- 16 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
Eric report a oops when booting the system after applying the commit a99b646a ("PCI: Disable PCIe Relaxed..."): [ 4.241029] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000050 [ 4.247001] IP: pci_find_pcie_root_port+0x62/0x80 [ 4.253011] PGD 0 [ 4.253011] P4D 0 [ 4.253011] [ 4.258013] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 4.262015] Modules linked in: [ 4.265005] CPU: 31 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0-dbx-DEV #316 [ 4.271002] Hardware name: Intel RML,PCH/Iota_QC_19, BIOS 2.40.0 06/22/2016 [ 4.279002] task: ffffa2ee38cfa040 task.stack: ffffa51ec0004000 [ 4.285001] RIP: 0010:pci_find_pcie_root_port+0x62/0x80 [ 4.290012] RSP: 0000:ffffa51ec0007ab8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 4.295003] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa2ee36bae000 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 4.303002] RDX: 000000000000081c RSI: ffffa2ee38cfa8c8 RDI: ffffa2ee36bae000 [ 4.310013] RBP: ffffa51ec0007b58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 4.317001] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa51ec0007ad0 [ 4.324005] R13: ffffa2ee36bae098 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffffa2ee37204818 [ 4.331002] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa2ee3fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 4.339002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 4.345001] CR2: 0000000000000050 CR3: 000000401000f000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [ 4.351002] Call Trace: [ 4.354012] ? pci_configure_device+0x19f/0x570 [ 4.359002] ? pci_conf1_read+0xb8/0xf0 [ 4.363002] ? raw_pci_read+0x23/0x40 [ 4.366011] ? pci_read+0x2c/0x30 [ 4.370014] ? pci_read_config_word+0x67/0x70 [ 4.374012] pci_device_add+0x28/0x230 [ 4.378012] ? pci_vpd_f0_read+0x50/0x80 [ 4.382014] pci_scan_single_device+0x96/0xc0 [ 4.386012] pci_scan_slot+0x79/0xf0 [ 4.389001] pci_scan_child_bus+0x31/0x180 [ 4.394014] acpi_pci_root_create+0x1c6/0x240 [ 4.398013] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x15f/0x1b0 [ 4.402012] acpi_pci_root_add+0x2e6/0x400 [ 4.406012] ? acpi_evaluate_integer+0x37/0x60 [ 4.411002] acpi_bus_attach+0xdf/0x200 [ 4.415002] acpi_bus_attach+0x6a/0x200 [ 4.418014] acpi_bus_attach+0x6a/0x200 [ 4.422013] acpi_bus_scan+0x38/0x70 [ 4.426011] acpi_scan_init+0x10c/0x271 [ 4.429001] acpi_init+0x2fa/0x348 [ 4.433004] ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x2d/0x2d [ 4.437001] do_one_initcall+0x43/0x169 [ 4.441001] kernel_init_freeable+0x1d0/0x258 [ 4.445003] ? rest_init+0xe0/0xe0 [ 4.449001] kernel_init+0xe/0x150 ====================== cut here ============================= It looks like the pci_find_pcie_root_port() was trying to find the Root Port for the PCI device which is the Root Port already, it will return NULL and trigger the problem, so check the highest_pcie_bridge to fix thie problem. Fixes: a99b646a ("PCI: Disable PCIe Relaxed Ordering if unsupported") Fixes: c56d4450 ("PCI: Turn off Request Attributes to avoid Chelsio T5 Completion erratum") Reported-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The implementation of PCI workarounds may require that the device is reset from its probe function. This implies that the PCI device lock is already held, and makes calling pci_reset_function() impossible (since it will itself try to take that lock). Add pci_reset_function_locked(), which is the equivalent of pci_reset_function(), except that it requires the PCI device lock to be already held by the caller. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> [bhelgaas: folded in fix for conflict with 52354b9d ("PCI: Remove __pci_dev_reset() and pci_dev_reset()")] Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.11: 52354b9d: PCI: Remove __pci_dev_reset() and pci_dev_reset() Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.11
-
- 13 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit dc15e71e (PCI / PM: Restore PME Enable if skipping wakeup setup) introduced a mechanism by which the PME Enable bit can be restored by pci_enable_wake() if dev->wakeup_prepared is set in case it has been overwritten by PCI config space restoration. However, that commit overlooked the fact that on some systems (Dell XPS13 9360 in particular) the AML handling wakeup events checks PME Status and PME Enable and it won't trigger a Notify() for devices where those bits are not set while it is running. That happens during resume from suspend-to-idle when pci_restore_state() invoked by pci_pm_default_resume_early() clears PME Enable before the wakeup events are processed by AML, effectively causing those wakeup events to be ignored. Fix this issue by restoring the PME Enable configuration right after pci_restore_state() has been called instead of doing that in pci_enable_wake(). Fixes: dc15e71e (PCI / PM: Restore PME Enable if skipping wakeup setup) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 03 7月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Implement the reset probing / reset chain directly in __pci_probe_reset_function() and __pci_reset_function_locked() respectively. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170601111039.8913-4-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The pci_error_handlers->reset_notify() method had a flag to indicate whether to prepare for or clean up after a reset. The prepare and done cases have no shared functionality whatsoever, so split them into separate methods. [bhelgaas: changelog, update locking comments] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170601111039.8913-3-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
