Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 9月, 2017 7 次提交
  3. 11 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 11 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 07 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 13 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 09 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 04 5月, 2017 7 次提交
  15. 14 4月, 2017 2 次提交
  17. 09 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 09 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 25 2月, 2017 2 次提交
  23. 23 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 03 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 11 1月, 2017 2 次提交
  29. 08 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  31. 02 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  33. 01 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      zram: fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal · 529e71e1
      由 Takashi Iwai 提交于 
      The zram hot removal code calls idr_remove() even when zram_remove()
returns an error (typically -EBUSY).  This results in a leftover at the
device release, eventually leading to a crash when the module is
reloaded.

As described in the bug report below, the following procedure would
cause an Oops with zram:

 - provision three zram devices via modprobe zram num_devices=3
 - configure a size for each device
   + echo "1G" > /sys/block/$zram_name/disksize
 - mkfs and mount zram0 only
 - attempt to hot remove all three devices
   + echo 2 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
   + echo 1 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
   + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
     - zram0 removal fails with EBUSY, as expected
 - unmount zram0
 - try zram0 hot remove again
   + echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
     - fails with ENODEV (unexpected)
 - unload zram kernel module
   + completes successfully
 - zram0 device node still exists
 - attempt to mount /dev/zram0
   + mount command is killed
   + following BUG is encountered

 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffa0002ba0
 IP: get_disk+0x16/0x50
 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 0 PID: 252 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-rc6 #176
 Call Trace:
   exact_lock+0xc/0x20
   kobj_lookup+0xdc/0x160
   get_gendisk+0x2f/0x110
   __blkdev_get+0x10c/0x3c0
   blkdev_get+0x19d/0x2e0
   blkdev_open+0x56/0x70
   do_dentry_open.isra.19+0x1ff/0x310
   vfs_open+0x43/0x60
   path_openat+0x2c9/0xf30
   do_filp_open+0x79/0xd0
   do_sys_open+0x114/0x1e0
   SyS_open+0x19/0x20
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94

This patch adds the proper error check in hot_remove_store() not to call
idr_remove() unconditionally.

Fixes: 17ec4cd9 ("zram: don't call idr_remove() from zram_remove()")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010970
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161121132140.12683-1-tiwai@suse.deSigned-off-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Reported-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Tested-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>    [4.4+]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      529e71e1
  35. 08 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  37. 05 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  39. 27 7月, 2016 4 次提交
    • M
      zram: use __GFP_MOVABLE for memory allocation · 9bc482d3
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Zsmalloc is ready for page migration so zram can use __GFP_MOVABLE from
now on.

I did test to see how it helps to make higher order pages.  Test
scenario is as follows.

KVM guest, 1G memory, ext4 formated zram block device,

  for i in `seq 1 8`;
  do
          dd if=/dev/vda1 of=mnt/test$i.txt bs=128M count=1 &
  done

  wait `pidof dd`

  for i in `seq 1 2 8`;
  do
          rm -rf mnt/test$i.txt
  done
  fstrim -v mnt

  echo "init"
  cat /proc/buddyinfo

  echo "compaction"
  echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
  cat /proc/buddyinfo

old:

  init
  Node 0, zone      DMA    208    120     51     41     11      0      0      0      0      0      0
  Node 0, zone    DMA32  16380  13777   9184   3805    789     54      3      0      0      0      0
  compaction
  Node 0, zone      DMA    132     82     40     39     16      2      1      0      0      0      0
  Node 0, zone    DMA32   5219   5526   4969   3455   1831    677    139     15      0      0      0

new:

  init
  Node 0, zone      DMA    379    115     97     19      2      0      0      0      0      0      0
  Node 0, zone    DMA32  18891  16774  10862   3947    637     21      0      0      0      0      0
  compaction
  Node 0, zone      DMA    214     66     87     29     10      3      0      0      0      0      0
  Node 0, zone    DMA32   1612   3139   3154   2469   1745    990    384     94      7      0      0

As you can see, compaction made so many high-order pages. Yay!

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-13-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9bc482d3
    • S
      zram: use crypto api to check alg availability · 415403be
      由 Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于 
      There is no way to get a string with all the crypto comp algorithms
supported by the crypto comp engine, so we need to maintain our own
backends list.  At the same time we additionally need to use
crypto_has_comp() to make sure that the user has requested a compression
algorithm that is recognized by the crypto comp engine.  Relying on
/proc/crypto is not an options here, because it does not show
not-yet-inserted compression modules.

