Avoid the full blown memory barrier of test_and_set_bit() by noting the
completed request and removing it from the lists.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114135612.13210-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Originally, we used the signal->lock as a means of following the
previous link in its timeline and peeking at the previous fence.
However, we have replaced the explicit serialisation with a series of
very careful probes that anticipate the links being deleted and the
fences recycled before we are able to acquire a strong reference to it.
We do not need the signal->lock crutch anymore, nor want the contention.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114135612.13210-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When we know that we are inside the timeline mutex, or inside the
submission flow (under active.lock or the holder's rcu lock), we know
that the rq->hwsp is stable and we can use the simpler direct version.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114135612.13210-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When wedging the device, we cancel all outstanding requests and mark
them as EIO. Rather than duplicate the small function to do so between
each submission backend, export one.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210109163455.28466-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we use a flag within i915_request.flags to indicate when we have
boosted the request (so that we only apply the boost) once, this can be
used as the serialisation with i915_request_retire() to avoid having to
explicitly take the i915_request.lock which is more heavily contended.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201231093149.19086-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We only need to evaluate the current status of the context when it is
scheduled in, we will force a reschedule when the context is closed
propagating the change to inflight contexts.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201231093946.11649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we process schedule-in of a context after submitting the request,
if we decide to reset the context at that time, we also have to cancel
the requets we have marked for submission.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201230220028.17089-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Rather than having special case code for opportunistically calling
process_csb() and performing a direct submit while holding the engine
spinlock for submitting the request, simply call the tasklet directly.
This allows us to retain the direct submission path, including the CS
draining to allow fast/immediate submissions, without requiring any
duplicated code paths, and most importantly greatly simplifying the
control flow by removing reentrancy. This will enable us to close a few
races in the virtual engines in the next few patches.

The trickiest part here is to ensure that paired operations (such as
schedule_in/schedule_out) remain under consistent locking domains,
e.g. when pulled outside of the engine->active.lock

v2: Use bh kicking, see commit 3c53776e ("Mark HI and TASKLET
softirq synchronous").
v3: Update engine-reset to be tasklet aware
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

tasklet_kill() ensures that we _yield_ the processor until a remote
tasklet is completed. However, this leads to a starvation condition as
being at the bottom of the scheduler's runqueue means that anything else
is able to run, including all hogs keeping the tasklet occupied.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201220134858.10510-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Reduce the pollution of intel_engine.h by moving gen8_emit_pipe_control
and friends to gen8_engine_cs.h
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201216135452.6063-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since the introduction of preempt-to-busy, requests can complete in the
background, even while they are not on the engine->active.requests list.
As such, the engine->active.request list itself is not in strict
retirement order, and we have to scan the entire list while unwinding to
not miss any. However, if the request is completed we currently leave it
on the list [until retirement], but we could just as simply remove it
and stop treating it as active. We would only have to then traverse it
once while unwinding in quick succession.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201126140407.31952-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Get rid of the __call_single_node union and clean up the API a little
to avoid external code relying on the structure layout as much.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

We plan to expand upon the number of available statuses for when we
pretty-print the requests along the timelines, and so need a new set of
flags. We have settled upon:

	Unready [U]
	  - initial status after being submitted, the request is not
	    ready for execution as it is waiting for external fences

	Ready [R]
	  - all fences the request was waiting on have been signaled,
            and the request is now ready for execution and will be
	    in a backend queue

	  - a ready request may still need to wait on semaphores
	    [internal fences]

	Ready/virtual [V]
	  - same as ready, but queued over multiple backends

	Executing [E]
	  - the request has been transferred from the backend queue and
	    submitted for execution on HW

	  - a completed request may still be regarded as executing, its
	    status may not be updated until it is retired and removed
	    from the lists
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201119165616.10834-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Extract i915_request_show for reuse in other request chain pretty
printers.

For a bonus point, quietly change the seqno format from %llx to %lld to
match everywhere else.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201119165616.10834-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We'll use these in the new, lockless kretprobes code.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/159870619318.1229682.13027387548510028721.stgit@devnote2

We only allow persistent requests to remain on the GPU past the closure
of their containing context (and process) so long as they are continuously
checked for hangs or allow other requests to preempt them, as we need to
ensure forward progress of the system. If we allow persistent contexts
to remain on the system after the the hangcheck mechanism is disabled,
the system may grind to a halt. On disabling the mechanism, we sent a
pulse along the engine to remove all executing contexts from the engine
which would check for hung contexts -- but we did not prevent those
contexts from being resubmitted if they survived the final hangcheck.

