1. 13 7月, 2011 13 次提交
  2. 12 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 29 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 28 6月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 27 6月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information · 2f7e33d4
      Miao Xie 提交于
      When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some
      delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again,
      we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to
      initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may
      cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the
      following oops:
      
      [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the
      insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17)
      [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301!
      [SNIP]
      [ 5447.790721] Call Trace:
      [ 5447.793191]  [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs]
      [ 5447.800156]  [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs]
      [ 5447.806517]  [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs]
      [ 5447.812876]  [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs]
      [ 5447.818961]  [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92
      [ 5447.824090]  [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b
      [ 5447.829133]  [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef
      [ 5447.834438]  [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44
      [ 5447.841216]  [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67
      [ 5447.847846]  [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87
      [ 5447.853156]  [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d
      [ 5447.859072]  [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80
      [ 5447.864636]  [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173
      [ 5447.870112]  [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26
      [ 5447.875682]  [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10
      [ 5447.880882]  [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae
      [ 5447.886153]  [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22
      [ 5447.891114]  [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      Fix it by reusing the old delayed node.
      Reported-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Tested-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      2f7e33d4
  6. 25 6月, 2011 20 次提交
  7. 24 6月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      Remove unneeded version.h includes from fs/ · 46e4edbf
      Jesper Juhl 提交于
      It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that some includes of
      linux/version.h were not needed in fs/ (fs/btrfs/ctree.h and
      fs/omfs/file.c).
      
      This patch removes them.
      Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
      Acked-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      46e4edbf
    • D
      xfs: prevent bogus assert when trying to remove non-existent attribute · 4a338212
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      If the attribute fork on an inode is in btree format and has
      multiple levels (i.e node format rather than leaf format), then a
      lookup failure will trigger an assert failure in xfs_da_path_shift
      if the flag XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT is not set. This flag is used to
      indicate to the directory btree code that not finding an entry is
      not a fatal error. In the case of doing a lookup for a directory
      name removal, this is valid as a user cannot insert an arbitrary
      name to remove from the directory btree.
      
      However, in the case of the attribute tree, a user has direct
      control over the attribute name and can ask for any random name to
      be removed without any validation. In this case, fsstress is asking
      for a non-existent user.selinux attribute to be removed, and that is
      causing xfs_da_path_shift() to fall off the bottom of the tree where
      it asserts that a lookup failure is allowed. Because the flag is not
      set, we die a horrible death on a debug enable kernel.
      
      Prevent this assert from firing on attribute removes by adding the
      op_flag XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT to atribute removal operations.
      
      Discovered when testing on a SELinux enabled system by fsstress in
      test 070 by trying to remove a non-existent user.selinux attribute.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
      4a338212