pci_target_state() calls device_may_wakeup() which checks whether or not the device may wake up the system from sleep states, but pci_target_state() is used for runtime PM too. Since runtime PM is expected to always enable remote wakeup if possible, modify pci_target_state() to take additional argument indicating whether or not it should look for a state from which the device can signal wakeup and pass either the return value of device_can_wakeup(), or "false" (if the device itself is not wakeup-capable) to it from the code related to runtime PM. While at it, fix the comment in pci_dev_run_wake() which is not about sleep states. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 28 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The run_wake flag in struct dev_pm_info is used to indicate whether or not the device is capable of generating remote wakeup signals at run time (or in the system working state), but the distinction between runtime remote wakeup and system wakeup signaling has always been rather artificial. The only practical reason for it to exist at the core level was that ACPI and PCI treated those two cases differently, but that's not the case any more after recent changes. For this reason, get rid of the run_wake flag and, when applicable, use device_set_wakeup_capable() and device_can_wakeup() instead of device_set_run_wake() and device_run_wake(), respectively. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After previous changes it is not necessary to distinguish between device wakeup for run time and device wakeup from system sleep states any more, so rework the PCI device wakeup settings code accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 17 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Piotr Gregor 提交于
The test for INTx masking via PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE performed in pci_intx_mask_supported() should be done before the device can be used. This is to avoid writing PCI_COMMAND while the driver owns the device, in case that has any effect on MSI/MSI-X interrupts. Move the content of pci_intx_mask_supported() to pci_intx_mask_broken() and call it from pci_setup_device(). The test result can be queried at any time later using the same pci_intx_mask_supported() interface as before (though with changed implementation), so callers (uio, vfio) should be unaffected. Signed-off-by: NPiotr Gregor <piotrgregor@rsyncme.org> [bhelgaas: changelog, remove quirk check, remove locking, move dev->broken_intx_masking assignment to caller] Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
-
- 15 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Every method in struct device_driver or structures derived from it like struct pci_driver MUST provide exclusion vs the driver's ->remove() method, usually by using device_lock(). Protect use of pci_error_handlers->reset_notify() by holding the device lock while calling it. Note: - pci_dev_lock() calls device_lock() in addition to blocking user-space config accesses. - pci_err_handlers->reset_notify() is used inside pci_dev_save_and_disable() and pci_dev_restore(). We could hold the device lock directly in pci_reset_notify(), but we expand the region since we have several calls following each other. Without this, ->reset_notify() may race with ->remove() calls, which can be easily triggered in NVMe. [bhelgaas: changelog, add pci_reset_notify() comment] [bhelgaas: fold in fix from Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170701135323.x5vaj4e2wcs2mcro@mwanda] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170601111039.8913-2-hch@lst.deReported-by: NRakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com> Tested-by: NRakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The wakeup_prepared PCI device flag is used for preventing subsequent changes of PCI device wakeup settings in the same way (e.g. enabling device wakeup twice in a row). However, in some cases PME Enable may be updated by things like PCI configuration space restoration in the meantime and it may need to be set again even though the rest of the settings need not change, so modify __pci_enable_wake() to do that when it is about to return early. Also, it is reasonable to expect that __pci_enable_wake() will always clear PME Status when invoked to disable device wakeup, so make it do so even if it is going to return early then. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 31 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 CQ Tang 提交于
