Instead of add allocated file_region one by one to region_cache, we could
use list_splice to merge two list at once.

Also we know the number of entries in the list, increase the number
directly.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200831022351.20916-4-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We are sure to get a valid file_region, otherwise the
VM_BUG_ON(resv->region_cache_count <= 0) at the very beginning would be
triggered.

Let's remove the redundant one.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200831022351.20916-3-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm/hugetlb: code refine and simplification", v4.

Following are some cleanups for hugetlb.  Simple testing with
tools/testing/selftests/vm/map_hugetlb passes.

This patch (of 7):

Per my understanding, we keep the regions ordered and would always
coalesce regions properly.  So the task to keep this property is just to
coalesce its neighbour.

Let's simplify this.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200901014636.29737-1-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200831022351.20916-1-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200831022351.20916-2-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Change 'pecify' to 'Specify'.
Signed-off-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723032248.24772-4-bhe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If a swap entry tests positive for either is_[migration|hwpoison]_entry(),
then its swap_type() is among SWP_MIGRATION_READ, SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE and
SWP_HWPOISON.  All these types >= MAX_SWAPFILES, exactly what is asserted
with non_swap_entry().

So the checking non_swap_entry() in is_hugetlb_entry_migration() and
is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned() is redundant.

Let's remove it to optimize code.
Signed-off-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723032248.24772-3-bhe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm/hugetlb: Small cleanup and improvement", v2.

This patch (of 3):

Just like its neighbour is_hugetlb_entry_migration() has done.
Signed-off-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723032248.24772-1-bhe@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723032248.24772-2-bhe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is a general understanding that GFP_ATOMIC/GFP_NOWAIT are to be used
from atomic contexts.  E.g.  from within a spin lock or from the IRQ
context.  This is correct but there are some atomic contexts where the
above doesn't hold.  One of them would be an NMI context.  Page allocator
has never supported that and the general fear of this context didn't let
anybody to actually even try to use the allocator there.  Good, but let's
be more specific about that.

Another such a context, and that is where people seem to be more daring,
is raw_spin_lock.  Mostly because it simply resembles regular spin lock
which is supported by the allocator and there is not any implementation
difference with !RT kernels in the first place.  Be explicit that such a
context is not supported by the allocator.  The underlying reason is that
zone->lock would have to become raw_spin_lock as well and that has turned
out to be a problem for RT
(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mu305c1w.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de).
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NUladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929123010.5137-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Here is a very rare race which leaks memory:

Page P0 is allocated to the page cache.  Page P1 is free.

Thread A                Thread B                Thread C
find_get_entry():
xas_load() returns P0
						Removes P0 from page cache
						P0 finds its buddy P1
			alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 1) returns P0
			P0 has refcount 1
page_cache_get_speculative(P0)
P0 has refcount 2
			__free_pages(P0)
			P0 has refcount 1
put_page(P0)
P1 is not freed

Fix this by freeing all the pages in __free_pages() that won't be freed
by the call to put_page().  It's usually not a good idea to split a page,
but this is a very unlikely scenario.

Fixes: e286781d ("mm: speculative page references")
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200926213919.26642-1-willy@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The function is_huge_zero_page() doesn't call compound_head() to make sure
the page pointer is a head page. The call to is_huge_zero_page() in
release_pages() is made before compound_head() is called so the test would
fail if release_pages() was called with a tail page of the huge_zero_page
and put_page_testzero() would be called releasing the page.
This is unlikely to be happening in normal use or we would be seeing all
sorts of process data corruption when accessing a THP zero page.

