- 28 8月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
create_singlethread_workqueue() returns NULL on error, and it doesn't return ERR_PTRs. I tweaked the error handling a little to be consistent with earlier in the function. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
There are two places where we read "nr_maps" if both of them are set to zero then we would hit a NULL dereference here. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
We've tried to fix the error paths in this function before, but there is still a hidden goto in the ceph_decode_need() macro which goes to the wrong place. We need to release the "req" and unlock a mutex before returning. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
- 16 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li Wang 提交于
This patch implements fallocate and punch hole support for Ceph kernel client. Signed-off-by: NLi Wang <liwang@ubuntukylin.com> Signed-off-by: NYunchuan Wen <yunchuanwen@ubuntukylin.com>
-
- 10 8月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
dbf2576e ("workqueue: make all workqueues non-reentrant") made WQ_NON_REENTRANT no-op and the flag is going away. Remove its usages. This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
-
由 majianpeng 提交于
For nofail == false request, if __map_request failed, the caller does cleanup work, like releasing the relative pages. It doesn't make any sense to retry this request. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
We can't use !req->r_sent to check if OSD request is sent for the first time, this is because __cancel_request() zeros req->r_sent when OSD map changes. Rather than adding a new variable to struct ceph_osd_request to indicate if it's sent for the first time, We can call the unsafe callback only when unsafe OSD reply is received. If OSD's first reply is safe, just skip calling the unsafe callback. The purpose of unsafe callback is adding unsafe request to a list, so that fsync(2) can wait for the safe reply. fsync(2) doesn't need to wait for a write(2) that hasn't returned yet. So it's OK to add request to the unsafe list when the first OSD reply is received. (ceph_sync_write() returns after receiving the first OSD reply) Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Tyler Hicks 提交于
A malicious monitor can craft an auth reply message that could cause a NULL function pointer dereference in the client's kernel. To prevent this, the auth_none protocol handler needs an empty ceph_auth_client_ops->build_request() function. CVE-2013-1059 Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Reported-by: NChanam Park <chanam.park@hkpco.kr> Reviewed-by: NSeth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
check the "not truncated yet" case Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
handle_reply() calls complete_request() only if the first OSD reply has ONDISK flag. Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
If an osd client response message arrives that has a front section that's too big for the buffer set aside to receive it, a warning gets reported and a new buffer is allocated. The warning says nothing about which connection had the problem. Add the peer type and number to what gets reported, to be a bit more informative. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When an osd request is set to linger, the osd client holds onto the request so it can be re-submitted following certain osd map changes. The osd client holds a reference to the request until it is unregistered. This is used by rbd for watch requests. Currently, the reference is taken when the request is marked with the linger flag. This means that if an error occurs after that time but before the the request completes successfully, that reference is leaked. There's really no reason to take the reference until the request is registered in the the osd client's list of lingering requests, and that only happens when the lingering (watch) request completes successfully. So take that reference only when it gets registered following succesful completion, and drop it (as before) when the request gets unregistered. This avoids the reference problem on error in rbd. Rearrange ceph_osdc_unregister_linger_request() to avoid using the request pointer after it may have been freed. And hold an extra reference in kick_requests() while handling a linger request that has not yet been registered, to ensure it doesn't go away. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3859Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd client has a red-black tree describing its osds, and occasionally we would get crashes due to one of these trees tree becoming corrupt somehow. The problem turned out to be that reset_changed_osds() was being called without protection of the osd client request mutex. That function would call __reset_osd() for any osd that had changed, and __reset_osd() would call __remove_osd() for any osd with no outstanding requests, and finally __remove_osd() would remove the corresponding entry from the red-black tree. Thus, the tree was getting modified without having any lock protection, and was vulnerable to problems due to concurrent updates. This appears to be the only osd tree updating path that has this problem. It can be fairly easily fixed by moving the call up a few lines, to just before the request mutex gets dropped in kick_requests(). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5043 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.4+ Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
- 14 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The rbd code has a need to be able to restart an osd request that has already been started and completed once before. This currently wouldn't work right because the osd client code assumes an osd request will be started exactly once Certain fields in a request are never cleared and this leads to trouble if you try to reuse it. Specifically, the r_sent, r_got_reply, and r_completed fields are never cleared. The r_sent field records the osd incarnation at the time the request was sent to that osd. If that's non-zero, the message won't get re-mapped to a target osd properly, and won't be put on the unsafe requests list the first time it's sent as it should. The r_got_reply field is used in handle_reply() to ensure the reply to a request is processed only once. And the r_completed field is used for lingering requests to avoid calling the callback function every time the osd client re-sends the request on behalf of its initiator. Each osd request passes through ceph_osdc_start_request() when responsibility for the request is handed over to the osd client for completion. We can safely zero these three fields there each time a request gets started. One last related change--clear the r_linger flag when a request is no longer registered as a linger request. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5026Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Create a slab cache to manage allocation of ceph_osdc_request structures. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3926Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Create a slab cache to manage ceph_msg_data structure allocation. This is part of: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3926Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Create a slab cache to manage ceph_msg structure allocation. This is part of: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3926Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
