1. 16 7月, 2020 2 次提交
  2. 09 7月, 2020 2 次提交
  3. 08 7月, 2020 4 次提交
  4. 20 6月, 2020 5 次提交
  5. 18 6月, 2020 5 次提交
  6. 15 6月, 2020 4 次提交
    • C
      bcache: pr_info() format clean up in bcache_device_init() · 4b25bbf5
      Coly Li 提交于
      scripts/checkpatch.pl reports following warning for patch
      ("bcache: check and adjust logical block size for backing devices"),
          WARNING: quoted string split across lines
          #146: FILE: drivers/md/bcache/super.c:896:
          +  pr_info("%s: sb/logical block size (%u) greater than page size "
          +	       "(%lu) falling back to device logical block size (%u)",
      
      There are two things to fix up,
      - The kernel message print should be in a single line.
      - pr_info() won't automatically add new line since v5.8, a '\n' should
        be added.
      
      This patch just does the above cleanup in bcache_device_init().
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      4b25bbf5
    • C
      bcache: use delayed kworker fo asynchronous devices registration · ee4a36f4
      Coly Li 提交于
      This patch changes the asynchronous registration kworker to a delayed
      kworker. There is probability queue_work() queues the async registration
      kworker to the same CPU (even though very little), then the process
      which writing sysfs interface to reigster bcache device may won't return
      immeidately. queue_delayed_work() in this patch will delay 10 jiffies
      before insert the kworker to run queue, which makes sure the registering
      process may always returns to user space in time.
      
      Fixes: 9e23ccf8 ("bcache: asynchronous devices registration")
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      ee4a36f4
    • M
      bcache: check and adjust logical block size for backing devices · dcacbc12
      Mauricio Faria de Oliveira 提交于
      It's possible for a block driver to set logical block size to
      a value greater than page size incorrectly; e.g. bcache takes
      the value from the superblock, set by the user w/ make-bcache.
      
      This causes a BUG/NULL pointer dereference in the path:
      
        __blkdev_get()
        -> set_init_blocksize() // set i_blkbits based on ...
           -> bdev_logical_block_size()
              -> queue_logical_block_size() // ... this value
        -> bdev_disk_changed()
           ...
           -> blkdev_readpage()
              -> block_read_full_page()
                 -> create_page_buffers() // size = 1 << i_blkbits
                    -> create_empty_buffers() // give size/take pointer
                       -> alloc_page_buffers() // return NULL
                       .. BUG!
      
      Because alloc_page_buffers() is called with size > PAGE_SIZE,
      thus it initializes head = NULL, skips the loop, return head;
      then create_empty_buffers() gets (and uses) the NULL pointer.
      
      This has been around longer than commit ad6bf88a ("block:
      fix an integer overflow in logical block size"); however, it
      increased the range of values that can trigger the issue.
      
      Previously only 8k/16k/32k (on x86/4k page size) would do it,
      as greater values overflow unsigned short to zero, and queue_
      logical_block_size() would then use the default of 512.
      
      Now the range with unsigned int is much larger, and users w/
      the 512k value, which happened to be zero'ed previously and
      work fine, started to hit this issue -- as the zero is gone,
      and queue_logical_block_size() does return 512k (>PAGE_SIZE.)
      
      Fix this by checking the bcache device's logical block size,
      and if it's greater than page size, fallback to the backing/
      cached device's logical page size.
      
      This doesn't affect cache devices as those are still checked
      for block/page size in read_super(); only the backing/cached
      devices are not.
      
      Apparently it's a regression from commit 2903381f ("bcache:
      Take data offset from the bdev superblock."), moving the check
      into BCACHE_SB_VERSION_CDEV only. Now that we have superblocks
      of backing devices out there with this larger value, we cannot
      refuse to load them (i.e., have a similar check in _BDEV.)
      
      Ideally perhaps bcache should use all values from the backing
      device (physical/logical/io_min block size)? But for now just
      fix the problematic case.
      
      Test-case:
      
          # IMG=/root/disk.img
          # dd if=/dev/zero of=$IMG bs=1 count=0 seek=1G
          # DEV=$(losetup --find --show $IMG)
          # make-bcache --bdev $DEV --block 8k
            < see dmesg >
      
      Before:
      
