- 26 4月, 2007 28 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the network header, it is still legal to touch skb->nh.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the mac header, it is still legal to touch skb->mac.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. This one also converts some more cases to skb_reset_mac_header() that my regex missed as it had no spaces before nor after '=', ugh. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
That is equal to skb->head before skb_reserve, to help in the layer header changes. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Add whitespace around keywords. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This allows the write queue implementation to be changed, for example, to one which allows fast interval searching. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 James Morris 提交于
Where appropriate, convert references to xtime.tv_sec to the get_seconds() helper function. Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Undoing ssthresh is disabled in fastretrans_alert whenever FLAG_ECE is set by clearing prior_ssthresh. The clearing does not protect FRTO because FRTO operates before fastretrans_alert. Moving the clearing of prior_ssthresh earlier seems to be a suboptimal solution to the FRTO case because then FLAG_ECE will cause a second ssthresh reduction in try_to_open (the first occurred when FRTO was entered). So instead, FRTO falls back immediately to the rate halving response, which switches TCP to CA_CWR state preventing the latter reduction of ssthresh. If the first ECE arrived before the ACK after which FRTO is able to decide RTO as spurious, prior_ssthresh is already cleared. Thus no undoing for ssthresh occurs. Besides, FLAG_ECE should be set also in the following ACKs resulting in rate halving response that sees TCP is already in CA_CWR, which again prevents an extra ssthresh reduction on that round-trip. If the first ECE arrived before RTO, ssthresh has already been adapted and prior_ssthresh remains cleared on entry because TCP is in CA_CWR (the same applies also to a case where FRTO is entered more than once and ECE comes in the middle). High_seq must not be touched after tcp_enter_cwr because CWR round-trip calculation depends on it. I believe that after this patch, FRTO should be ECN-safe and even able to take advantage of synergy benefits. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
A local variable for icsk was created but this change was missing. Spotted by Jarek Poplawski. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
New sysctl tcp_frto_response is added to select amongst these responses: - Rate halving based; reuses CA_CWR state (default) - Very conservative; used to be the only one available (=1) - Undo cwr; undoes ssthresh and cwnd reductions (=2) The response with rate halving requires a new parameter to tcp_enter_cwr because FRTO has already reduced ssthresh and doing a second reduction there has to be prevented. In addition, to keep things nice on 80 cols screen, a local variable was added. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The reordering detection must work also when FRTO has not been used at all which was the original intention of mine, just the expression of the idea was flawed. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Implements the SACK-enhanced FRTO given in RFC4138 using the variant given in Appendix B. RFC4138, Appendix B: "This means that in order to declare timeout spurious, the TCP sender must receive an acknowledgment for non-retransmitted segment between SND.UNA and RecoveryPoint in algorithm step 3. RecoveryPoint is defined in conservative SACK-recovery algorithm [RFC3517]" The basic version of the FRTO algorithm can still be used also when SACK is enabled. To enabled SACK-enhanced version, tcp_frto sysctl is set to 2. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
To be honest, I'm not too sure how the reord stuff works in the first place but this seems necessary. When FRTO has been active, the one and only retransmission could be unnecessary but the state and sending order might not be what the sacktag code expects it to be (to work correctly). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
TCP without FRTO would be in Loss state with small cwnd. FRTO, however, leaves cwnd (typically) to a larger value which causes ssthresh to become too large in case RTO is triggered again compared to what conventional recovery would do. Because consecutive RTOs result in only a single ssthresh reduction, RTO+cumulative ACK+RTO pattern is required to trigger this event. A large comment is included for congestion control module writers trying to figure out what CA_EVENT_FRTO handler should do because there exists a remote possibility of incompatibility between FRTO and module defined ssthresh functions. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Previously RETRANS bits were cleared on the entry to FRTO. We postpone that into tcp_enter_frto_loss, which is really the place were the clearing should be done anyway. This allows simplification of the logic from a clearing loop to the head skb clearing only. Besides, the other changes made in the previous patches to tcp_use_frto made it impossible for the non-SACKed FRTO to be entered if other than the head has been rexmitted. With SACK-enhanced FRTO (and Appendix B), however, there can be a number retransmissions in flight when RTO expires (same thing could happen before this patchset also with non-SACK FRTO). To not introduce any jumpiness into the packet counting during FRTO, instead of clearing RETRANS bits from skbs during entry, do it later on. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This interpretation comes from RFC4138: "If the sender implements some loss recovery algorithm other than Reno or NewReno [FHG04], the F-RTO algorithm SHOULD NOT be entered when earlier fast recovery is underway." I think the RFC means to say (especially in the light of Appendix B) that ...recovery is underway (not just fast recovery) or was underway when it was interrupted by an earlier (F-)RTO that hasn't yet been resolved (snd_una has not advanced enough). Thus, my interpretation is that whenever TCP has ever retransmitted other than head, basic version cannot be used because then the order assumptions which are used as FRTO basis do not hold. NewReno has only the head segment retransmitted at a time. Therefore, walk up to the segment that has not been SACKed, if that segment is not retransmitted nor anything before it, we know for sure, that nothing after the non-SACKed segment should be either. This assumption is valid because TCPCB_EVER_RETRANS does not leave holes but each non-SACKed segment is rexmitted in-order. Check for retrans_out > 1 avoids more expensive walk through the skb list, as we can know the result beforehand: F-RTO will not be allowed. SACKed skb can turn into non-SACked only in the extremely rare case of SACK reneging, in this case we might fail to detect retransmissions if there were them for any other than head. To get rid of that feature, whole rexmit queue would have to be walked (always) or FRTO should be prevented when SACK reneging happens. Of course RTO should still trigger after reneging which makes this issue even less likely to show up. And as long as the response is as conservative as it's now, nothing bad happens even then. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
FRTO controls cwnd when it still processes the ACK input or it has just reverted back to conventional RTO recovery; the normal rules apply when FRTO has reverted to standard congestion control. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Because TCP is not in Loss state during FRTO recovery, fast recovery could be triggered by accident. Non-SACK FRTO is more robust than not yet included SACK-enhanced version (that can receiver high number of duplicate ACKs with SACK blocks during FRTO), at least with unidirectional transfers, but under extraordinary patterns fast recovery can be incorrectly triggered, e.g., Data loss+ACK losses => cumulative ACK with enough SACK blocks to meet sacked_out >= dupthresh condition). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Since purpose is to reduce CWND, we prevent immediate growth. This is not a major issue nor is "the correct way" specified anywhere. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The FRTO detection did not care how ACK pattern affects to cwnd calculation of the conventional recovery. This caused incorrect setting of cwnd when the fallback becames necessary. The knowledge tcp_process_frto() has about the incoming ACK is now passed on to tcp_enter_frto_loss() in allowed_segments parameter that gives the number of segments that must be added to packets-in-flight while calculating the new cwnd. Instead of snd_una we use FLAG_DATA_ACKED in duplicate ACK detection because RFC4138 states (in Section 2.2): If the first acknowledgment after the RTO retransmission does not acknowledge all of the data that was retransmitted in step 1, the TCP sender reverts to the conventional RTO recovery. Otherwise, a malicious receiver acknowledging partial segments could cause the sender to declare the timeout spurious in a case where data was lost. If the next ACK after RTO is duplicate, we do not retransmit anything, which is equal to what conservative conventional recovery does in such case. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Handles RFC4138 shortcoming (in step 2); it should also have case c) which ignores ACKs that are not duplicates nor advance window (opposite dir data, winupdate). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Retransmission counter assumptions are to be changed. Forcing reason to do this exist: Using sysctl in check would be racy as soon as FRTO starts to ignore some ACKs (doing that in the following patches). Userspace may disable it at any moment giving nice oops if timing is right. frto_counter would be inaccessible from userspace, but with SACK enhanced FRTO retrans_out can include other than head, and possibly leaving it non-zero after spurious RTO, boom again. Luckily, solution seems rather simple: never go directly to Open state but use Disorder instead. This does not really change much, since TCP could anyway change its state to Disorder during FRTO using path tcp_fastretrans_alert -> tcp_try_to_open (e.g., when a SACK block makes ACK dubious). Besides, Disorder seems to be the state where TCP should be if not recovering (in Recovery or Loss state) while having some retransmissions in-flight (see tcp_try_to_open), which is exactly what happens with FRTO. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
In case a latency spike causes more than one RTO, the later should not cause the already reduced ssthresh to propagate into the prior_ssthresh since FRTO declares all such RTOs spurious at once or none of them. In treating of ssthresh, we mimic what tcp_enter_loss() does. The previous state (in frto_counter) must be available until we have checked it in tcp_enter_frto(), and also ACK information flag in process_frto(). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Moved comments out from the body of process_frto() to the head (preferred way; see Documentation/CodingStyle). Bonus: it's much easier to read in this compacted form. FRTO algorithm and implementation is described in greater detail. For interested reader, more information is available in RFC4138. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
In addition, removed inline. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
FRTO spurious RTO detection algorithm (RFC4138) does not include response to a detected spurious RTO but can use different response algorithms. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
FRTO was slightly too brave... Should only clear TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS bit. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 2月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Baruch Even 提交于
We clear the unused parts of the SACK cache, This prevents us from mistakenly taking the cache data if the old data in the SACK cache is the same as the data in the SACK block. This assumes that we never receive an empty SACK block with start and end both at zero. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Baruch Even 提交于
Move DSACK code outside the SACK fast-path checking code. If the DSACK determined that the information was too old we stayed with a partial cache copied. Most likely this matters very little since the next packet will not be DSACK and we will find it in the cache. but it's still not good form and there is little reason to couple the two checks. Since the SACK receive cache doesn't need the data to be in host order we also remove the ntohl in the checking loop. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Baruch Even 提交于
Only advance the SACK fast-path pointer for the first block, the fast-path assumes that only the first block advances next time so we should not move the cached skb for the next sack blocks. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Baruch Even 提交于
The sorting of SACK blocks actually munges them rather than sort, causing the TCP stack to ignore some SACK information and breaking the assumption of ordered SACK blocks after sorting. The sort takes the data from a second buffer which isn't moved causing subsequent data moves to occur from the wrong location. The fix is to use a temporary buffer as a normal sort does. Signed-off-By: NBaruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masayuki Nakagawa 提交于
I encountered a kernel panic with my test program, which is a very simple IPv6 client-server program. The server side sets IPV6_RECVPKTINFO on a listening socket, and the client side just sends a message to the server. Then the kernel panic occurs on the server. (If you need the test program, please let me know. I can provide it.) This problem happens because a skb is forcibly freed in tcp_rcv_state_process(). When a socket in listening state(TCP_LISTEN) receives a syn packet, then tcp_v6_conn_request() will be called from tcp_rcv_state_process(). If the tcp_v6_conn_request() successfully returns, the skb would be discarded by __kfree_skb(). However, in case of a listening socket which was already set IPV6_RECVPKTINFO, an address of the skb will be stored in treq->pktopts and a ref count of the skb will be incremented in tcp_v6_conn_request(). But, even if the skb is still in use, the skb will be freed. Then someone still using the freed skb will cause the kernel panic. I suggest to use kfree_skb() instead of __kfree_skb(). Signed-off-by: NMasayuki Nakagawa <nakagawa.msy@ncos.nec.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
I believe all the below memory barriers only matter on SMP so therefore the smp_* variant of the barrier should be used. I'm wondering if the barrier in net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c should be dropped entirely. schedule_work's implementation currently implies a memory barrier and I think sane semantics of schedule_work() should imply a memory barrier, as needed so the caller shouldn't have to worry. It's not quite obvious why the barrier in net/packet/af_packet.c is needed; maybe it should be implied through flush_dcache_page? Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Based on implementation by Rick Payne. Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Venkat Yekkirala 提交于
Fix SO_PEERSEC for tcp sockets to return the security context of the peer (as represented by the SA from the peer) as opposed to the SA used by the local/source socket. Signed-off-by: NVenkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-
- 04 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
GCC can't tell we always initialize 'tv' in all the cases we actually use it, so explicitly set it up with zeros. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Heffner 提交于
This changes the microsecond RTT sampling so that samples are taken in the same way that RTT samples are taken for the RTO calculator: on the last segment acknowledged, and only when the segment hasn't been retransmitted. Signed-off-by: NJohn Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu> Acked-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-