This collection of PCI error bits is used in more than one driver,
so move it to the PCI core.
Signed-off-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Compared to other DSA switches, in the Ocelot cores, the RX filtering is
a much more important concern.

Firstly, the primary use case for Ocelot is non-DSA, so there isn't any
secondary Ethernet MAC [the DSA master's one] to implicitly drop frames
having a DMAC we are not interested in.  So the switch driver itself
needs to install FDB entries towards the CPU port module (PGID_CPU) for
the MAC address of each switch port, in each VLAN installed on the port.
Every address that is not whitelisted is implicitly dropped. This is in
order to achieve a behavior similar to N standalone net devices.

Secondly, even in the secondary use case of DSA, such as illustrated by
Felix with the NPI port mode, that secondary Ethernet MAC is present,
but its RX filter is bypassed. This is because the DSA tags themselves
are placed before Ethernet, so the DMAC that the switch ports see is
not seen by the DSA master too (since it's shifter to the right).

So RX filtering is pretty important. A good RX filter won't bother the
CPU in case the switch port receives a frame that it's not interested
in, and there exists no other line of defense.

Ocelot is pretty strict when it comes to RX filtering: non-IP multicast
and broadcast traffic is allowed to go to the CPU port module, but
unknown unicast isn't. This means that traffic reception for any other
MAC addresses than the ones configured on each switch port net device
won't work. This includes use cases such as macvlan or bridging with a
non-Ocelot (so-called "foreign") interface. But this seems to be fine
for the scenarios that the Linux system embedded inside an Ocelot switch
is intended for - it is simply not interested in unknown unicast
traffic, as explained in Allan Nielsen's presentation [0].

On the other hand, the Felix DSA switch is integrated in more
general-purpose Linux systems, so it can't afford to drop that sort of
traffic in hardware, even if it will end up doing so later, in software.

Actually, unknown unicast means more for Felix than it does for Ocelot.
Felix doesn't attempt to perform the whitelisting of switch port MAC
addresses towards PGID_CPU at all, mainly because it is too complicated
to be feasible: while the MAC addresses are unique in Ocelot, by default
in DSA all ports are equal and inherited from the DSA master. This adds
into account the question of reference counting MAC addresses (delayed
ocelot_mact_forget), not to mention reference counting for the VLAN IDs
that those MAC addresses are installed in. This reference counting
should be done in the DSA core, and the fact that it wasn't needed so
far is due to the fact that the other DSA switches don't have the DSA
tag placed before Ethernet, so the DSA master is able to whitelist the
MAC addresses in hardware.

So this means that even regular traffic termination on a Felix switch
port happens through flooding (because neither Felix nor Ocelot learn
source MAC addresses from CPU-injected frames).

So far we've explained that whitelisting towards PGID_CPU:
- helps to reduce the likelihood of spamming the CPU with frames it
  won't process very far anyway
- is implemented in the ocelot driver
- is sufficient for the ocelot use cases
- is not feasible in DSA
- breaks use cases in DSA, in the current status (whitelisting enabled
  but no MAC address whitelisted)

So the proposed patch allows unknown unicast frames to be sent to the
CPU port module. This is done for the Felix DSA driver only, as Ocelot
seems to be happy without it.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1HhxEcU7JgSuggested-by: NAllan W. Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NAllan W. Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Ocelot has the concept of a CPU port. The CPU port is represented in the
forwarding and the queueing system, but it is not a physical device. The
CPU port can either be accessed via register-based injection/extraction
(which is the case of Ocelot), via Frame-DMA (similar to the first one),
or "connected" to a physical Ethernet port (called NPI in the datasheet)
which is the case of the Felix DSA switch.

In Ocelot the CPU port is at index 11.
In Felix the CPU port is at index 6.

The CPU bit is treated special in the forwarding, as it is never cleared
from the forwarding port mask (once added to it). Other than that, it is
treated the same as a normal front port.

Both Felix and Ocelot should use the CPU port in the same way. This
means that Felix should not use the NPI port directly when forwarding to
the CPU, but instead use the CPU port.

This patch is fixing this such that Felix will use port 6 as its CPU
port, and just use the NPI port to carry the traffic.

Therefore, eliminate the "ocelot->cpu" variable which was holding the
index of the NPI port for Felix, and the index of the CPU port module
for Ocelot, so the variable was actually configuring different things
for different drivers and causing at least part of the confusion.

