Constify static data in ext4 that is never (intentionally) modified so
that it is placed in .rodata and benefits from memory protection.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Replace all 1 << inode->i_blkbits and (1 << inode->i_blkbits) in fs
branch.

This patch also fixes multiple checkpatch warnings: WARNING: Prefer
'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'

Thanks to Andrew Morton for suggesting more appropriate function instead
of macro.

[geliangtang@gmail.com: truncate: use i_blocksize()]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9c8b2cd83c8f5653805d43debde9fa8817e02fc4.1484895804.git.geliangtang@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481319905-10126-1-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.beSigned-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: NGeliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When a filesystem is created using:

	mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -E stride=512 <dev>

and we try to allocate 64MB extent, we will end up directly in
ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(). This is because the request is detected
as power-of-two allocation (so we start in ext4_mb_regular_allocator()
with ac_criteria == 0) however the check before
ext4_mb_simple_scan_group() refuses the direct buddy scan because the
allocation request is too large. Since cr == 0, the check whether we
should use ext4_mb_scan_aligned() fails as well and we fall back to
ext4_mb_complex_scan_group().

Fix the problem by checking for upper limit on power-of-two requests
directly when detecting them.
Reported-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

If filesystem groups are artifically small (using parameter -g to
mkfs.ext4), ext4_mb_normalize_request() can result in a request that is
larger than a block group. Trim the request size to not confuse
allocation code.
Reported-by: N"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The last BUG_ON in mb_find_extent() is apparently triggering in some
rare cases.  Most of the time it indicates a bug in the buddy bitmap
algorithms, but there are some weird cases where it can trigger when
buddy bitmap is still in memory, but the block bitmap has to be read
from disk, and there is disk or memory corruption such that the block
bitmap and the buddy bitmap are out of sync.

Google-Bug-Id: #33702157
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The number of 'counters' elements needed in 'struct sg' is
super_block->s_blocksize_bits + 2. Presently we have 16 'counters'
elements in the array. This is insufficient for block sizes >= 32k. In
such cases the memcpy operation performed in ext4_mb_seq_groups_show()
would cause stack memory corruption.

Fixes: c9de560dSigned-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

'border' variable is set to a value of 2 times the block size of the
underlying filesystem. With 64k block size, the resulting value won't
fit into a 16-bit variable. Hence this commit changes the data type of
'border' to 'unsigned int'.

Fixes: c9de560dSigned-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

If we hit this error when mounted with errors=continue or
errors=remount-ro:

    EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used:2940: comm ext4.exe: Allocating blocks 5090-6081 which overlap fs metadata

then ext4_mb_new_blocks() will call ext4_mb_release_context() and try to
continue. However, ext4_mb_release_context() is the wrong thing to call
here since we are still actually using the allocation context.

Instead, just error out. We could retry the allocation, but there is a
possibility of getting stuck in an infinite loop instead, so this seems
safer.

[ Fixed up so we don't return EAGAIN to userspace. --tytso ]

Fixes: 8556e8f3 ("ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block allocation")
Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

If there are no pending blocks to be released after a commit, forcing
a journal commit has no hope of helping.  It's possible that a commit
had just completed, so if there are now free blocks available for
allocation, it's worth retrying the commit.
Reported-by: NChao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

it's not needed for file_operations of inodes located on fs defined
in the hosting module and for file_operations that go into procfs.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Currently, in ext4_mb_init(), there's a loop like the following:

  do {
    ...
    offset += 1 << (sb->s_blocksize_bits - i);
    i++;
  } while (i <= sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1);

Note that the updated offset is used in the loop's next iteration only.

However, at the last iteration, that is at i == sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1,
the shift count becomes equal to (unsigned)-1 > 31 (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3))
and UBSAN reports

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2621:15
  shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
  [...]
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff818c4d25>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117
   [<ffffffff818c4c69>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169
   [<ffffffff819411ab>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e
   [<ffffffff81941cac>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254
   [<ffffffff81941ab1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158
   [<ffffffff814b6dc1>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x101/0x390
   [<ffffffff816fc13b>] ? ext4_mb_init+0x13b/0xfd0
   [<ffffffff814293c7>] ? create_cache+0x57/0x1f0
   [<ffffffff8142948a>] ? create_cache+0x11a/0x1f0
   [<ffffffff821c2168>] ? mutex_lock+0x38/0x60
   [<ffffffff821c23ab>] ? mutex_unlock+0x1b/0x50
   [<ffffffff814c26ab>] ? put_online_mems+0x5b/0xc0
   [<ffffffff81429677>] ? kmem_cache_create+0x117/0x2c0
   [<ffffffff816fcc49>] ext4_mb_init+0xc49/0xfd0
   [...]

