Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 27 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 24 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 23 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 22 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 20 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  13. 04 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  15. 16 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 13 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 12 2月, 2020 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/gt: Acquire ce->active before ce->pin_count/ce->pin_mutex · 5b92415e
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Similar to commit ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of
i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") we have the same race of
trying to pin the context underneath a mutex while allowing the
decrement to be atomic outside of that mutex. This leads to the problem
where two threads may simultaneously try to pin the context and the
second not notice that they needed to repin the context.

<2> [198.669621] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c:387!
<4> [198.669703] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
<4> [198.669712] CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: gem_exec_create Tainted: G     U  W         5.5.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_7755+ #1
<4> [198.669723] Hardware name:  /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017
<4> [198.669776] RIP: 0010:timeline_advance+0x7b/0xe0 [i915]
<4> [198.669785] Code: 00 48 c7 c2 10 f1 46 a0 48 c7 c7 70 1b 32 a0 e8 bb dd e7 e0 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 d1 af e7 e0 31 f6 bf 09 00 00 00 e8 35 ef d8 e0 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c1 48 fa 49 a0 ba 84 01 00 00 48 c7 c6 10 f1 46 a0 48
<4> [198.669803] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004c3a38 EFLAGS: 00010296
<4> [198.669810] RAX: ffff888270b35140 RBX: ffff88826f32ee00 RCX: 0000000000000006
<4> [198.669818] RDX: 00000000000017c5 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009
<4> [198.669826] RBP: ffffc900004c3a64 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
<4> [198.669834] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88826f9b5980
<4> [198.669841] R13: 0000000000000cc0 R14: ffffc900004c3dc0 R15: ffff888253610068
<4> [198.669849] FS:  00007f63e663fe40(0000) GS:ffff888276c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [198.669857] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4> [198.669864] CR2: 00007f171f8e39a8 CR3: 000000026b1f6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0
<4> [198.669872] Call Trace:
<4> [198.669924]  intel_timeline_get_seqno+0x12/0x40 [i915]
<4> [198.669977]  __i915_request_create+0x76/0x5a0 [i915]
<4> [198.670024]  i915_request_create+0x86/0x1c0 [i915]
<4> [198.670068]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xbf2/0x2500 [i915]
<4> [198.670082]  ? __lock_acquire+0x460/0x15d0
<4> [198.670128]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x470 [i915]
<4> [198.670171]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915]
<4> [198.670181]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0
<4> [198.670188]  drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390
<4> [198.670233]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915]

Fixes: 84135022 ("drm/i915/gt: Drop mutex serialisation between context pin/unpin")
References: ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127152829.2842149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit e5429340)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      5b92415e
  21. 28 1月, 2020 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/gt: Acquire ce->active before ce->pin_count/ce->pin_mutex · e5429340
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Similar to commit ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of
i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") we have the same race of
trying to pin the context underneath a mutex while allowing the
decrement to be atomic outside of that mutex. This leads to the problem
where two threads may simultaneously try to pin the context and the
second not notice that they needed to repin the context.

<2> [198.669621] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c:387!
<4> [198.669703] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
<4> [198.669712] CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: gem_exec_create Tainted: G     U  W         5.5.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_7755+ #1
<4> [198.669723] Hardware name:  /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017
<4> [198.669776] RIP: 0010:timeline_advance+0x7b/0xe0 [i915]
<4> [198.669785] Code: 00 48 c7 c2 10 f1 46 a0 48 c7 c7 70 1b 32 a0 e8 bb dd e7 e0 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 d1 af e7 e0 31 f6 bf 09 00 00 00 e8 35 ef d8 e0 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c1 48 fa 49 a0 ba 84 01 00 00 48 c7 c6 10 f1 46 a0 48
<4> [198.669803] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004c3a38 EFLAGS: 00010296
<4> [198.669810] RAX: ffff888270b35140 RBX: ffff88826f32ee00 RCX: 0000000000000006
<4> [198.669818] RDX: 00000000000017c5 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009
<4> [198.669826] RBP: ffffc900004c3a64 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
<4> [198.669834] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88826f9b5980
<4> [198.669841] R13: 0000000000000cc0 R14: ffffc900004c3dc0 R15: ffff888253610068
<4> [198.669849] FS:  00007f63e663fe40(0000) GS:ffff888276c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [198.669857] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4> [198.669864] CR2: 00007f171f8e39a8 CR3: 000000026b1f6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0
<4> [198.669872] Call Trace:
<4> [198.669924]  intel_timeline_get_seqno+0x12/0x40 [i915]
<4> [198.669977]  __i915_request_create+0x76/0x5a0 [i915]
<4> [198.670024]  i915_request_create+0x86/0x1c0 [i915]
<4> [198.670068]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xbf2/0x2500 [i915]
<4> [198.670082]  ? __lock_acquire+0x460/0x15d0
<4> [198.670128]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x470 [i915]
<4> [198.670171]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915]
<4> [198.670181]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0
<4> [198.670188]  drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390
<4> [198.670233]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915]

