Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 30 10月, 2008 29 次提交
  3. 23 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 21 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 16 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 14 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 11 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 26 9月, 2008 2 次提交
    • L
      [XFS] Remove xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() · 71a8c87f
      由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于 
      Yet another bug was found in xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() and while the
source of the bug was found it wasn't an easy task to track it down
because the conditions are very difficult to reproduce.

A HUGE thank-you goes to Russell Cattelan and Eric Sandeen for their
significant effort in tracking down the source of this corruption.

xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() and xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() are almost
identical - they both compact indirect extent lists by moving extents from
subsequent buffers into earlier ones. xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() only
moves extents if all of the extents in the next buffer will fit into the
empty space in the buffer before it. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() will go
a step further and move part of the next buffer if all the extents wont
fit. It will then shift the remaining extents in the next buffer up to the
start of the buffer. The bug here was that we did not update er_extoff and
this caused extent list corruption.

It does not appear that this extra functionality gains us much. Calling
xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() instead will do a good enough job at
compacting the indirect list and will be quicker too.

For the case in xfs_iext_indirect_to_direct() the total number of extents
in the indirect list will fit into one buffer so we will never need the
extra functionality of xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() there.

Also xfs_iext_irec_compact_pages() doesn't need to do a memmove() (the
buffers will never overlap) so we don't want the performance hit that can
incur.

SGI-PV: 987159

SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32166a
Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
      71a8c87f
    • L
      [XFS] Fix extent list corruption in xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). · f1ccd295
      由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于 
      If we don't move all the records from the next buffer into the current
buffer then we need to update the er_extoff field of the next buffer as we
shift the remaining records to the start of the buffer.

SGI-PV: 987159

SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32165a
Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: NRussell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
      f1ccd295
  15. 17 9月, 2008 3 次提交
    • L
      [XFS] Don't do I/O beyond eof when unreserving space · 2fd6f6ec
      由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于 
      When unreserving space with boundaries that are not block aligned we round
up the start and round down the end boundaries and then use this function,
xfs_zero_remaining_bytes(), to zero the parts of the blocks that got
dropped during the rounding. The problem is we don't consider if these
blocks are beyond eof. Worse still is if we encounter delayed allocations
beyond eof we will try to use the magic delayed allocation block number as
a real block number. If the file size is ever extended to expose these
blocks then we'll go through xfs_zero_eof() to zero them anyway.

SGI-PV: 983683

SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32055a
Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
      2fd6f6ec
    • L
      [XFS] Fix use-after-free with buffers · e1f5dbd7
      由 Lachlan McIlroy 提交于 
      We have a use-after-free issue where log completions access buffers via
the buffer log item and the buffer has already been freed. Fix this by
taking a reference on the buffer when attaching the buffer log item and
release the hold when the buffer log item is detached and we no longer
need the buffer. Also create a new function xfs_buf_item_free() to combine
some common code.

SGI-PV: 985757

SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32025a
Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
      e1f5dbd7
    • D
      [XFS] Prevent lockdep false positives when locking two inodes. · f9114eba
      由 David Chinner 提交于 
      If we call xfs_lock_two_inodes() to grab both the iolock and the ilock,
then drop the ilocks on both inodes, then grab them again (as
xfs_swap_extents() does) then lockdep will report a locking order problem.
This is a false positive.

To avoid this, disallow xfs_lock_two_inodes() fom locking both inode locks
at once - force calers to make two separate calls. This means that nested
dropping and regaining of the ilocks will retain the same lockdep subclass
and so lockdep will not see anything wrong with this code.

SGI-PV: 986238

SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31999a
Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Leckie <pleckie@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
      f9114eba