Some applications want to know whether the memory is LP or
not.
Reviewed-by: NHawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This is now handled by the DMA-buf framework in the dma_resv obj.

Also remove the workaround inside VMWGFX to update the moving fence.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-14-christian.koenig@amd.com

Wait only for kernel fences before kmap or UVD direct submission.

This also makes sure that we always wait in amdgpu_bo_kmap() even when
returning a cached pointer.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-6-christian.koenig@amd.com

Instead of distingting between shared and exclusive fences specify
the fence usage while adding fences.

Rework all drivers to use this interface instead and deprecate the old one.

v2: some kerneldoc comments suggested by Daniel
v3: fix a missing case in radeon
v4: rebase on nouveau changes, fix lockdep and temporary disable warning
v5: more documentation updates
v6: separate internal dma_resv changes from this patch, avoids to
    disable warning temporary, rebase on upstream changes
v7: fix missed case in lima driver, minimize changes to i915_gem_busy_ioctl
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-3-christian.koenig@amd.com

This change adds the dma_resv_usage enum and allows us to specify why a
dma_resv object is queried for its containing fences.

Additional to that a dma_resv_usage_rw() helper function is added to aid
retrieving the fences for a read or write userspace submission.

This is then deployed to the different query functions of the dma_resv
object and all of their users. When the write paratermer was previously
true we now use DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE and DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ otherwise.

v2: add KERNEL/OTHER in separate patch
v3: some kerneldoc suggestions by Daniel
v4: some more kerneldoc suggestions by Daniel, fix missing cases lost in
    the rebase pointed out by Bas.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-2-christian.koenig@amd.com

Audit all the users of dma_resv_add_excl_fence() and make sure they
reserve a shared slot also when only trying to add an exclusive fence.

This is the next step towards handling the exclusive fence like a
shared one.

v2: fix missed case in amdgpu
v3: and two more radeon, rename function
v4: add one more case to TTM, fix i915 after rebase
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220406075132.3263-2-christian.koenig@amd.com

That are bytes not pages.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

On GPUs with RAS enabled, below call trace is observed when
suspending or shutting down device. The cause is we have enabled
memory wipe flag for BOs on such GPUs by default, and such BOs
will go to memory wipe by amdgpu_fill_buffer, however, because
ring is off already, it fails to clean up the memory and throw
this error message. So add a suspend/shutdown check before
wipping memory.

[drm:amdgpu_fill_buffer [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Trying to clear memory with ring turned off.

v2: fix coding style issue

Fixes: fc6ea4be ("drm/amdgpu: Wipe all VRAM on free when RAS is enabled")
Signed-off-by: NGuchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

This is provided by TTM now.

Also switch man->size to bytes instead of pages and fix the double
printing of size and usage in debugfs.

v2: fix size checking as well
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: NBas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220214093439.2989-8-christian.koenig@amd.com

This is provided by TTM now.

Also switch man->size to bytes instead of pages and fix the double
printing of size and usage in debugfs.

v2: fix size checking as well
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: NBas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220214093439.2989-6-christian.koenig@amd.com

Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10
GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation
locks.

[  +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[  +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 Not tainted
[  +0.000004] --------------------------------------------
[  +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock:
[  +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000203]
              but task is already holding lock:
[  +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[  +0.000017]
              other info that might help us debug this:
[  +0.000002]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  +0.000003]        CPU0
[  +0.000002]        ----
[  +0.000002]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[  +0.000004]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[  +0.000003]
               *** DEADLOCK ***

