- 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
This function is used to find the differences between two trees. The tree compare skips whole subtrees if it detects shared tree blocks and thus is pretty fast. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Reviewed-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Reviewed-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex.bolshoy.btrfs@gmail.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Often no exact match is wanted but just the next lower or higher item. There's a lot of duplicated code throughout btrfs to deal with the corner cases. This patch adds a helper function that can facilitate searching. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
- 24 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When calling btrfs_next_old_leaf, we were leaking an extent buffer in the rare case of using the deadlock avoidance code needed for the tree mod log. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Often no exact match is wanted but just the next lower or higher item. There's a lot of duplicated code throughout btrfs to deal with the corner cases. This patch adds a helper function that can facilitate searching. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
We've got two mechanisms both required for reliable backref resolving (tree mod log and holding back delayed refs). You cannot make use of one without the other. So instead of requiring the user of this mechanism to setup both correctly, we join them into a single interface. Additionally, we stop inserting non-blockers into fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list as we did before, which was of no value. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When calling btrfs_next_old_leaf, we were leaking an extent buffer in the rare case of using the deadlock avoidance code needed for the tree mod log. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 27 6月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
With the tree mod log, we may end up with two roots (the current root and a rewinded version of it) both pointing to two leaves, l1 and l2, of which l2 had already been cow-ed in the current transaction. If we don't rewind any tree blocks, we cannot have two roots both pointing to an already cowed tree block. Now there is btrfs_next_leaf, which has a leaf locked and wants a lock on the next (right) leaf. And there is push_leaf_left, which has a (cowed!) leaf locked and wants a lock on the previous (left) leaf. In order to solve this dead lock situation, we use try_lock in btrfs_next_leaf (only in case it's called with a tree mod log time_seq paramter) and if we fail to get a lock on the next leaf, we give up our lock on the current leaf and retry from the very beginning. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When a MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD operation is rewinded, we remove the key from the tree block. If its not the last key, removal involves a move operation. This move operation was explicitly done before this commit. However, at insertion time, there's a move operation before the actual addition to make room for the new key, which is recorded in the tree mod log as well. This means, we must drop the move operation when rewinding the add operation, because the next operation we'll be rewinding will be the corresponding MOD_LOG_MOVE_KEYS operation. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Several callers of insert_ptr set the tree_mod_log parameter to 0 to avoid addition to the tree mod log. In fact, we need all of those operations. This commit simply removes the additional parameter and makes addition to the tree mod log unconditional. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
For the tree mod log, we don't log any operations at leaf level. If the root is at the leaf level (i.e. the tree consists only of the root), then __tree_mod_log_oldest_root will find a ROOT_REPLACE operation in the log (because we always log that one no matter which level), but no other operations. With this patch __tree_mod_log_oldest_root exits cleanly instead of BUGging in this situation. get_old_root checks if its really a root at leaf level in case we don't have any operations and WARNs if this assumption breaks. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 16 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
gcc was giving an uninit variable warning here. Strictly speaking we don't need to init it, but this will make things much less error prone. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 15 6月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When adding to the tree modification log, we grab two locks at different stages. We must not drop the outer lock until we're done with section protected by the inner lock. This moves the unlock call for the outer lock to the appropriate position. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
To make sense of the tree mod log, the backref walker not only needs btrfs_search_old_slot, but it also called btrfs_next_leaf, which in turn was calling btrfs_search_slot. This obviously didn't give the correct result. This commit adds btrfs_next_old_leaf, a drop-in replacement for btrfs_next_leaf with a time_seq parameter. If it is zero, it behaves exactly like btrfs_next_leaf. If it is non-zero, it will use btrfs_search_old_slot with this time_seq parameter. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
In __tree_mod_log_oldest_root() we must return the found operation even if it's not a ROOT_REPLACE operation. Otherwise, the caller assumes that there are no operations to be rewinded and returns immediately. The code in the caller is modified to improve readability. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
get_old_root could race with root node updates because we weren't locking the node early enough. Use btrfs_read_lock_root_node to grab the root locked in the very beginning and release the lock as soon as possible (just like btrfs_search_slot does). Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 04 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
This is a leftover from cleanup patch 559af821. Before the cleanup, btrfs_header_nritems was called inside an if condition. As it has no side effects we need to preserve here, it should simply be dropped. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 01 6月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When we rewind REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operations, there's code that allocates a fresh buffer instead of cloning the old one. Setting that buffer's level correctly was missing in this case. When rewinding a MOVE_KEYS operation, btrfs_node_key_ptr_offset(slot) was missing for memmove_extent_buffer()'s arguments. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Logging for del_ptr when we're not deleting the last pointer was wrong. This fixes both, duplicate log entries and log sequence. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Replace duplicate code by small inline helper function. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
