Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 2月, 2023 1 次提交
  3. 02 12月, 2022 1 次提交
  5. 29 11月, 2022 2 次提交
  7. 25 11月, 2022 3 次提交
  9. 24 11月, 2022 2 次提交
  11. 21 11月, 2022 4 次提交
  13. 18 11月, 2022 1 次提交
  15. 30 9月, 2022 6 次提交
  17. 23 5月, 2022 1 次提交
  19. 10 5月, 2022 2 次提交
  21. 23 2月, 2022 1 次提交
  23. 29 1月, 2022 2 次提交
  25. 31 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  27. 29 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  29. 10 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  31. 15 11月, 2021 2 次提交
  33. 21 10月, 2021 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Avoid infinite loop for copy from user recovery · c6a9d0e7
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.68
commit 619d747c1850bab61625ca9d8b4730f470a5947b
bugzilla: 182671 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4EWUH

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=619d747c1850bab61625ca9d8b4730f470a5947b

--------------------------------

commit 81065b35 upstream.

There are two cases for machine check recovery:

1) The machine check was triggered by ring3 (application) code.
   This is the simpler case. The machine check handler simply queues
   work to be executed on return to user. That code unmaps the page
   from all users and arranges to send a SIGBUS to the task that
   triggered the poison.

2) The machine check was triggered in kernel code that is covered by
   an exception table entry. In this case the machine check handler
   still queues a work entry to unmap the page, etc. but this will
   not be called right away because the #MC handler returns to the
   fix up code address in the exception table entry.

Problems occur if the kernel triggers another machine check before the
return to user processes the first queued work item.

Specifically, the work is queued using the ->mce_kill_me callback
structure in the task struct for the current thread. Attempting to queue
a second work item using this same callback results in a loop in the
linked list of work functions to call. So when the kernel does return to
user, it enters an infinite loop processing the same entry for ever.

There are some legitimate scenarios where the kernel may take a second
machine check before returning to the user.

1) Some code (e.g. futex) first tries a get_user() with page faults
   disabled. If this fails, the code retries with page faults enabled
   expecting that this will resolve the page fault.

2) Copy from user code retries a copy in byte-at-time mode to check
   whether any additional bytes can be copied.

On the other side of the fence are some bad drivers that do not check
the return value from individual get_user() calls and may access
multiple user addresses without noticing that some/all calls have
failed.

Fix by adding a counter (current->mce_count) to keep track of repeated
machine checks before task_work() is called. First machine check saves
the address information and calls task_work_add(). Subsequent machine
checks before that task_work call back is executed check that the address
is in the same page as the first machine check (since the callback will
offline exactly one page).

Expected worst case is four machine checks before moving on (e.g. one
user access with page faults disabled, then a repeat to the same address
with page faults enabled ... repeat in copy tail bytes). Just in case
there is some code that loops forever enforce a limit of 10.

 [ bp: Massage commit message, drop noinstr, fix typo, extend panic
   messages. ]

Fixes: 5567d11c ("x86/mce: Send #MC singal from task work")
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YT/IJ9ziLqmtqEPu@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
      c6a9d0e7
  35. 28 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  37. 14 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  39. 03 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  41. 09 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  43. 07 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  45. 17 11月, 2020 2 次提交
    • J
      sched/deadline: Fix priority inheritance with multiple scheduling classes · 2279f540
      由 Juri Lelli 提交于 
      Glenn reported that "an application [he developed produces] a BUG in
deadline.c when a SCHED_DEADLINE task contends with CFS tasks on nested
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutexes.  I believe the bug is triggered when a CFS
task that was boosted by a SCHED_DEADLINE task boosts another CFS task
(nested priority inheritance).