Also remove the "ocelot->num_cpu_ports" variable, which is the result of
another confusion. The 2 CPU ports mentioned in the datasheet are
because there are two frame extraction channels (register based or DMA
based). This is of no relevance to the driver at the moment, and
invisible to the analyzer module.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Suggested-by: NAllan W. Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Realign a comment after the change introduced by the
previous patch.
Signed-off-by: NLeslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The variable pie_vars->accu_prob is used as an accumulator for
probability values. Since probabilty values are scaled using the
MAX_PROB macro denoting (2^64 - 1), pie_vars->accu_prob is
likely to overflow as it is of type u64.

The variable pie_vars->accu_prob_overflows counts the number of
times the variable pie_vars->accu_prob overflows.

The MAX_PROB macro needs to be equal to at least (2^39 - 1) in
order to do precise calculations without any underflow. Thus
MAX_PROB can be reduced to (2^56 - 1) without affecting the
precision in calculations drastically. Doing so will eliminate
the need for the variable pie_vars->accu_prob_overflows as the
variable pie_vars->accu_prob will never overflow.

Removing the variable pie_vars->accu_prob_overflows also reduces
the size of the structure pie_vars to exactly 64 bytes.
Signed-off-by: NMohit P. Tahiliani <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>
Signed-off-by: NGautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLeslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Remove ambiguity by using the term backlog instead of qlen when
representing the queue length in bytes.
Signed-off-by: NMohit P. Tahiliani <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>
Signed-off-by: NGautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLeslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Export the cls_flower methods from the ocelot driver and hook them up to
the DSA passthrough layer.

Tables for the VCAP IS2 parameters, as well as half key packing (field
offsets and lengths) need to be defined for the VSC9959 core, as they
are different from Ocelot, mainly due to the different port count.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Due to the immense variety of classification keys and actions available
for tc-flower, as well as due to potentially very different DSA switch
capabilities, it doesn't make a lot of sense for the DSA mid layer to
even attempt to interpret these. So just pass them on to the underlying
switch driver.

DSA implements just the standard boilerplate for binding and unbinding
flow blocks to ports, since nobody wants to deal with that.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Remove the definitions for the VCAP IS2 table from ocelot_ace.c, since
it is specific to VSC7514.

The VSC9959 VCAP IS2 table supports more rules (1024 instead of 64) and
has a different width for the action (89 bits instead of 99).
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The Felix driver is now using its own PHYLINK instance, not calling into
ocelot_adjust_link. So the port_pcs_init function pointer is an
unnecessary indirection. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: NHoratiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: NAllan W. Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The IGR_PORT_MASK key width is different between the 11-port VSC7514 and
the 6-port VSC9959 switches. And since IGR_PORT_MASK is one of the first
fields of a VCAP key entry, it means that all further field
offset/length pairs are shifted between the 2.

The ocelot driver performs packing of VCAP half keys with the help of
some preprocessor macros:

- A set of macros for defining the HKO (Half Key Offset) and HKL (Half
  Key Length) of each possible key field. The offset of each field is
  defined as the sum between the offset and the sum of the previous
  field.

- A set of accessors on top of vcap_key_set for shorter (aka less
  typing) access to the HKO and HKL of each key field.

Since the field offsets and lengths are different between switches,
defining them through the preprocessor isn't going to fly. So introduce
a structure holding (offset, length) pairs and instantiate it in
ocelot_board.c for VSC7514. In a future patch, a similar structure will
be instantiated in felix_vsc9959.c for NXP LS1028A.

The accessors also need to go. They are based on macro name
concatenation, which is horrible to understand and follow.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: NHoratiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The ocelot tc-flower offload binds a second flow block callback (apart
from the one for matchall) just because it uses a different block
private structure (ocelot_port_private for matchall, ocelot_port_block
for flower).

But ocelot_port_block just appears to be boilerplate, and doesn't help
with anything in particular at all, it's just useless glue between the
(global!) struct ocelot_acl_block *block pointer, and a per-netdevice
struct ocelot_port_private *priv.

So let's just simplify that, and make struct ocelot_port_private be the
private structure for the block offload. This makes us able to use the
same flow callback as in the case of matchall.

This also reveals that the struct ocelot_acl_block *block is used rather
strangely, as mentioned above: it is defined globally, allocated at
probe time, and freed at unbind time. So just move the structure to the
main ocelot structure, which gives further opportunity for
simplification.

Also get rid of backpointers from struct ocelot_acl_block and struct
ocelot_ace_rule back to struct ocelot, by reworking the function
prototypes, where necessary, to use a more DSA-friendly "struct ocelot
*ocelot, int port" format.