Looking at other places where is_huge_zero_page() is called, all seem to
only pass a head page so I think the right solution is to move the call
to compound_head() in release_pages() to a point before calling
is_huge_zero_page().
Signed-off-by: NRalph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917173938.16420-1-rcampbell@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Previously 'for_next_zone_zonelist_nodemask' macro parameter 'zlist' was
unused so this patch removes it.
Signed-off-by: NMateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917211906.30059-1-mateusznosek0@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__perform_reclaim()'s single caller expects it to return 'unsigned long',
hence change its return value and a local variable to 'unsigned long'.
Suggested-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200916022138.16740-1-yanfei.xu@windriver.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

finalise_ac() is just 'epilogue' for 'prepare_alloc_pages'.  Therefore
there is no need to keep them both so 'finalise_ac' content can be merged
into prepare_alloc_pages() code.  It would make __alloc_pages_nodemask()
cleaner when it comes to readability.
Signed-off-by: NMateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200916110118.6537-1-mateusznosek0@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Previously in '__init early_init_on_alloc' and '__init early_init_on_free'
the return values from 'kstrtobool' were not handled properly.  That
caused potential garbage value read from variable 'bool_result'.
Introduced patch fixes error handling.
Signed-off-by: NMateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200916214125.28271-1-mateusznosek0@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Previously flags check was separated into two separated checks with two
separated branches. In case of presence of any of two mentioned flags,
the same effect on flow occurs. Therefore checks can be merged and one
branch can be avoided.
Signed-off-by: NMateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200911092310.31136-1-mateusznosek0@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Previously variable 'tmp' was initialized, but was not read later before
reassigning.  So the initialization can be removed.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove `tmp' altogether]
Signed-off-by: NMateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200904132422.17387-1-mateusznosek0@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In has_unmovable_pages(), the page parameter would not always be the first
page within a pageblock (see how the page pointer is passed in from
start_isolate_page_range() after call __first_valid_page()), so that would
cause checking unmovable pages span two pageblocks.

After this patch, the checking is enforced within one pageblock no matter
the page is first one or not, and obey the semantics of this function.

This issue is found by code inspection.

Michal said "this might lead to false negatives when an unrelated block
would cause an isolation failure".
Signed-off-by: NLi Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824065811.383266-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Let's document what ZONE_MOVABLE means, how it's used, and which special
cases we have regarding unmovable pages (memory offlining vs.  migration /
allocations).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-7-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

When introducing virtio-mem, the semantics of ZONE_MOVABLE were rather
unclear, which is why we special-cased ZONE_MOVABLE such that partially
plugged blocks would never end up in ZONE_MOVABLE.

Now that the semantics are much clearer (and will be documented in a
follow-up patch including the new virtio-mem behavior), let's allow to
online partially plugged memory blocks to ZONE_MOVABLE and also consider
memory blocks that were onlined to ZONE_MOVABLE when unplugging memory.
While unplugged memory pages are, in general, unmovable, they can be
skipped when offlining memory.

virtio-mem only unplugs fairly big chunks (in the megabyte range) and
rather tries to shrink the memory region than randomly choosing memory.
In theory, if all other pages in the movable zone would be movable,
virtio-mem would only shrink that zone and not create any kind of
fragmentation.

In the future, we might want to remember the zone again and use the
information when (un)plugging memory.  For now, let's keep it simple.

Note: Support for defragmentation is planned, to deal with fragmentation
after unplug due to memory chunks within memory blocks that could not get
unplugged before (e.g., somebody pinning pages within ZONE_MOVABLE for a
longer time).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-6-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Let's clean it up a bit, simplifying the exit paths.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-5-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Inside has_unmovable_pages(), we have a comment describing how unmovable
data could end up in ZONE_MOVABLE - via "movablecore".  Also, besides
checking if the first page in the pageblock is reserved, we don't perform
any further checks in case of ZONE_MOVABLE.

In case of memory offlining, we set REPORT_FAILURE, properly dump_page()
the page and handle the error gracefully.  alloc_contig_pages() users
currently never allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE.  E.g., hugetlb uses
alloc_contig_pages() for the allocation of gigantic pages only, which will
never end up on the MOVABLE zone (see htlb_alloc_mask()).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-4-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Right now, if we have two isolations racing on a pageblock that's in the
MOVABLE zone, we would trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE().  Let's just return
directly, simplifying error handling.