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 kernel BUG at kernel/sched/deadline.c:1462!
 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 CPU: 12 PID: 19171 Comm: dl_boost_bug Tainted: ...
 Hardware name: ...
 RIP: 0010:enqueue_task_dl+0x335/0x910
 Code: ...
 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000c2bbc68 EFLAGS: 00010002
 RAX: 0000000000000009 RBX: ffff888c0af94c00 RCX: ffffffff81e12500
 RDX: 000000000000002e RSI: ffff888c0af94c00 RDI: ffff888c10b22600
 RBP: ffffc9000c2bbd08 R08: 0000000000000009 R09: 0000000000000078
 R10: ffffffff81e12440 R11: ffffffff81e1236c R12: ffff888bc8932600
 R13: ffff888c0af94eb8 R14: ffff888c10b22600 R15: ffff888bc8932600
 FS:  00007fa58ac55700(0000) GS:ffff888c10b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007fa58b523230 CR3: 0000000bf44ab003 CR4: 00000000007606e0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 PKRU: 55555554
 Call Trace:
  ? intel_pstate_update_util_hwp+0x13/0x170
  rt_mutex_setprio+0x1cc/0x4b0
  task_blocks_on_rt_mutex+0x225/0x260
  rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked+0xab/0x2d0
  rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x50/0x80
  hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock+0x20/0x30
  hrtimer_cancel+0x13/0x30
  do_nanosleep+0xa0/0x150
  hrtimer_nanosleep+0xe1/0x230
  ? __hrtimer_init_sleeper+0x60/0x60
  __x64_sys_nanosleep+0x8d/0xa0
  do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x100
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
 RIP: 0033:0x7fa58b52330d
 ...
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]—

He also provided a simple reproducer creating the situation below:

 So the execution order of locking steps are the following
 (N1 and N2 are non-deadline tasks. D1 is a deadline task. M1 and M2
 are mutexes that are enabled * with priority inheritance.)

 Time moves forward as this timeline goes down:

 N1              N2               D1
 |               |                |
 |               |                |
 Lock(M1)        |                |
 |               |                |
 |             Lock(M2)           |
 |               |                |
 |               |              Lock(M2)
 |               |                |
 |             Lock(M1)           |
 |             (!!bug triggered!) |

Daniel reported a similar situation as well, by just letting ksoftirqd
run with DEADLINE (and eventually block on a mutex).

Problem is that boosted entities (Priority Inheritance) use static
DEADLINE parameters of the top priority waiter. However, there might be
cases where top waiter could be a non-DEADLINE entity that is currently
boosted by a DEADLINE entity from a different lock chain (i.e., nested
priority chains involving entities of non-DEADLINE classes). In this
case, top waiter static DEADLINE parameters could be null (initialized
to 0 at fork()) and replenish_dl_entity() would hit a BUG().

Fix this by keeping track of the original donor and using its parameters
when a task is boosted.
Reported-by: NGlenn Elliott <glenn@aurora.tech>
Reported-by: NDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: NDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117061432.517340-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
      2279f540
    • P
      sched: Fix data-race in wakeup · f97bb527
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Mel reported that on some ARM64 platforms loadavg goes bananas and
Will tracked it down to the following race:

  CPU0					CPU1

  schedule()
    prev->sched_contributes_to_load = X;
    deactivate_task(prev);

					try_to_wake_up()
					  if (p->on_rq &&) // false
					  if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) && // true
					      ttwu_queue_wakelist())
					        p->sched_remote_wakeup = Y;

    smp_store_release(prev->on_cpu, 0);

where both p->sched_contributes_to_load and p->sched_remote_wakeup are
in the same word, and thus the stores X and Y race (and can clobber
one another's data).

Whereas prior to commit c6e7bd7a ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu()
spinning on p->on_cpu") the p->on_cpu handoff serialized access to
p->sched_remote_wakeup (just as it still does with
p->sched_contributes_to_load) that commit broke that by calling
ttwu_queue_wakelist() with p->on_cpu != 0.

However, due to

  p->XXX = X			ttwu()
  schedule()			  if (p->on_rq && ...) // false
    smp_mb__after_spinlock()	  if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) &&
    deactivate_task()		      ttwu_queue_wakelist())
      p->on_rq = 0;		        p->sched_remote_wakeup = Y;

We can be sure any 'current' store is complete and 'current' is
guaranteed asleep. Therefore we can move p->sched_remote_wakeup into
the current flags word.

Note: while the observed failure was loadavg accounting gone wrong due
to ttwu() cobbering p->sched_contributes_to_load, the reverse problem
is also possible where schedule() clobbers p->sched_remote_wakeup,
this could result in enqueue_entity() wrecking ->vruntime and causing
scheduling artifacts.

Fixes: c6e7bd7a ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu")
Reported-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Debugged-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201117083016.GK3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
      f97bb527
  47. 17 10月, 2020 1 次提交