Example:

 modprobe zram
 cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4
 modprobe lz4
 cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4
name         : lz4
driver       : lz4-generic
module       : lz4

So the user can't tell exactly if the lz4 is really supported from
/proc/crypto output, unless someone or something has loaded it.

This patch also adds crypto_has_comp() to zcomp_available_show().  We
store all the compression algorithms names in zcomp's `backends' array,
regardless the CONFIG_CRYPTO_FOO configuration, but show only those that
are also supported by crypto engine.  This helps user to know the exact
list of compression algorithms that can be used.

Example:
  module lz4 is not loaded yet, but is supported by the crypto
  engine. /proc/crypto has no information on this module, while
  zram's `comp_algorithm' lists it:

 cat /proc/crypto | grep -i lz4

 cat /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm
[lzo] lz4 deflate lz4hc 842

We still use the `backends' array to determine if the requested
compression backend is known to crypto api.  This array, however, may not
contain some entries, therefore as the last step we call crypto_has_comp()
function which attempts to insmod the requested compression algorithm to
determine if crypto api supports it.  The advantage of this method is that
now we permit the usage of out-of-tree crypto compression modules
(implementing S/W or H/W compression).

[sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com: zram-use-crypto-api-to-check-alg-availability-v3]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160604024902.11778-4-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531122017.2878-5-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      415403be
    • S
      zram: switch to crypto compress API · ebaf9ab5
      由 Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于 
      We don't have an idle zstreams list anymore and our write path now works
absolutely differently, preventing preemption during compression.  This
removes possibilities of read paths preempting writes at wrong places
(which could badly affect the performance of both paths) and at the same
time opens the door for a move from custom LZO/LZ4 compression backends
implementation to a more generic one, using crypto compress API.

Joonsoo Kim [1] attempted to do this a while ago, but faced with the
need of introducing a new crypto API interface.  The root cause was the
fact that crypto API compression algorithms require a compression stream
structure (in zram terminology) for both compression and decompression
ops, while in reality only several of compression algorithms really need
it.  This resulted in a concept of context-less crypto API compression
backends [2].  Both write and read paths, though, would have been
executed with the preemption enabled, which in the worst case could have
resulted in a decreased worst-case performance, e.g.  consider the
following case:

	CPU0

	zram_write()
	  spin_lock()
	    take the last idle stream
	  spin_unlock()

	<< preempted >>

		zram_read()
		  spin_lock()
		   no idle streams
			  spin_unlock()
			  schedule()

	resuming zram_write compression()

but it took me some time to realize that, and it took even longer to
evolve zram and to make it ready for crypto API.  The key turned out to be
-- drop the idle streams list entirely.  Without the idle streams list we
are free to use compression algorithms that require compression stream for
decompression (read), because streams are now placed in per-cpu data and
each write path has to disable preemption for compression op, almost
completely eliminating the aforementioned case (technically, we still have
a small chance, because write path has a fast and a slow paths and the
slow path is executed with the preemption enabled; but the frequency of
failed fast path is too low).

TEST
====

- 4 CPUs, x86_64 system
- 3G zram, lzo
- fio tests: read, randread, write, randwrite, rw, randrw

test script [3] command:
 ZRAM_SIZE=3G LOG_SUFFIX=XXXX FIO_LOOPS=5 ./zram-fio-test.sh

