1. 13 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      context_tracking: Remove full dynticks' hacky dependency on wide context tracking · d84d27a4
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Now that the full dynticks subsystem only enables the context tracking
      on full dynticks CPUs, lets remove the dependency on CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE
      
      This dependency was a hack to enable the context tracking widely for the
      full dynticks susbsystem until the latter becomes able to enable it in a
      more CPU-finegrained fashion.
      
      Now CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE only stands for testing on archs that
      work on support for the context tracking while full dynticks can't be
      used yet due to unmet dependencies. It simulates a system where all CPUs
      are full dynticks so that RCU user extended quiescent states and dynticks
      cputime accounting can be tested on the given arch.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      d84d27a4
  2. 10 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 08 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 04 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 25 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      build some drivers only when compile-testing · 4bb16672
      Jiri Slaby 提交于
      Some drivers can be built on more platforms than they run on. This is
      a burden for users and distributors who package a kernel. They have to
      manually deselect some (for them useless) drivers when updating their
      configs via oldconfig. And yet, sometimes it is even impossible to
      disable the drivers without patching the kernel.
      
      Introduce a new config option COMPILE_TEST and make all those drivers
      to depend on the platform they run on, or on the COMPILE_TEST option.
      Now, when users/distributors choose COMPILE_TEST=n they will not have
      the drivers in their allmodconfig setups, but developers still can
      compile-test them with COMPILE_TEST=y.
      
      Now the drivers where we use this new option:
      * PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH: The PCH EG20T is only compatible with Intel Atom
        processors so it should depend on x86.
      * FB_GEODE: Geode is 32-bit only so only enable it for X86_32.
      * USB_CHIPIDEA_IMX: The OF_DEVICE dependency will be met on powerpc
        systems -- which do not actually support the hardware via that
        method.
      * INTEL_MID_PTI: It is specific to the Penwell type of Intel Atom
        device.
      
      [v2]
      * remove EXPERT dependency
      
      [gregkh - remove chipidea portion, as it's incorrect, and also doesn't
       apply to my driver-core tree]
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
      Cc: linux-geode@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
      Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
      Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      4bb16672
  6. 13 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 11 6月, 2013 4 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Remove TINY_PREEMPT_RCU · 127781d1
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      TINY_PREEMPT_RCU adds significant code and complexity, but does not
      offer commensurate benefits.  People currently using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
      can get much better memory footprint with TINY_RCU, or, if they really
      need preemptible RCU, they can use TREE_PREEMPT_RCU with a relatively
      minor degradation in memory footprint.  Please note that this move
      has been widely publicized on LKML (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/545)
      and on LWN (http://lwn.net/Articles/541037/).
      
      This commit therefore removes TINY_PREEMPT_RCU.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      [ paulmck: Updated to eliminate #else in rcutiny.h as suggested by Josh ]
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
      127781d1
    • P
      rcu: Apply Dave Jones's NOCB Kconfig help feedback · 676c3dc2
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      The Kconfig help text for the RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE, RCU_NOCB_CPU_ZERO,
      and RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL Kconfig options was unclear, so this commit
      adds a bit more detail.
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      676c3dc2
    • P
      rcu: Remove "Experimental" flags · 9a5739d7
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      After a release or two, features are no longer experimental.  Therefore,
      this commit removes the "Experimental" tag from them.
      Reported-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
      9a5739d7
    • S
      rcu: Don't call wakeup() with rcu_node structure ->lock held · 016a8d5b
      Steven Rostedt 提交于
      This commit fixes a lockdep-detected deadlock by moving a wake_up()
      call out from a rnp->lock critical section.  Please see below for
      the long version of this story.
      
