Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 6月, 2021 27 次提交
  3. 22 6月, 2021 13 次提交
    • B
      Revert "net/sched: cls_flower: Remove match on n_proto" · 6d551617
      由 Boris Sukholitko 提交于 
      This reverts commit 0dca2c74.

The commit in question breaks hardware offload of flower filters.

Quoting Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>:

 fl_hw_replace_filter() and fl_reoffload() create a struct
 flow_cls_offload with a rule->match.mask member derived from the mask
 of the software classifier: &f->mask->key - that same mask that is used
 for initializing the flow dissector keys, and the one from which Boris
 removed the basic.n_proto member because it was bothering him.
Reported-by: NVadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBoris Sukholitko <boris.sukholitko@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6d551617
    • Y
      net: add pf_family_names[] for protocol family · fe0bdbde
      由 Yejune Deng 提交于 
      Modify the pr_info content from int to char * in sock_register() and
sock_unregister(), this looks more readable.

Fixed build error in ARCH=sparc64.
Signed-off-by: NYejune Deng <yejune.deng@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      fe0bdbde
    • V
      net: dsa: remove cross-chip support from the MRP notifiers · f9bcdc36
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      With MRP hardware assist being supported only by the ocelot switch
family, which by design does not support cross-chip bridging, the
current match functions are at best a guess and have not been confirmed
in any way to do anything relevant in a multi-switch topology.

Drop the code and make the notifiers match only on the targeted switch
port.

Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f9bcdc36
    • V
      net: dsa: targeted MTU notifiers should only match on one port · 88faba20
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      dsa_slave_change_mtu() calls dsa_port_mtu_change() twice:
- it sends a cross-chip notifier with the MTU of the CPU port which is
  used to update the DSA links.
- it sends one targeted MTU notifier which is supposed to only match the
  user port on which we are changing the MTU. The "propagate_upstream"
  variable is used here to bypass the cross-chip notifier system from
  switch.c

But due to a mistake, the second, targeted notifier matches not only on
the user port, but also on the DSA link which is a member of the same
switch, if that exists.

And because the DSA links of the entire dst were programmed in a
previous round to the largest_mtu via a "propagate_upstream == true"
notification, then the dsa_port_mtu_change(propagate_upstream == false)
call that is immediately upcoming will break the MTU on the one DSA link
which is chip-wise local to the dp whose MTU is changing right now.

Example given this daisy chain topology:

   sw0p0     sw0p1     sw0p2     sw0p3     sw0p4
[  cpu  ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  user ]
[   x   ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ] [       ]
                                  |
                                  +---------+
                                            |
   sw1p0     sw1p1     sw1p2     sw1p3     sw1p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  dsa  ]
[       ] [       ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ]

ip link set sw0p1 mtu 9000
ip link set sw1p1 mtu 9000 # at this stage, sw0p1 and sw1p1 can talk
                           # to one another using jumbo frames
ip link set sw0p2 mtu 1500 # this programs the sw0p3 DSA link first to
                           # the largest_mtu of 9000, then reprograms it to
                           # 1500 with the "propagate_upstream == false"
                           # notifier, breaking communication between
                           # sw0p1 and sw1p1

To escape from this situation, make the targeted match really match on a
single port - the user port, and rename the "propagate_upstream"
variable to "targeted_match" to clarify the intention and avoid future
issues.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      88faba20
    • V
      net: dsa: calculate the largest_mtu across all ports in the tree · 4e4ab795
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      If we have a cross-chip topology like this:

   sw0p0     sw0p1     sw0p2     sw0p3     sw0p4
[  cpu  ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  user ]
                                  |
                                  +---------+
                                            |
   sw1p0     sw1p1     sw1p2     sw1p3     sw1p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  dsa  ]

and we issue the following commands:

1. ip link set sw0p1 mtu 1700
2. ip link set sw1p1 mtu 1600

we notice the following happening:

Command 1. emits a non-targeted MTU notifier for the CPU port (sw0p0)
with the largest_mtu calculated across switch 0, of 1700. This matches
sw0p0, sw0p3 and sw1p4 (all CPU ports and DSA links).
Then, it emits a targeted MTU notifier for the user port (sw0p1), again
with MTU 1700 (this doesn't matter).

Command 2. emits a non-targeted MTU notifier for the CPU port (sw0p0)
with the largest_mtu calculated across switch 1, of 1600. This matches
the same group of ports as above, and decreases the MTU for the CPU port
and the DSA links from 1700 to 1600.

As a result, the sw0p1 user port can no longer communicate with its CPU
port at MTU 1700.

To address this, we should calculate the largest_mtu across all switches
that may share a CPU port, and only emit MTU notifiers with that value.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4e4ab795
    • V
      net: dsa: execute dsa_switch_mdb_add only for routing port in cross-chip topologies · abd49535
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Currently, the notifier for adding a multicast MAC address matches on
the targeted port and on all DSA links in the system, be they upstream
or downstream links.

