1. 18 2月, 2015 3 次提交
  2. 14 12月, 2014 4 次提交
  3. 14 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 07 6月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 07 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  6. 13 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 12 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 21 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 21 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers · 02c24a82
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
      in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
      the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
      file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
      ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
      sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
      individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
      Thanks,
      Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      02c24a82
  10. 10 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 26 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  14. 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      sanitize ->fsync() for affs · c4758795
      Al Viro 提交于
      unfortunately, for affs (especially for affs directories) we have
      no real way to keep track of metadata ownership.  So we have to
      do more or less what file_fsync() does, but we do *not* need to
      call write_super() there.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      c4758795
  15. 05 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • N
      fs: symlink write_begin allocation context fix · 54566b2c
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      With the write_begin/write_end aops, page_symlink was broken because it
      could no longer pass a GFP_NOFS type mask into the point where the
      allocations happened.  They are done in write_begin, which would always
      assume that the filesystem can be entered from reclaim.  This bug could
      cause filesystem deadlocks.
      
      The funny thing with having a gfp_t mask there is that it doesn't really
      allow the caller to arbitrarily tinker with the context in which it can be
      called.  It couldn't ever be GFP_ATOMIC, for example, because it needs to
      take the page lock.  The only thing any callers care about is __GFP_FS
      anyway, so turn that into a single flag.
      
      Add a new flag for write_begin, AOP_FLAG_NOFS.  Filesystems can now act on
      this flag in their write_begin function.  Change __grab_cache_page to
      accept a nofs argument as well, to honour that flag (while we're there,
      change the name to grab_cache_page_write_begin which is more instructive
      and does away with random leading underscores).
      
      This is really a more flexible way to go in the end anyway -- if a
      filesystem happens to want any extra allocations aside from the pagecache
      ones in ints write_begin function, it may now use GFP_KERNEL (rather than
      GFP_NOFS) for common case allocations (eg.  ocfs2_alloc_write_ctxt, for a
      random example).
      
      [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix ubifs]
      [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix fuse]
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.28.x]
      Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      [ Cleaned up the calling convention: just pass in the AOP flags
        untouched to the grab_cache_page_write_begin() function.  That
        just simplifies everybody, and may even allow future expansion of the
        logic.   - Linus ]
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      54566b2c
  16. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 07 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  20. 17 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  21. 10 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  22. 10 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  23. 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  24. 01 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  25. 29 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  26. 29 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  27. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  28. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4