After a Function-Level Reset, PCI states need to be restored. Save PASID features and PRI reqs cached. [bhelgaas: search for capability only if PRI/PASID were enabled] Signed-off-by: NCQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Jean-Phillipe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 24 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Some drivers - like i915 - may not support the system suspend direct complete optimization due to differences in their runtime and system suspend sequence. Add a flag that when set resumes the device before calling the driver's system suspend handlers which effectively disables the optimization. Needed by a future patch fixing suspend/resume on i915. Suggested by Rafael. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 18 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
Commit f44116ae ("PCI: Remove pci_find_parent_resource() use for allocation") updated the logic that iterates over all bus resources and compares them to a given resource, in order to decide whether one is the parent of the latter. This change inadvertently causes pci_find_parent_resource() to disregard resources starting at address 0x0, resulting in an error such as the one below on ARM systems whose I/O window starts at 0x0. pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x10000000-0x3efeffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0xffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x8000000000-0xffffffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-0f] pci 0000:00:01.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01] pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 02] pci 0000:00:03.0: PCI bridge to [bus 03] pci 0000:00:03.0: can't claim BAR 13 [io 0x0000-0x0fff]: no compatible bridge window pci 0000:03:01.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x0000-0x001f]: no compatible bridge window While this never happens on x86, it is perfectly legal in general for a PCI MMIO or IO window to start at address 0x0, and it was supported in the code before commit f44116ae. Drop the test for res->start != 0; resource_contains() already checks whether [start, end) completely covers the resource, and so it should be redundant. Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
The introduction of the pci_remap_cfgspace() interface allows PCI host controller drivers to map PCI config space through a dedicated kernel interface. Current PCI host controller drivers use the devm_ioremap_*() devres interfaces to map PCI configuration space regions so in order to update them to the new pci_remap_cfgspace() mapping interface a new set of devres interfaces should be implemented so that PCI host controller drivers can make use of them. Introduce two new functions in the PCI kernel layer and Devres documentation: - devm_pci_remap_cfgspace() - devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource() so that PCI host controller drivers can make use of them to map PCI configuration space regions. Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 21 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brian Norris 提交于
These are useful for PCIe host drivers, and those drivers can be modules. [bhelgaas: don't remove __weak; it's removed elsewhere] Signed-off-by: NBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NShawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
-
- 20 4月, 2017 6 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently we opencode the FLR sequence in lots of place; export a core helper instead. We split out the probing for FLR support as all the non-core callers already know their hardware. Note that in the new pci_has_flr() function the quirk check has been moved before the capability check as there is no point in reading the capability in this case. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
pci_remap_iospace() is marked as a weak symbol even though no architecture is currently overriding it; given that its implementation internals have already code paths that are arch specific (ie PCI_IOBASE and ioremap_page_range() attributes) there is no need to leave the weak symbol in the kernel since the same functionality can be achieved by customizing per-arch the corresponding functionality. Remove the __weak symbol from pci_remap_iospace(). Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
由 Yongji Xie 提交于
The "pci=resource_alignment" argument aligns BARs of designated devices by artificially increasing their size. Increasing the size increases the alignment and prevents other resources from being assigned in the same alignment region, e.g., in the same page, but it can break drivers that use the BAR size to locate things, e.g., ilo_map_device() does this: off = pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) - 0x2000; The new pcibios_default_alignment() interface allows an arch to request that *all* BARs in the system be aligned to a larger size. In this case, we don't need to artificially increase the resource size because we know every BAR of every device will be realigned, so nothing will share the same alignment region. Use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to request realignment of PCI BARs when we know we're realigning all BARs in the system. [bhelgaas: comment, changelog] Signed-off-by: NYongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
The "pci=resource_alignment=" kernel argument designates devices for which we want alignment greater than is required by the PCI specs. Previously we set IORESOURCE_UNSET for every MEM resource of those devices, even if the resource was *already* sufficiently aligned. If a resource is already sufficiently aligned, leave it alone and don't try to reassign it. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Pull the BAR size adjustment out into a new function, pci_request_resource_alignment(), and add a comment about how and why we increase the resource size and alignment. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yongji Xie 提交于
When VFIO passes through a PCI device to a guest, it does not allow the guest to mmap BARs that are smaller than PAGE_SIZE unless it can reserve the rest of the page (see vfio_pci_probe_mmaps()). This is because a page might contain several small BARs for unrelated devices and a guest should not be able to access all of them. VFIO emulates guest accesses to non-mappable BARs, which is functional but slow. On systems with large page sizes, e.g., PowerNV with 64K pages, BARs are more likely to share a page and performance is more likely to be a problem. Add a weak function to set default alignment for all PCI devices. An arch can override it to force the PCI core to place memory BARs on their own pages. Signed-off-by: NYongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 19 4月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
Laurent Pinchart reported that the Renesas R-Car H2 Lager board (r8a7790) crashes during suspend tests. Geert Uytterhoeven managed to reproduce the issue on an M2-W Koelsch board (r8a7791): It occurs when the PME scan runs, once per second. During PME scan, the PCI host bridge (rcar-pci) registers are accessed while its module clock has already been disabled, leading to the crash. One reproducer is to configure s2ram to use "s2idle" instead of "deep" suspend: # echo 0 > /sys/module/printk/parameters/console_suspend # echo s2idle > /sys/power/mem_sleep # echo mem > /sys/power/state Another reproducer is to write either "platform" or "processors" to /sys/power/pm_test. It does not (or is less likely) to happen during full system suspend ("core" or "none") because system suspend also disables timers, and thus the workqueue handling PME scans no longer runs. Geert believes the issue may still happen in the small window between disabling module clocks and disabling timers: # echo 0 > /sys/module/printk/parameters/console_suspend # echo platform > /sys/power/pm_test # Or "processors" # echo mem > /sys/power/state (Make sure CONFIG_PCI_RCAR_GEN2 and CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_PCI are enabled.) Rafael Wysocki agrees that PME scans should be suspended before the host bridge registers become inaccessible. To that end, queue the task on a workqueue that gets frozen before devices suspend. Rafael notes however that as a result, some wakeup events may be missed if they are delivered via PME from a device without working IRQ (which hence must be polled) and occur after the workqueue has been frozen. If that turns out to be an issue in practice, it may be possible to solve it by calling pci_pme_list_scan() once directly from one of the host bridge's pm_ops callbacks. Stacktrace for posterity: PM: Syncing filesystems ... [ 38.566237] done. PM: Preparing system for sleep (mem) Freezing user space processes ... [ 38.579813] (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done. Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done. PM: Suspending system (mem) PM: suspend of devices complete after 152.456 msecs PM: late suspend of devices complete after 2.809 msecs PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 29.863 msecs suspend debug: Waiting for 5 second(s). Unhandled fault: asynchronous external abort (0x1211) at 0x00000000 pgd = c0003000 [00000000] *pgd=80000040004003, *pmd=00000000 Internal error: : 1211 [#1] SMP ARM Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 20 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc1-koelsch-00011-g68db9bc8 #3383 Hardware name: Generic R8A7791 (Flattened Device Tree) Workqueue: events pci_pme_list_scan task: eb56e140 task.stack: eb58e000 PC is at pci_generic_config_read+0x64/0x6c LR is at rcar_pci_cfg_base+0x64/0x84 pc : [<c041d7b4>] lr : [<c04309a0>] psr: 600d0093 sp : eb58fe98 ip : c041d750 fp : 00000008 r10: c0e2283c r9 : 00000000 r8 : 600d0013 r7 : 00000008 r6 : eb58fed6 r5 : 00000002 r4 : eb58feb4 r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000044 r1 : 00000008 r0 : 00000000 Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user Control: 30c5387d Table: 6a9f6c80 DAC: 55555555 Process kworker/1:1 (pid: 20, stack limit = 0xeb58e210) Stack: (0xeb58fe98 to 0xeb590000) fe80: 00000002 00000044 fea0: eb6f5800 c041d9b0 eb58feb4 00000008 00000044 00000000 eb78a000 eb78a000 fec0: 00000044 00000000 eb9aff00 c0424bf0 eb78a000 00000000 eb78a000 c0e22830 fee0: ea8a6fc0 c0424c5c eaae79c0 c0424ce0 eb55f380 c0e22838 eb9a9800 c0235fbc ff00: eb55f380 c0e22838 eb55f380 eb9a9800 eb9a9800 eb58e000 eb9a9824 c0e02100 ff20: eb55f398 c02366c4 eb56e140 eb5631c0 00000000 eb55f380 c023641c 00000000 ff40: 00000000 00000000 00000000 c023a928 cd105598 00000000 40506a34 eb55f380 ff60: 00000000 00000000 dead4ead ffffffff ffffffff eb58ff74 eb58ff74 00000000 ff80: 00000000 dead4ead ffffffff ffffffff eb58ff90 eb58ff90 eb58ffac eb5631c0 ffa0: c023a844 00000000 00000000 c0206d68 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 3a81336c 10ccd1dd [<c041d7b4>] (pci_generic_config_read) from [<c041d9b0>] (pci_bus_read_config_word+0x58/0x80) [<c041d9b0>] (pci_bus_read_config_word) from [<c0424bf0>] (pci_check_pme_status+0x34/0x78) [<c0424bf0>] (pci_check_pme_status) from [<c0424c5c>] (pci_pme_wakeup+0x28/0x54) [<c0424c5c>] (pci_pme_wakeup) from [<c0424ce0>] (pci_pme_list_scan+0x58/0xb4) [<c0424ce0>] (pci_pme_list_scan) from [<c0235fbc>] (process_one_work+0x1bc/0x308) [<c0235fbc>] (process_one_work) from [<c02366c4>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x3e0) [<c02366c4>] (worker_thread) from [<c023a928>] (kthread+0xe4/0xfc) [<c023a928>] (kthread) from [<c0206d68>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) Code: ea000000 e5903000 f57ff04f e3a00000 (e5843000) ---[ end trace 667d43ba3aa9e589 ]--- Fixes: df17e62e ("PCI: Add support for polling PME state on suspended legacy PCI devices") Reported-and-tested-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.37+ Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
-
由 Yongji Xie 提交于
We would call pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment() before pci_init_capabilities(). So the requested alignment would never work for IOV BARs. Furthermore, it's meaningless to request additional alignment for IOV BARs, the IOV BAR alignment is only determined by the VF BAR size. Signed-off-by: NYongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NGavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 04 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sasha Neftin 提交于
Per Intel Specification Update 335553-002 (see link below), some 82579 network adapters advertise a Function Level Reset (FLR) capability, but they can hang when an FLR is triggered. To reproduce the problem, attach the device to a VM, then detach and try to attach again. Add a quirk to prevent the use of FLR on these devices. [bhelgaas: changelog, comments] Link: http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/82579lm-82579v-gigabit-network-connection-spec-update.pdfSigned-off-by: NSasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Keith Busch 提交于
If the PCI device is disconnected, return false immediately from pci_device_is_present(). pci_device_is_present() uses the bus accessors, so the early return in the device accessors doesn't help here. Tested-by: NKrishna Dhulipala <krishnad@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NWei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>
-
- 15 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
msleep() still sleeps 1 jiffy even when told to sleep for zero milliseconds. That can end up being 1-2 milliseconds or more. In the cases of d3_delay and d3cold_delay, that unnecessarily increases suspend and/or resume latencies. Do not sleep at all for the respective cases if d3_delay is zero or d3cold_delay is zero. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This reverts commit 68db9bc8. Yinghai reported that the following manual hotplug sequence: # echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/8/power # echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/8/power worked in v4.9, but fails in v4.10-rc1, and that reverting 68db9bc8 ("PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe hotplug ports") makes it work again. Fixes: 68db9bc8 ("PCI: pciehp: Add runtime PM support for PCIe hotplug ports") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQVCMCa7iVyuwp9z6VrY0cE7V_xghuXip28Ft52=8QmTWw@mail.gmail.com Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193951Reported-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
pci_std_update_resource() only deals with standard BARs, so we don't have to worry about the complications of VF BARs in an SR-IOV capability. Compute the BAR address inline and remove pci_resource_bar(). That makes pci_iov_resource_bar() unused, so remove that as well. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NGavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 29 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
VF BARs are read-only zero, so updating VF BARs will not have any effect. See the SR-IOV spec r1.1, sec 3.4.1.11. We already ignore these updates because of 70675e0b ("PCI: Don't try to restore VF BARs"); this merely restructures it slightly to make it easier to split updates for standard and SR-IOV BARs. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NGavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 18 11月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
Linux 4.8 added support for runtime suspending PCIe ports to D3hot with commit 006d44e4 ("PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports"), but excluded hotplug ports. Those are now afforded runtime PM by the present commit. Hotplug ports require a few extra considerations: - The configuration space of the port remains accessible in D3hot, so all the functions to read or modify the Slot Status and Slot Control registers need not be modified. Even turning on slot power doesn't seem to require the port to be in D0, at least the PCIe spec doesn't say so and I confirmed that by testing with a Thunderbolt controller. - However D0 is required to access devices on the secondary bus. This happens in pciehp_check_link_status() and pciehp_configure_device() (both called from board_added()) and in pciehp_unconfigure_device() (called from remove_board()), so acquire a runtime PM ref for their invocation. - The hotplug port stays active as long as it has active children. If all hotplugged devices below the port runtime suspend, the port is allowed to runtime suspend as well. Plug and unplug detection continues to work in D3hot. - Hotplug interrupts are delivered in-band, so while the hotplug port itself is allowed to go to D3hot, its parent ports must stay in D0 for interrupts to come through. Add a corresponding restriction to pci_dev_check_d3cold(). - Runtime PM may only be allowed if the hotplug port is handled natively by the OS. On ACPI systems, the port may alternatively be handled by the firmware and things break if the OS puts the port into D3 behind the firmware's back: E.g. Thunderbolt hotplug ports on non-Macs are handled by Intel's firmware in System Management Mode and the firmware is known to access devices on the port's secondary bus without checking first if the port is in D0: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53811Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
The conditions to block D3 on parent ports are currently condensed into a single expression in pci_dev_check_d3cold(). Upcoming commits will add further conditions for hotplug ports, making this expression fairly large and impenetrable. Unfold the conditions to maintain readability when they are amended. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
The conditions to allow runtime PM on PCIe ports are currently spread across two different files: The condition relating to hotplug ports is located in portdrv_pci.c whereas all other conditions are located in pci.c. Consolidate all conditions in a single place in pci.c, thus making it easier to follow the logic and amend conditions down the road. Note that the condition relating to hotplug ports is inserted *before* the condition relating to the "pcie_port_pm=force" command line option, so runtime PM is not afforded to hotplug ports even if this option is given. That's exactly how the code behaved up until now. If this is not desired, the ordering of the conditions can simply be reversed. No functional change intended. Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
Currently pcie_portdrv_probe() activates runtime PM on a PCIe port even if it will never actually suspend because the BIOS is too old or the "pcie_port_pm=off" option was specified on the kernel command line. A few CPU cycles can be saved by not activating runtime PM at all in these cases, because rpm_idle() and rpm_suspend() will bail out right at the beginning when calling rpm_check_suspend_allowed(), instead of carrying out various locking and assignments, invoking rpm_callback(), getting back -EBUSY and rolling everything back. The conditions checked in pci_bridge_d3_possible() are all static, they never change during uptime of the system, hence it's safe to call this to determine if runtime PM should be activated. No functional change intended. Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
After a device has been added, removed or had its D3cold attributes changed, we recheck whether its parent bridge may runtime suspend to D3hot with pci_bridge_d3_update(). The most naive algorithm would be to iterate over the bridge's children and check if any of them are blocking D3. The function already tries to be a bit smarter than that by first checking the device that was changed. If this device already blocks D3 on the bridge, then walking over all the other children can be skipped. A drawback of this approach is that if the device is *not* blocking D3, it will be checked a second time by pci_walk_bus(). But that's cheap and is outweighed by the performance gain of potentially skipping pci_walk_bus() altogether. The algorithm can be optimized further by taking into account if D3 is currently allowed for the bridge, as shown in the following truth table: (a) remove && bridge_d3: D3 is currently allowed for the bridge and removing one of its children won't change that. No action necessary. (b) remove && !bridge_d3: D3 may now be allowed for the bridge if the removed child was the only one blocking it. Check all its siblings to verify that. (c) !remove && bridge_d3: D3 may now be disallowed but this can only be caused by the added/changed child, not any of its siblings. Check only that single device. (d) !remove && !bridge_d3: D3 may now be allowed for the bridge if the changed child was the only one blocking it. Check all its siblings to verify that. By checking beforehand if the changed child is blocking D3, we may be able to skip checking its siblings. Currently we do not special-case option (a) and in case of option (c) we gratuitously call pci_walk_bus(). Speed up the algorithm by adding these optimizations. Reword the comments a bit in an attempt to improve clarity. No functional change intended. Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