This leads to a considerable amount of useless traffic.

Consider this daisy chain topology, and a MDB add notifier emitted on
sw0p0. It matches on sw0p0, sw0p3, sw1p3 and sw2p4.

   sw0p0     sw0p1     sw0p2     sw0p3     sw0p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  cpu  ]
[   x   ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ] [       ]
                                  |
                                  +---------+
                                            |
   sw1p0     sw1p1     sw1p2     sw1p3     sw1p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  dsa  ]
[       ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ] [   x   ]
                                  |
                                  +---------+
                                            |
   sw2p0     sw2p1     sw2p2     sw2p3     sw2p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ]
[       ] [       ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ]

But switch 0 has no reason to send the multicast traffic for that MAC
address on sw0p3, which is how it reaches switches 1 and 2. Those
switches don't expect, according to the user configuration, to receive
this multicast address from switch 1, and they will drop it anyway,
because the only valid destination is the port they received it on.
They only need to configure themselves to deliver that multicast address
_towards_ switch 1, where the MDB entry is installed.

Similarly, switch 1 should not send this multicast traffic towards
sw1p3, because that is how it reaches switch 2.

With this change, the heat map for this MDB notifier changes as follows:

   sw0p0     sw0p1     sw0p2     sw0p3     sw0p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  cpu  ]
[   x   ] [       ] [       ] [       ] [       ]
                                  |
                                  +---------+
                                            |
   sw1p0     sw1p1     sw1p2     sw1p3     sw1p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ] [  dsa  ]
[       ] [       ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ]
                                  |
                                  +---------+
                                            |
   sw2p0     sw2p1     sw2p2     sw2p3     sw2p4
[  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  user ] [  dsa  ]
[       ] [       ] [       ] [       ] [   x   ]

Now the mdb notifier behaves the same as the fdb notifier.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      abd49535
    • V
      net: dsa: export the dsa_port_is_{user,cpu,dsa} helpers · a8986681
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      The difference between dsa_is_user_port and dsa_port_is_user is that the
former needs to look up the list of ports of the DSA switch tree in
order to find the struct dsa_port, while the latter directly receives it
as an argument.

dsa_is_user_port is already in widespread use and has its place, so
there isn't any chance of converting all callers to a single form.
But being able to do:
	dsa_port_is_user(dp)
instead of
	dsa_is_user_port(dp->ds, dp->index)

is much more efficient too, especially when the "dp" comes from an
iterator over the DSA switch tree - this reduces the complexity from
quadratic to linear.

Move these helpers from dsa2.c to include/net/dsa.h so that others can
use them too.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a8986681
    • V
      net: dsa: assert uniqueness of dsa,member properties · 8674f8d3
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      The cross-chip notifiers work by comparing each ds->index against the
info->sw_index value from the notifier. The ds->index is retrieved from
the device tree dsa,member property.

If a single tree cross-chip topology does not declare unique switch IDs,
this will result in hard-to-debug issues/voodoo effects such as the
cross-chip notifier for one switch port also matching the port with the
same number from another switch.

Check in dsa_switch_parse_member_of() whether the DSA switch tree
contains a DSA switch with the index we're preparing to add, before
actually adding it.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8674f8d3
    • A
      __unix_find_socket_byname(): don't pass hash and type separately · be752283
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      We only care about exclusive or of those, so pass that directly.
Makes life simpler for callers as well...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      be752283
    • A
      unix_bind_bsd(): unlink if we fail after successful mknod · c0c3b8d3
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      We can do that more or less safely, since the parent is
held locked all along.  Yes, somebody might observe the
object via dcache, only to have it disappear afterwards,
but there's really no good way to prevent that.  It won't
race with other bind(2) or attempts to move the sucker
elsewhere, or put something else in its place - locked
parent prevents that.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c0c3b8d3
    • A
      unix_bind_bsd(): move done_path_create() call after dealing with ->bindlock · 56c1731b
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Final preparations for doing unlink on failure past the successful
mknod.  We can't hold ->bindlock over ->mknod() or ->unlink(), since
either might do sb_start_write() (e.g. on overlayfs).  However, we
can do it while holding filesystem and VFS locks - doing
	kern_path_create()
	vfs_mknod()
	grab ->bindlock
	if u->addr had been set
		drop ->bindlock
		done_path_create
		return -EINVAL
	else
		assign the address to socket
		drop ->bindlock
		done_path_create
		return 0
would be deadlock-free.  Here we massage unix_bind_bsd() to that
form.  We are still doing equivalent transformations.

Next commit will *not* be an equivalent transformation - it will
add a call of vfs_unlink() before done_path_create() in "alread bound"
case.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      56c1731b
    • A
      fold unix_mknod() into unix_bind_bsd() · 71e6be6f
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      71e6be6f
    • A
      unix_bind(): take BSD and abstract address cases into new helpers · fa42d910
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      unix_bind_bsd() and unix_bind_abstract() respectively.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      fa42d910