      On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 16:13 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
      
      > [12572.705832] ======================================================
      > [12572.750317] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      > [12572.796978] 3.10.0-rc3+ #39 Not tainted
      > [12572.833381] -------------------------------------------------------
      > [12572.862233] trinity-child17/31341 is trying to acquire lock:
      > [12572.870390]  (rcu_node_0){..-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff811054ff>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0
      > [12572.878859]
      > but task is already holding lock:
      > [12572.894894]  (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff811390ed>] perf_lock_task_context+0x7d/0x2d0
      > [12572.903381]
      > which lock already depends on the new lock.
      >
      > [12572.927541]
      > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      > [12572.943736]
      > -> #4 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}:
      > [12572.960032]        [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0
      > [12572.968337]        [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
      > [12572.976633]        [<ffffffff8113c987>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x2e7/0x5e0
      > [12572.984969]        [<ffffffff81088953>] perf_event_task_sched_out+0x93/0xa0
      > [12572.993326]        [<ffffffff816ea0bf>] __schedule+0x2cf/0x9c0
      > [12573.001652]        [<ffffffff816eacfe>] schedule_user+0x2e/0x70
      > [12573.009998]        [<ffffffff816ecd64>] retint_careful+0x12/0x2e
      > [12573.018321]
      > -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
      > [12573.034628]        [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0
      > [12573.042930]        [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
      > [12573.051248]        [<ffffffff8108e6a7>] wake_up_new_task+0xb7/0x260
      > [12573.059579]        [<ffffffff810492f5>] do_fork+0x105/0x470
      > [12573.067880]        [<ffffffff81049686>] kernel_thread+0x26/0x30
      > [12573.076202]        [<ffffffff816cee63>] rest_init+0x23/0x140
      > [12573.084508]        [<ffffffff81ed8e1f>] start_kernel+0x3f1/0x3fe
      > [12573.092852]        [<ffffffff81ed856f>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
      > [12573.101233]        [<ffffffff81ed863d>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xcc/0xcf
      > [12573.109528]
      > -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
      > [12573.125675]        [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0
      > [12573.133829]        [<ffffffff816ebe9b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
      > [12573.141964]        [<ffffffff8108e881>] try_to_wake_up+0x31/0x320
      > [12573.150065]        [<ffffffff8108ebe2>] default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
      > [12573.158151]        [<ffffffff8107bbf8>] autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x40
      > [12573.166195]        [<ffffffff81085398>] __wake_up_common+0x58/0x90
      > [12573.174215]        [<ffffffff81086909>] __wake_up+0x39/0x50
      > [12573.182146]        [<ffffffff810fc3da>] rcu_start_gp_advanced.isra.11+0x4a/0x50
      > [12573.190119]        [<ffffffff810fdb09>] rcu_start_future_gp+0x1c9/0x1f0
      > [12573.198023]        [<ffffffff810fe2c4>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x114/0x930
      > [12573.205860]        [<ffffffff8107a91d>] kthread+0xed/0x100
      > [12573.213656]        [<ffffffff816f4b1c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      > [12573.221379]
      > -> #1 (&rsp->gp_wq){..-.-.}:
      > [12573.236329]        [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0
      > [12573.243783]        [<ffffffff816ebe9b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
      > [12573.251178]        [<ffffffff810868f3>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
      > [12573.258505]        [<ffffffff810fc3da>] rcu_start_gp_advanced.isra.11+0x4a/0x50
      > [12573.265891]        [<ffffffff810fdb09>] rcu_start_future_gp+0x1c9/0x1f0
      > [12573.273248]        [<ffffffff810fe2c4>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x114/0x930
      > [12573.280564]        [<ffffffff8107a91d>] kthread+0xed/0x100
      > [12573.287807]        [<ffffffff816f4b1c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      
      Notice the above call chain.
      
      rcu_start_future_gp() is called with the rnp->lock held. Then it calls
      rcu_start_gp_advance, which does a wakeup.
      
      You can't do wakeups while holding the rnp->lock, as that would mean
      that you could not do a rcu_read_unlock() while holding the rq lock, or
      any lock that was taken while holding the rq lock. This is because...
      (See below).
      