The change was introduced in commit 3d680bdf ("mm/page_isolation: fix
potential warning from user").  As far as I can see, we currently don't
have alloc_contig_range() users that use the ZONE_MOVABLE (anymore), so
it's currently more a cleanup and a preparation for the future than a fix.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE", v5.

When introducing virtio-mem, the semantics of ZONE_MOVABLE were rather
unclear, which is why we special-cased ZONE_MOVABLE such that partially
plugged blocks would never end up in ZONE_MOVABLE.

Now that the semantics are much clearer (and are documented in patch #6),
let's support partially plugged memory blocks in ZONE_MOVABLE, allowing
partially plugged memory blocks to be online to ZONE_MOVABLE and also
unplugging from such memory blocks.  This avoids surprises when onlining
of memory blocks suddenly fails, just because they are not completely
populated by virtio-mem (yet).

This is especially helpful for testing, but also paves the way for
virtio-mem optimizations, allowing more memory to get reliably unplugged.

Cleanup has_unmovable_pages() and set_migratetype_isolate(), providing
better documentation of how ZONE_MOVABLE interacts with different kind of
unmovable pages (memory offlining vs.  alloc_contig_range()).

This patch (of 6):

Let's move the split comment regarding bootmem allocations and memory
holes, especially in the context of ZONE_MOVABLE, to the PageReserved()
check.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-1-david@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-2-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

KASAN errors will currently trigger a panic when panic_on_warn is set.
This renders kasan_multishot useless, as further KASAN errors won't be
reported if the kernel has already paniced.  By making kasan_multishot
disable this behaviour for KASAN errors, we can still have the benefits of
panic_on_warn for non-KASAN warnings, yet be able to use kasan_multishot.

This is particularly important when running KASAN tests, which need to
trigger multiple KASAN errors: previously these would panic the system if
panic_on_warn was set, now they can run (and will panic the system should
non-KASAN warnings show up).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915035828.570483-6-davidgow@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200910070331.3358048-6-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Include documentation on how to test KASAN using CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_KUNIT
and CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_MODULE.
Signed-off-by: NPatricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Acked-by: NBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915035828.570483-5-davidgow@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200910070331.3358048-5-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Transfer all previous tests for KASAN to KUnit so they can be run more
easily.  Using kunit_tool, developers can run these tests with their other
KUnit tests and see "pass" or "fail" with the appropriate KASAN report
instead of needing to parse each KASAN report to test KASAN
functionalities.  All KASAN reports are still printed to dmesg.

Stack tests do not work properly when KASAN_STACK is enabled so those
tests use a check for "if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_STACK)" so they only run
if stack instrumentation is enabled.  If KASAN_STACK is not enabled, KUnit
will print a statement to let the user know this test was not run with
KASAN_STACK enabled.

copy_user_test and kasan_rcu_uaf cannot be run in KUnit so there is a
separate test file for those tests, which can be run as before as a
module.

[trishalfonso@google.com: v14]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915035828.570483-4-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: NPatricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200910070331.3358048-4-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Integrate KASAN into KUnit testing framework.

        - Fail tests when KASAN reports an error that is not expected
        - Use KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL to expect a KASAN error in KASAN
	  tests
        - Expected KASAN reports pass tests and are still printed when run
          without kunit_tool (kunit_tool still bypasses the report due to the
          test passing)
	- KUnit struct in current task used to keep track of the current
	  test from KASAN code

Make use of "[PATCH v3 kunit-next 1/2] kunit: generalize kunit_resource
API beyond allocated resources" and "[PATCH v3 kunit-next 2/2] kunit: add
support for named resources" from Alan Maguire [1]

        - A named resource is added to a test when a KASAN report is
          expected
        - This resource contains a struct for kasan_data containing
          booleans representing if a KASAN report is expected and if a
          KASAN report is found

[1] (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/1583251361-12748-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com/T/#t)
Signed-off-by: NPatricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Acked-by: NBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915035828.570483-3-davidgow@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200910070331.3358048-3-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Patch series "KASAN-KUnit Integration", v14.

