying
object is not already in the process of being freed.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820100531.8430-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As every i915_active_request should be serialised by a dedicated lock,
i915_active consists of a tree of locks; one for each node. Markup up
the i915_active_request with what lock is supposed to be guarding it so
that we can verify that the serialised updated are indeed serialised.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816121000.8507-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the
i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the
process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the
easier i915_active -- with the plan that this avoids any potential
atomic callbacks as the frontbuffer tracking wishes to sleep as it
flushes.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816074635.26062-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Be more consistent with the naming of the other DMA-buf objects.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/323401/

We were using the last_fence to track the last request that used this
vma that might be interpreted by a fence register and forced ourselves
to wait for this request before modifying any fence register that
overlapped our vma. Due to requirement that we need to track any XY_BLT
command, linear or tiled, this in effect meant that we have to track the
vma for its active lifespan anyway, so we can forgo the explicit
last_fence tracking and just use the whole vma->active.

Another solution would be to pipeline the register updates, and would
help resolve some long running stalls for gen3 (but only gen 2 and 3!)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812174804.26180-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Disentangle i915_drv.h from intel_drv.h, which gets included via
i915_trace.h. This necessitates including i915_trace.h wherever it's
needed.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ed82bf259d3b725a1a1a3c3e9d6fb5c08bc4d489.1565085691.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The shrinker cannot touch objects used by the contexts (logical state
and ring). Currently we mark those as "pin_global" to let the shrinker
skip over them, however, if we remove them from the shrinker lists
entirely, we don't event have to include them in our shrink accounting.

By keeping the unshrinkable objects in our shrinker tracking, we report
a large number of objects available to be shrunk, and leave the shrinker
deeply unsatisfied when we fail to reclaim those. The shrinker will
persist in trying to reclaim the unavailable objects, forcing the system
into a livelock (not even hitting the dread oomkiller).

v2: Extend unshrinkable protection for perma-pinned scratch and guc
allocations (Tvrtko)
v3: Notice that we should be pinned when marking unshrinkable and so the
link cannot be empty; merge duplicate paths.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802212137.22207-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since commit 64d6c500 ("drm/i915: Generalise GPU activity
tracking"), we have been prepared for i915_vma_move_to_active() to fail.
We can take advantage of this to report the failure for allocating the
shared-fence slot in the reservation_object.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730205805.3733-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The aliasing_ppgtt provides a PIN_USER alias for the global gtt, so move
it under the i915_ggtt to simplify later transformations to enable
intel_context.vm.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730143209.4549-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since a shrinker may be forced to wait on GPU activity,
i915_active_wait(&vma->active) must be safe for use inside a shrinker,
and so let's mark up the lock as being acquired by the shrinker to avoid
any nasty surprises creeping in.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190703091726.11690-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we introduce a callback for i915_active that is only called the first
time we use the i915_active and is symmetrically paired with the
i915_active.retire callback, we can replace the open-coded and
non-atomic implementations -- which will be very fragile (i.e. broken)
upon removing the struct_mutex serialisation.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621183801.23252-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Remove the accumulated optimisations that we have for i915_vma_retire
and reduce it to the bare essential of tracking the active object
reference. This allows us to only use atomic operations, and so will be
able to avoid the struct_mutex requirement.

The principal loss here is the shrinker MRU bumping, so now if we have
to shrink, we will do so in much more random order and more likely to
try and shrink recently used objects. That is a nuisance, but shrinking
active objects is a second step we try to avoid and will always be a
system-wide performance issue.

The other loss is here is in the automatic pruning of the
reservation_object when idling. This is not as large an issue as upon
reservation_object introduction as now adding new fences into the object
replaces already signaled fences, keeping the array compact. But we do
lose the auto-expiration of stale fences and unused arrays. That may be
a noticeable problem for which we need to re-implement autopruning.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621183801.23252-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Having introduced struct intel_gt (named the anonymous structure in i915)
we can start using it to compartmentalize our code better. It makes more
sense logically to have the code internally like this and it will also
help with future split between gt and display in i915.

v2:
 * Keep ggtt flush before fb obj flush. (Chris)

v3:
 * Fix refactoring fail.
 * Always flush ggtt writes. (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190621070811.7006-23-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

Since commit 1ba62714 ("drm: Add reservation_object to
drm_gem_object"), struct drm_gem_object grew its own builtin
reservation_object rendering our own private one bloat. Remove our
redundant reservation_object and point into obj->base.resv instead.

References: 1ba62714 ("drm: Add reservation_object to drm_gem_object")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618125858.7295-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.

display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.

v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com

Quite a few of the call points have already switched to the version
working directly on the runtime_pm structure, so let's switch over the
rest and kill the i915-based asserts.

v2: rebase
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

With async binding, we don't want to manage a bound/unbound list as we
may end up running before we even acquire the pages. All that is
required is keeping track of shrinkable objects, so reduce it to the
minimum list.

Fixes: 6951e589 ("drm/i915: Move GEM object domain management from struct_mutex to local")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190612105720.30310-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The intent is to be able to update the mm.lists from inside an irqsoff
section (e.g. from a softirq rcu workqueue), ergo we need to make the
i915->mm.obj_lock irqsafe.

v2: can_discard_pages() ensures we are shrinkable
v3: Beware shadowing of 'flags'

Fixes: 3b4fa964 ("drm/i915: Track the purgeable objects on a separate eviction list")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110869Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190610145430.17717-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Use i915_gem_object_lock() to guard the LUT and active reference to
allow us to break free of struct_mutex for handling GEM_CLOSE.

Testcase: igt/gem_close_race
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_parallel
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190606112320.9704-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Currently, we try to report to the shrinker the precise number of
objects (pages) that are available to be reaped at this moment. This
requires searching all objects with allocated pages to see if they
fulfill the search criteria, and this count is performed quite
frequently. (The shrinker tries to free ~128 pages on each invocation,
before which we count all the objects; counting takes longer than
unbinding the objects!) If we take the pragmatic view that with
sufficient desire, all objects are eventually reapable (they become
inactive, or no longer used as framebuffer etc), we can simply return
the count of pinned pages maintained during get_pages/put_pages rather
than walk the lists every time.

The downside is that we may (slightly) over-report the number of
objects/pages we could shrink and so penalize ourselves by shrinking
more than required. This is mitigated by keeping the order in which we
shrink objects such that we avoid penalizing active and frequently used
objects, and if memory is so tight that we need to free them we would
need to anyway.

v2: Only expose shrinkable objects to the shrinker; a small reduction in
not considering stolen and foreign objects.
v3: Restore the tracking from a "backup" copy from before the gem/ split
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Currently the purgeable objects, I915_MADV_DONTNEED, are mixed in the
normal bound/unbound lists. Every shrinker pass starts with an attempt
to purge from this set of unneeded objects, which entails us doing a
walk over both lists looking for any candidates. If there are none, and
since we are shrinking we can reasonably assume that the lists are
full!, this becomes a very slow futile walk.

If we separate out the purgeable objects into own list, this search then
becomes its own phase that is preferentially handled during shrinking.
Instead the cost becomes that we then need to filter the purgeable list
if we want to distinguish between bound and unbound objects.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

An old optimisation to reduce the number of atomics per batch sadly
relies on struct_mutex for coordination. In order to remove struct_mutex
from serialising object/context closing, always taking and releasing an
active reference on first use / last use greatly simplifies the locking.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Use the per-object local lock to control the cache domain of the
individual GEM objects, not struct_mutex. This is a huge leap forward
for us in terms of object-level synchronisation; execbuffers are
coordinated using the ww_mutex and pread/pwrite is finally fully
serialised again.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk