1. 13 4月, 2015 10 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: qgroup: do a reservation in a higher level. · e2d1f923
      Dongsheng Yang 提交于
      There are two problems in qgroup:
      
      a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K,
      qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup
      is not available to user.
      
      b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it,
      it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup.
      
      The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes
      rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about
      the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the
      data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to
      write and release it in transaction committed.
      
      In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in
      btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account
      when the data is written in commit_transaction().
      Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e2d1f923
    • D
      Btrfs: qgroup, Account data space in more proper timings. · 237c0e9f
      Dongsheng Yang 提交于
      Currenly, in data writing, ->reserved is accounted in
      fill_delalloc(), but ->may_use is released in clear_bit_hook()
      which is called by btrfs_finish_ordered_io(). That's too late,
      that said, between fill_delalloc() and btrfs_finish_ordered_io(),
      the data is doublely accounted by qgroup. It will cause some
      unexpected -EDQUOT.
      
      Example:
      	# btrfs quota enable /root/btrfs-auto-test/
      	# btrfs subvolume create /root/btrfs-auto-test//sub
      	Create subvolume '/root/btrfs-auto-test/sub'
      	# btrfs qgroup limit 1G /root/btrfs-auto-test//sub
      	dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/btrfs-auto-test//sub/file bs=1024 count=1500000
      	dd: error writing '/root/btrfs-auto-test//sub/file': Disk quota exceeded
      	681353+0 records in
      	681352+0 records out
      	697704448 bytes (698 MB) copied, 8.15563 s, 85.5 MB/s
      It's (698 MB) when we got an -EDQUOT, but we limit it by 1G.
      
      This patch move the btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free() for data from
      btrfs_delalloc_reserve/release_metadata() to btrfs_check_data_free_space()
      and btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(). Then the accounter in qgroup
      will be updated at the same time with the accounter in space_info updated.
      In this way, the unexpected -EDQUOT will be killed.
      Reported-by: NSatoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      237c0e9f
    • D
      Btrfs: qgroup: Introduce a may_use to account space_info->bytes_may_use. · 31193213
      Dongsheng Yang 提交于
      Currently, for pre_alloc or delay_alloc, the bytes will be accounted
      in space_info by the three guys.
      space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used.
      But on the other hand, in qgroup, there are only two counters to account the
      bytes, qgroup->reserved and qgroup->excl. And qg->reserved accounts
      bytes in space_info->bytes_may_use and qg->excl accounts bytes in
      space_info->used. So the bytes in space_info->reserved is not accounted
      in qgroup. If so, there is a window we can exceed the quota limit when
      bytes is in space_info->reserved.
      
      Example:
      	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
      	# btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt
      	# for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done
      	# sync
      	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
      qgroupid rfer     excl     max_rfer max_excl parent  child
      -------- ----     ----     -------- -------- ------  -----
      0/5      20987904 20987904 0        10485760 ---     ---
      
      qg->excl is 20987904 larger than max_excl 10485760.
      
      This patch introduce a new counter named may_use to qgroup, then
      there are three counters in qgroup to account bytes in space_info
      as below.
      space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used.
      qgroup->may_use           --- qgroup->reserved     --- qgroup->excl
      
      With this patch applied:
      	# btrfs quota enable /mnt
      	# btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt
      	# for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done
      fallocate: /mnt/data9: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data10: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data11: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data12: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data13: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data14: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data15: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data16: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data17: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data18: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      fallocate: /mnt/data19: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded
      	# sync
      	# btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
      qgroupid rfer    excl    max_rfer max_excl parent  child
      -------- ----    ----    -------- -------- ------  -----
      0/5      9453568 9453568 0        10485760 ---     ---
      Reported-by: NCyril SCETBON <cyril.scetbon@free.fr>
      Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      31193213
    • D
      Btrfs: qgroup: free reserved in exceeding quota. · 804ca127
      Dongsheng Yang 提交于
      When we exceed quota limit in writing, we will free
      some reserved extent when we need to drop but not free
      account in qgroup. It means, each time we exceed quota
      in writing, there will be some remain space in qg->reserved
      we can not use any more. If things go on like this, the
      all space will be ate up.
      Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      804ca127
    • Z
      btrfs: Support busy loop of write and delete · c99f1b0c
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      Reproduce:
       while true; do
         dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file count=[75% fs_size]
         rm /mnt/btrfs/file
       done
       Then we can see above loop failed on NO_SPACE.
      
      It it long-term problem since very beginning, because delayed-iput
      after rm are not run.
      
      We already have commit_transaction() in alloc_space code, but it is
      not triggered in above case.
      This patch trigger commit_transaction() to run delayed-iput and
      reflash pinned-space to to make write success.
      
      It is based on previous fix of delayed-iput in commit_transaction(),
      need to be applied on top of:
      btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c99f1b0c
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput · d7c15171
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      Steps to reproduce:
        while true; do
          dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs_dir/file count=[fs_size * 75%]
          rm /btrfs_dir/file
          sync
        done
      
        And we'll see dd failed because btrfs return NO_SPACE.
      
      Reason:
        Normally, btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
        in end to free fs space for next write, but sometimes it hadn't
        done work on time, because btrfs-cleaner thread get delayed-iputs
        from list before, but do iput() after next write.
      
        This is log:
        [ 2569.050776] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() begin
      
        [ 2569.084280] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
        [ 2569.085418] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() done btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()
        [ 2569.087554] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() end
      
        [ 2569.191081] comm=dd begin
        [ 2569.790112] comm=dd func=__btrfs_buffered_write() ret=-28
      
        [ 2569.847479] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 0 + 32677888 = 32677888
        [ 2569.849530] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 32677888 + 23834624 = 56512512
        ...
        [ 2569.903893] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 943976448 + 21762048 = 965738496
        [ 2569.908270] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() end
      
      Fix:
        Make btrfs_commit_transaction() wait current running btrfs-cleaner's
        delayed-iputs() done in end.
      
      Test:
        Use script similar to above(more complex),
        before patch:
          7 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
        after patch:
          0 failed in 100 * 20 loop.
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      d7c15171
    • Z
      btrfs: add WARN_ON() to check is space_info op current · 18d018ad
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      space_info's value calculation is some complex and easy to cause
      bug, add WARN_ON() to help debug.
      
      Changelog v1->v2:
       Put WARN_ON()s under the ENOSPC_DEBUG mount option.
       Suggested by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      18d018ad
    • Z
      btrfs: Set relative data on clear btrfs_block_group_cache->pinned · c30666d4
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      Bug1:
        space_info->bytes_readonly was set to very large(negative) value in
        btrfs_remove_block_group().
      
      Reason:
        Current code set block_group_cache->pinned = 0 in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(),
        but above space was not counted to space_info->bytes_readonly.
      
        Then in btrfs_remove_block_group():
          block_group->space_info->bytes_readonly -= block_group->key.offset;
        We can see following value in trace:
          btrfs_remove_block_group: pid=2677 comm=btrfs-cleaner WARNING: bytes_readonly=12582912, key.offset=134217728
      
      Bug2:
        space_info->total_bytes_pinned grow to value larger than fs size.
        In a 1.2G fs, we can get following trace log:
        at first:
          ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=2710 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 869793792 + 95944704 = 965738496
        after some op:
          ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=2770 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 1780178944 + 95944704 = 1876123648
        after some op:
          ZL_DEBUG: add_pinned_bytes: pid=3193 comm=sync change total_bytes_pinned flags=1 2924568576 + 95551488 = 3020120064
        ...
      
      Reason:
        Similar to bug1, we also need to adjust space_info->total_bytes_pinned
        in above code block.
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c30666d4
    • Z
      btrfs: Adjust commit-transaction condition to avoid NO_SPACE more · 264ca0f6
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      If we have any chance to make a successful write, we should not give up.
      
