Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 22 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 19 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 16 6月, 2009 6 次提交
  7. 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      module: trim exception table on init free. · ad6561df
      由 Rusty Russell 提交于 
      It's theoretically possible that there are exception table entries
which point into the (freed) init text of modules.  These could cause
future problems if other modules get loaded into that memory and cause
an exception as we'd see the wrong fixup.  The only case I know of is
kvm-intel.ko (when CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n).

Amerigo fixed this long-standing FIXME in the x86 version, but this
patch is more general.

This implements trim_init_extable(); most archs are simple since they
use the standard lib/extable.c sort code.  Alpha and IA64 use relative
addresses in their fixups, so thier trimming is a slight variation.

Sparc32 is unique; it doesn't seem to define ARCH_HAS_SORT_EXTABLE,
yet it defines its own sort_extable() which overrides the one in lib.
It doesn't sort, so we have to mark deleted entries instead of
actually trimming them.
Inspired-by: NAmerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
      ad6561df
  9. 08 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  11. 01 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 19 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 16 3月, 2009 2 次提交
  17. 04 2月, 2009 1 次提交
    • D
      sparc64: Kill bogus TPC/address truncation during 32-bit faults. · 9b026058
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      This builds upon eeabac73
("sparc64: Validate kernel generated fault addresses on sparc64.")

Upon further consideration, we actually should never see any
fault addresses for 32-bit tasks with the upper 32-bits set.

If it does every happen, by definition it's a bug.  Whatever
context created that fault would only have that fault satisfied
if we used the full 64-bit address.  If we truncate it, we'll
always fault the wrong address and we'll always loop faulting
forever.

So catch such conditions and mark them as errors always.  Log
the error and fail the fault.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9b026058
  19. 03 2月, 2009 1 次提交
    • D
      sparc64: Validate kernel generated fault addresses on sparc64. · eeabac73
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      In order to handle all of the cases of address calculation overflow
properly, we run sparc 32-bit processes in "address masking" mode
when running on a 64-bit kernel.

Address masking mode zeros out the top 32-bits of the address
calculated for every load and store instruction.

However, when we're in privileged mode we have to run with that
address masking mode disabled even when accessing userspace from
the kernel.

To "simulate" the address masking mode we clear the top-bits by
hand for 32-bit processes in the fault handler.

It is the responsibility of code in the compat layer to properly
zero extend addresses used to access userspace.  If this isn't
followed properly we can get into a fault loop.

Say that the user address is 0xf0000000 but for whatever reason
the kernel code sign extends this to 64-bit, and then the kernel
tries to access the result.

In such a case we'll fault on address 0xfffffffff0000000 but the fault
handler will process that fault as if it were to address 0xf0000000.
We'll loop faulting forever because the fault never gets satisfied.

So add a check specifically for this case, when the kernel is faulting
on a user address access and the addresses don't match up.

This code path is sufficiently slow path, and this bug is sufficiently
painful to diagnose, that this kind of bug check is warranted.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      eeabac73
  21. 09 1月, 2009 2 次提交
    • S
      sparc64: move EXPORT_SYMBOL to the symbols definition · 917c3660
      由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于 
      Move all applicable EXPORT_SYMBOL()s to the file where the respective
symbol is defined.

Removed all the includes that are no longer needed in sparc_ksyms_64.c

Comment all remaining EXPORT_SYMBOL()s in sparc_ksyms_64.c
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

Additions by Julian Calaby:
* Moved EXPORT_SYMBOL()s for prom functions to their rightful places.
* Made some minor cleanups to the includes and comments of sparc_ksyms_64.c
* Updated and tidied commit message.
* Rebased patch over sparc-2.6.git HEAD.
* Ensured that all modified files have the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: NJulian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      917c3660
    • S
      sparc: move EXPORT_SYMBOL to the symbols definition · 6943f3da
      由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于 
      Move all applicable EXPORT_SYMBOL()s to the file where the respective
symbol is defined.

Removed all the includes that are no longer needed in sparc_ksyms_32.c

Comment all remaining EXPORT_SYMBOL()s in sparc_ksyms_32.c

Two symbols are shared with sparc64 thus the exports were removed from
the sparc_ksyms_64.c too, along with the include their ommission made
redundant.
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

Additions by Julian Calaby:
* Moved EXPORT_SYMBOL()s for prom functions to their rightful places.
* Made some minor cleanups to the includes and comments of sparc_ksyms_32.c
* Made another subtraction from sparc_ksyms_64.c
* Updated and tidied commit message.
* Rebased patch over sparc-2.6.git HEAD.
* Ensured that all modified files have the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: NJulian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6943f3da
  23. 07 1月, 2009 3 次提交
    • S
      sparc64: Use unsigned long long for u64. · 90181136
      由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于 
      Andrew Morton wrote:

    People keep on doing

            printk("%llu", some_u64);

    testing it only on x86_64 and this generates a warning storm on
    powerpc, sparc64, etc.  Because they use `long', not `long long'.

    Quite a few 64-bit architectures are using `long' for their
    s64/u64 types.  We should convert them all to `long long'.

Update types.h so we use unsigned long long for u64 and
fix all warnings in sparc64 code.
Tested with an allnoconfig, defconfig and allmodconfig builds.

This patch introduces additional warnings in several drivers.
These will be dealt with in separate patches.
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      90181136
    • S
      sparc: refactor code in fault_32.c · 0157141a
      由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于 
      The sparc allmodconfig build broke due to enabling of the
branch_tracer that does some very clever things with
all if conditions. This caused my gcc 3.4.5 to be so confused that
it emitted a warning:

arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c: In function `do_sparc_fault':
arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c:176: warning: 'fixup' might be used uninitialized in this function

And with -Werror this broke the build.

Refactor code so it:
1) becomes more readable
2) no longer emit a warning with the branch_tracer enabled
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0157141a
    • S
      sparc64: refactor code in init_64.c · ff9aefbf
      由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于 
      The sparc64 allmodconfig build broke due to enabling of the
branch_tracer that does some very clever things with
all if conditions. This caused my gcc 3.4.5 to be so confused that
it emitted two warnings:

arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c: In function `update_mmu_cache':
arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c:271: warning: 'pg_flags' might be used uninitialized in this function
arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c:272: warning: 'page' might be used uninitialized in this function

And with -Werror this broke the build.

Refactor code so it:
1) becomes more readable
2) no longer emit a warning with the branch_tracer enabled

The refactoring uses a small helper function (flush_dcache()).
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ff9aefbf
  25. 27 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  27. 12 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 05 12月, 2008 6 次提交
  31. 01 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  33. 04 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  35. 02 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  37. 01 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      sparc: remove CONFIG_SUN4 · 5110bd21
      由 Adrian Bunk 提交于 
      While doing some easy cleanups on the sparc code I noticed that the
CONFIG_SUN4 code seems to be worse than the rest - there were some
"I don't know how it should work, but the current code definitely cannot
work." places.

And while I have seen people running Linux on machines like a
SPARCstation 5 a few years ago I don't recall having seen sun4
machines, even less ones running Linux.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5110bd21
  39. 29 8月, 2008 5 次提交