Observe that the mentioned shift exponent, 4294967295, equals (unsigned)-1.

Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least
GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the
such calculated value of offset is never used again.

Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, offset_incr, holding the
next increment to apply to offset and adjust that one by right shifting it
by one position per loop iteration.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently, in mb_find_order_for_block(), there's a loop like the following:

  while (order <= e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) {
    ...
    bb += 1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits - order);
  }

Note that the updated bb is used in the loop's next iteration only.

However, at the last iteration, that is at order == e4b->bd_blkbits + 1,
the shift count becomes negative (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3)) and UBSAN reports

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1281:11
  shift exponent -1 is negative
  [...]
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff818c4d35>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117
   [<ffffffff818c4c79>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169
   [<ffffffff819411bb>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e
   [<ffffffff81941cbc>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254
   [<ffffffff81941ac1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158
   [<ffffffff816e93a0>] ? ext4_mb_generate_from_pa+0x590/0x590
   [<ffffffff816502c8>] ? ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait+0x598/0xe80
   [<ffffffff816e7b7e>] mb_find_order_for_block+0x1ce/0x240
   [...]

Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least
GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the
such calculated value of bb is never used again.

Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, bb_incr, holding the next
increment to apply to bb and adjust that one by right shifting it by one
position per loop iteration.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Messages passed to ext4_warning() or ext4_error() don't need trailing
newlines, because these function add the newlines themselves.
Signed-off-by: NJakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>

Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing
outdated comments.
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This might be unexpected but pages allocated for sbi->s_buddy_cache are
charged to current memory cgroup. So, GFP_NOFS allocation could fail if
current task has been killed by OOM or if current memory cgroup has no
free memory left. Block allocator cannot handle such failures here yet.
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Now, ext4_free_blocks() doesn't revoke data blocks of per-file data
journalled inode and it can cause file data inconsistency problems.
Even though data blocks of per-file data journalled inode are already
forgotten by jbd2_journal_invalidatepage() in advance of invoking
ext4_free_blocks(), we still need to revoke the data blocks here.
Moreover some of the metadata blocks, which are not found by
sb_find_get_block(), are still needed to be revoked, but this is also
missing here.
Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

This patch adds a line break for proc mb_groups display.
Signed-off-by: NHuaitong Han <huaitong.han@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

Switch everything to the new and more capable implementation of abs().
Mainly to give the new abs() a bit of a workout.

Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The ext4_fsblk_t type is a long long, which should not be used
with abs(), as is done in ext4_mb_check_group_pa().

This patch modifies ext4_mb_check_group_pa() to use abs64()
instead.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When you repeatly execute xfstest generic/269 with bigalloc_1k option
enabled using the below command:

"./kvm-xfstests -c bigalloc_1k -m nodelalloc -C 1000 generic/269"

you can easily see the below bug message.

"JBD2 unexpected failure: jbd2_journal_revoke: !buffer_revoked(bh);"

This means that an already revoked buffer is erroneously revoked again
and it is caused by doing revoke for the buffer at the wrong position
in ext4_free_blocks(). We need to re-position the buffer revoke
procedure for an unspecified buffer after checking the cluster boundary
for bigalloc option. If not, some part of the cluster can be doubly
revoked.
Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>

Make the bitmap reaading routines return real error codes (EIO,
EFSCORRUPTED, EFSBADCRC) which can then be reflected back to
userspace for more precise diagnosis work.

In particular, this means that mballoc no longer claims that we're out
of memory if the block bitmaps become corrupt.
Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

This allows us to refactor the procfs code, which saves a bit of
compiled space.  More importantly it isolates most of the procfs
support code into a single file, so it's easier to #ifdef it out if
the proc file system has been disabled.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_free_blocks is looping around the allocation request and mimics
__GFP_NOFAIL behavior without any allocation fallback strategy. Let's
remove the open coded loop and replace it with __GFP_NOFAIL. Without the
flag the allocator has no way to find out never-fail requirement and
cannot help in any way.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Making a function call with 20 arguments is rather expensive in both
stack and .text. In this case, doing the formatting manually doesn't
make it any less readable, so we might as well save 155 bytes of .text
and 112 bytes of stack.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

Currently ext4_mb_good_group() only returns 0 or 1 depending on whether
the allocation group is suitable for use or not. However we might get
various errors and fail while initializing new group including -EIO
which would never get propagated up the call chain. This might lead to
an endless loop at writeback when we're trying to find a good group to
allocate from and we fail to initialize new group (read error for
example).