          # uname -r
          5.7.0-rc7
      
          [   55.944046] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
          ...
          [   55.949742] CPU: 3 PID: 610 Comm: bcache-register Not tainted 5.7.0-rc7 #4
          ...
          [   55.952281] RIP: 0010:create_empty_buffers+0x1a/0x100
          ...
          [   55.966434] Call Trace:
          [   55.967021]  create_page_buffers+0x48/0x50
          [   55.967834]  block_read_full_page+0x49/0x380
          [   55.972181]  do_read_cache_page+0x494/0x610
          [   55.974780]  read_part_sector+0x2d/0xaa
          [   55.975558]  read_lba+0x10e/0x1e0
          [   55.977904]  efi_partition+0x120/0x5a6
          [   55.980227]  blk_add_partitions+0x161/0x390
          [   55.982177]  bdev_disk_changed+0x61/0xd0
          [   55.982961]  __blkdev_get+0x350/0x490
          [   55.983715]  __device_add_disk+0x318/0x480
          [   55.984539]  bch_cached_dev_run+0xc5/0x270
          [   55.986010]  register_bcache.cold+0x122/0x179
          [   55.987628]  kernfs_fop_write+0xbc/0x1a0
          [   55.988416]  vfs_write+0xb1/0x1a0
          [   55.989134]  ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0
          [   55.989825]  do_syscall_64+0x43/0x140
          [   55.990563]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
          [   55.991519] RIP: 0033:0x7f7d60ba3154
          ...
      
      After:
      
          # uname -r
          5.7.0.bcachelbspgsz
      
          [   31.672460] bcache: bcache_device_init() bcache0: sb/logical block size (8192) greater than page size (4096) falling back to device logical block size (512)
          [   31.675133] bcache: register_bdev() registered backing device loop0
      
          # grep ^ /sys/block/bcache0/queue/*_block_size
          /sys/block/bcache0/queue/logical_block_size:512
          /sys/block/bcache0/queue/physical_block_size:8192
      Reported-by: NRyan Finnie <ryan@finnie.org>
      Reported-by: NSebastian Marsching <sebastian@marsching.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      dcacbc12
    • Z
      bcache: fix potential deadlock problem in btree_gc_coalesce · be23e837
      Zhiqiang Liu 提交于
      coccicheck reports:
        drivers/md//bcache/btree.c:1538:1-7: preceding lock on line 1417
      
      In btree_gc_coalesce func, if the coalescing process fails, we will goto
      to out_nocoalesce tag directly without releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock.
      Then, it will cause a deadlock when trying to acquire new_nodes[i]->
      write_lock for freeing new_nodes[i] before return.
      
      btree_gc_coalesce func details as follows:
      	if alloc new_nodes[i] fails:
      		goto out_nocoalesce;
      	// obtain new_nodes[i]->write_lock
      	mutex_lock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock)
      	// main coalescing process
      	for (i = nodes - 1; i > 0; --i)
      		[snipped]
      		if coalescing process fails:
      			// Here, directly goto out_nocoalesce
      			 // tag will cause a deadlock
      			goto out_nocoalesce;
      		[snipped]
      	// release new_nodes[i]->write_lock
      	mutex_unlock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock)
      	// coalesing succ, return
      	return;
      out_nocoalesce:
      	btree_node_free(new_nodes[i])	// free new_nodes[i]
      	// obtain new_nodes[i]->write_lock
      	mutex_lock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock);
      	// set flag for reuse
      	clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_dirty, &ew_nodes[i]->flags);
      	// release new_nodes[i]->write_lock
      	mutex_unlock(&new_nodes[i]->write_lock);
      
      To fix the problem, we add a new tag 'out_unlock_nocoalesce' for
      releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock before out_nocoalesce tag. If
      coalescing process fails, we will go to out_unlock_nocoalesce tag
      for releasing new_nodes[i]->write_lock before free new_nodes[i] in
      out_nocoalesce tag.
      
      (Coly Li helps to clean up commit log format.)
      
      Fixes: 2a285686 ("bcache: btree locking rework")
      Signed-off-by: NZhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      be23e837
  7. 14 6月, 2020 1 次提交
    • M
      treewide: replace '---help---' in Kconfig files with 'help' · a7f7f624
      Masahiro Yamada 提交于
      Since commit 84af7a61 ("checkpatch: kconfig: prefer 'help' over
      '---help---'"), the number of '---help---' has been gradually
      decreasing, but there are still more than 2400 instances.
      
      This commit finishes the conversion. While I touched the lines,
      I also fixed the indentation.
      
      There are a variety of indentation styles found.
      
        a) 4 spaces + '---help---'
        b) 7 spaces + '---help---'
        c) 8 spaces + '---help---'
        d) 1 space + 1 tab + '---help---'
        e) 1 tab + '---help---'    (correct indentation)
        f) 1 tab + 1 space + '---help---'
        g) 1 tab + 2 spaces + '---help---'
      
      In order to convert all of them to 1 tab + 'help', I ran the
      following commend:
      
        $ find . -name 'Kconfig*' | xargs sed -i 's/^[[:space:]]*---help---/\thelp/'
      Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
      a7f7f624
  8. 06 6月, 2020 17 次提交