tree_mod_alloc calls __get_tree_mod_seq and must acquire a spinlock before doing so. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
btrfs_read_buffer() has the possibility of returning the error. Therefore, I add the code in which the return value of btrfs_read_buffer() is checked. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The tree modification log together with the current state of the tree gives a consistent, old version of the tree. btrfs_search_old_slot is used to search through this old version and return old (dummy!) extent buffers. Naturally, this function cannot do any tree modifications. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Record all relevant modifications to block pointers in the tree mod log so that we can rewind them later on for backref walking. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When running functions that can make changes to the internal trees (e.g. btrfs_search_slot), we check if somebody may be interested in the block we're currently modifying. If so, we record our modification to be able to rewind it later on. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The tree mod log will log modifications made fs-tree nodes. Most modifications are done by autobalance of the tree. Such changes are recorded as long as a block entry exists. When released, the log is cleaned. With the tree modification log, it's possible to reconstruct a consistent old state of the tree. This is required to do backref walking on a busy file system. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 26 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Three callers of btrfs_free_tree_block or btrfs_alloc_tree_block passed parameter for_cow = 1. In fact, these two functions should never mark their tree modification operations as for_cow, because they can change the number of blocks referenced by a tree. Hence, we remove the extra for_cow parameter from these functions and make them pass a zero down. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 11 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Sheng-Hui 提交于
The code path should not reach there. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NWang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
verify_parent_transid needs to lock the extent range to make sure no IO is underway, and so it can safely clear the uptodate bits if our checks fail. But, a few callers are using it with spinlocks held. Most of the time, the generation numbers are going to match, and we don't want to switch to a blocking lock just for the error case. This adds an atomic flag to verify_parent_transid, and changes it to return EAGAIN if it needs to block to properly verifiy things. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
add_root_to_dirty_list happens once at the very beginning of the transaction, but it is still racey. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
btrfs_search_slot sometimes needs write locks on high levels of the tree. It remembers the highest level that needs a write lock and will use that for all future searches through the tree in a given call. But, very often we'll just cow the top level or the level below and we won't really need write locks on the root again after that. This patch changes things to adjust the write lock requirement as it unlocks levels. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This cuts down on the CPU time used by map_private_extent_buffer Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Because btrfs cow's we can end up with extent buffers that are no longer necessary just sitting around in memory. So instead of evicting these pages, we could end up evicting things we actually care about. Thus we have free_extent_buffer_stale for use when we are freeing tree blocks. This will make it so that the ref for the eb being in the radix tree is dropped as soon as possible and then is freed when the refcount hits 0 instead of waiting to be released by releasepage. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
btrfs currently handles most errors with BUG_ON. This patch is a work-in- progress but aims to handle most errors other than internal logic errors and ENOMEM more gracefully. This iteration prevents most crashes but can run into lockups with the page lock on occasion when the timing "works out." Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
balace_level() seems to deal with missing tree nodes by BUG_ON(). Instead, we can easily just set the file system readonly and bubble -EROFS back up the stack. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
__btrfs_cow_block(), the only caller of update_ref_for_cow() will BUG_ON() any error return. Instead, we can go read-only fs as update_ref_for_cow() manipulates disk data in a way which doesn't look like it's easily rolled back. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
update_ref_for_cow() will BUG_ON() after it's call to btrfs_lookup_extent_info() if no existing references are found. Since refs are computed directly from disk, this should be treated as a corruption instead of a logic error. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
The only caller of update_ref_for_cow() is __btrfs_cow_block() which was originally ignoring any return values. update_ref_for_cow() however doesn't look like a candidate to become a void function - there are a few places where errors can occur. So instead I changed update_ref_for_cow() to bubble all errors up (instead of BUG_ON). __btrfs_cow_block() was then updated to catch and BUG_ON() any errors from update_ref_for_cow(). The end effect is that we have no change in behavior, but about 8 different places where a BUG_ON(ret) was removed. Obviously a future patch will have to address the BUG_ON() in __btrfs_cow_block(). Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups. Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they don't change subvol quota. Also pass in the fs_info for later use. btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to those delayed refs. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 15 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit. But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions: 1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction, and this may change the src root when processing the following pending snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions; 2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache, which lead to corruptions. This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be consistent. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-