The algorithm to update the flag indicating whether a bridge may go to D3 makes a few optimizations based on whether the update was caused by the removal of a device on the one hand, versus the addition of a device or the change of its D3cold flags on the other hand. The information whether the update pertains to a removal is currently passed in by the caller, but the function may as well determine that itself by examining the device in question, thereby allowing for a considerable simplification and reduction of the code. Out of several options to determine removal, I've chosen the function device_is_registered() because it's cheap: It merely returns the dev->kobj.state_in_sysfs flag. That flag is set through device_add() when the root bus is scanned and cleared through device_remove(). The call to pci_bridge_d3_update() happens after each of these calls, respectively, so the ordering is correct. No functional change intended. Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
This function is always called with an existing pci_dev struct, which holds a reference on the pci_bus struct it resides on, which in turn holds a reference on pci_bus->bridge, which is the pci_dev's parent. Hence there's no need to acquire an additional ref on the parent. More specifically, the pci_dev exists until pci_destroy_dev() drops the final reference on it, so all calls to pci_bridge_d3_update() must be finished before that. It is arguably the caller's responsibility to ensure that it doesn't call pci_bridge_d3_update() with a pci_dev that might suddenly disappear, but in any case the existing callers are all safe: - The call in pci_destroy_dev() happens before the call to put_device(). - The call in pci_bus_add_device() is synchronized with pci_destroy_dev() using pci_lock_rescan_remove(). - The calls to pci_d3cold_disable() from the xhci and nouveau drivers are safe because a ref on the pci_dev is held as long as it's bound to a driver. - The calls to pci_d3cold_enable() / pci_d3cold_disable() when modifying the sysfs "d3cold_allowed" entry are also safe because kernfs_drain() waits for existing sysfs users to finish before removing the entry, and pci_destroy_dev() is called way after that. No functional change intended. Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Stern 提交于
One some systems, the firmware does not allow certain PCI devices to be put in deep D-states. This can cause problems for wakeup signalling, if the device does not support PME# in the deepest allowed suspend state. For example, Pierre reports that on his system, ACPI does not permit his xHCI host controller to go into D3 during runtime suspend -- but D3 is the only state in which the controller can generate PME# signals. As a result, the controller goes into runtime suspend but never wakes up, so it doesn't work properly. USB devices plugged into the controller are never detected. If the device relies on PME# for wakeup signals but is not capable of generating PME# in the target state, the PCI core should accurately report that it cannot do wakeup from runtime suspend. This patch modifies the pci_dev_run_wake() routine to add this check. Reported-by: NPierre de Villemereuil <flyos@mailoo.org> Tested-by: NPierre de Villemereuil <flyos@mailoo.org> Signed-off-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org CC: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
-
- 29 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yongji Xie 提交于
Resource allocation for VFs is done via the VF BARx registers in the PF's SR-IOV Capability, and the BARs in the VFs themselves are read-only zeros (see SR-IOV spec r1.1, secs 3.3.14 and 3.4.1.11). Even though the actual VF BARs are read-only zeros, the VF dev->resource[] structs describe the space allocated for the VF (this is a piece of the space described by the VF BARx register in the PF's SR-IOV capability). It's meaningless to request additional alignment for a VF: the VF BAR alignment is completely determined by the alignment of the VF BARx in the PF and the size of the VF BAR. Ignore the user's alignment requests for VF devices. Signed-off-by: NYongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yongji Xie 提交于
Users may request additional alignment of PCI resources, e.g., to align BARs on page boundaries so they can be shared with guests via VFIO. This of course may require reallocation if firmware has already assigned the BARs with smaller alignments. If the platform has requested PCI_PROBE_ONLY, we should never change any PCI BARs, so we can't provide any additional alignment. Also, if a BAR is marked as IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED, e.g., for PCI Enhanced Allocation or if the firmware depends on the current BAR value, we can't change the alignment. In these cases, log a message and ignore the user's alignment requests. [bhelgaas: changelog, use goto to simplify PCI_PROBE_ONLY check] Signed-off-by: NYongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-