      This patch adjust commit-transaction condition from:
        pinned >= wanted
      to
        left + pinned >= wanted
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      264ca0f6
    • Z
      btrfs: fix condition of commit transaction · 94b947b2
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      Old code bypass commit transaction when we don't have enough
      pinned space, but another case is there exist freed bgs in current
      transction, it have possibility to make alloc_chunk success.
      
      This patch modify the condition to:
      if (have_free_bg || have_pinned_space) commit_transaction()
      
      Confirmed above action by printk before and after patch.
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      94b947b2
  2. 11 4月, 2015 7 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: fix use after free when close_ctree frees the orphan_rsv · cdfb080e
      Chris Mason 提交于
      Near the end of close_ctree, we're calling btrfs_free_block_rsv
      to free up the orphan rsv.  The problem is this call updates the
      space_info, which has already been freed.
      
      This adds a new __ function that directly calls kfree instead of trying
      to update the space infos.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      cdfb080e
    • C
      Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout outside critical section in commit · 1bbc621e
      Chris Mason 提交于
      We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
      the free space cache.  In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
      this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.
      
      If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
      stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
      trying to change the filesystem.
      
      This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
      locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit.  We'll still have to
      redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
      out of the way without blocking the entire FS.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      1bbc621e
    • C
      Btrfs: two stage dirty block group writeout · c9dc4c65
      Chris Mason 提交于
      Block group cache writeout is currently waiting on the pages for each
      block group cache before moving on to writing the next one.  This commit
      switches things around to send down all the caches and then wait on them
      in batches.
      
      The end result is much faster, since we're keeping the disk pipeline
      full.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c9dc4c65
    • J
      Btrfs: don't commit the transaction in the async space flushing · 365c5313
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We're triggering a huge number of commits from
      btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space.  These aren't really requried,
      because everyone calling the async reclaim code is going to end up
      triggering a commit on their own.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      365c5313
    • J
      Btrfs: reserve space for block groups · cb723e49
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      This changes our delayed refs calculations to include the space needed
      to write back dirty block groups.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      cb723e49
    • C
      Btrfs: refill block reserves during truncate · 28f75a0e
      Chris Mason 提交于
      When truncate starts, it allocates some space in the block reserves so
      that we'll have enough to update metadata along the way.
      
      For very large files, we can easily go through all of that space as we
      loop through the extents.  This changes truncate to refill the space
      reservation as it progresses through the file.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      28f75a0e
    • J
      Btrfs: account for crcs in delayed ref processing · 1262133b
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      As we delete large extents, we end up doing huge amounts of COW in order
      to delete the corresponding crcs.  This adds accounting so that we keep
      track of that space and flushing of delayed refs so that we don't build
      up too much delayed crc work.
      
      This helps limit the delayed work that must be done at commit time and
      tries to avoid ENOSPC aborts because the crcs eat all the global
      reserves.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      1262133b
  3. 01 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: free and unlock our path before btrfs_free_and_pin_reserved_extent() · dd825259
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The error handling path for alloc_reserved_tree_block is calling
      btrfs_free_and_pin_reserved_extent with a spinning tree lock held.  This
      might sleep as we allocate extent_state objects:
      
       BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1268
       in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 11093, name: kworker/u4:7
       5 locks held by kworker/u4:7/11093:
        #0:  ("%s-%s""btrfs", name){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81091d51>] process_one_work+0x151/0x520
        #1:  ((&work->normal_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81091d51>] process_one_work+0x151/0x520
        #2:  (sb_internal){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffffa003a70e>] start_transaction+0x43e/0x590 [btrfs]
        #3:  (&head_ref->mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0089f8c>] btrfs_delayed_ref_lock+0x4c/0x240 [btrfs]
        #4:  (btrfs-extent-00){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa007697b>] btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw+0x9b/0x150 [btrfs]
       CPU: 0 PID: 11093 Comm: kworker/u4:7 Tainted: G        W 4.0.0-rc6-default+ #246
       Hardware name: Intel Corporation Santa Rosa platform/Matanzas, BIOS TSRSCRB1.86C.0047.B00.0610170821 10/17/06
       Workqueue: btrfs-extent-refs btrfs_extent_refs_helper [btrfs]
        00000000000004f4 ffff88006dd17848 ffffffff81ab0e3b ffff88006dd17848
        ffff88007a944760 ffff88006dd17868 ffffffff8109d516 ffff88006dd17898
        0000000000000000 ffff88006dd17898 ffffffff8109d5b2 ffffffff81aba2bb
       Call Trace:
        [<ffffffff81ab0e3b>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x6c
        [<ffffffff8109d516>] ___might_sleep+0xf6/0x140
        [<ffffffff8109d5b2>] __might_sleep+0x52/0x90
        [<ffffffff81aba2bb>] ? ftrace_call+0x5/0x34
        [<ffffffff81196363>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x163/0x1b0
        [<ffffffffa0056f31>] ? alloc_extent_state+0x31/0x150 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0056f20>] ? alloc_extent_state+0x20/0x150 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0056f31>] alloc_extent_state+0x31/0x150 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa005805b>] __set_extent_bit+0x37b/0x5d0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffff81aba2bb>] ? ftrace_call+0x5/0x34
        [<ffffffffa005888d>] ? set_extent_bit+0xd/0x30 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa00588a3>] set_extent_bit+0x23/0x30 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0058e80>] set_extent_dirty+0x20/0x30 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa00195ba>] pin_down_extent+0xaa/0x170 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa001d8ef>] __btrfs_free_reserved_extent+0xcf/0x160 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0023856>] btrfs_free_and_pin_reserved_extent+0x16/0x20 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa002482a>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xfca/0x1290 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0026eae>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x6e/0x2e0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0027378>] delayed_ref_async_start+0x48/0xb0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa006c883>] normal_work_helper+0x83/0x350 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa006cd79>] ? btrfs_extent_refs_helper+0x9/0x20 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa006cd82>] btrfs_extent_refs_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffff81091dcb>] process_one_work+0x1cb/0x520
        [<ffffffff81091d51>] ? process_one_work+0x151/0x520
        [<ffffffff811c7abf>] ? seq_read+0x3f/0x400
        [<ffffffff8109260b>] worker_thread+0x5b/0x4e0
        [<ffffffff81097be2>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x12/0xa0
        [<ffffffff810925b0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x450/0x450
        [<ffffffff81098686>] kthread+0xf6/0x120
        [<ffffffff81098590>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x1b0/0x1b0
        [<ffffffff81ab8088>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
        [<ffffffff81098590>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x1b0/0x1b0
       ------------[ cut here ]------------
      
      This changes things to free the path first, which will also unlock the
      extent buffer.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Reported-by: NDave Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Tested-by: NDave Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      dd825259
  4. 27 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix log tree corruption when fs mounted with -o discard · dcc82f47
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      While committing a transaction we free the log roots before we write the
      new super block. Freeing the log roots implies marking the disk location
      of every node/leaf (metadata extent) as pinned before the new super block
      is written. This is to prevent the disk location of log metadata extents
      from being reused before the new super block is written, otherwise we
      would have a corrupted log tree if before the new super block is written
      a crash/reboot happens and the location of any log tree metadata extent
      ended up being reused and rewritten.
      
      Even though we pinned the log tree's metadata extents, we were issuing a
      discard against them if the fs was mounted with the -o discard option,
      resulting in corruption of the log tree if a crash/reboot happened before
      writing the new super block - the next time the fs was mounted, during
      the log replay process we would find nodes/leafs of the log btree with
      a content full of zeroes, causing the process to fail and require the
      use of the tool btrfs-zero-log to wipeout the log tree (and all data
      previously fsynced becoming lost forever).
      
