In the new api all the flush in the FW is done before we
get the response and in the response we only get the updated
read pointer and all queued packets don't get anymore rx_tx
per packet to free the queued packet, so driver needs to free
all queued packets on flushed queue at once after flush response.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4bd0eca8c0ef.I1601aad2eb2cc83f6f73b8ca52be57bb9fd626ab@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If there are frequent CCA delays due to the extension channel
as detected by the firmware, and we're on 2.4 GHz, then handle
this by disconnecting (with a reconnect hint).

When we disconnect, we'll also update our capabilities to use
only 20 MHz on the next connection (if it's on 2.4 GHz) as to
avoid the use of the extension channel that has too much noise.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4de9c363b0b5.I709b7e6f73a7537c53f22d7418927691259de8a8@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When restarting firmware with an ongoing scheduled scan, we
don't (and shouldn't) mark it as aborted as mac80211 will be
restarting it, and so no event should go out to userspace.
The appropriate comment regarding this wasn't moved to this
place, so add it.

However, we _do_ need to clean up our internal state, since
mac80211 will restart the scan, and we'll otherwise get to
the WARN_ON() a few lines below for no reason whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4ddc9b017268.Ie869b628ae56a5d776eba0e7b7f05f42fc566f2e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

For testing features where the firmware may send some
notifications it can often be a lot easier to do that
from a test script. Remove most injection limitations
from debugfs to be able to do this.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.9aff3c6b4607.I03b0ae7df094734451445ffcb7f9f0274969f1c0@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Some notifications aren't handled by the general RX handler
code, due to multi-queue. Add size checks for them explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.1370c776cb31.Ic536bd1aee5368969fbf65db85b9b9b5dc9c6034@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We shouldn't trust the firmware with the sizes (or contents)
of notifications, accessing too much data could cause page
faults if the data doesn't fit into the allocated space. This
applies more on older NICs where multiple notifications can
be in a single RX buffer.

Add a general framework for checking a minimum size of any
notification in the RX handlers and use it for most. Some RX
handlers were already checking and I've moved the checks,
some more complex checks I left and made them _NO_SIZE for
the RX handlers.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.3e155d5e5f90.I2121fa4ac7cd7eb98970d84b793796646afa3eed@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Also add documentation for 'mvm'.

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:400: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const u16 expected_tpt_legacy[IWL_RATE_COUNT] = '
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'tbl' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'scale_index' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'attempts' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'successes' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'window' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2677: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'band' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:4213: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'iwl_mvm_tx_protection'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-3-lee.jones@linaro.org

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117135053.GA13248@embeddedor

When waiting for a notification and then processing it,
we also need to check the size of the data before we use
it. Most places do that already, but fix the remaining
ones to do it as well.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b29573bcba39.I4b7e72824d06dc0719a40021d933e29edfc14713@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When the firmware is loaded, its internal timer (GP2) is
reset and all the time_sync in the BSS table is now
unusable. Ask cfg80211 to purge the BSS table.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1b703b6f4c05.I0b5c51aa87e86c964e2eae6d959a96e232840ef5@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

FW now puts in the struct version, the TLV version so we also check
it to make sure it matches.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.bc1dfb56ffbd.I99d8085cccc8687805781ccc43e189dbcef0e63b@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The range response notification has several versions. Check the
notification size according to the expected notification version.
Notifications with incorrect size will be ignored.
Signed-off-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.ee57c3214d05.I810d7de33fb08001ef1a2e24714d5b68932e088e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The RX handlers for probe response data and channel switch weren't
hooked up properly, fix that.

Fixes: 86e177d8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add NOA and CSA to a probe response")
Fixes: d3a108a4 ("iwlwifi: mvm: Support CSA countdown offloading")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.2d07dcee0d35.I07a61b5d734478db57d9434ff303e4c90bf6c32b@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Previously, we added checks that the contained MPDU size is long
enough, but really we should also check that the notification
itself fits into the data. Add some checks for that.

Also add unlikely() annotations on the previously added checks.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.51cc04cf1e3e.I7bfd6809f8f5feb75f79397646e6656e95688a0e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If the channel switch delay that we would incur after the channel
switch actually happens is longer than the quiet time we're willing
to tolerate, disconnect as well.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.3bc3449922da.Ib0255deb67b2fc21317e274adcacb545bb1dc669@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

There are some races in the hardware that can possibly lead to
a bus lockup later during a restart when we manage to kill the
firmware at a bad time (while it's accessing the bus).

To work around this, add support for a new handshake between
firmware and driver to ensure that the firmware is in a well-
known state before we kill it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.7756fcc9865c.I13de65e0ffcb4186dd4c1a465f66df2e98c9a947@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When we get a channel switch with a very long quiet period, we schedule
a work to disconnect after a while. This work runs in background. In the
meanwhile, we keep getting beacons and sending FW modify command for each.
This has a potential race, where we modify the CSA after we aborted it.

Protect the flow by setting csa_failed to true in case we abort, and check
it before sending the modify command.

This required a modification to the way we treat csa_failed in
iwl_mvm_post_channel_switch:
1. The variable isn't being reset anymore, so we can still look at it in
iwl_mvm_channel_switch_rx_beacon. This is fine, since we reset it when
starting a new CSA.
2. There is no more early return in case of csa_failed. This is fine,
since before this patch csa_failed was set only for GO, and for GO the
function is only resetting the power settings, which we want to restore
even in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b023856bdf39.I4ed0149e0018fe5e1ae3c2a1cbc614954016063f@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We send some data to the firmware and expect to get it back,
but we shouldn't really trust the firmware on this. Check the
size of all the data we send down to avoid using bad or just
uninitialized data when the firmware doesn't respond right.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.a5a8173f16c7.I4fa68bb2b1c7dcc52ddd381c4042722d27c4a34d@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Use SPDX tags instead of the long copyright notices.  Also cleanup
some duplicate copyright notices and combine the years where possible.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000603.481bcb512a6f.I8146abe5a637079e7336209f23cb26af98b12b31@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We keep the scan status per UID in scan_uid_status field when the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function is called. If we error out after
this, e.g. due to FW restart being in progress, we're not cleaning
up properly, and can run into warnings later.

Clean up internal variables when starting fails after calling the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.970421a2f753.Id62b2da8a0ccccbb114407db82ca485d07749d39@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We're currently doing accounting on the queue sync with an
atomic variable that counts down the number of remaining
notifications that we still need.

As we've been hitting issues in this area, modify this to
track a bitmap of queues, not just the number of queues,
and print out the remaining bitmap in the warning.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.0a3fa177cd6b.I7c69ff999419368266279ec27dd618eb450908b3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

This function has grown quite a bit over time, move it
out of line before we grow it even further.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1a0211e66906.I572eb69dc3738319310c9cbe03a36d942f4f68f7@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The argument type to iwl_mvm_notify_rx_queue() is currently just
a u8 *, but that's misleading because we actually need the inner
data to be of type struct iwl_mvm_internal_rxq_notif, because we
interpret it when we get it back from the device (to check the
sync bool and possibly the cookie.)

Therefore, clear up any potential confusion and require that the
data passed is of type struct iwl_mvm_internal_rxq_notif *.

Also, while at it, rename the "count" to "notif_size" as "count"
doesn't really clearly say what it's counting.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.d28e14682bdc.I9ac366aa97db045be4daa4ba263267a3ac6a6a2f@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

This was a hack done to test the data path of devices that
didn't support well CSUM offload in Tx. This is not needed
anymore.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6c9fc9fb48d5.I2aaebf90e6fe81860105d049a8d35746fa8d86c2@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The MPDU contained in a notification shouldn't be larger than the
notification size itself is, validate this.
Reported-by: NHaggai Abramovsky <haggai.abramovsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.7c721ad37014.Id5746874ecfa208b60baa62691b2d9dc5dd4d89c@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Instead of enumerating all possible stations iterate only active ones.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.c049de5611b4.Ic35b8d1a328903195ec7cb887a9cb198b7d8f856@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The new inclusive terminology requires to change a few
terms that were used in iwlwifi.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1eb4c8625f36.I1b17b68d4a8e77071da3e15ffbd902d15c1d4938@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Similarly to what I did to iwl_run_init_mvm_ucode, there is no
need to pass the read_nvm parameter. Either we have an NVM
and we don't need to read it, or we don't and we need to read it.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1b764faecfee.I2da0ada577fc16268125a4a15b5e725c18c643ee@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Curretly we only mark HW error state "after" trying to collect HW data,
but if any HW error happens while colleting HW data we go into endless
loop. avoid this by setting HW error state "before" collecting HW data.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.4c7e5a87da15.Ic35b2f28ff08f7ac23143c80f224d52eb97a0454@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Add support to the 6GHz band (aka. Ultra High Band or UHB).  This
allows us to scan and connect to channels in that band, including all
the relevant features, such as preferred scan channels, colocated
channels etc.
Co-developed-by: NHaim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHaim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: NTova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: NAndrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: NTali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: NAyala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAyala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000657.0fdbfc3d7352.Idb648536faf21716e2ab2c6d6890d3e49f719cd3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If we already read the NVM, we don't need to read it again.
Make sure that this is the case with a WARNING.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.8e0ffce7f873.Ie526042c4d4b93d9116c90f53180cbadef0b32cb@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If case we have an error reading FW memory we get garbage (stack old
data) in the report, so just initialize the table to zero.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.742786ffddba.Id7a17985f5bf6a03d3850f445ccdc611f97776ce@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

This command should be used only when there's a real client station.
Currently it works, but since soon the driver will stop actually having
an auxiliary station by default, and this command requires _some_ valid
station, it needs to be removed from this flow.
Signed-off-by: NNaftali Goldstein <naftali.goldstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.81b2acfe292b.I8c7372e6f72279e22966a2d0a9066521f9d2f1a0@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The profile shows an invalid value because the wrong format was used.
A u8 value should use by %hhu, not %hhd.  Fix thisit by changing it to
%hhu.
Signed-off-by: NJanie Tu <janiex.tu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.a595be52af22.I1843c3c4f9fb32fa8d439052bd0a5ad230f292e2@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

During CSA, we briefly nullify the phy context, in __iwl_mvm_unassign_vif_chanctx.
In case we have a FW assert right after it, it remains NULL though.
We end up running into endless loop due to mac80211 trying repeatedly to
move us to ASSOC state, and we keep returning -EINVAL. Later down the road
we hit a kernel panic.

Detect and avoid this endless loop.
Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201107104557.d64de2c17bff.Iedd0d2afa20a2aacba5259a5cae31cb3a119a4eb@changeid

We use mvm->queue_sync_state to wait for synchronous queue sync
messages, but if an async one happens inbetween we shouldn't
clear mvm->queue_sync_state after sending the async one, that
can run concurrently (at least from the CPU POV) with another
synchronous queue sync.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixes: 3c514bf8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add a loose synchronization of the NSSN across Rx queues")
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201107104557.51a3148f2c14.I0772171dbaec87433a11513e9586d98b5d920b5f@changeid

We need to feed the configuration id to remove  session protection
properly.
Remember the conf_id when we add the session protection so that we
can give it back when we want to remove the session protection.
While at it, slightly improve the kernel doc for the conf_id
of the notification.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Fixes: fe959c7b ("iwlwifi: mvm: use the new session protection command")
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201107104557.3642f730333d.I01a98ecde62096d00d171cf34ad775bf80cb0277@changeid

The ROC that runs on the AUX ROC (meaning an ROC on the STA vif),
was added with the HOT_SPOT_CMD firmware command and must be
cancelled with that same command.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Fixes: fe959c7b ("iwlwifi: mvm: use the new session protection command")
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201107104557.a317376154da.I44fa3637373ba4bd421cdff2cabc761bffc0735f@changeid

Currently, our max tpt is limited to max HT A-MPDU for LB,
and max VHT A-MPDU for HB. Configure HE exponent value correctly to
achieve HE max A-MPDU, both on LB and HB.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201107104557.4486852ebb56.I9eb0d028e31f183597fb90120e7d4ca87e0dd6cb@changeid

A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return
Signed-off-by: NTom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020125841.26791-1-trix@redhat.com