Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 6月, 2017 5 次提交
  3. 13 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 08 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 07 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 06 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • V
      drm/i915: Workaround VLV/CHV DSI scanline counter hardware fail · ec1b4ee2
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      The scanline counter is bonkers on VLV/CHV DSI. The scanline counter
increment is not lined up with the start of vblank like it is on
every other platform and output type. This causes problems for
both the vblank timestamping and atomic update vblank evasion.

On my FFRD8 machine at least, the scanline counter increment
happens about 1/3 of a scanline ahead of the start of vblank (which
is where all register latching happens still). That means we can't
trust the scanline counter to tell us whether we're in vblank or not
while we're on that particular line. In order to keep vblank
timestamping in working condition when called from the vblank irq,
we'll leave scanline_offset at one, which means that the entire
line containing the start of vblank is considered to be inside
the vblank.

For the vblank evasion we'll need to consider that entire line
to be bad, since we can't tell whether the registers already
got latched or not. And we can't actually use the start of vblank
interrupt to get us past that line as the interrupt would fire
too soon, and then we'd up waiting for the next start of vblank
instead. One way around that would using the frame start
interrupt instead since that wouldn't fire until the next
scanline, but that would require some bigger changes in the
interrupt code. So for simplicity we'll just poll until we get
past the bad line.

v2: Adjust the comments a bit

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonas Aaberg <cja@gmx.net>
Tested-by: NJonas Aaberg <cja@gmx.net>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99086Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161215174734.28779-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comTested-by: NMika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
      ec1b4ee2
  11. 01 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/skl+: consider max supported plane pixel rate while scaling · 73b0ca8e
      由 Mahesh Kumar 提交于 
      A display resolution is only supported if it meets all the restrictions
below for Maximum Pipe Pixel Rate.

The display resolution must fit within the maximum pixel rate output
from the pipe. Make sure that the display pipe is able to feed pixels at
a rate required to support the desired resolution.
For each enabled plane on the pipe {
    If plane scaling enabled {
	Horizontal down scale amount = Maximum[1, plane horizontal size /
		    scaler horizontal window size]
	Vertical down scale amount = Maximum[1, plane vertical size /
		    scaler vertical window size]
	Plane down scale amount = Horizontal down scale amount *
		    Vertical down scale amount
	Plane Ratio = 1 / Plane down scale amount
    }
    Else {
	Plane Ratio = 1
    }
    If plane source pixel format is 64 bits per pixel {
	Plane Ratio = Plane Ratio * 8/9
    }
}

Pipe Ratio = Minimum Plane Ratio of all enabled planes on the pipe

If pipe scaling is enabled {
    Horizontal down scale amount = Maximum[1, pipe horizontal source size /
		scaler horizontal window size]
    Vertical down scale amount = Maximum[1, pipe vertical source size /
		scaler vertical window size]
    Note: The progressive fetch - interlace display mode is equivalent to a
		2.0 vertical down scale
    Pipe down scale amount = Horizontal down scale amount *
		Vertical down scale amount
    Pipe Ratio = Pipe Ratio / Pipe down scale amount
}

Pipe maximum pixel rate = CDCLK frequency * Pipe Ratio

In this patch our calculation is based on pipe downscale amount
(plane max downscale amount * pipe downscale amount) instead of Pipe
Ratio. So,
max supported crtc clock with given scaling = CDCLK / pipe downscale.
Flip will fail if,
current crtc clock > max supported crct clock with given scaling.

Changes since V1:
 - separate out fixed_16_16 wrapper API definition
Changes since V2:
 - Fix buggy crtc !active condition (Maarten)
 - use intel_wm_plane_visible wrapper as per Maarten's suggestion
Changes since V3:
 - Change failure return from ERANGE to EINVAL
Changes since V4:
 - Rebase based on previous patch changes
Changes since V5:
 - return EINVAL instead of continue (Maarten)
Changes since V6:
 - Improve commit message
 - Address review comment
Changes since V7:
 - use !enable instead of !active
 - rename config variable for consistency (Maarten)
Signed-off-by: NMahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170526151546.25025-4-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com
      73b0ca8e
  13. 30 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  15. 22 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 16 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  19. 11 5月, 2017 14 次提交
  21. 10 5月, 2017 6 次提交
  23. 26 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 15 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 12 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  29. 07 4月, 2017 2 次提交