1. 15 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP3: clock: remove un-used core dpll re-program code · d42f265a
      Tero Kristo 提交于
      Remove the OMAP3 core DPLL re-program code, and the associated SRAM
      code that does the low-level programming of the DPLL divider, idling
      of the SDRAM etc.
      
      This code was never fully implemented in the kernel; things missing
      were driver side handling of core clock changes (they need to account
      for their functional clock rate being changed on-the-fly), and the whole
      framework required for handling this. Thus, there is not much point
      to keep carrying the low-level support code either.
      Signed-off-by: NTero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
      Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      d42f265a
  2. 16 7月, 2015 2 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for Pandora · 7fcf7e06
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
      
      This board has support for device tree based booting, and we've been
      printing warnings about the legacy booting being deprecated for a
      few merge cycles now. Let's attempt to remove the legacy booting
      for it.
      
      The reason for removing the legacy booting support now rather than
      later is we can simply revert this patch if necessary if we run
      into some unexpected issues that are not trivial to fix for the
      device tree based booting.
      
      Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      7fcf7e06
    • S
      ARM: OMAP2+: Remove module references from IOMMU machine layer · 228e5fad
      Suman Anna 提交于
      The OMAP IOMMU driver has been adapted to the IOMMU framework
      for a while now, and it no longer supports being built as a
      module. Cleanup all the module related references both from
      the code and in the build.
      
      While at it, also relocate a comment around the initcall to
      avoid a checkpatch strict warning about using a blank line
      after function/struct/union/enum declarations.
      Signed-off-by: NSuman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      228e5fad
  3. 13 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for LogicPD Torpedo · d0796c4c
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
      
      This board has support for device tree based booting, and we've been
      printing warnings about the legacy booting being deprecated for a
      few merge cycles now. Let's attempt to remove the legacy booting
      for it.
      
      The reason for removing the legacy booting support now rather than
      later is we can simply revert this patch if necessary if we run
      into some unexpected issues that are not trivial to fix for the
      device tree based booting.
      
      Cc: Tim Nordell <tim.nordell@logicpd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      d0796c4c
  4. 02 6月, 2015 12 次提交
  5. 07 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for Beagleboards · d203c574
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
          
      This board has support for device tree based booting, and we've been
      printing warnings about the legacy booting being deprecated for a
      few merge cycles now. Let's attempt to remove the legacy booting
      for it.
      
      The reason for removing the legacy booting support now rather than
      later is we can simply revert this patch if necessary if we run
      into some unexpected issues that are not trivial to fix for the
      device tree based booting.
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      d203c574
  6. 05 5月, 2015 2 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for Overo · 71115b30
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
      
      This board has support for device tree based booting, and we've been
      printing warnings about the legacy booting being deprecated for a
      few merge cycles now. Let's attempt to remove the legacy booting
      for it.
      
      The reason for removing the legacy booting support now rather than
      later is we can simply revert this patch if necessary if we run
      into some unexpected issues that are not trivial to fix for the
      device tree based booting.
      
      Cc: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
      Acked-by: NAsh Charles <ashcharles@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      71115b30
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for cm-t35 · 11cd7b8c
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
      
      This board has support for device tree based booting, and we've been
      printing warnings about the legacy booting being deprecated for a
      few merge cycles now. Let's attempt to remove the legacy booting
      for it.
      
      The reason for removing the legacy booting support now rather than
      later is we can simply revert this patch if necessary if we run
      into some unexpected issues that are not trivial to fix for the
      device tree based booting.
      
      Cc: Dmitry Lifshitz <lifshitz@compulab.co.il>
      Cc: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      11cd7b8c
  7. 02 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  8. 17 3月, 2015 3 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy support for omap3 TouchBook · 01ea0d42
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
      
      As it seems this board only has minimal support upstreamed for the
      legacy booting and has not seen activity for on the mailing lists
      for a few years, let's attempt to remove the related legacy board-*.c
      file.
      
      I do not have this board, but it seems getting the same level of
      support with device tree based booting is mostly just configuring
      the .dts file. And there is no need to upgrade the boot loader as
      we can boot with appended DTB too. And most of the omap3 boards
      seem to be related to omap3-evm, and omap3beagleboard that are
      supported with device tree based booting.
      