      Fix this by not doing a discard when pinning an extent. The discard will
      be done later when it's safe (after the new super block is committed) at
      extent-tree.c:btrfs_finish_extent_commit().
      
      Fixes: e688b725 (Btrfs: fix extent pinning bugs in the tree log)
      CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      dcc82f47
  5. 18 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: add sanity test for outstanding_extents accounting · 6a3891c5
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I introduced a regression wrt outstanding_extents accounting.  These are tricky
      areas that aren't easily covered by xfstests as we could change MAX_EXTENT_SIZE
      at any time.  So add sanity tests to cover the various conditions that are
      tricky in order to make sure we don't introduce regressions in the future.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      6a3891c5
  6. 17 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: prepare block group cache before writing · dcdf7f6d
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Writing the block group cache will modify the extent tree quite a bit because it
      truncates the old space cache and pre-allocates new stuff.  To try and cut down
      on the churn lets do the setup dance first, then later on hopefully we can avoid
      looping with newly dirtied roots.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      dcdf7f6d
  7. 14 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  8. 04 3月, 2015 5 次提交
  9. 03 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  10. 21 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 17 2月, 2015 2 次提交
  12. 15 2月, 2015 2 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group · 3d84be79
      Forrest Liu 提交于
      Removing large amount of block group in a transaction may encounters
      BUG_ON() in btrfs_orphan_add(). That is because btrfs_orphan_reserve_metadata()
      will grab metadata reservation from transaction handle, and
      btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() didn't reserve metadata for trnasaction handle when
      delete unused block group.
      
      The problem can be reproduce by following script
      
          mntpath=/btrfs
          loopdev=/dev/loop0
          filepath=/home/forrest/image
      
          umount $mntpath
          losetup -d $loopdev
          truncate --size 1000g $filepath
          losetup $loopdev $filepath
          mkfs.btrfs -f $loopdev
          mount $loopdev $mntpath
      
          for j in `seq 1 1 1000`; do
              fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/$j
          done
          # wait cleaner thread remove unused block group
          sleep 300
      
      The call trace that results from the BUG_ON() is:
      