And finally, remove the debugging prints that were added during
development, since they provide no useful information at this point.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: NHoratiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: NAllan W. Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently mlx5 PCI PF and VF devlink devices register their ports as
physical port in non-representors mode.

Introduce a new port flavour as virtual so that virtual devices can
register 'virtual' flavour to make it more clear to users.

An example of one PCI PF and 2 PCI virtual functions, each having
one devlink port.

$ devlink port show
pci/0000:06:00.0/1: type eth netdev ens2f0 flavour physical port 0
pci/0000:06:00.2/1: type eth netdev ens2f2 flavour virtual port 0
pci/0000:06:00.3/1: type eth netdev ens2f3 flavour virtual port 0
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NParav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use the NF flow tables infrastructure for CT offload.

Create a nf flow table per zone.

Next patches will add FT entries to this table, and do
the software offload.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Three virtual devices (ibmveth, virtio_net, and netvsc) all have
similar code to set link settings and validate ethtool command. To
eliminate duplication of code, it is factored out into core/ethtool.c.
Signed-off-by: NCris Forno <cforno12@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The only users for such argument are the UDP protocol and the UNIX
socket family. We can safely reclaim the accounted memory directly
from the UDP code and, after the previous patch, we can do scm
stats accounting outside the datagram helpers.

Overall this cleans up a bit some datagram-related helpers, and
avoids an indirect call per packet in the UDP receive path.

v1 -> v2:
 - call scm_stat_del() only when not peeking - Kirill
 - fix build issue with CONFIG_INET_ESPINTCP
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

So the scm_stat_{add,del} helper can be invoked with no
additional lock held.

This clean-up the code a bit and will make the next
patch easier.
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch will dump out the bpf_sk_storages of a sk
if the request has the INET_DIAG_REQ_SK_BPF_STORAGES nlattr.

An array of SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_REQ_MAP_FD can be specified in
INET_DIAG_REQ_SK_BPF_STORAGES to select which bpf_sk_storage to dump.
If no map_fd is specified, all bpf_sk_storages of a sk will be dumped.

bpf_sk_storages can be added to the system at runtime.  It is difficult
to find a proper static value for cb->min_dump_alloc.

This patch learns the nlattr size required to dump the bpf_sk_storages
of a sk.  If it happens to be the very first nlmsg of a dump and it
cannot fit the needed bpf_sk_storages,  it will try to expand the
skb by "pskb_expand_head()".

Instead of expanding it in inet_sk_diag_fill(), it is expanded at a
sleepable context in __inet_diag_dump() so __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM can
be used.  In __inet_diag_dump(), it will retry as long as the
skb is empty and the cb->min_dump_alloc becomes larger than before.
cb->min_dump_alloc is bounded by KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE.  The min_dump_alloc
is also changed from 'u16' to 'u32' to accommodate a sk that may have
a few large bpf_sk_storages.

The updated cb->min_dump_alloc will also be used to allocate the skb in
the next dump.  This logic already exists in netlink_dump().

Here is the sample output of a locally modified 'ss' and it could be made
more readable by using BTF later:
[root@arch-fb-vm1 ~]# ss --bpf-map-id 14 --bpf-map-id 13 -t6an 'dst [::1]:8989'
State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port  Peer Address:PortProcess
ESTAB 0      0              [::1]:51072        [::1]:8989
	 bpf_map_id:14 value:[ 3feb ]
	 bpf_map_id:13 value:[ 3f ]
ESTAB 0      0              [::1]:51070        [::1]:8989
	 bpf_map_id:14 value:[ 3feb ]
	 bpf_map_id:13 value:[ 3f ]

[root@arch-fb-vm1 ~]# ~/devshare/github/iproute2/misc/ss --bpf-maps -t6an 'dst [::1]:8989'
State         Recv-Q         Send-Q                   Local Address:Port                    Peer Address:Port         Process
ESTAB         0              0                                [::1]:51072                          [::1]:8989
	 bpf_map_id:14 value:[ 3feb ]
	 bpf_map_id:13 value:[ 3f ]
	 bpf_map_id:12 value:[ 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000... total:65407 ]
ESTAB         0              0                                [::1]:51070                          [::1]:8989
	 bpf_map_id:14 value:[ 3feb ]
	 bpf_map_id:13 value:[ 3f ]
	 bpf_map_id:12 value:[ 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000... total:65407 ]
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200225230427.1976129-1-kafai@fb.com