                   BASE           PATCHED
jobs1
READ:           2527.2MB/s	 2482.7MB/s
READ:           2102.7MB/s	 2045.0MB/s
WRITE:          1284.3MB/s	 1324.3MB/s
WRITE:          1080.7MB/s	 1101.9MB/s
READ:           430125KB/s	 437498KB/s
WRITE:          430538KB/s	 437919KB/s
READ:           399593KB/s	 403987KB/s
WRITE:          399910KB/s	 404308KB/s
jobs2
READ:           8133.5MB/s	 7854.8MB/s
READ:           7086.6MB/s	 6912.8MB/s
WRITE:          3177.2MB/s	 3298.3MB/s
WRITE:          2810.2MB/s	 2871.4MB/s
READ:           1017.6MB/s	 1023.4MB/s
WRITE:          1018.2MB/s	 1023.1MB/s
READ:           977836KB/s	 984205KB/s
WRITE:          979435KB/s	 985814KB/s
jobs3
READ:           13557MB/s	 13391MB/s
READ:           11876MB/s	 11752MB/s
WRITE:          4641.5MB/s	 4682.1MB/s
WRITE:          4164.9MB/s	 4179.3MB/s
READ:           1453.8MB/s	 1455.1MB/s
WRITE:          1455.1MB/s	 1458.2MB/s
READ:           1387.7MB/s	 1395.7MB/s
WRITE:          1386.1MB/s	 1394.9MB/s
jobs4
READ:           20271MB/s	 20078MB/s
READ:           18033MB/s	 17928MB/s
WRITE:          6176.8MB/s	 6180.5MB/s
WRITE:          5686.3MB/s	 5705.3MB/s
READ:           2009.4MB/s	 2006.7MB/s
WRITE:          2007.5MB/s	 2004.9MB/s
READ:           1929.7MB/s	 1935.6MB/s
WRITE:          1926.8MB/s	 1932.6MB/s
jobs5
READ:           18823MB/s	 19024MB/s
READ:           18968MB/s	 19071MB/s
WRITE:          6191.6MB/s	 6372.1MB/s
WRITE:          5818.7MB/s	 5787.1MB/s
READ:           2011.7MB/s	 1981.3MB/s
WRITE:          2011.4MB/s	 1980.1MB/s
READ:           1949.3MB/s	 1935.7MB/s
WRITE:          1940.4MB/s	 1926.1MB/s
jobs6
READ:           21870MB/s	 21715MB/s
READ:           19957MB/s	 19879MB/s
WRITE:          6528.4MB/s	 6537.6MB/s
WRITE:          6098.9MB/s	 6073.6MB/s
READ:           2048.6MB/s	 2049.9MB/s
WRITE:          2041.7MB/s	 2042.9MB/s
READ:           2013.4MB/s	 1990.4MB/s
WRITE:          2009.4MB/s	 1986.5MB/s
jobs7
READ:           21359MB/s	 21124MB/s
READ:           19746MB/s	 19293MB/s
WRITE:          6660.4MB/s	 6518.8MB/s
WRITE:          6211.6MB/s	 6193.1MB/s
READ:           2089.7MB/s	 2080.6MB/s
WRITE:          2085.8MB/s	 2076.5MB/s
READ:           2041.2MB/s	 2052.5MB/s
WRITE:          2037.5MB/s	 2048.8MB/s
jobs8
READ:           20477MB/s	 19974MB/s
READ:           18922MB/s	 18576MB/s
WRITE:          6851.9MB/s	 6788.3MB/s
WRITE:          6407.7MB/s	 6347.5MB/s
READ:           2134.8MB/s	 2136.1MB/s
WRITE:          2132.8MB/s	 2134.4MB/s
READ:           2074.2MB/s	 2069.6MB/s
WRITE:          2087.3MB/s	 2082.4MB/s
jobs9
READ:           19797MB/s	 19994MB/s
READ:           18806MB/s	 18581MB/s
WRITE:          6878.7MB/s	 6822.7MB/s
WRITE:          6456.8MB/s	 6447.2MB/s
READ:           2141.1MB/s	 2154.7MB/s
WRITE:          2144.4MB/s	 2157.3MB/s
READ:           2084.1MB/s	 2085.1MB/s
WRITE:          2091.5MB/s	 2092.5MB/s
jobs10
READ:           19794MB/s	 19784MB/s
READ:           18794MB/s	 18745MB/s
WRITE:          6984.4MB/s	 6676.3MB/s
WRITE:          6532.3MB/s	 6342.7MB/s
READ:           2150.6MB/s	 2155.4MB/s
WRITE:          2156.8MB/s	 2161.5MB/s
READ:           2106.4MB/s	 2095.6MB/s
WRITE:          2109.7MB/s	 2098.4MB/s