      [  613.093084] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [  613.097928] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3142!
      [  613.105855] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
      [  613.112702] Modules linked in: coretemp(E) crc32_pclmul(E) ghash_clmulni_intel(E) aesni_intel(E) snd_ens1371(E) snd_ac97_codec(E) aes_x86_64(E) lrw(E) gf128mul(E) glue_helper(E) ppdev(E) ac97_bus(E) ablk_helper(E) gameport(E) cryptd(E) snd_rawmidi(E) snd_seq_device(E) snd_pcm(E) vmw_balloon(E) snd_timer(E) snd(E) soundcore(E) serio_raw(E) vmwgfx(E) ttm(E) drm_kms_helper(E) drm(E) vmw_vmci(E) parport_pc(E) shpchp(E) i2c_piix4(E) mac_hid(E) lp(E) parport(E) btrfs(E) xor(E) raid6_pq(E) hid_generic(E) usbhid(E) hid(E) psmouse(E) ahci(E) libahci(E) e1000(E) mptspi(E) mptscsih(E) mptbase(E) floppy(E) vmw_pvscsi(E) vmxnet3(E)
      [  613.144196] CPU: 0 PID: 1480 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Tainted: G            E  3.19.0-rc7-custom #2
      [  613.148501] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/31/2013
      [  613.152694] task: ffff880035cdb1a0 ti: ffff880039cf4000 task.ti: ffff880039cf4000
      [  613.154969] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01441c2>]  [<ffffffffa01441c2>] btrfs_orphan_add+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [  613.157780] RSP: 0018:ffff880039cf7c48  EFLAGS: 00010286
      [  613.159560] RAX: 00000000ffffffe4 RBX: ffff88003bd981a0 RCX: ffff88003c9e4000
      [  613.161904] RDX: 0000000000002244 RSI: 0000000000040000 RDI: ffff88003c9e4138
      [  613.164264] RBP: ffff880039cf7c88 R08: 000060ffc0000850 R09: 0000000000000000
      [  613.166507] R10: ffff88003bc4b7a0 R11: ffffea0000eb6740 R12: ffff88003c9c0000
      [  613.168681] R13: ffff88003c102160 R14: ffff88003c9c0458 R15: 0000000000000001
      [  613.170932] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [  613.173316] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [  613.175227] CR2: 00007f6343537000 CR3: 0000000036329000 CR4: 00000000000407f0
      [  613.177554] Stack:
      [  613.178712]  ffff880039cf7c88 ffffffffa0182a54 ffff88003c9e4b04 ffff88003c9c7800
      [  613.181297]  ffff88003bc4b7a0 ffff88003bd981a0 ffff88003c8db200 ffff88003c2fcc60
      [  613.183782]  ffff880039cf7d18 ffffffffa012da97 ffff88003bc4b7a4 ffff88003bc4b7a0
      [  613.186171] Call Trace:
      [  613.187493]  [<ffffffffa0182a54>] ? lookup_free_space_inode+0x44/0x100 [btrfs]
      [  613.189801]  [<ffffffffa012da97>] btrfs_remove_block_group+0x137/0x740 [btrfs]
      [  613.192126]  [<ffffffffa0166912>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x672/0x780 [btrfs]
      [  613.194267]  [<ffffffffa012e2ff>] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x25f/0x280 [btrfs]
      [  613.196567]  [<ffffffffa0135e4c>] cleaner_kthread+0x12c/0x190 [btrfs]
      [  613.198687]  [<ffffffffa0135d20>] ? check_leaf+0x350/0x350 [btrfs]
      [  613.200758]  [<ffffffff8108f232>] kthread+0xd2/0xf0
      [  613.202616]  [<ffffffff8108f160>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
      [  613.204738]  [<ffffffff8175dabc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      [  613.206652]  [<ffffffff8108f160>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
      [  613.208741] Code: ff ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 89 45 c8 3e 80 63 80 fd 48 89 df e8 d0 23 fe ff 8b 45 c8 e9 14 ff ff ff b8 f4 ff ff ff e9 12 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 66 66 66 90 55 48
      [  613.216562] RIP  [<ffffffffa01441c2>] btrfs_orphan_add+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [  613.218828]  RSP <ffff880039cf7c48>
      [  613.220382] ---[ end trace 71073106deb8a457 ]---
      
      This patch replace btrfs_join_transaction() with btrfs_start_transaction() in
      btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() to revent BUG_ON() in btrfs_orphan_add()
      Signed-off-by: NForrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      3d84be79
    • J
      Btrfs: account for large extents with enospc · dcab6a3b
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      On our gluster boxes we stream large tar balls of backups onto our fses.  With
      160gb of ram this means we get really large contiguous ranges of dirty data, but
      the way our ENOSPC stuff works is that as long as it's contiguous we only hold
      metadata reservation for one extent.  The problem is we limit our extents to
      128mb, so we'll end up with at least 800 extents so our enospc accounting is
      quite a bit lower than what we need.  To keep track of this make sure we
      increase outstanding_extents for every multiple of the max extent size so we can
      be sure to have enough reserved metadata space.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      dcab6a3b
  13. 03 2月, 2015 2 次提交
    • S
      btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro · 2f081088
      Shaohua Li 提交于
      Below test will fail currently:
            mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sda
            btrfs-convert /dev/sda
            mount /dev/sda /mnt
            btrfs device add -f /dev/sdb /mnt
            btrfs balance start -v -dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=raid1 /mnt
      