Fix this by returning proper error code from ext4_mb_good_group() and
using it in ext4_mb_regular_allocator(). In ext4_mb_regular_allocator()
we will always return only the first occurred error from
ext4_mb_good_group() and we only propagate it back  to the caller if we
do not get any other errors and we fail to allocate any blocks.

Note that with other modes than errors=continue, we will fail
immediately in ext4_mb_good_group() in case of error, however with
errors=continue we should try to continue using the file system, that's
why we're not going to fail immediately when we see an error from
ext4_mb_good_group(), but rather when we fail to find a suitable block
group to allocate from due to an problem in group initialization.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

Currently on the machines with page size > block size when initializing
block group buddy cache we initialize it for all the block group bitmaps
in the page. However in the case of read error, checksum error, or if
a single bitmap is in any way corrupted we would fail to initialize all
of the bitmaps. This is problematic because we will not have access to
the other allocation groups even though those might be perfectly fine
and usable.

Fix this by reading all the bitmaps instead of error out on the first
problem and simply skip the bitmaps which were either not read properly,
or are not valid.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

With the planned cgroup writeback support, backing-dev related
declarations will be more widely used across block and cgroup;
unfortunately, including backing-dev.h from include/linux/blkdev.h
makes cyclic include dependency quite likely.

This patch separates out backing-dev-defs.h which only has the
essential definitions and updates blkdev.h to include it.  c files
which need access to more backing-dev details now include
backing-dev.h directly.  This takes backing-dev.h off the common
include dependency chain making it a lot easier to use it across block
and cgroup.

v2: fs/fat build failure fixed.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

The iput() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We must use GFP_NOFS instead GFP_KERNEL inside ext4_mb_add_groupinfo
and ext4_calculate_overhead() because they are called from inside a
journal transaction. Call trace:

ioctl
 ->ext4_group_add
   ->journal_start
   ->ext4_setup_new_descs
     ->ext4_mb_add_groupinfo -> GFP_KERNEL
   ->ext4_flex_group_add
     ->ext4_update_super
       ->ext4_calculate_overhead  -> GFP_KERNEL
   ->journal_stop
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Having done a full regression test, we can now drop the
DELALLOC_RESERVED state flag.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

The EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED flag was originally implemented
because it was too hard to make sure the mballoc and get_block flags
could be reliably passed down through all of the codepaths that end up
calling ext4_mb_new_blocks().

Since then, we have mb_flags passed down through most of the code
paths, so getting rid of EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED isn't as tricky
as it used to.

This commit plumbs in the last of what is required, and then adds a
WARN_ON check to make sure we haven't missed anything.  If this passes
a full regression test run, we can then drop
EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

__this_cpu_ptr is being phased out use raw_cpu_ptr instead which was
introduced in 3.15-rc1.

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

If we suffer a block allocation failure (for example due to a memory
allocation failure), it's possible that we will call
ext4_discard_allocated_blocks() before we've actually allocated any
blocks.  In that case, fe_len and fe_start in ac->ac_f_ex will still
be zero, and this will result in mb_free_blocks(inode, e4b, 0, 0)
triggering the BUG_ON on mb_free_blocks():

	BUG_ON(last >= (sb->s_blocksize << 3));

Fix this by bailing out of ext4_discard_allocated_blocks() if fs_len
is zero.

Also fix a missing ext4_mb_unload_buddy() call in
ext4_discard_allocated_blocks().

Google-Bug-Id: 16844242

Fixes: 86f0afd4Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

If there is a failure while allocating the preallocation structure, a
number of blocks can end up getting marked in the in-memory buddy
bitmap, and then not getting released.  This can result in the
following corruption getting reported by the kernel:

EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:758: group 1126,
12793 clusters in bitmap, 12729 in gd

In that case, we need to release the blocks using mb_free_blocks().

Tested: fs smoke test; also demonstrated that with injected errors,
	the file system is no longer getting corrupted

Google-Bug-Id: 16657874
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

As the member fe_len defined in struct ext4_free_extent is expressed as
number of clusters, the variable "size" computation is wrong, we need to
first translate fe_len to block number, then to bytes.
Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

Commit 27dd4385 ("ext4: introduce reserved space") reserves 2% of
the file system space to make sure metadata allocations will always
succeed.  Given that, tracking the reservation of metadata blocks is
no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>