                                    BASE                       PATCHED
jobs1                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     102,480,595,419 (  41.53%)	  114,508,864,804 (  46.92%)
stalled-cycles-backend       51,941,417,832 (  21.05%)	   46,836,112,388 (  19.19%)
instructions                283,612,054,215 (    1.15)	  283,918,134,959 (    1.16)
branches                     56,372,560,385 ( 724.923)	   56,449,814,753 ( 733.766)
branch-misses                   374,826,000 (   0.66%)	      326,935,859 (   0.58%)
jobs2                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     155,142,745,777 (  40.99%)	  164,170,979,198 (  43.82%)
stalled-cycles-backend       70,813,866,387 (  18.71%)	   66,456,858,165 (  17.74%)
instructions                463,436,648,173 (    1.22)	  464,221,890,191 (    1.24)
branches                     91,088,733,902 ( 760.088)	   91,278,144,546 ( 769.133)
branch-misses                   504,460,363 (   0.55%)	      394,033,842 (   0.43%)
jobs3                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     201,300,397,212 (  39.84%)	  223,969,902,257 (  44.44%)
stalled-cycles-backend       87,712,593,974 (  17.36%)	   81,618,888,712 (  16.19%)
instructions                642,869,545,023 (    1.27)	  644,677,354,132 (    1.28)
branches                    125,724,560,594 ( 690.682)	  126,133,159,521 ( 694.542)
branch-misses                   527,941,798 (   0.42%)	      444,782,220 (   0.35%)
jobs4                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     246,701,197,429 (  38.12%)	  280,076,030,886 (  43.29%)
stalled-cycles-backend      119,050,341,112 (  18.40%)	  110,955,641,671 (  17.15%)
instructions                822,716,962,127 (    1.27)	  825,536,969,320 (    1.28)
branches                    160,590,028,545 ( 688.614)	  161,152,996,915 ( 691.068)
branch-misses                   650,295,287 (   0.40%)	      550,229,113 (   0.34%)
jobs5                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     298,958,462,516 (  38.30%)	  344,852,200,358 (  44.16%)
stalled-cycles-backend      137,558,742,122 (  17.62%)	  129,465,067,102 (  16.58%)
instructions              1,005,714,688,752 (    1.29)	1,007,657,999,432 (    1.29)
branches                    195,988,773,962 ( 697.730)	  196,446,873,984 ( 700.319)
branch-misses                   695,818,940 (   0.36%)	      624,823,263 (   0.32%)
jobs6                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     334,497,602,856 (  36.71%)	  387,590,419,779 (  42.38%)
stalled-cycles-backend      163,539,365,335 (  17.95%)	  152,640,193,639 (  16.69%)
instructions              1,184,738,177,851 (    1.30)	1,187,396,281,677 (    1.30)
branches                    230,592,915,640 ( 702.902)	  231,253,802,882 ( 702.356)
branch-misses                   747,934,786 (   0.32%)	      643,902,424 (   0.28%)
jobs7                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     396,724,684,187 (  37.71%)	  460,705,858,952 (  43.84%)
stalled-cycles-backend      188,096,616,496 (  17.88%)	  175,785,787,036 (  16.73%)
instructions              1,364,041,136,608 (    1.30)	1,366,689,075,112 (    1.30)
branches                    265,253,096,936 ( 700.078)	  265,890,524,883 ( 702.839)
branch-misses                   784,991,589 (   0.30%)	      729,196,689 (   0.27%)
jobs8                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     440,248,299,870 (  36.92%)	  509,554,793,816 (  42.46%)
stalled-cycles-backend      222,575,930,616 (  18.67%)	  213,401,248,432 (  17.78%)
instructions              1,542,262,045,114 (    1.29)	1,545,233,932,257 (    1.29)
branches                    299,775,178,439 ( 697.666)	  300,528,458,505 ( 694.769)
branch-misses                   847,496,084 (   0.28%)	      748,794,308 (   0.25%)
jobs9                              perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     506,269,882,480 (  37.86%)	  592,798,032,820 (  44.43%)
stalled-cycles-backend      253,192,498,861 (  18.93%)	  233,727,666,185 (  17.52%)
instructions              1,721,985,080,913 (    1.29)	1,724,666,236,005 (    1.29)
branches                    334,517,360,255 ( 694.134)	  335,199,758,164 ( 697.131)
branch-misses                   873,496,730 (   0.26%)	      815,379,236 (   0.24%)
jobs10                             perfstat
stalled-cycles-frontend     549,063,363,749 (  37.18%)	  651,302,376,662 (  43.61%)
stalled-cycles-backend      281,680,986,810 (  19.07%)	  277,005,235,582 (  18.55%)
instructions              1,901,859,271,180 (    1.29)	1,906,311,064,230 (    1.28)
branches                    369,398,536,153 ( 694.004)	  370,527,696,358 ( 688.409)
branch-misses                   967,929,335 (   0.26%)	      890,125,056 (   0.24%)