      The reason is there are some block groups with usage 0, but the whole
      disk hasn't free space to allocate new chunk, so we even can't set such
      block group readonly. This patch deletes the chunk allocation when
      setting block group ro. For META, we already have reserve. But for
      SYSTEM, we don't have, so the check_system_chunk is still required.
      Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      2f081088
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between transaction commit and empty block group removal · d4b450cd
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Committing a transaction can race with automatic removal of empty block
      groups (cleaner kthread), leading to a BUG_ON() in the transaction
      commit code while running btrfs_finish_extent_commit(). The following
      sequence diagram shows how it can happen:
      
                 CPU 1                                       CPU 2
      
      btrfs_commit_transaction()
        fs_info->running_transaction = NULL
        btrfs_finish_extent_commit()
          find_first_extent_bit()
            -> found range for block group X
               in fs_info->freed_extents[]
      
                                                     btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
                                                       -> found block group X
      
                                                       Removed block group X's range
                                                       from fs_info->freed_extents[]
      
                                                       btrfs_remove_chunk()
                                                          btrfs_remove_block_group(bg X)
      
          unpin_extent_range(bg X range)
             btrfs_lookup_block_group(bg X)
                -> returns NULL
                  -> BUG_ON()
      
      The trace that results from the BUG_ON() is:
      
      [48665.187808] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [48665.188032] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5675!
      [48665.188032] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
      [48665.188032] Modules linked in: dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic btrfs xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop parport_pc evdev microcode
      [48665.197388] CPU: 2 PID: 31211 Comm: kworker/u32:16 Tainted: G        W      3.19.0-rc5-btrfs-next-4+ #1
      [48665.197388] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
      [48665.197388] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs]
      [48665.197388] task: ffff880222011810 ti: ffff8801b56a4000 task.ti: ffff8801b56a4000
      [48665.197388] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0350d05>]  [<ffffffffa0350d05>] unpin_extent_range+0x6a/0x1ba [btrfs]
      [48665.197388] RSP: 0018:ffff8801b56a7b88  EFLAGS: 00010246
      [48665.197388] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8802143a6000 RCX: ffff8802220120c8
      [48665.197388] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8800a3c140b0
      [48665.197388] RBP: ffff8801b56a7bd8 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000000
      [48665.197388] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000000bbac R12: 0000000012e8e000
      [48665.197388] R13: ffff8800a3c14000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
      [48665.197388] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88023ec40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [48665.197388] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
      [48665.197388] CR2: 00007f065e42f270 CR3: 0000000206f70000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
      [48665.197388] Stack:
      [48665.197388]  ffff8801b56a7bd8 0000000012ea0000 01ff8800a3c14138 0000000012e9ffff
      [48665.197388]  ffff880141df3dd8 ffff8802143a6000 ffff8800a3c14138 ffff880141df3df0
      [48665.197388]  ffff880141df3dd8 0000000000000000 ffff8801b56a7c08 ffffffffa0354227
      [48665.197388] Call Trace:
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffffa0354227>] btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0xb0/0xd9 [btrfs]
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffffa0366b4b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x791/0x92c [btrfs]
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffffa0352432>] flush_space+0x43d/0x452 [btrfs]
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff814295c3>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x33
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffffa035255f>] btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x118/0x164 [btrfs]
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff81059917>] ? process_one_work+0x14b/0x3ab
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff810599ac>] process_one_work+0x1e0/0x3ab
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff81079fa9>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff8105a55b>] worker_thread+0x210/0x2d0
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff8105a34b>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2c3/0x2c3
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff8105e5c0>] kthread+0xef/0xf7
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff81429682>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x39
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff8105e4d1>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff81429dec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      [48665.197388]  [<ffffffff8105e4d1>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
      [48665.197388] Code: 85 f6 74 14 49 8b 06 49 03 46 09 49 39 c4 72 1d 4c 89 f7 e8 83 ec ff ff 4c 89 e6 4c 89 ef e8 1e f1 ff ff 48 85 c0 49 89 c6 75 02 <0f> 0b 49 8b 1e 49 03 5e 09 48 8b
      [48665.197388] RIP  [<ffffffffa0350d05>] unpin_extent_range+0x6a/0x1ba [btrfs]
      [48665.197388]  RSP <ffff8801b56a7b88>
      [48665.272246] ---[ end trace b9c6ab9957521376 ]---
      