Fixes: 84135022 ("drm/i915/gt: Drop mutex serialisation between context pin/unpin")
References: ac0e331a ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127152829.2842149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      e5429340
  23. 13 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  25. 10 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  27. 09 1月, 2020 3 次提交
  29. 06 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  31. 22 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 20 12月, 2019 2 次提交
  35. 14 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  37. 05 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  39. 04 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  41. 28 11月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Serialise i915_active_fence_set() with itself · df9f85d8
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      The expected downside to commit 58b4c1a0 ("drm/i915: Reduce nested
prepare_remote_context() to a trylock") was that it would need to return
-EAGAIN to userspace in order to resolve potential mutex inversion. Such
an unsightly round trip is unnecessary if we could atomically insert a
barrier into the i915_active_fence, so make it happen.

Currently, we use the timeline->mutex (or some other named outer lock)
to order insertion into the i915_active_fence (and so individual nodes
of i915_active). Inside __i915_active_fence_set, we only need then
serialise with the interrupt handler in order to claim the timeline for
ourselves.

However, if we remove the outer lock, we need to ensure the order is
intact between not only multiple threads trying to insert themselves
into the timeline, but also with the interrupt handler completing the
previous occupant. We use xchg() on insert so that we have an ordered
sequence of insertions (and each caller knows the previous fence on
which to wait, preserving the chain of all fences in the timeline), but
we then have to cmpxchg() in the interrupt handler to avoid overwriting
the new occupant. The only nasty side-effect is having to temporarily
strip off the RCU-annotations to apply the atomic operations, otherwise
the rules are much more conventional!

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
Fixes: 58b4c1a0 ("drm/i915: Reduce nested prepare_remote_context() to a trylock")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127134527.3438410-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      df9f85d8
  43. 27 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  45. 26 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  47. 24 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  49. 08 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  51. 04 10月, 2019 3 次提交
  53. 20 9月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Mark i915_request.timeline as a volatile, rcu pointer · d19d71fc
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      The request->timeline is only valid until the request is retired (i.e.
before it is completed). Upon retiring the request, the context may be
unpinned and freed, and along with it the timeline may be freed. We
therefore need to be very careful when chasing rq->timeline that the
pointer does not disappear beneath us. The vast majority of users are in
a protected context, either during request construction or retirement,
where the timeline->mutex is held and the timeline cannot disappear. It
is those few off the beaten path (where we access a second timeline) that
need extra scrutiny -- to be added in the next patch after first adding
the warnings about dangerous access.

One complication, where we cannot use the timeline->mutex itself, is
during request submission onto hardware (under spinlocks). Here, we want
to check on the timeline to finalize the breadcrumb, and so we need to
impose a second rule to ensure that the request->timeline is indeed
valid. As we are submitting the request, it's context and timeline must
be pinned, as it will be used by the hardware. Since it is pinned, we
know the request->timeline must still be valid, and we cannot submit the
idle barrier until after we release the engine->active.lock, ergo while
submitting and holding that spinlock, a second thread cannot release the
timeline.

v2: Don't be lazy inside selftests; hold the timeline->mutex for as long
as we need it, and tidy up acquiring the timeline with a bit of
refactoring (i915_active_add_request)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919111912.21631-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      d19d71fc
  55. 11 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  57. 17 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  59. 16 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  61. 10 8月, 2019 1 次提交