                            BASE           PATCHED
seconds elapsed        79.421641008	78.735285546
seconds elapsed        61.471246133	60.869085949
seconds elapsed        62.317058173	62.224188495
seconds elapsed        60.030739363	60.081102518
seconds elapsed        74.070398362	74.317582865
seconds elapsed        84.985953007	85.414364176
seconds elapsed        97.724553255	98.173311344
seconds elapsed        109.488066758	110.268399318
seconds elapsed        122.768189405	122.967164498
seconds elapsed        135.130035105	136.934770801

On my other system (8 x86_64 CPUs, short version of test results):

                            BASE           PATCHED
seconds elapsed        19.518065994	19.806320662
seconds elapsed        15.172772749	15.594718291
seconds elapsed        13.820925970	13.821708564
seconds elapsed        13.293097816	14.585206405
seconds elapsed        16.207284118	16.064431606
seconds elapsed        17.958376158	17.771825767
seconds elapsed        19.478009164	19.602961508
seconds elapsed        21.347152811	21.352318709
seconds elapsed        24.478121126	24.171088735
seconds elapsed        26.865057442	26.767327618

So performance-wise the numbers are quite similar.

Also update zcomp interface to be more aligned with the crypto API.

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144480832108927&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145379613507518&w=2
[3] https://github.com/sergey-senozhatsky/zram-perf-test

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531122017.2878-3-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ebaf9ab5
    • S
      zram: rename zstrm find-release functions · 2aea8493
      由 Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于 
      This has started as a 'add zlib support' work, but after some thinking I
saw no blockers for a bigger change -- a switch to crypto API.

We don't have an idle zstreams list anymore and our write path now works
absolutely differently, preventing preemption during compression.  This
removes possibilities of read paths preempting writes at wrong places
and opens the door for a move from custom LZO/LZ4 compression backends
implementation to a more generic one, using crypto compress API.

This patch set also eliminates the need of a new context-less crypto API
interface, which was quite hard to sell, so we can move along faster.

benchmarks:

(x86_64, 4GB, zram-perf script)

perf reported run-time fio (max jobs=3).  I performed fio test with the
increasing number of parallel jobs (max to 3) on a 3G zram device, using
`static' data and the following crypto comp algorithms:

	842, deflate, lz4, lz4hc, lzo

the output was:

 - test running time (which can tell us what algorithms performs faster)

and

 - zram mm_stat (which tells the compressed memory size, max used memory, etc).

It's just for information.  for example, LZ4HC has twice the running
time of LZO, but the compressed memory size is: 23592960 vs 34603008
bytes.

  test-fio-zram-842
     197.907655282 seconds time elapsed
     201.623142884 seconds time elapsed
     226.854291345 seconds time elapsed
  test-fio-zram-DEFLATE
     253.259516155 seconds time elapsed
     258.148563401 seconds time elapsed
     290.251909365 seconds time elapsed
  test-fio-zram-LZ4
      27.022598717 seconds time elapsed
      29.580522717 seconds time elapsed
      33.293463430 seconds time elapsed
  test-fio-zram-LZ4HC
      56.393954615 seconds time elapsed
      74.904659747 seconds time elapsed
     101.940998564 seconds time elapsed
  test-fio-zram-LZO
      28.155948075 seconds time elapsed
      30.390036330 seconds time elapsed
      34.455773159 seconds time elapsed

zram mm_stat-s (max fio jobs=3)

  test-fio-zram-842
  mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472 673185792 690266112        0 690266112        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472 673185792 690266112        0 690266112        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472 673185792 690266112        0 690266112        0        0
  test-fio-zram-DEFLATE
  mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  24379392  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  24379392  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  24379392  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  test-fio-zram-LZ4
  mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  test-fio-zram-LZ4HC
  mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  23592960  37761024        0  37761024        0        0
  test-fio-zram-LZO
  mm_stat (jobs1): 3221225472  34603008  50335744        0  50335744        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs2): 3221225472  34603008  50335744        0  50335744        0        0
  mm_stat (jobs3): 3221225472  34603008  50335744        0  50339840        0        0

This patch (of 8):

We don't perform any zstream idle list lookup anymore, so
zcomp_strm_find()/zcomp_strm_release() names are not representative.

Rename to zcomp_stream_get()/zcomp_stream_put().

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531122017.2878-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2aea8493
  41. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  43. 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交