      Fix this by ensuring that unpining the block group's range in
      btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is done in a synchronized fashion
      with removing the block group's range from freed_extents[]
      in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
      
      This race got introduced with the change:
      
          Btrfs: remove empty block groups automatically
          commit 47ab2a6cSigned-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      d4b450cd
  14. 22 1月, 2015 4 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: cleanup unused run_most · 26455d33
      Liu Bo 提交于
      "run_most" is not used anymore.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NSatoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      26455d33
    • Z
      Btrfs: add ref_count and free function for btrfs_bio · 6e9606d2
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      1: ref_count is simple than current RBIO_HOLD_BBIO_MAP_BIT flag
         to keep btrfs_bio's memory in raid56 recovery implement.
      2: free function for bbio will make code clean and flexible, plus
         forced data type checking in compile.
      
      Changelog v1->v2:
       Rename following by David Sterba's suggestion:
       put_btrfs_bio() -> btrfs_put_bio()
       get_btrfs_bio() -> btrfs_get_bio()
       bbio->ref_count -> bbio->refs
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      6e9606d2
    • F
      Btrfs: lookup for block group only if needed when freeing a tree block · 6219872d
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Very often our extent buffer's header generation doesn't match the current
      transaction's id or it is also referenced by other trees (snapshots), so
      we don't need the corresponding block group cache object. Therefore only
      search for it if we are going to use it, so we avoid an unnecessary search
      in the block groups rbtree (and acquiring and releasing its spinlock).
      
      Freeing a tree block is performed when COWing or deleting a node/leaf,
      which implies we are holding the node/leaf's parent node lock, therefore
      reducing the amount of time spent when freeing a tree block helps reducing
      the amount of time we are holding the parent node's lock.
      
      For example, for a run of xfstests/generic/083, the block group cache
      object was needed only 682 times for a total of 226691 calls to free
      a tree block.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      6219872d
    • J
      Btrfs: track dirty block groups on their own list · ce93ec54
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Currently any time we try to update the block groups on disk we will walk _all_
      block groups and check for the ->dirty flag to see if it is set.  This function
      can get called several times during a commit.  So if you have several terabytes
      of data you will be a very sad panda as we will loop through _all_ of the block
      groups several times, which makes the commit take a while which slows down the
      rest of the file system operations.
      
      This patch introduces a dirty list for the block groups that we get added to
      when we dirty the block group for the first time.  Then we simply update any
      block groups that have been dirtied since the last time we called
      btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups.  This allows us to clean up how we write the
      free space cache out so it is much cleaner.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ce93ec54
  15. 20 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race deleting block group from space_info->ro_bgs list · 75c68e9f
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When removing a block group we were deleting it from its space_info's
      ro_bgs list without the correct protection - the space info's spinlock.
      Fix this by doing the list delete while holding the spinlock of the
      corresponding space info, which is the correct lock for any operation
      on that list.
      
      This issue was introduced in the 3.19 kernel by the following change:
      
          Btrfs: move read only block groups onto their own list V2
          commit 633c0aad
      
      I ran into a kernel crash while a task was running statfs, which iterates
      the space_info->ro_bgs list while holding the space info's spinlock,
      and another task was deleting it from the same list, without holding that
      spinlock, as part of the block group remove operation (while running the
      function btrfs_remove_block_group). This happened often when running the
      stress test xfstests/generic/038 I recently made.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      75c68e9f