      > [12573.295067]
      > -> #0 (rcu_node_0){..-.-.}:
      > [12573.309293]        [<ffffffff810b8d36>] __lock_acquire+0x1786/0x1af0
      > [12573.316568]        [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0
      > [12573.323825]        [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
      > [12573.331081]        [<ffffffff811054ff>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0
      > [12573.338377]        [<ffffffff810760a6>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x96/0xa0
      > [12573.345648]        [<ffffffff811391b3>] perf_lock_task_context+0x143/0x2d0
      > [12573.352942]        [<ffffffff8113938e>] find_get_context+0x4e/0x1f0
      > [12573.360211]        [<ffffffff811403f4>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x514/0xbd0
      > [12573.367514]        [<ffffffff81140e49>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0x10
      > [12573.374816]        [<ffffffff816f4dd4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
      
      Notice the above trace.
      
      perf took its own ctx->lock, which can be taken while holding the rq
      lock. While holding this lock, it did a rcu_read_unlock(). The
      perf_lock_task_context() basically looks like:
      
      rcu_read_lock();
      raw_spin_lock(ctx->lock);
      rcu_read_unlock();
      
      Now, what looks to have happened, is that we scheduled after taking that
      first rcu_read_lock() but before taking the spin lock. When we scheduled
      back in and took the ctx->lock, the following rcu_read_unlock()
      triggered the "special" code.
      
      The rcu_read_unlock_special() takes the rnp->lock, which gives us a
      possible deadlock scenario.
      
      	CPU0		CPU1		CPU2
      	----		----		----
      
      				     rcu_nocb_kthread()
          lock(rq->lock);
      		    lock(ctx->lock);
      				     lock(rnp->lock);
      
      				     wake_up();
      
      				     lock(rq->lock);
      
      		    rcu_read_unlock();
      
      		    rcu_read_unlock_special();
      
      		    lock(rnp->lock);
          lock(ctx->lock);
      
      **** DEADLOCK ****
      
      > [12573.382068]
      > other info that might help us debug this:
      >
      > [12573.403229] Chain exists of:
      >   rcu_node_0 --> &rq->lock --> &ctx->lock
      >
      > [12573.424471]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      >
      > [12573.438499]        CPU0                    CPU1
      > [12573.445599]        ----                    ----
      > [12573.452691]   lock(&ctx->lock);
      > [12573.459799]                                lock(&rq->lock);
      > [12573.467010]                                lock(&ctx->lock);
      > [12573.474192]   lock(rcu_node_0);
      > [12573.481262]
      >  *** DEADLOCK ***
      >
      > [12573.501931] 1 lock held by trinity-child17/31341:
      > [12573.508990]  #0:  (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff811390ed>] perf_lock_task_context+0x7d/0x2d0
      > [12573.516475]
      > stack backtrace:
      > [12573.530395] CPU: 1 PID: 31341 Comm: trinity-child17 Not tainted 3.10.0-rc3+ #39
      > [12573.545357]  ffffffff825b4f90 ffff880219f1dbc0 ffffffff816e375b ffff880219f1dc00
      > [12573.552868]  ffffffff816dfa5d ffff880219f1dc50 ffff88023ce4d1f8 ffff88023ce4ca40
      > [12573.560353]  0000000000000001 0000000000000001 ffff88023ce4d1f8 ffff880219f1dcc0
      > [12573.567856] Call Trace:
      > [12573.575011]  [<ffffffff816e375b>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
      > [12573.582284]  [<ffffffff816dfa5d>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20f
      > [12573.589637]  [<ffffffff810b8d36>] __lock_acquire+0x1786/0x1af0
      > [12573.596982]  [<ffffffff810918f5>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb5/0x100
      > [12573.604344]  [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0
      > [12573.611652]  [<ffffffff811054ff>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0
      > [12573.619030]  [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
      > [12573.626331]  [<ffffffff811054ff>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0
      > [12573.633671]  [<ffffffff811054ff>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0
      > [12573.640992]  [<ffffffff811390ed>] ? perf_lock_task_context+0x7d/0x2d0
      > [12573.648330]  [<ffffffff810b429e>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.29+0xe/0x40
      > [12573.655662]  [<ffffffff813095a0>] ? delay_tsc+0x90/0xe0
      > [12573.662964]  [<ffffffff810760a6>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x96/0xa0
      > [12573.670276]  [<ffffffff811391b3>] perf_lock_task_context+0x143/0x2d0
      > [12573.677622]  [<ffffffff81139070>] ? __perf_event_enable+0x370/0x370
      > [12573.684981]  [<ffffffff8113938e>] find_get_context+0x4e/0x1f0
      > [12573.692358]  [<ffffffff811403f4>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x514/0xbd0
      > [12573.699753]  [<ffffffff8108cd9d>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50
      > [12573.707135]  [<ffffffff810b71fd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0
      > [12573.714599]  [<ffffffff81140e49>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0x10
      > [12573.721996]  [<ffffffff816f4dd4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
      