      If somebody is using this board actively with the mainline kernel,
      please communicate this to the linux-omap mailing list so we can
      get the board booting with device tree based support. I can help
      some too getting the minimal device tree based booting going if
      help is needed.
      
      The reason for attempting to remove this board now is that I'd
      rather get the remaining omap3 legacy booting support into a known
      state where we at least have a .dts file being written for the
      remaining legacy boards. That is because for the next few merge
      cycles we can still revert this patch if absolutely necessary,
      but I'd rather not get suprised by missing .dts files at the point
      where we are ready to drop all remaining omap3 legacy booting
      support later on.
      
      Cc: Gregoire Gentil <gregoire@gentil.com>
      Cc: Radek Pilar <mrkva@mrkva.eu>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      01ea0d42
    • T
      ARM: OMAP3: Remove legacy support for devkit8000 · f56a1b24
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
      
      As it seems this board only has minimal support upstreamed for the
      legacy booting and has not seen activity for on the mailing lists
      for a few years, let's attempt to remove the related legacy board-*.c
      file.
      
      I do not have this board, but it seems getting the same level of
      support with device tree based booting is mostly just configuring
      the .dts file. And there is no need to upgrade the boot loader as
      we can boot with appended DTB too. And most of the omap3 boards
      seem to be related to omap3-evm, and omap3beagleboard that are
      supported with device tree based booting.
      
      If somebody is using this board actively with the mainline kernel,
      please communicate this to the linux-omap mailing list so we can
      get the board booting with device tree based support. I can help
      some too getting the minimal device tree based booting going if
      help is needed.
      
      The reason for attempting to remove this board now is that I'd
      rather get the remaining omap3 legacy booting support into a known
      state where we at least have a .dts file being written for the
      remaining legacy boards. That is because for the next few merge
      cycles we can still revert this patch if absolutely necessary,
      but I'd rather not get suprised by missing .dts files at the point
      where we are ready to drop all remaining omap3 legacy booting
      support later on.
      
      http://www.embest-tech.com/product/single-board-computers/index.html
      
      Cc: Thomas Weber <thomas@tomweber.eu>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      f56a1b24
    • T
      ARM: OMAP3: Remove legacy support for EMA-Tech Stalker board · 35cc73da
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      We've been moving all omap2+ based systems to boot in device tree only
      mode for a few years now. Only omap3 has legacy booting support
      remaining. Most omap3 boards already have related arch/arm/boot/*.dts*
      files for booting with device tree.
      
      As it seems this board only has minimal support upstreamed for the
      legacy booting and has not seen activity for on the mailing lists
      for a few years, let's attempt to remove the related legacy board-*.c
      file.
      
      I do not have this board, but it seems getting the same level of
      support with device tree based booting is mostly just configuring
      the .dts file. And there is no need to upgrade the boot loader as
      we can boot with appended DTB too. And most of the omap3 boards
      seem to be related to omap3-evm, and omap3beagleboard that are
      supported with device tree based booting.
      
      If somebody is using this board actively with the mainline kernel,
      please communicate this to the linux-omap mailing list so we can
      get the board booting with device tree based support. I can help
      some too getting the minimal device tree based booting going if
      help is needed.
      
      The reason for attempting to remove this board now is that I'd
      rather get the remaining omap3 legacy booting support into a known
      state where we at least have a .dts file being written for the
      remaining legacy boards. That is because for the next few merge
      cycles we can still revert this patch if absolutely necessary,
      but I'd rather not get suprised by missing .dts files at the point
      where we are ready to drop all remaining omap3 legacy booting
      support later on.
      
      Also looks like this board is no longer listed on ema-tech.com
      product page at:
      
      http://ema-tech.com/en/categories.html
      
      Cc: Jason Lam <lzg@ema-tech.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      35cc73da
  9. 31 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  10. 27 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  11. 15 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  12. 14 1月, 2015 4 次提交
  13. 08 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 29 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 08 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  16. 04 11月, 2014 3 次提交
  17. 27 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  18. 17 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 10 9月, 2014 1 次提交