Not used anywhere, hence dead code. wpa_supplicant has its
own clear_keys routine.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Interestingly, wpa_supplicant doesn't use it, but uses the
currently unsupported IW_AUTH_DROP_UNENCRYPTED. So I guess
it doesn't matter anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

These aren't used anywhere (hostapd, wpa_supplicant) and until we
have a proper interface to the rate control algorithms they don't
make much sense either since e.g. rc80211_lowest won't honour them.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add mac80211, the IEEE 802.11 software MAC layer.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>