Fixes: 9a40bddd ("drm/i915/gt: Expose heartbeat interval via sysfs")
Testcase: igt/gem_ctx_persistence/heartbeat-stop
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200928221510.26044-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 7a991cd3)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

The reordering and rebasing of commit 2e4c6c1a ("drm/i915: Remove
i915_request.lock requirement for execution callbacks") caused it to
revert an earlier correction. Let us restore commit 99f0a640d464
("drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding i915_request.lock for
breadcrumbs")

Fixes: 2e4c6c1a ("drm/i915: Remove i915_request.lock requirement for execution callbacks")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200925101107.27869-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 35faeb7d)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

We only allow persistent requests to remain on the GPU past the closure
of their containing context (and process) so long as they are continuously
checked for hangs or allow other requests to preempt them, as we need to
ensure forward progress of the system. If we allow persistent contexts
to remain on the system after the the hangcheck mechanism is disabled,
the system may grind to a halt. On disabling the mechanism, we sent a
pulse along the engine to remove all executing contexts from the engine
which would check for hung contexts -- but we did not prevent those
contexts from being resubmitted if they survived the final hangcheck.

Fixes: 9a40bddd ("drm/i915/gt: Expose heartbeat interval via sysfs")
Testcase: igt/gem_ctx_persistence/heartbeat-stop
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200928221510.26044-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The reordering and rebasing of commit 2e4c6c1a ("drm/i915: Remove
i915_request.lock requirement for execution callbacks") caused it to
revert an earlier correction. Let us restore commit 99f0a640d464
("drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding i915_request.lock for
breadcrumbs")

Fixes: 2e4c6c1a ("drm/i915: Remove i915_request.lock requirement for execution callbacks")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200925101107.27869-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

To implement preempt-to-busy (and so efficient timeslicing and best utilization
of the hardware submission ports) we let the GPU run asynchronously in respect
to the ELSP submission queue. This created challenges in keeping and accessing
the driver state mirroring the asynchronous GPU execution.

The latest occurence of this was spotted by KCSAN:

[ 1413.563200] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __await_execution+0x217/0x370 [i915]
[ 1413.563221]
[ 1413.563236] race at unknown origin, with read to 0xffff88885bb6c478 of 8 bytes by task 9654 on cpu 1:
[ 1413.563548]  __await_execution+0x217/0x370 [i915]
[ 1413.563891]  i915_request_await_dma_fence+0x4eb/0x6a0 [i915]
[ 1413.564235]  i915_request_await_object+0x421/0x490 [i915]
[ 1413.564577]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x29b7/0x3c40 [i915]
[ 1413.564967]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x22f/0x5c0 [i915]
[ 1413.564998]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0x156/0x1b0
[ 1413.565022]  drm_ioctl+0x2ff/0x480
[ 1413.565046]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xd0
[ 1413.565069]  do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x80
[ 1413.565094]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

To complicate matters, we have to both avoid the read tearing of *active and
avoid any write tearing as perform the pending[] -> inflight[] promotion of the
execlists.

This is because we cannot rely on the memcpy doing u64 aligned copies on all
kernels/platforms and so we opt to open-code it with explicit WRITE_ONCE
annotations to satisfy KCSAN.

v2: When in doubt, write the same comment again.
v3: Expanded commit message.

Fixes: b55230e5 ("drm/i915: Check for awaits on still currently executing requests")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716142207.13003-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Joonas: Rebased and reordered into drm-intel-gt-next branch]
[Joonas: Added expanded commit message from Tvrtko and Chris]
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit b4d9145b)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

To implement preempt-to-busy (and so efficient timeslicing and best utilization
of the hardware submission ports) we let the GPU run asynchronously in respect
to the ELSP submission queue. This created challenges in keeping and accessing
the driver state mirroring the asynchronous GPU execution.

Previous fix 1d9221e9 ("drm/i915: Skip signaling a signaled request")
however did not correctly serialize request retirement with the execution
callbacks.

We were using the i915_request.lock to serialise adding an execution callback
with __i915_request_submit. However, if we use an atomic llist_add to serialise
multiple waiters and then check to see if the request is already executing, we
can remove the irq-spinlock and fix serialization between retirement and
execution callbacks in one go.

v2: Avoid using the irq_work when outside of the irq-spinlocks, where we
can execute the callbacks immediately.
v3: Pay close attention to the order of setting ACTIVE on retirement, we
need to ensure the request is signaled and breadcrumbs detached before
we finish removing the request from the engine.
v4: Expanded commit message.