This patchset contains everything needed to integrate KASAN and KUnit.

KUnit will be able to:
(1) Fail tests when an unexpected KASAN error occurs
(2) Pass tests when an expected KASAN error occurs

Convert KASAN tests to KUnit with the exception of copy_user_test because
KUnit is unable to test those.

Add documentation on how to run the KASAN tests with KUnit and what to
expect when running these tests.

This patch (of 5):

In order to integrate debugging tools like KASAN into the KUnit framework,
add KUnit struct to the current task to keep track of the current KUnit
test.
Signed-off-by: NPatricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: NAndrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915035828.570483-1-davidgow@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915035828.570483-2-davidgow@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200910070331.3358048-1-davidgow@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200910070331.3358048-2-davidgow@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In the context of the anonymous address space lifespan description the
'mm_users' reference counter is confused with 'mm_count'.  I.e a "zombie"
mm gets released when "mm_count" becomes zero, not "mm_users".
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1597040695-32633-1-git-send-email-agordeev@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Fix the comment of find_vm_area() and get_vm_area()
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200927153034.GA199877@rlkSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Since c67dc624 ("mm/vmalloc: do not call kmemleak_free() on not yet
accounted memory"), the __vunmap() have been changed to __vfree(), so
update the confusing comment().
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200927155409.GA3315@rlkSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Unlike others we don't use the marco writeback.  so let's remove it to
tame gcc warning:

mm/memory-failure.c:827: warning: macro "writeback" is not used
[-Wunused-macros]
Signed-off-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1599715096-20369-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is no need to calculate pgoff in each loop of for_each_process(), so
move it to the place before for_each_process(), which can save some CPU
cycles.
Signed-off-by: NXianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818082647.34322-1-tian.xianting@h3c.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

No need to hard code function name when __func__ can be used.

While here, replace specifiers for special types like dma_addr_t.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200814135055.24898-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is a place in the code where open-coded version of
list_for_each_entry_safe() is used.  Replace that with the standard macro.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200814135055.24898-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The variable dmirror_zero_page is unused in the HMM self test driver which
was probably intended to demonstrate how a driver could use
migrate_vma_setup() to share a single read-only device private zero page
similar to how the CPU does.  However, this isn't needed for the self
tests so remove it.
Signed-off-by: NRalph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200914213801.16520-1-rcampbell@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Some tests might not be able to be run if resources like huge pages are
not available.  Mark these tests as skipped instead of simply passing.
Signed-off-by: NRalph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827190400.12608-1-rcampbell@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

As mincore_huge_pmd() was dropped, remove the declaration from the header
file.
Signed-off-by: NYulei Zhang <yuleixzhang@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922083423.15074-1-yuleixzhang@tencent.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Both of the mm pointers are not needed after commit 7a4830c3
("mm/fork: Pass new vma pointer into copy_page_range()").

Jason Gunthorpe also reported that the ordering of copy_page_range() is
odd.  Since working at it, reorder the parameters to be logical, by (1)
always put the dst_* fields to be before src_* fields, and (2) keep the
same type of parameters together.

[peterx@redhat.com: further reorder some parameters and line format, per Jason]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201002192647.7161-1-peterx@redhat.com
[peterx@redhat.com: fix warnings]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201006200138.GA6026@xz-x1Reported-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930204950.6668-1-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Replace do_brk with do_brk_flags in comment of insert_vm_struct(), since
do_brk was removed in following commit.

Fixes: bb177a73 ("mm: do not bug_on on incorrect length in __mm_populate()")
Signed-off-by: NLiao Pingfang <liao.pingfang@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: NYi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1600650778-43230-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cnSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In commit 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2"), the helper allow_write_access
came with the atomic_inc operation of the i_writecount field in the func
__remove_shared_vm_struct().  But it forgot to use this helper function.
Signed-off-by: NMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921115814.39680-1-linmiaohe@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>