      This commit delays the wakeup via irq_work(), which is what
      perf and ftrace use to perform wakeups in critical sections.
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      016a8d5b
  8. 04 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 04 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      rcu: Fix full dynticks' dependency on wide RCU nocb mode · 73c30828
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Commit 0637e029
      ("nohz: Select wide RCU nocb for full dynticks") intended
      to force CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y when full dynticks is
      enabled.
      
      However this option is part of a choice menu and Kconfig's
      "select" instruction has no effect on such targets.
      
      Fix this by using reverse dependencies on the targets we
      don't want instead.
      Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      73c30828
  10. 01 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      init/Kconfig: re-order CONFIG_EXPERT options to fix menuconfig display · 657a5209
      Mike Frysinger 提交于
      The kconfig language requires that dependent options all follow the
      menuconfig symbol in order to be collapsed below it.  Recently some hidden
      options were added below the EXPERT menuconfig, but did not depend on
      EXPERT (because hidden options can't).  This broke the display.  So
      re-order all these options, and while we're here stick the PCI quirks
      under the EXPERT menu (since it isn't sitting with any related options).
      
      Before this commit, we get:
      	[*] Configure standard kernel features (expert users)  --->
      	[ ] Sysctl syscall support
      	[*] Load all symbols for debugging/ksymoops
      	...
      	[ ] Embedded system
      
      Now we get the older (and correct) behavior:
      	[*] Configure standard kernel features (expert users)  --->
      	[ ] Embedded system
      And if you go into the expert menu you get the expert options:
      	[ ] Sysctl syscall support
      	[*] Load all symbols for debugging/ksymoops
      	...
      Signed-off-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
      Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
      Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
      Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      657a5209
  11. 27 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      nohz: Select VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN from full dynticks config · c58b0df1
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Turn the full dynticks passive dependency on VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
      to an active one.
      
      The full dynticks Kconfig is currently hidden behind the full dynticks
      cputime accounting, which is an awkward and counter-intuitive layout:
      the user first has to select the dynticks cputime accounting in order
      to make the full dynticks feature to be visible.
      
      We definetly want it the other way around. The usual way to perform
      this kind of active dependency is use "select" on the depended target.
      Now we can't use the Kconfig "select" instruction when the target is
      a "choice".
      
      So this patch inspires on how the RCU subsystem Kconfig interact
      with its dependencies on SMP and PREEMPT: we make sure that cputime
      accounting can't propose another option than VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
      when NO_HZ_FULL is selected by using the right "depends on" instruction
      for each cputime accounting choices.
      
      v2: Keep full dynticks cputime accounting available even without
      full dynticks, as per Paul McKenney's suggestion.
      Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      c58b0df1
  12. 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      nohz: Rename CONFIG_NO_HZ to CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON · 3451d024
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      We are planning to convert the dynticks Kconfig options layout
      into a choice menu. The user must be able to easily pick
      any of the following implementations: constant periodic tick,
      idle dynticks, full dynticks.
      
      As this implies a mutual exclusion, the two dynticks implementions
      need to converge on the selection of a common Kconfig option in order
      to ease the sharing of a common infrastructure.
      
      It would thus seem pretty natural to reuse CONFIG_NO_HZ to
      that end. It already implements all the idle dynticks code
      and the full dynticks depends on all that code for now.
      So ideally the choice menu would propose CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE and
      CONFIG_NO_HZ_EXTENDED then both would select CONFIG_NO_HZ.
      
      On the other hand we want to stay backward compatible: if
      CONFIG_NO_HZ is set in an older config file, we want to
      enable CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE by default.
      
      But we can't afford both at the same time or we run into
      a circular dependency:
      
      1) CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE and CONFIG_NO_HZ_EXTENDED both select
         CONFIG_NO_HZ
      2) If CONFIG_NO_HZ is set, we default to CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE
      
      We might be able to support that from Kconfig/Kbuild but it
      may not be wise to introduce such a confusing behaviour.
      