- 02 5月, 2013 23 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This creates a new source file "net/ceph/snapshot.c" to contain utility routines related to ceph snapshot contexts. The main motivation was to define ceph_create_snap_context() as a common way to create these structures, but I've moved the definitions of ceph_get_snap_context() and ceph_put_snap_context() there too. (The benefit of inlining those is very small, and I'd rather keep this collection of functions together.) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A WATCH op includes an object version. The version that's supplied is incorrectly byte-swapped osd_req_op_watch_init() where it's first assigned (it's been this way since that code was first added). The result is that the version sent to the osd is wrong, because that value gets byte-swapped again in osd_req_encode_op(). This is the source of a sparse warning related to improper byte order in the assignment. The approach of using the version to avoid a race is deprecated (see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3871), and the watch parameter is no longer even examined by the osd. So fix the assignment in osd_req_op_watch_init() so it no longer does the byte swap. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3847Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add the ability to provide an array of pages as outbound request data for object class method calls. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch makes four small changes in the ceph messenger. While getting copyup functionality working I found two bugs in the messenger. Existing paths through the code did not trigger these problems, but they're fixed here: - In ceph_msg_data_pagelist_cursor_init(), the cursor's last_piece field was being checked against the length supplied. This was OK until this commit: ccba6d98 libceph: implement multiple data items in a message That commit changed the cursor init routines to allow lengths to be supplied that exceeded the size of the current data item. Because of this, we have to use the assigned cursor resid field rather than the provided length in determining whether the cursor points to the last piece of a data item. - In ceph_msg_data_add_pages(), a BUG_ON() was erroneously catching attempts to add page data to a message if the message already had data assigned to it. That was OK until that same commit, at which point it was fine for messages to have multiple data items. It slipped through because that BUG_ON() call was present twice in that function. (You can never be too careful.) In addition two other minor things are changed: - In ceph_msg_data_cursor_init(), the local variable "data" was getting assigned twice. - In ceph_msg_data_advance(), it was assumed that the type-specific advance routine would set new_piece to true after it advanced past the last piece. That may have been fine, but since we check for that case we might as well set it explicitly in ceph_msg_data_advance(). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4762Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Allow osd request ops that aren't otherwise structured (not class, extent, or watch ops) to specify "raw" data to be used to hold incoming data for the op. Make use of this capability for the osd STAT op. Prefix the name of the private function osd_req_op_init() with "_", and expose a new function by that (earlier) name whose purpose is to initialize osd ops with (only) implied data. For now we'll just support the use of a page array for an osd op with incoming raw data. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are a bunch of functions defined to encapsulate getting the address of a data field for a particular op in an osd request. They're all defined the same way, so create a macro to take the place of all of them. Two of these are used outside the osd client code, so preserve them (but convert them to use the new macro internally). Stop exporting the ones that aren't used elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In the incremental move toward supporting distinct data items in an osd request some of the functions had "write_request" parameters to indicate, basically, whether the data belonged to in_data or the out_data. Now that we maintain the data fields in the op structure there is no need to indicate the direction, so get rid of the "write_request" parameters. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request currently has two callbacks. They inform the initiator of the request when we've received confirmation for the target osd that a request was received, and when the osd indicates all changes described by the request are durable. The only time the second callback is used is in the ceph file system for a synchronous write. There's a race that makes some handling of this case unsafe. This patch addresses this problem. The error handling for this callback is also kind of gross, and this patch changes that as well. In ceph_sync_write(), if a safe callback is requested we want to add the request on the ceph inode's unsafe items list. Because items on this list must have their tid set (by ceph_osd_start_request()), the request added *after* the call to that function returns. The problem with this is that there's a race between starting the request and adding it to the unsafe items list; the request may already be complete before ceph_sync_write() even begins to put it on the list. To address this, we change the way the "safe" callback is used. Rather than just calling it when the request is "safe", we use it to notify the initiator the bounds (start and end) of the period during which the request is *unsafe*. So the initiator gets notified just before the request gets sent to the osd (when it is "unsafe"), and again when it's known the results are durable (it's no longer unsafe). The first call will get made in __send_request(), just before the request message gets sent to the messenger for the first time. That function is only called by __send_queued(), which is always called with the osd client's request mutex held. We then have this callback function insert the request on the ceph inode's unsafe list when we're told the request is unsafe. This will avoid the race because this call will be made under protection of the osd client's request mutex. It also nicely groups the setup and cleanup of the state associated with managing unsafe requests. The name of the "safe" callback field is changed to "unsafe" to better reflect its new purpose. It has a Boolean "unsafe" parameter to indicate whether the request is becoming unsafe or is now safe. Because the "msg" parameter wasn't used, we drop that. This resolves the original problem reportedin: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4706Reported-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Right now the data for a method call is specified via a pointer and length, and it's copied--along with the class and method name--into a pagelist data item to be sent to the osd. Instead, encode the data in a data item separate from the class and method names. This will allow large amounts of data to be supplied to methods without copying. Only rbd uses the class functionality right now, and when it really needs this it will probably need to use a page array rather than a page list. But this simple implementation demonstrates the functionality on the osd client, and that's enough for now. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4104Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Change the names of the functions that put data on a pagelist to reflect that we're adding to whatever's already there rather than just setting it to the one thing. Currently only one data item is ever added to a message, but that's about to change. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2770Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch adds support to the messenger for more than one data item in its data list. A message data cursor has two more fields to support this: - a count of the number of bytes left to be consumed across all data items in the list, "total_resid" - a pointer to the head of the list (for validation only) The cursor initialization routine has been split into two parts: the outer one, which initializes the cursor for traversing the entire list of data items; and the inner one, which initializes the cursor to start processing a single data item. When a message cursor is first initialized, the outer initialization routine sets total_resid to the length provided. The data pointer is initialized to the first data item on the list. From there, the inner initialization routine finishes by setting up to process the data item the cursor points to. Advancing the cursor consumes bytes in total_resid. If the resid field reaches zero, it means the current data item is fully consumed. If total_resid indicates there is more data, the cursor is advanced to point to the next data item, and then the inner initialization routine prepares for using that. (A check is made at this point to make sure we don't wrap around the front of the list.) The type-specific init routines are modified so they can be given a length that's larger than what the data item can support. The resid field is initialized to the smaller of the provided length and the length of the entire data item. When total_resid reaches zero, we're done. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In place of the message data pointer, use a list head which links through message data items. For now we only support a single entry on that list. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Rather than having a ceph message data item point to the cursor it's associated with, have the cursor point to a data item. This will allow a message cursor to be used for more than one data item. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A message will only be processing a single data item at a time, so there's no need for each data item to have its own cursor. Move the cursor embedded in the message data structure into the message itself. To minimize the impact, keep the data->cursor field, but make it be a pointer to the cursor in the message. Move the definition of ceph_msg_data above ceph_msg_data_cursor so the cursor can point to the data without a forward definition rather than vice-versa. This and the upcoming patches are part of: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The bio is the only data item type that doesn't record its full length. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We know the length of our message buffers. If we get a message that's too long, just dump it and ignore it. If skip was set then con->in_msg won't be valid, so be careful not to dereference a null pointer in the process. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4664Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch: 15a0d7b libceph: record message data length did not enclose some bio-specific code inside CONFIG_BLOCK as it should have. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Finally! Convert the osd op data pointers into real structures, and make the switch over to using them instead of having all ops share the in and/or out data structures in the osd request. Set up a new function to traverse the set of ops and release any data associated with them (pages). This and the patches leading up to it resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Still using the osd request r_data_in and r_data_out pointer, but we're basically only referring to it via the data pointers in the osd ops. And we're transferring that information to the request or reply message only when the op indicates it's needed, in osd_req_encode_op(). To avoid a forward reference, ceph_osdc_msg_data_set() was moved up in the file. Don't bother calling ceph_osd_data_init(), in ceph_osd_alloc(), because the ops array will already be zeroed anyway. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This ends up being a rather large patch but what it's doing is somewhat straightforward. Basically, this is replacing two calls with one. The first of the two calls is initializing a struct ceph_osd_data with data (either a page array, a page list, or a bio list); the second is setting an osd request op so it associates that data with one of the op's parameters. In place of those two will be a single function that initializes the op directly. That means we sort of fan out a set of the needed functions: - extent ops with pages data - extent ops with pagelist data - extent ops with bio list data and - class ops with page data for receiving a response We also have define another one, but it's only used internally: - class ops with pagelist data for request parameters Note that we *still* haven't gotten rid of the osd request's r_data_in and r_data_out fields. All the osd ops refer to them for their data. For now, these data fields are pointers assigned to the appropriate r_data_* field when these new functions are called. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
All calls of ceph_osdc_start_request() are preceded (in the case of rbd, almost) immediately by a call to ceph_osdc_build_request(). Move the build calls at the top of ceph_osdc_start_request() out of there and into the ceph_osdc_build_request(). Nothing prevents moving these calls to the top of ceph_osdc_build_request(), either (and we're going to want them there in the next patch) so put them at the top. This and the next patch are related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This simply moves ceph_osdc_build_request() later in its source file without any change. Done as a separate patch to facilitate review of the change in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An object class method is formatted using a pagelist which contains the class name, the method name, and the data concatenated into an osd request's outbound data. Currently when a class op is initialized in osd_req_op_cls_init(), the lengths of and pointers to these three items are recorded. Later, when the op is getting formatted into the request message, a new pagelist is created and that is when these items get copied into the pagelist. This patch makes it so the pagelist to hold these items is created when the op is initialized instead. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-