Fixes: 1d9221e9 ("drm/i915: Skip signaling a signaled request")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716142207.13003-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Joonas: Rebased and reordered into drm-intel-gt-next branch]
[Joonas: Added expanded commit message from Tvrtko and Chris]
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

To implement preempt-to-busy (and so efficient timeslicing and best utilization
of the hardware submission ports) we let the GPU run asynchronously in respect
to the ELSP submission queue. This created challenges in keeping and accessing
the driver state mirroring the asynchronous GPU execution.

The latest occurence of this was spotted by KCSAN:

[ 1413.563200] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __await_execution+0x217/0x370 [i915]
[ 1413.563221]
[ 1413.563236] race at unknown origin, with read to 0xffff88885bb6c478 of 8 bytes by task 9654 on cpu 1:
[ 1413.563548]  __await_execution+0x217/0x370 [i915]
[ 1413.563891]  i915_request_await_dma_fence+0x4eb/0x6a0 [i915]
[ 1413.564235]  i915_request_await_object+0x421/0x490 [i915]
[ 1413.564577]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x29b7/0x3c40 [i915]
[ 1413.564967]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x22f/0x5c0 [i915]
[ 1413.564998]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0x156/0x1b0
[ 1413.565022]  drm_ioctl+0x2ff/0x480
[ 1413.565046]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xd0
[ 1413.565069]  do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x80
[ 1413.565094]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

To complicate matters, we have to both avoid the read tearing of *active and
avoid any write tearing as perform the pending[] -> inflight[] promotion of the
execlists.

This is because we cannot rely on the memcpy doing u64 aligned copies on all
kernels/platforms and so we opt to open-code it with explicit WRITE_ONCE
annotations to satisfy KCSAN.

v2: When in doubt, write the same comment again.
v3: Expanded commit message.

Fixes: b55230e5 ("drm/i915: Check for awaits on still currently executing requests")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716142207.13003-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Joonas: Rebased and reordered into drm-intel-gt-next branch]
[Joonas: Added expanded commit message from Tvrtko and Chris]
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Currently we hold no actual reference to the request nor context while
they are attached to a breadcrumb. To avoid freeing the request/context
too early, we serialise with cancel-breadcrumbs by taking the irq
spinlock in i915_request_retire(). The alternative is to take a
reference for a new breadcrumb and release it upon signaling; removing
the more frequently hit contention point in i915_request_retire().
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200801160225.6814-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Joonas: Rebased and reordered into drm-intel-gt-next branch]
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

On the virtual engines, we only use the intel_breadcrumbs for tracking
signaling of stale breadcrumbs from the irq_workers. They do not have
any associated interrupt handling, active requests are passed to a
physical engine and associated breadcrumb interrupt handler. This causes
issues for us as we need to ensure that we do not actually try and
enable interrupts and the powermanagement required for them on the
virtual engine, as they will never be disabled. Instead, let's
specify the physical engine used for interrupt handler on a particular
breadcrumb.

v2: Drop b->irq_armed = true mocking for no interrupt HW

Fixes: 4fe6abb8 ("drm/i915/gt: Ignore irq enabling on the virtual engines")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

After staring at the breadcrumb enabling/cancellation and coming to the
conclusion that the cause of the mysterious stale breadcrumbs must the
act of submitting a completed requests, we can then redirect those
completed requests onto a dedicated signaled_list at the time of
construction and so eliminate intel_engine_transfer_stale_breadcrumbs().
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Since the breadcrumb enabling/cancelling itself is serialised by the
breadcrumbs.irq_lock, with a bit of care we can remove the outer
serialisation with i915_request.lock for concurrent
dma_fence_enable_signaling(). This has the important side-effect of
eliminating the nested i915_request.lock within request submission.

The challenge in serialisation is around the unsubmission where we take
an active request that wants a breadcrumb on the signaling engine and
put it to sleep. We do not want a concurrent
dma_fence_enable_signaling() to attach a breadcrumb as we unsubmit, so
we must mark the request as no longer active before serialising with the
concurrent enable-signaling.