      So to solve this, create a new CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON option
      which gathers the common code between idle and full dynticks
      (that common code for now is simply the idle dynticks code)
      and select it from their referring Kconfig.
      
      Then we'll later create CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE and map CONFIG_NO_HZ
      to it for backward compatibility.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
      Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
      Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      3451d024
  13. 26 3月, 2013 3 次提交
  14. 13 3月, 2013 2 次提交
    • K
      final removal of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL · 3d374d09
      Kees Cook 提交于
      Remove "config EXPERIMENTAL" itself, now that every "depends on" it has
      been removed from the tree.
      Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      3d374d09
    • P
      rcu: Remove restrictions on no-CBs CPUs · 34ed6246
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      Currently, CPU 0 is constrained to not be a no-CBs CPU, and furthermore
      at least one no-CBs CPU must remain online at any given time.  These
      restrictions are problematic in some situations, such as cases where
      all CPUs must run a real-time workload that needs to be insulated from
      OS jitter and latencies due to RCU callback invocation.  This commit
      therefore provides no-CBs CPUs a (very crude and energy-inefficient)
      way to start and to wait for grace periods independently of the normal
      RCU callback mechanisms.  This approach allows any or all of the CPUs to
      be designated as no-CBs CPUs, and allows any proper subset of the CPUs
      (whether no-CBs CPUs or not) to be offlined.
      
      This commit also provides a fix for a locking bug spotted by Xie
      ChanglongX <changlongx.xie@intel.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      34ed6246
  15. 08 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      context_tracking: Enable probes by default for selftesting · 8b438766
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Until we provide the nohz_mask boot parameter, keeping
      the context tracking probes disabled by default is pointless
      since what we want is to runtime test this code anyway.
      
      It's furthermore confusing for the users which don't expect
      the probes to be off when they select RCU user mode or full
      dynticks cputime accounting.
      
      Let's enable these probes selftests by default for now.
      
      Suggested: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
      Cc: Mats Liljegren <mats.liljegren@enea.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      8b438766
  16. 16 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 13 2月, 2013 8 次提交
  18. 12 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  19. 08 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  20. 29 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  21. 28 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      cputime: Generic on-demand virtual cputime accounting · abf917cd
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      If we want to stop the tick further idle, we need to be
      able to account the cputime without using the tick.
      
      Virtual based cputime accounting solves that problem by
      hooking into kernel/user boundaries.
      
      However implementing CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING require
      low level hooks and involves more overhead. But we already
      have a generic context tracking subsystem that is required
      for RCU needs by archs which plan to shut down the tick
      outside idle.
      
      This patch implements a generic virtual based cputime
      accounting that relies on these generic kernel/user hooks.
      
      There are some upsides of doing this:
      
      - This requires no arch code to implement CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
      if context tracking is already built (already necessary for RCU in full
      tickless mode).
      
      - We can rely on the generic context tracking subsystem to dynamically
      (de)activate the hooks, so that we can switch anytime between virtual
      and tick based accounting. This way we don't have the overhead
      of the virtual accounting when the tick is running periodically.
      
      And one downside:
      
      - There is probably more overhead than a native virtual based cputime
      accounting. But this relies on hooks that are already set anyway.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      abf917cd
  22. 27 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 25 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  24. 17 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • K
      Tell the world we gave up on pushing CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE · 3a55fb0d
      Kirill Smelkov 提交于
      In commit 281dc5c5 ("Give up on pushing CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE") we
      already changed the actual default value, but the help-text still
      suggested 'y'. Fix the help text too, for all the same reasons.
      
      Sadly, -Os keeps on generating some very suboptimal code for certain
      cases, to the point where any I$ miss upside is swamped by the downside.
      The main ones are:
      
       - using "rep movsb" for memcpy, even on CPU's where that is
         horrendously bad for performance.
      
       - not honoring branch prediction information, so any I$ footprint you
         win from smaller code, you lose from less code density in the I$.
      
       - using divide instructions when that is very expensive.
      Signed-off-by: NKirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3a55fb0d