1. 15 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 26 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 25 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 05 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 27 11月, 2014 2 次提交
    • A
      ACPI / PMIC: support PMIC operation region for XPower AXP288 · d8139f63
      Aaron Lu 提交于
      The Baytrail-T-CR platform firmware has defined two customized operation
      regions for PMIC chip Dollar Cove XPower - one is for power resource
      handling and one is for thermal just like the CrystalCove one. This patch
      adds support for them on top of the common PMIC opregion region code.
      Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
      Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> for the MFD part
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      d8139f63
    • A
      ACPI / PMIC: support PMIC operation region for CrystalCove · b1eea857
      Aaron Lu 提交于
      The Baytrail-T platform firmware has defined two customized operation
      regions for PMIC chip Crystal Cove - one is for power resource handling
      and one is for thermal: sensor temperature reporting, trip point setting,
      etc. This patch adds support for them on top of the existing Crystal Cove
      PMIC driver.
      
      The reason to split code into a separate file intel_pmic.c is that there
      are more PMIC drivers with ACPI operation region support coming and we can
      re-use those code. The intel_pmic_opregion_data structure is created also
      for this purpose: when we need to support a new PMIC's operation region,
      we just need to fill those callbacks and the two register mapping tables.
      Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
      Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> for the MFD part
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      b1eea857
  6. 18 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 17 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 21 7月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 26 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 10 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 06 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 09 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • H
      ACPI: Update the ACPI spec information in Kconfig · c7f5220d
      Hanjun Guo 提交于
      The UEFI Forum included the ACPI spec in its portfolio in October 2013
      and will host future spec iterations, following the ACPI v5.0a release.
      
      A UEFI Forum working group named ACPI Specification Working Group (ASWG)
      has been established to handle future ACPI developments, any UEFI member
      can join the group and contribute to ACPI specification.
      
      So update the ownership and developers for ACPI in Kconfig accordingly,
      and add another website link to ACPI specification too.
      Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      c7f5220d
  13. 20 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  14. 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 05 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      ACPI: introduce CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY · af1ae78a
      Al Stone 提交于
      ACPI hardware reduced mode exists to allow newer platforms to use a
      simpler form of ACPI that does not require supporting legacy versions
      of the specification and their associated hardware.  This mode was
      introduced in the ACPI 5.0 specification.
      
      The ACPI hardware reduced mode is supposed to be used on systems
      having the HW_REDUCED_ACPI flag set in the FADT.  ACPICA checks
      that flag to determine whether or not it should work in the HW
      reduced mode and there are pieces of code in it that will never
      be used in that case.
      
      Since some architecutres will always use the ACPI HW reduced mode,
      it doesn't make sense for them to ever compile support for anything
      else.  Thus, they should set the flag ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE to TRUE
      in the ACPICA source.  To enable them to do that, introduce a new
      kernel configuration option, CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY, that
      will cause the ACPICA's ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE flag to be TRUE when
      set.
      
      Introducing this configuration item is based on suggestions from Lv
      Zheng saying that this does not belong in ACPICA, but rather to the
      Linux kernel itself.
      
      References: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg46369.htmlSigned-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
      [rjw: Subject and changelog]
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      af1ae78a
  16. 20 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 13 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: delete CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR · 4c47cb19
      Len Brown 提交于
      About 10 years ago, this option was created to help
      distros enable ACPI and not get distracted by ACPI
      BIOS issues in machines which were deemed old
      at that time, eg 1999 and earlier.
      
      After a couple of years, the high volume distros
      stopped bothering to set this option, and instead
      simply ran in ACPI mode on all systems with an
      ACPI BIOS -- regardless of BIOS DMI year.
      
      Recently there have been some ACPI-enabled systems
      with no DMI, mandating that CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0.
      
      So it seems vanishingly unlikely that this option
      is helping anybody run a 2013 kernel on a 1998 system,
      and now more systems mandate this option be disabled,
      so we simplify by deleting it entirely.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      4c47cb19
  18. 11 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 01 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  20. 24 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 16 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  22. 12 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  24. 01 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  25. 23 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  26. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  28. 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      ACPI / BGRT: Don't let users configure BGRT on non X86 systems · e66cd537
      Tony Luck 提交于
      Fengguang Wu's 0-Day kernel build testing backend found the
      following build error for an allmodconfig build on ia64:
      
         drivers/built-in.o: In function `show_yoffset':
      >> bgrt.c:(.text+0xe5a71): undefined reference to `bgrt_tab'
      >> bgrt.c:(.text+0xe5a91): undefined reference to `bgrt_tab'
         drivers/built-in.o: In function `show_xoffset':
      >> bgrt.c:(.text+0xe5b51): undefined reference to `bgrt_tab'
      >> bgrt.c:(.text+0xe5b71): undefined reference to `bgrt_tab'
         drivers/built-in.o: In function `show_type':
      >> bgrt.c:(.text+0xe5c31): undefined reference to `bgrt_tab'
         drivers/built-in.o:bgrt.c:(.text+0xe5c51): more undefined references to `bgrt_tab' follow
         drivers/built-in.o: In function `bgrt_init':
         bgrt.c:(.init.text+0x8931): undefined reference to `bgrt_image'
         bgrt.c:(.init.text+0x8932): undefined reference to `bgrt_image_size'
         bgrt.c:(.init.text+0x8950): undefined reference to `bgrt_image'
         bgrt.c:(.init.text+0x8960): undefined reference to `bgrt_image_size'
      
      The problem is that all these undefined names are provided by
      arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c - which is obviously not available
      to the ia64 build.
      
      It doesn't seem useful to provide the BGRT support for Itanium
      (many systems are headless and have no graphics at all). So
      just don't let users configure this driver on non-X86 machines.
      Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      e66cd537
  29. 25 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  30. 04 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  31. 26 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  32. 16 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  33. 13 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  34. 22 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  35. 23 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  36. 01 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  37. 30 9月, 2012 1 次提交