1. 03 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  2. 17 1月, 2018 4 次提交
  3. 20 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 18 12月, 2017 2 次提交
  5. 14 12月, 2017 2 次提交
    • R
      libbpf: prefer global symbols as bpf program name source · fe4d44b2
      Roman Gushchin 提交于
      Libbpf picks the name of the first symbol in the corresponding
      elf section to use as a program name. But without taking symbol's
      scope into account it may end's up with some local label
      as a program name. E.g.:
      
      $ bpftool prog
      1: type 15  name LBB0_10    tag 0390a5136ba23f5c
      	loaded_at Dec 07/17:22  uid 0
      	xlated 456B  not jited  memlock 4096B
      
      Fix this by preferring global symbols as program name.
      
      For instance:
      $ bpftool prog
      1: type 15  name bpf_prog1  tag 0390a5136ba23f5c
      	loaded_at Dec 07/17:26  uid 0
      	xlated 456B  not jited  memlock 4096B
      Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
      Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
      Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      fe4d44b2
    • R
      libbpf: add ability to guess program type based on section name · 583c9009
      Roman Gushchin 提交于
      The bpf_prog_load() function will guess program type if it's not
      specified explicitly. This functionality will be used to implement
      loading of different programs without asking a user to specify
      the program type. In first order it will be used by bpftool.
      Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
      Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
      Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      583c9009
  6. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • G
      License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license · b2441318
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
      makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
      
      By default all files without license information are under the default
      license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
      
      Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
      SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
      shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
      
      This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
      Philippe Ombredanne.
      
      How this work was done:
      
      Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
      the use cases:
       - file had no licensing information it it.
       - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
       - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
      
      Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
      where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
      had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
      
      The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
      a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
      output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
      tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
      base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
      
      The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
      assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
      results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
      to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
      immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
       - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
       - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
         lines of source
       - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
         lines).
      
      All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
      
      The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
      identifiers to apply.
      
       - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
         considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
         COPYING file license applied.
      
         For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0                                              11139
      
         and resulted in the first patch in this series.
      
         If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
         Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930
      
         and resulted in the second patch in this series.
      
       - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
         of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
         any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
         it (per prior point).  Results summary:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
         GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
         LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
         GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
         ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
         LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
         LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1
      
         and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
      
       - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
         the concluded license(s).
      
       - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
         license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
         licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
      
       - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
         resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
         which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
      
       - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
         confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
       - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
         the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
         in time.
      
      In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
      spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
      source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
      by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
      FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
      disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
      Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
      they are related.
      
      Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
      for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
      files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
      in about 15000 files.
      
      In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
      copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
      correct identifier.
      
      Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
      inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
      version early this week with:
       - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
         license ids and scores
       - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
         files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
       - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
         was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
         SPDX license was correct
      
      This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
      worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
      different types of files to be modified.
      
      These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
      parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
      format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
      based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
      distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
      comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
      generate the patches.
      Reviewed-by: NKate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
      Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      b2441318
  7. 06 10月, 2017 2 次提交
  8. 05 10月, 2017 2 次提交
  9. 29 9月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      bpf: libbpf: Provide basic API support to specify BPF obj name · 88cda1c9
      Martin KaFai Lau 提交于
      This patch extends the libbpf to provide API support to
      allow specifying BPF object name.
      
      In tools/lib/bpf/libbpf, the C symbol of the function
      and the map is used.  Regarding section name, all maps are
      under the same section named "maps".  Hence, section name
      is not a good choice for map's name.  To be consistent with
      map, bpf_prog also follows and uses its function symbol as
      the prog's name.
      
      This patch adds logic to collect function's symbols in libbpf.
      There is existing codes to collect the map's symbols and no change
      is needed.
      
      The bpf_load_program_name() and bpf_map_create_name() are
      added to take the name argument.  For the other bpf_map_create_xxx()
      variants, a name argument is directly added to them.
      
      In samples/bpf, bpf_load.c in particular, the symbol is also
      used as the map's name and the map symbols has already been
      collected in the existing code.  For bpf_prog, bpf_load.c does
      not collect the function symbol name.  We can consider to collect
      them later if there is a need to continue supporting the bpf_load.c.
      Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      88cda1c9
  10. 29 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 21 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  12. 20 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 18 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  14. 17 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  15. 05 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  16. 31 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • I
      perf build: Clarify open-coded header version warning message · 8255e1ef
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      In this patch we changed the header checks:
      
        perf build: Clarify header version warning message
      
      Unfortunately the header checks were copied to various places and thus the message got
      out of sync. Fix some of them here.
      
      Note that there's still old, misleading messages remaining in:
      
        tools/objtool/Makefile: || echo "warning: objtool: x86 instruction decoder differs from kernel" >&2 )) || true
        tools/objtool/Makefile: || echo "warning: objtool: orc_types.h differs from kernel" >&2 )) || true
      
      here objtool copied the perf message, plus:
      
       tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/Build: || echo "Warning: Intel PT: x86 instruction decoder differs from kernel" >&2 )) || true
      
      here the PT code regressed over the original message and only emits a vague warning
      instead of specific file names...
      
      All of this should be consolidated into tools/Build/ and used in a consistent
      manner.
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
      Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      Cc: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
      Cc: Francis Deslauriers <francis.deslauriers@efficios.com>
      Cc: Geneviève Bastien <gbastien@versatic.net>
      Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
      Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@efficios.com>
      Cc: Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz>
      Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
      Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
      Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
      Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Simon Que <sque@chromium.org>
      Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
      Cc: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
      Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170730095130.bblldwxjz5hamybb@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      8255e1ef
  17. 27 7月, 2017 2 次提交
  18. 21 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 07 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  20. 12 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 23 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  22. 02 4月, 2017 2 次提交
  23. 23 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  24. 10 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 28 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  26. 16 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 13 2月, 2017 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: introduce BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag · 7f677633
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      If BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag is used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command
      to the given cgroup the descendent cgroup will be able to override
      effective bpf program that was inherited from this cgroup.
      By default it's not passed, therefore override is disallowed.
      
      Examples:
      1.
      prog X attached to /A with default
      prog Y fails to attach to /A/B and /A/B/C
      Everything under /A runs prog X
      
      2.
      prog X attached to /A with allow_override.
      prog Y fails to attach to /A/B with default (non-override)
      prog M attached to /A/B with allow_override.
      Everything under /A/B runs prog M only.
      
      3.
      prog X attached to /A with allow_override.
      prog Y fails to attach to /A with default.
      The user has to detach first to switch the mode.
      
      In the future this behavior may be extended with a chain of
      non-overridable programs.
      
      Also fix the bug where detach from cgroup where nothing is attached
      was not throwing error. Return ENOENT in such case.
      
      Add several testcases and adjust libbpf.
      
      Fixes: 30070984 ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs")
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7f677633
  28. 11 2月, 2017 3 次提交