On retire, we serialise with the concurrent enable-signaling, but
instead of clearing ACTIVE, we mark it as SIGNALED.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Joonas: Rebased and reordered into drm-intel-gt-next branch]
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

I915_GEM_THROTTLE dates back to the time before contexts where there was
just a single engine, and therefore a single timeline and request list
globally. That request list was in execution/retirement order, and so
walking it to find a particular aged request made sense and could be
split per file.

That is no more. We now have many timelines with a file, as many as the
user wants to construct (essentially per-engine, per-context). Each of
those run independently and so make the single list futile. Remove the
disordered list, and iterate over all the timelines to find a request to
wait on in each to satisfy the criteria that the CPU is no more than 20ms
ahead of its oldest request.

It should go without saying that the I915_GEM_THROTTLE ioctl is no
longer used as the primary means of throttling, so it makes sense to push
the complication into the ioctl where it only impacts upon its few
irregular users, rather than the execbuf/retire where everybody has to
pay the cost. Fortunately, the few users do not create vast amount of
contexts, so the loops over contexts/engines should be concise.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200728152010.30701-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

We include a tasklet flush before waiting on a request as a precaution
against the HW being lax in event signaling. We now have a precautionary
flush in the engine's heartbeat and so do not need to be quite so
zealous on every request wait. If we focus on the request, the only
tasklet flush that matters is if there is a delay in submitting this
request to HW, so if the request is not ready to be executed, no
advantage in reducing this wait can be gained by running the tasklet.
And there is little point in doing busy work for no result.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200715115147.11866-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Currently, we use i915_request_completed() directly in
i915_request_wait() and follow up with a manual invocation of
dma_fence_signal(). This appears to cause a large number of contentions
on i915_request.lock as when the process is woken up after the fence is
signaled by an interrupt, we will then try and call dma_fence_signal()
ourselves while the signaler is still holding the lock.
dma_fence_is_signaled() has the benefit of checking the
DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT prior to calling dma_fence_signal() and so
avoids most of that contention.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716100754.5670-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

It's been a while since gen6_rps_boost() [that only worked on gen6+] was
replaced by intel_rps_boost() that understood itself when rps was
active. Since the intel_rps_boost() is gen-agnostic, just call it.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200728152219.1387-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Preempt-to-busy introduces various fascinating complications in that the
requests may complete as we are unsubmitting them from HW. As they may
then signal after unsubmission, we may find ourselves having to cleanup
the signaling request from within the signaling callback. This causes us
to recurse onto the same i915_request.lock.

However, if the request is already signaled (as it will be before we
enter the signal callbacks), we know we can skip the signaling of that
request during submission, neatly evading the spinlock recursion.

unsubmit(ve.rq0) # timeslice expiration or other preemption
 -> virtual_submit_request(ve.rq0)
dma_fence_signal(ve.rq0) # request completed before preemption ack
 -> submit_notify(ve.rq1)
   -> virtual_submit_request(ve.rq1) # sees that we have completed ve.rq0
      -> __i915_request_submit(ve.rq0)

[  264.210142] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#2, sample_multi_tr/2093
[  264.210150]  lock: 0xffff9efd6ac55080, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: sample_multi_tr/2093, .owner_cpu: 2
[  264.210155] CPU: 2 PID: 2093 Comm: sample_multi_tr Tainted: G     U
[  264.210158] Hardware name: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake Client Platform/CoffeeLake S UDIMM RVP, BIOS CNLSFWR1.R00.X212.B01.1909060036 09/06/2019
[  264.210160] Call Trace:
[  264.210167]  dump_stack+0x98/0xda
[  264.210174]  spin_dump.cold+0x24/0x3c
[  264.210178]  do_raw_spin_lock+0x9a/0xd0
[  264.210184]  _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x6a/0x70
[  264.210314]  __i915_request_submit+0x10a/0x3c0 [i915]
[  264.210415]  virtual_submit_request+0x9b/0x380 [i915]
[  264.210516]  submit_notify+0xaf/0x14c [i915]
[  264.210602]  __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8a/0x230 [i915]
[  264.210692]  i915_sw_fence_complete+0x2d/0x40 [i915]
[  264.210762]  __dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x19/0x30 [i915]
[  264.210767]  dma_fence_signal_locked+0xb1/0x1c0
[  264.210772]  dma_fence_signal+0x29/0x50
[  264.210871]  i915_request_wait+0x5cb/0x830 [i915]
[  264.210876]  ? dma_resv_get_fences_rcu+0x294/0x5d0
[  264.210974]  i915_gem_object_wait_fence+0x2f/0x40 [i915]
[  264.211084]  i915_gem_object_wait+0xce/0x400 [i915]
[  264.211178]  i915_gem_wait_ioctl+0xff/0x290 [i915]