[  +0.000002]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[  +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822:
[  +0.000003]  #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000232]  #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000241]  #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000236]  #3: ffffb2b35606fd28
(reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000235]  #4: ffff932cbb7181f8
(reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[  +0.000015]  #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at:
drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm]
[  +0.000038]  #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000195]
              stack backtrace:
[  +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted
5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030
[  +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02
08/29/2018
[  +0.000003] Call Trace:
[  +0.000003]  dump_stack+0x6d/0x89
[  +0.000010]  __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90
[  +0.000009]  lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0
[  +0.000005]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000184]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[  +0.000006]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000184]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060
[  +0.000007]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[  +0.000005]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[  +0.000006]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000185]  ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm]
[  +0.000010]  amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000189]  amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000189]  amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000229]  ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000190]  amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60
[amdgpu]
[  +0.000234]  kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000218]  kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000216]  ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000216]  ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[  +0.000006]  ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0
[  +0.000007]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0
[  +0.000007]  do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70
[  +0.000004]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[  +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317
[  +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00
48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f
05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[  +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX:
00007fbff90a7317
[  +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI:
0000000000000004
[  +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
00007fbcc402d880
[  +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00000000c0184b18
[  +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15:
00007fbcc402d820

Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

On GPUs with RAS, poison can propagate between processes if VRAM is not
cleared when it is freed or allocated. The reason is, that not all write
accesses clear RAS poison. 32-byte writes by the SDMA engine do clear RAS
poison. Clearing memory in the background when it is freed should avoid
major performance impact. KFD has been doing this already for a long time.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Patch: 3efb17ae7e92 ("drm/amdgpu: Call amdgpu_device_unmap_mmio() if device
is unplugged to prevent crash in GPU initialization failure") makes call to
amdgpu_device_unmap_mmio() conditioned on device unplugged. This patch unmaps
MMIO mappings even when device is not unplugged.

v2: Add condition of drm_dev_enter() to deleted unmaps in patch
"drm/amdgpu: Unmap all MMIO mappings"
Signed-off-by: NLeslie Shi <Yuliang.Shi@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

We set WC memtype for aper_base but don't check return value
of arch_io_reserve_memtype_wc(). Be more defensive and return
early on error.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

If a kfd_bo was shared (e.g. a dmabuf export), the original kfd_bo may be
freed when the amdgpu_bo still lives on. Free the kfd_bo struct in the
release_notify callback then the amdgpu_bo is freed.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-By: NRamesh Errabolu <Ramesh.Errabolu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Unify BO evicting functionality for possible memory
types in amdgpu_ttm.c.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Just drop some dead code.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_pin_domain is used for page tables
creation, which is not involved with page pinning. And it is used in
more cases than display scanout, modify its documentation as well.
Signed-off-by: NYifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

For some reason we run into an use case where a BO is already pinned
into GTT, but should be pinned into VRAM|GTT again.

Handle that case gracefully as well.
Reviewed-by: NShashank Sharma <Shashank.sharma@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

For some reason we run into an use case where a BO is already pinned
into GTT, but should be pinned into VRAM|GTT again.

Handle that case gracefully as well.
Reviewed-by: NShashank Sharma <Shashank.sharma@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

make htmldocs complaints about parameter for amdgpu_bo_add_to_shadow_list

./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c:739: warning: Excess function parameter 'bo' description in 'amdgpu_bo_add_to_shadow_list'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c:739: warning: Function parameter or member 'vmbo' not described in 'amdgpu_bo_add_to_shadow_list'
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c:739: warning: Excess function parameter 'bo' description in 'amdgpu_bo_add_to_shadow_list'
Signed-off-by: NAnson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

With added CPU domain to placement you can have
now 3 placemnts at once.

CC: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210622162339.761651-5-andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com

Drop the workaround and instead implement a better solution.

Basically we are now chaining all submissions using a dma_fence_chain
container and adding them as exclusive fence to the dma_resv object.

This way other drivers can still sync to the single exclusive fence
while amdgpu only sync to fences from different processes.

v3: add the shared fence first before the exclusive one
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210614174536.5188-2-christian.koenig@amd.com

Move shadow_list to struct amdgpu_bo_vm as shadow BOs
are part of PT/PD BOs.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Make provision to pass different ttm BO destroy callback
while creating a amdgpu_bo.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

It will cause error when alloc memory larger than 128KB in
amdgpu_bo_create->kzalloc. So it needs to switch kzalloc to kvzalloc.

Call Trace:
   alloc_pages_current+0x6a/0xe0
   kmalloc_order+0x32/0xb0
   kmalloc_order_trace+0x1e/0x80
   __kmalloc+0x249/0x2d0
   amdgpu_bo_create+0x102/0x500 [amdgpu]
   ? xas_create+0x264/0x3e0
   amdgpu_bo_create_vm+0x32/0x60 [amdgpu]
   amdgpu_vm_pt_create+0xf5/0x260 [amdgpu]
   amdgpu_vm_init+0x1fd/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
Signed-off-by: NChangfeng <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

The functions can be called both in _rcu context as well
as while holding the lock.

v2: add some kerneldoc as suggested by Daniel
v3: fix indentation
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602111714.212426-7-christian.koenig@amd.com

It will cause error when alloc memory larger than 128KB in
amdgpu_bo_create->kzalloc. So it needs to switch kzalloc to kvzalloc.

Call Trace:
   alloc_pages_current+0x6a/0xe0
   kmalloc_order+0x32/0xb0
   kmalloc_order_trace+0x1e/0x80
   __kmalloc+0x249/0x2d0
   amdgpu_bo_create+0x102/0x500 [amdgpu]
   ? xas_create+0x264/0x3e0
   amdgpu_bo_create_vm+0x32/0x60 [amdgpu]
   amdgpu_vm_pt_create+0xf5/0x260 [amdgpu]
   amdgpu_vm_init+0x1fd/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
Signed-off-by: NChangfeng <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Instead of both driver and TTM allocating memory finalize embedding the
ttm_resource object as base into the driver backends.

v2: fix typo in vmwgfx grid mgr and double init in amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602100914.46246-10-christian.koenig@amd.com

To improve the handling we want the establish the resource object as base
class for the backend allocations.

v2: add missing error handling
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602100914.46246-1-christian.koenig@amd.com

When we want to decouble resource management from buffer management we need to
be able to handle resources separately.

Add a resource pointer and rename bo->mem so that all code needs to
change to access the pointer instead.

No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430092508.60710-4-christian.koenig@amd.com

Remove unused code related to shadow BO.

v2: removing shadow bo ptr from base class.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Add amdgpu_bo_add_to_shadow_list() to handle shadow list
additions and amdgpu_bo_shadowed() to check if a BO is shadowed.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Add new BO subclass that will be used by amdgpu vm code.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Since both sg and device type BOs have metadata buffer, free
the buffer in both cases when to destroy BOs
Signed-off-by: NShiwu Zhang <shiwu.zhang@amd.com>
Acked-by: NNirmoy Das <Nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Although the kfd_ioctl_get_dmabuf_info() still fail it will indicate
the caller right metadat_size useful for the same kfd ioctl next time.
Signed-off-by: NShiwu Zhang <shiwu.zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

SG BOs such as dmabuf imports and userptr BOs do not consume system
resources directly. Instead they point to resources owned elsewhere.
They typically get evicted by DMABuf move notifiers of MMU notifiers.
If those notifiers don't need to wait for hardware fences (i.e. the SG
BOs are used in a preemptible context), then we don't need to limit
them to the GTT size and we don't need TTM to evict them.

Create a new placement for such preemptible SG BOs that does not impose
artificial size limits and TTM evictions.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Access to those must be prevented post pci_remove

v6: Drop BOs list, unampping VRAM BAR is enough.
v8:
Add condition of xgmi.connected_to_cpu to MTTR
handling and remove MTTR handling from the old place.
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210517193105.491461-1-andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com

Tracking devices, process info and fence info using
/proc/pid/fdinfo
Signed-off-by: NDavid M Nieto <David.Nieto@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoy Sun <Roy.Sun@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210426062701.39732-2-Roy.Sun@amd.com

Remove unused AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_SHADOW flag.
Userspace is never allowed to use this.
Signed-off-by: NNirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>