Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 30 4月, 2019 23 次提交
  3. 17 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 04 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: tree-checker: Don't check max block group size as current max chunk size limit is unreliable · 10950929
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
A completely valid btrfs will refuse to mount, with error message like:
  BTRFS critical (device sdb2): corrupt leaf: root=2 block=239681536 slot=172 \
    bg_start=12018974720 bg_len=10888413184, invalid block group size, \
    have 10888413184 expect (0, 10737418240]

This has been reported several times as the 4.19 kernel is now being
used. The filesystem refuses to mount, but is otherwise ok and booting
4.18 is a workaround.

Btrfs check returns no error, and all kernels used on this fs is later
than 2011, which should all have the 10G size limit commit.

[CAUSE]
For a 12 devices btrfs, we could allocate a chunk larger than 10G due to
stripe stripe bump up.

__btrfs_alloc_chunk()
|- max_stripe_size = 1G
|- max_chunk_size = 10G
|- data_stripe = 11
|- if (1G * 11 > 10G) {
       stripe_size = 976128930;
       stripe_size = round_up(976128930, SZ_16M) = 989855744

However the final stripe_size (989855744) * 11 = 10888413184, which is
still larger than 10G.

[FIX]
For the comprehensive check, we need to do the full check at chunk read
time, and rely on bg <-> chunk mapping to do the check.

We could just skip the length check for now.

Fixes: fce466ea ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Reported-by: NWang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      10950929
  7. 06 11月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 15 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 06 8月, 2018 2 次提交
  13. 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 26 3月, 2018 3 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: add more __cold annotations · e67c718b
      由 David Sterba 提交于 
      The __cold functions are placed to a special section, as they're
expected to be called rarely. This could help i-cache prefetches or help
compiler to decide which branches are more/less likely to be taken
without any other annotations needed.

Though we can't add more __exit annotations, it's still possible to add
__cold (that's also added with __exit). That way the following function
categories are tagged:

- printf wrappers, error messages
- exit helpers
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e67c718b
    • N
      btrfs: Remove custom crc32c init code · 9678c543
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      The custom crc32 init code was introduced in
14a958e6 ("Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in") to
enable using btrfs as a built-in. However, later as pointed out by
60efa5eb ("Btrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init") this
wasn't enough and finally btrfs was switched to late_initcall which
comes after the generic crc32c implementation is initiliased. The
latter commit superseeded the former. Now that we don't have to
maintain our own code let's just remove it and switch to using the
generic implementation.

Despite touching a lot of files the patch is really simple. Here is the gist of
the changes:

1. Select LIBCRC32C rather than the low-level modules.
2. s/btrfs_crc32c/crc32c/g
3. replace hash.h with linux/crc32c.h
4. Move the btrfs namehash funcs to ctree.h and change the tree accordingly.

I've tested this with btrfs being both a module and a built-in and xfstest
doesn't complain.

Does seem to fix the longstanding problem of not automatically selectiong
the crc32c module when btrfs is used. Possibly there is a workaround in
dracut.

The modinfo confirms that now all the module dependencies are there:

before:
depends:        zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate

after:
depends:        libcrc32c,zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add more info to changelog from mails ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      9678c543
    • Q
      btrfs: tree-checker: Replace root parameter with fs_info · 2f659546
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      When inspecting the error message with real corruption, the "root=%llu"
always shows "1" (root tree), instead of the correct owner.

The problem is that we are getting @root from page->mapping->host, which
points the same btree inode, so we will always get the same root.

This makes the root owner output meaningless, and harder to port
tree-checker to btrfs-progs.

So get rid of the false and meaningless @root parameter and replace it
with @fs_info.
To get the owner, we can only rely on btrfs_header_owner() now.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2f659546
  17. 22 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  19. 28 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: tree-checker: Fix false panic for sanity test · 69fc6cbb
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
If we run btrfs with CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS=y, it will
instantly cause kernel panic like:

------
...
assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c, line: 3853
...
Call Trace:
 btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty+0x187/0x1f0 [btrfs]
 setup_items_for_insert+0x385/0x650 [btrfs]
 __btrfs_drop_extents+0x129a/0x1870 [btrfs]
...
-----

[Cause]
Btrfs will call btrfs_check_leaf() in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() to check
if the leaf is valid with CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS=y.

However quite some btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() callers(*) don't really
initialize its item data but only initialize its item pointers, leaving
item data uninitialized.

This makes tree-checker catch uninitialized data as error, causing
such panic.

*: These callers include but not limited to
setup_items_for_insert()
btrfs_split_item()
btrfs_expand_item()

[Fix]
Add a new parameter @check_item_data to btrfs_check_leaf().
With @check_item_data set to false, item data check will be skipped and
fallback to old btrfs_check_leaf() behavior.

So we can still get early warning if we screw up item pointers, and
avoid false panic.

Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NLakshmipathi.G <lakshmipathi.g@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      69fc6cbb
  21. 30 10月, 2017 3 次提交