Fixes: 22b7a426 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
References: 6d06779e ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: "Nayana, Venkata Ramana" <venkata.ramana.nayana@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200713141636.29326-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We infrequently use the direct i915 backpointer from the i915_request,
so do we really need to waste the space in the struct for it? 8 bytes
from the most frequently allocated struct vs an 3 bytes and pointer
chasing in using rq->engine->i915?
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NAkeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602220953.21178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

With the advent of preempt-to-busy, a request may still be on the GPU as
we unwind. And in the case of a unpreemptible [due to HW] request, that
request will remain indefinitely on the GPU even though we have
returned it back to our submission queue, and cleared the active bit.

We only run the execution callbacks on transferring the request from our
submission queue to the execution queue, but if this is a bonded request
that the HW is waiting for, we will not submit it (as we wait for a
fresh execution) even though it is still being executed.

As we know that there are always preemption points between requests, we
know that only the currently executing request may be still active even
though we have cleared the flag. However, we do not precisely know which
request is in ELSP[0] due to a delay in processing events, and
furthermore we only store the last request in a context in our state
tracker.

Fixes: 22b7a426 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-dual
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529143926.3245-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit b55230e5)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

When we push a virtual request onto the HW, we update the rq->engine to
point to the physical engine. A request that is then submitted by the
user that waits upon the virtual engine, but along the physical engine
in use, will then see that it is due to be submitted to the same engine
and take a shortcut (and be queued without waiting for the completion
fence). However, the virtual request may be preempted (either by higher
priority users, or by timeslicing) and removed from the physical engine
to be migrated over to one of its siblings. The dependent normal request
however is oblivious to the removal of the virtual request and remains
queued to execute on HW, believing that once it reaches the head of its
queue all of its predecessors will have completed executing!

v2: Beware restriction of signal->execution_mask prior to submission.

Fixes: 6d06779e ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/sliced
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 511b6d9a)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Reorder the code so that we can reuse the await_execution from a special
case in await_request in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit ffb0c600)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

With the advent of preempt-to-busy, a request may still be on the GPU as
we unwind. And in the case of a unpreemptible [due to HW] request, that
request will remain indefinitely on the GPU even though we have
returned it back to our submission queue, and cleared the active bit.

We only run the execution callbacks on transferring the request from our
submission queue to the execution queue, but if this is a bonded request
that the HW is waiting for, we will not submit it (as we wait for a
fresh execution) even though it is still being executed.

As we know that there are always preemption points between requests, we
know that only the currently executing request may be still active even
though we have cleared the flag. However, we do not precisely know which
request is in ELSP[0] due to a delay in processing events, and
furthermore we only store the last request in a context in our state
tracker.

Fixes: 22b7a426 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-dual
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529143926.3245-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Let's assert that we only call the execute callbacks on making the
request active, and that we do not execute the request without calling
the callbacks.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529085809.23691-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When we push a virtual request onto the HW, we update the rq->engine to
point to the physical engine. A request that is then submitted by the
user that waits upon the virtual engine, but along the physical engine
in use, will then see that it is due to be submitted to the same engine
and take a shortcut (and be queued without waiting for the completion
fence). However, the virtual request may be preempted (either by higher
priority users, or by timeslicing) and removed from the physical engine
to be migrated over to one of its siblings. The dependent normal request
however is oblivious to the removal of the virtual request and remains
queued to execute on HW, believing that once it reaches the head of its
queue all of its predecessors will have completed executing!

v2: Beware restriction of signal->execution_mask prior to submission.

Fixes: 6d06779e ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/sliced
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Reorder the code so that we can reuse the await_execution from a special
case in await_request in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Reduce the irq_work llist for attaching the callbacks to the signal for
both smaller structs (two fewer pointers!) and simpler [debug] code:

Function                                     old     new   delta
irq_execute_cb                                35      34      -1
__igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest                 1684    1682      -2
i915_request_retire                         2003    1996      -7
__i915_request_create                       1047    1040      -7
__notify_execute_cb                          135     126      -9
__i915_request_ctor                          188     178     -10
__await_execution.part.constprop             451     440     -11
igt_wait_request                             924     714    -210

One minor artifact is that the order of cb exection is reversed. No
current use cases are affected by that change.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526112051.10229-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk