We do not need to call 'jffs2_write_super()' on unmount. This function
causes a GC pass to make sure the current contents is pushed out with
the data which we already have on the media.

But this is not needed on unmount and only slows unmount down unnecessarily.
It is enough to just sync the write-buffer.

This call was added by one of the generic VFS rework patch-sets,
see 8c85e125.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

We do not need 'lock_super()'/'unlock_super()' in JFFS2 - kill them.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

lglocks and brlocks are currently generated with some complicated macros
in lglock.h.  But there's no reason to not just use common utility
functions and put all the data into a common data structure.

In preparation, this patch changes the API to look more like normal
function calls with pointers, not magic macros.

The patch is rather large because I move over all users in one go to keep
it bisectable.  This impacts the VFS somewhat in terms of lines changed.
But no actual behaviour change.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

lglocks and brlocks are currently generated with some complicated macros
in lglock.h.  But there's no reason to not just use common utility
functions and put all the data into a common data structure.

Since there are at least two users it makes sense to share this code in a
library.  This is also easier maintainable than a macro forest.

This will also make it later possible to dynamically allocate lglocks and
also use them in modules (this would both still need some additional, but
now straightforward, code)

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Optimizing the slow paths adds a lot of complexity.  If you need to
grab every lock often, you have other problems.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

seeing that "fast" symlinks still get allocation + copy, we might as
well simply switch them to pagecache-based variant of ->follow_link();
just need an appropriate ->readpage() for them...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

switch to generic_readlink(), while we are at it
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

little-endians...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

annotate properly...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Fix kernel-doc warnings in fs/inode.c:

Warning(fs/inode.c:1493): No description found for parameter 'path'
Warning(fs/inode.c:1493): Excess function parameter 'mnt' description in 'touch_atime'
Warning(fs/inode.c:1493): Excess function parameter 'dentry' description in 'touch_atime'
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

a couple of le32 and le16 used with wrong le..._to_cpu(), plus
idiotic use of le32_to_cpu() on 1-bit bitfield
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

ocfs2_block_check is for little-endian contents; if we just want to
its fields converted to host-endian in a couple of functions, just
put those values into local u32 and u16...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... unused since 2.4.4.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

In *all* callers we have a dentry of child of that directory.
Just use ->d_parent of that one, for fsck sake...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

a) %d does _not_ produce a page worth of output
b) snprintf() doesn't return negatives - it used to in old glibc, but
that's the kernel...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Use parent_inode has a flag for whether nfsd wants a connectable fh, but
generate one opportunistically so that we can take advantage of the
additional info in there.
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

pass inode + parent's inode or NULL instead of dentry + bool saying
whether we want the parent or not.

NOTE: that needs ceph fix folded in.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

don't open-code it...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>