- 11 5月, 2015 40 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Make link_path_walk() work with any value of nd->depth on entry - memorize it and use it in tests instead of comparing with 1. Don't bother with increment/decrement in path_init(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all calls are preceded by decrement of nd->depth; move it into put_link() itself. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
move decrement of nd->depth on successful returns into the callers. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
make get_link() increment nd->depth on successful exit Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
move increment of ->depth to the point where we'd discovered that get_link() has not returned an error, adjust exits accordingly. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
lift increment/decrement into link_path_walk() callers. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
remove decrement/increment surrounding nd_alloc_stack(), adjust the test in it. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
collapse adjacent increment/decrement pairs. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
nd->stack[0] is unused until the handling of trailing symlinks and we want to get rid of that. Having fucked that transformation up several times, I went for bloody pedantic series of provably equivalent transformations. Sorry. Step 1: keep nd->depth higher by one in link_path_walk() - increment upon entry, decrement on exits, adjust the arithmetics inside and surround the calls of functions that care about nd->depth value (nd_alloc_stack(), get_link(), put_link()) with decrement/increment pairs. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
The only restriction is that on the total amount of symlinks crossed; how they are nested does not matter Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
same story as the previous commit Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Array of MAX_NESTED_LINKS + 1 elements put into nameidata; what used to be a local array in link_path_walk() occupies entries 1 .. MAX_NESTED_LINKS in it, link and cookie from the trailing symlink handling loops - entry 0. This is _not_ the final arrangement; just an easily verified incremental step. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Deal with skipping leading slashes before what used to be the recursive call. That way we can get rid of that goto completely. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
absolutely straightforward now - the only variables we need to preserve across the recursive call are name, link and cookie, and recursion depth is limited (and can is equal to nd->depth). So arrange an array of triples to hold instances of those and be done with that. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
reduce the number of returns in there - turn all places where it returns zero into goto OK and places where it returns non-zero into goto Err. The only non-trivial detail is that all breaks in the loop are guaranteed to be with non-zero err. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
What we do after the second walk_component() + put_link() + depth decrement in there is exactly equivalent to what's done right after the first walk_component(). Easy to verify and not at all surprising, seeing that there we have just walked the last component of nested symlink. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Pull the block after the if-else in the end of what used to be do-while body into all branches there. We are almost done with the massage... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... it does nothing if nd->last_type is LAST_BIND. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
If we get ERR_PTR() from get_link(), we are guaranteed to get err != 0 when we break out of do-while, so we are going to hit if (err) return err; shortly after it. Pull that into the if (IS_ERR(s)) body. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
All remaining callers of the former are preceded by the latter Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and strip __always_inline from follow_link() - remaining callers don't need that. Now link_path_walk() recursion is a direct one. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We used to need it to feed to follow_link(). No more... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
shares space with nameidata->next, walk_component() et.al. store the struct path of symlink instead of returning it into a variable passed by caller. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
with new calling conventions it's trivial Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Conflicts: fs/namei.c
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Split a piece of fs/namei.c:follow_link() that does obtaining the link body into a separate function. follow_link() itself is converted to calling get_link() and then doing the body traversal (if any). The next step will expand follow_link() call in link_path_walk() and this helps to keep the size down... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
a) instead of storing the symlink body (via nd_set_link()) and returning an opaque pointer later passed to ->put_link(), ->follow_link() _stores_ that opaque pointer (into void * passed by address by caller) and returns the symlink body. Returning ERR_PTR() on error, NULL on jump (procfs magic symlinks) and pointer to symlink body for normal symlinks. Stored pointer is ignored in all cases except the last one. Storing NULL for opaque pointer (or not storing it at all) means no call of ->put_link(). b) the body used to be passed to ->put_link() implicitly (via nameidata). Now only the opaque pointer is. In the cases when we used the symlink body to free stuff, ->follow_link() now should store it as opaque pointer in addition to returning it. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
when we go for on-demand allocation of saved state in link_path_walk(), we'll want nameidata to stay around for all 3 calls of path_mountpoint(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
that avoids having nameidata on stack during the calls of ->rmdir()/->unlink() and *two* of those during the calls of ->rename(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's a convenient helper, but we'll want to shift nameidata down the call chain, so it won't be available there... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
With LOOKUP_FOLLOW we unlazy and return 1; without it we either fail with ELOOP or, for O_PATH opens, succeed. No need to mix those cases... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
When O_PATH is present, O_CREAT isn't, so symlink_ok is always equal to (open_flags & O_PATH) && !(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
seriously improves the stack *and* I-cache footprint... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
No ->inode_follow_link() methods use the nameidata arg, and it is about to become private to namei.c. So remove from all inode_follow_link() functions. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-